Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.

Matt Watts

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1900, on May 7th, 2013, 05:52 AM »Last edited on May 7th, 2013, 05:56 AM by Matt Watts
Yes, my point was that we nor Bob has been able to see the inert gases expand rapidly to 1000 psi and then contract back to ambient pressure.  If we can figure out the proper combinations to do that, then affixing that phenomena to an engine should be pretty straightforward.  If I were to magically hit on the proper combination, I would expect it to destroy my test fixture (bomb reference).  Anything less would get me no farther than where Bob is at now.

If we go the other way and attempt to recover electrical energy instead of mechanical power, there is no way to know if it will be in excess of the power needed to initiate the reaction since Papp didn't build such a device.  We also don't know if mechanical motion isn't still needed to generate the excess electrical power, in which case we might as well focus on harnessing it directly in the form of an engine.

Bob is pretty far along in the development process.  He can generate a pretty strong thrust and do it repeatedly, but even he insists the pressures are not nearly as high as what Papp was developing in the original motor.  So where having a good gas mixture and electronic initiator is key, it still isn't enough to replicate the Papp prototype.

I hope that clears things up a bit.  In any event, the costs associated with getting that far along are outside my capability at present, so the best I can offer is to sit on the sidelines and participate in the discussion.  As much as I would like to assemble a working Papp engine, it's just not possible for me to engage in.

jonardaron

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1901, on May 7th, 2013, 01:24 PM »Last edited on May 7th, 2013, 01:25 PM by jonardaron
Quote from FaradayEZ on May 7th, 2013, 03:14 AM
True, i don't understand also why building a bomb will proof much, but for the rest of your noble engine remarks....you clearly don't grasp the concept yet Jonardaron...

I suggest you look at some video's over at bob rohners site, or read more in this popper thread, the noble gas engine doesn't consume noble gas!
You're right. So I will do. Not really a idea what this exactly is, Sherlock. I have to read the other messages from time to time.



@DogOne: Aj, yes of course. Get the point of your bomb. Pay attention of the bombing effect!
Say does anybody know where this prototype is you talked of? Does it exist? Real I mean? Why not reengineer it if the inventor left no written detailed plans?

Willard Elliott

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1902, on May 7th, 2013, 05:31 PM »


To all builders,

I have just figured the expansion ratio of the gasses used in the Papp engine. It is related to the atomic number of each gas.
As one electron is attached to each atom the expansion of hydrogen would be X that of helium would be X/2 and so on. This is by Avagardoes number.
I hope. this helps.

Willard

Matt Watts

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1903, on May 7th, 2013, 11:17 PM »
Quote from Willard Elliott on May 7th, 2013, 05:31 PM


To all builders,

I have just figured the expansion ratio of the gasses used in the Papp engine. It is related to the atomic number of each gas.
As one electron is attached to each atom the expansion of hydrogen would be X that of helium would be X/2 and so on. This is by Avagardoes number.
I hope. this helps.

Willard
Excellent research.  Would you mind taking it just a bit further and document the gases and their ratios by mole or volume.  That information would be highly valuable for those you want to order laboratory gas mix to start testing with.

~Russ

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1904, on May 8th, 2013, 12:03 AM »
Quote from Willard Elliott on April 27th, 2013, 09:08 AM
Quote from ~Russ/Rwg42985 on April 26th, 2013, 10:39 PM
Quote from Willard Elliott on April 3rd, 2013, 10:26 AM
To Russ and all builders in the group,

I used 42 volts as my capacitor was only rated at 40 Volts DC. I used the igniter method of setting off the spark. My next experiment is to try Hydrogen gas. I wish I could monitor the temperature through the time period of 3.5 seconds. If i can find a fast enough probe I will monitor it on my storage oscilloscope. I hope this helps. Keep up the good work Russ, Bob Rohner and all others.

Willard


Willard, thanks for the report. i think its all in the circuit design as well. can you please post a schematic and also some photos of your current set up?

this would be extremely helpful!

thanks for the post !

~Russ
Russ,

I have attached a picture of my crrystal ball with sillica gell in it and a static detecter (folded Renolds wrap foil).  No static was detected during the two tests that I did. The first test had the reflectiv cover around the ball covering about 90% of it.
As I cannot figure out how to send a video file with this pos I have sent a personal E-mail to you Russ of the second test  video.

Willard
elliott. i did not get any emails from you. did not see any in spam. could you please send again., thanks!! ~Russ

RWG42985(AT)aol.com

replace (AT) with @

~Russ

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1905, on May 8th, 2013, 12:37 AM »
Quote from Willard Elliott on May 3rd, 2013, 05:38 PM

To all builders,

Here is my other video which I call capture and hold. Unlike my first video this one has the reflective cover around the crystal ball to keep the light and other radio and ultraviolet and beond inside so it cannot be dissipated.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPI3FBmVbDE

Iether the Papp engine is not a neculear reaction or I have stumbled upon another entierly unrelated effect!

Willard
wow, so just by keeping the light/others stuff in a reflective place you get that much of a deference.  that's a cool test!!!!

will need to play with that one! thanks! ~Russ

~Russ

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1906, on May 8th, 2013, 12:54 AM »
Quote from Dog-One on May 3rd, 2013, 07:18 PM
Quote from FaradayEZ on May 3rd, 2013, 05:40 PM
The multiple ignitions, 3 to preferably as much as possible, and the ones after the primary one need less current / amps from the capacitor.
Now this one is cool.  What is happening is this:  When the gas mix is fully compressed, it takes X joules to create the plasma.  In creating the plasma, the gas expands, the piston moves, the ignition arc goes out, the plasma ceases, piston keeps moving, pressure drops.

Now this is the cool part.

When the pressure drops to some critical point, only X/3 joules is needed to create another ignition event.  Guess what, that's exactly how much juice is left in the capacitor bank and it fires again by itself and creates another plasma.

Now if you get all the dimensions, pressures, gap size, cap bank size correct.  You can get three ignition events to happen on every power stroke, but you only need to trigger the first one.  And that is why the Papp engine demonstrated so much torque at low RPM.  I'd be will to bet if you thought this through you could come up with a combination to get ten or more ignition events per power stroke and get really massive torque at low RPM.

Keep this concept in mind:  Pressure extinguishes the plasma arc.  So immediately after the initial plasma forms and the pressure builds, the arc goes out and you get to keep whatever is left in the cap bank.  When the plasma dies down due to the pressure dropping from the piston moving, a new arc strikes by itself and the process repeats.  You can do this all the way until BDC when the pressure can't drop any further and starts again to rise.  That's your signal to start charging the cap bank back up again.  But when you start charging, you need to electrically disconnect from the spark gap or else you'll start firing again before TDC.

My recommendation for Bob is to ditch the crossover charging and only use that as a supplement to the primary charging circuit.  That way you can make an ignition system that works for a single cylinder engine and just attach the crossover charging on multi-cylinder engines to improve efficiency a little.  That way you have a fail safe on a mutli-cylinder engine--it will keep running even if you drop a cylinder.
[/quote]this all goes back to having a vacuum. the grater the vacuum the eazyer it is to create the plasma... i have seen this in my tests.  you can discharge lower voltages when in a vacuum. this is why i could get the second POP when Doing the "green glow" tests...

this is how i see it...

~Russ

~Russ

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1907, on May 8th, 2013, 02:00 AM »
FYI to all. still waiting for something to continue testing... something really good is happening so we will all learn from it.

time time time... its worth the wait.

PS. had my 3rd child... :) Elijah... a beautiful 7lb 7.2oz 19"long baby boy.  :) happy daddy here... :)

jonardaron

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1908, on May 8th, 2013, 04:52 PM »Last edited on May 8th, 2013, 04:53 PM by jonardaron
Congrats, Russ! :)
Just continue the endless effort. And spare time for your babe!!

Would be cool if the first post could appear on each page of the forum (some forum SW [= software] allows this setting).
Then we could use it as a wiki if it somehow could be created as editable for everyone. This would be so useful for collecting all the data!
And as it would be on each page of the thread, no jumping to page 1 necessary. Would just be a dream.


Avogadros Number is  N_A = 6.022 × 10^23 particles/mol. It's once been introduced for conversion between SI-unit for mass (kg) and the chemical system (Dalton -> mol) system.

It's used to calculate the number of particles of atoms of the periodic table of elements.

[/list]
If that's somehow useful.

P.S. I could assist with this idea for the first post as wiki entry and showing on each site if you wish it. (If you want I even change the PHP-template, I know this language by heart^^ [webdesign is my job, eventhough I avoid it in my free time as a consequence ... :s])

~Russ

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1909, on May 9th, 2013, 02:53 AM »Last edited on May 9th, 2013, 02:57 AM by ~Russ/Rwg42985
this was passed to me to pass along... designed after my efforts to replicate bob rohner's work... thanks anonymous... ( not the hacker group)

This should be used as reference but should be accurate...

FULL POPPER DRAWINGS...

jonardaron

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1910, on May 9th, 2013, 03:31 AM »Last edited on May 9th, 2013, 04:12 AM by jonardaron
This is what I call detailed. [Part POP002,7 look difficult to machine] Thanks a lot, Russ & Anonymous. (also good work at PulseFire & PulseGen [DogOne])
Is an anonymous leak a good or bad sign? Why being anonymous for all the CAD work? Publishing electronics schematics is more risky because probalitiy is higher it will not work as expected in comparison to mechanic construction assembly following CAD. (Especially as we seek for replication of stunning results of Papp's engine.) Ah, this must be of Bob Roehner himself, not? He is the retired engineer. Why not openly state it? It could propell his fundraising.

It mentions "Part 1 - Mechanic". Somehow implies there is a 2nd part for electronics also? Impossible this could be possible: detailed instructions.



~Russ

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1911, on May 9th, 2013, 04:40 AM »
Quote from jonardaron on May 9th, 2013, 03:31 AM
This is what I call detailed. [Part POP002,7 look difficult to machine] Thanks a lot, Russ & Anonymous. (also good work at PulseFire & PulseGen [DogOne])
Is an anonymous leak a good or bad sign? Why being anonymous for all the CAD work? Publishing electronics schematics is more risky because probalitiy is higher it will not work as expected in comparison to mechanic construction assembly following CAD. (Especially as we seek for replication of stunning results of Papp's engine.) Ah, this must be of Bob Roehner himself, not? He is the retired engineer. Why not openly state it? It could propell his fundraising.

It mentions "Part 1 - Mechanic". Somehow implies there is a 2nd part for electronics also? Impossible this could be possible: detailed instructions.
i have had this for a while. just posting it trying to catch up... no not bob himself... just an experimenter trying to help... :)

some people are willing to reach out but don't want to be in the public eye... so i have respect for them... this is me saying anonymous. not them... :)

~Russ  

k c dias

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1912, on May 10th, 2013, 10:23 AM »Last edited on May 10th, 2013, 01:02 PM by k c dias
Interesting discussion on fb probing into various ideas for Papp's initial experiments and discoveries, with feedback and comments from Bob.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/186725904802176/permalink/243540395787393/

EDIT: Perhaps I should provide a peek into the discussion --> Within the discussion it is suggested that Papp may have formed the first room temperature stable rare gas clusters (for the dry mix engine) by leaking the gas slowly into the hard vacuum of an operating TV set.

Enjoy. :) :P :D

kcd

Axil

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1913, on May 10th, 2013, 01:34 PM »Last edited on May 10th, 2013, 01:46 PM by Axil
Quote from k c dias on May 10th, 2013, 10:23 AM
Interesting discussion on fb probing into various ideas for Papp's initial experiments and discoveries, with feedback and comments from Bob.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/186725904802176/permalink/243540395787393/

EDIT: Perhaps I should provide a peek into the discussion --> Within the discussion it is suggested that Papp may have formed the first room temperature stable rare gas clusters (for the dry mix engine) by leaking the gas slowly into the hard vacuum of an operating TV set.

Enjoy. :) :P :D

kcd
Three common ways exist to produce clusters:
a)   Gas aggregation sources: This is the oldest and easiest method for cluster production. Atoms or molecules are evaporated into a flow of rare gas atoms. The evaporated atoms are cooled in collision with the rare gas. When the atoms or molecules loose enough energy the cluster production is started.
It is possible that this cooling process may be going on in the Papp gas mix as one or some combination of the noble gases are cooling another one of the noble gases through collision; a sort of moderation.

b)   Laser-ablation sources (surface sources, sputtering): Photon or heavy particle impact on a surface leads to the desorption of atoms or molecules. The released atoms or molecules are partially ionized and form plasma. Similar like in the gas aggregation sources the plasma is cooled by present rare gas and cluster formation is achieved

c) Supersonic cluster sources: A gas under high pressure is expanded adiabatically through a small nozzle. This is how noble gases are liquefied.

The elements helium (He), neon (Ne), argon (Ar), krypton (Kr), xenon (Xe) can produce very large clusters under the right conditions. Xenon is the most vigorous and prolific cluster producer. These Xenon clusters take the shape of buckminsterfullerene.


In explanation, when Xenon is forced to move in a coherent direction in a group, translational, rotational and vibrational energy is converted to directional energy and the Xenon atoms are cooled but still energetic.

Typical set-up for cooling noble gases is the supersonic beam technique.

Such cooling can be done using radio frequency when the ionized Xenon atoms are forced to move back and forth in unison. Any kinetic energy that the Xenon atoms have is converted to directional energy.

So in plain language, Radio frequency will catalyze the formation of Xenon clusters as the atoms of Xenon are cooled by coherent motion.





Think of a collection of Noble gas atoms as a herd of cattle. To begin with the cattle roam around on the prairie aimlessly with boundless energy but not applied to any purpose. To build a herd for a cattle drive, the cowpunchers prod the cattle into a tight bunch during the roundup. Then the drovers get the cattle to all go in the same direction as a herd. The drovers pack them close, shoulder to short ribs. The cows have little room but to march forward hardly able to move their heads. The cattle are all contented and well behaved and centered on the mindless march forward, but they are still are exerting a large amount of energy as they stumble forward to cover ground.

In this analogy, the cowpokes are radio frequency radiation (RF) and the constraining coils. Papp talks about using RF in his engines.

Xenon is easy to excite using RF because its binding energy is low: many orders of magnitude lower than hydrogen. The RF also produces clusters because the RF get noble gas atoms to all go in the same direction and the coils pack them tight.. Xenon strongly interacts with RF because these molecules have good dipole characteristics like water.

Noble gases can combine and readily form clusters that can be very complex.

For example, Helium and Xenon form a family of atomic clusters that behaves like argon.

Excited Clusters have a positively charged ionic core composed of possibly hundreds or thousands of ionized atoms. Around this core of positive charge ions swarm a loosely connected flight of electrons orbiting on the outside of the cluster core and can be easily removed from the cluster by ionization.


In a TV tube,  magnetic deflection is commonly used with television and other large CRTs. The beam is deflected horizontally by applying an electric field between a pair of plates to its left and right, and vertically by applying an electric field to plates above and below.

This regular deflection in the picture tube will cool the noble gases thereby producing noble gas clusters

atanguy

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1914, on May 11th, 2013, 02:45 PM »
Quote from ~Russ/Rwg42985 on May 8th, 2013, 02:00 AM
FYI to all. still waiting for something to continue testing... something really good is happening so we will all learn from it.

time time time... its worth the wait.

PS. had my 3rd child... :) Elijah... a beautiful 7lb 7.2oz 19"long baby boy.  :) happy daddy here... :)
Welcome to Elijah and congratulation to his parents. Hope he will live in a better world than us!:heart::heart::heart:

securesupplies

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1915, on May 12th, 2013, 07:26 AM »
Quote from atanguy on May 11th, 2013, 02:45 PM
Quote from ~Russ/Rwg42985 on May 8th, 2013, 02:00 AM
FYI to all. still waiting for something to continue testing... something really good is happening so we will all learn from it.

time time time... its worth the wait.

PS. had my 3rd child... :) Elijah... a beautiful 7lb 7.2oz 19"long baby boy.  :) happy daddy here... :)
Welcome to Elijah and congratulation to his parents. Hope he will live in a better world than us!:heart::heart::heart:
Russ and Family Congratulations
on the new addition.

All the Best
Dan  and Family.

Earl

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1916, on May 12th, 2013, 07:55 PM »
Russ,

I have been following Inteligentry for a couple of years and almost purchase a popper.  Only reason I did not was I looked at what was in the kit and what else was need to put a complete popper together and decide I did not at the time have the money or time to complete the rest of the items.  I just found this site a few weeks ago and have read all the pages in this forum and looked at most of the videos.  I do not claim to have a theory of why it works.  I like what you have done so far and am very pleased with the progress you have made so far and the way you have been documenting what your are doing.

At this point I wonder if the Pug On Coil (POC) would work better than the auto coils your are using.  It is my understanding that each of POCs in the popper kit put out 90,000 to 110,000v (at least new ones Inteligentry claims to be using).  Note:  These were 24volt POCs not there standard 12v plugs which put out 80,000v.  If you hook even the standard high performance coils like you did the auto coils you should get a much higher voltage spark not sure if that would be effort to eliminate caps but it should help for a minor change.

Now I did check the WeaponX web site and could not find anything on the 24 volt coils so I do not know for sure if they are on the market yet or even if they exist.

Earl
Russ,

I have been following Inteligentry for a couple of years and almost purchase a popper.  Only reason I did not was I looked at what was in the kit and what else was need to put a complete popper together and decide I did not at the time have the money or time to complete the rest of the items.  I just found this site a few weeks ago and have read all the pages in this forum and looked at most of the videos.  I do not claim to have a theory of why it works.  I like what you have done so far and am very pleased with the progress you have made so far and the way you have been documenting what your are doing.

At this point I wonder if the Pug On Coil (POC) would work better than the auto coils your are using.  It is my understanding that each of POCs in the popper kit put out 90,000 to 110,000v (at least new ones Inteligentry claims to be using).  Note:  These were 24volt POCs not there standard 12v plugs which put out 80,000v.  If you hook even the standard high performance coils like you did the auto coils you should get a much higher voltage spark not sure if that would be effort to eliminate caps but it should help for a minor change.

Now I did check the WeaponX web site and could not find anything on the 24 volt coils so I do not know for sure if they are on the market yet or even if they exist.

Earl


Axil

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1918, on May 13th, 2013, 10:09 AM »
Quote from k c dias on May 13th, 2013, 07:32 AM
AXIL - GREAT REPLY - THANK YOU!!

I am glad SOMEONE is paying attention! :D
I am intrigued by clustering. IMHO, it is at the bottom of many subjects discussed on this site, including HHO.

I want to pay attention; close attention. I would love to get feedback from experimenters about how they are trying to produce molecular clustering.

Producing clusters is just a matter of engineering to optimize it.

Please, give me more experimental info to pay attention to.



Matt Watts

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1919, on May 13th, 2013, 10:33 AM »Last edited on May 13th, 2013, 10:37 PM by Matt Watts
Quote from Axil on May 13th, 2013, 10:09 AM
I am intrigued by clustering. IMHO, it is at the bottom of many subjects discussed on this site, including HHO.
I'm quite certain you are correct.

Something about Dr. Polick's lecture on water where he speaks of "Like likes Like".  That to me is clustering.  It happens in water due to electrostatic charge.  I wouldn't be a bit surprised to find out you need clustering with HHO in order to achieve the density required to run an ICE.  I know without it, you need a lot of HHO to do any useful work.  I proved that much to myself already.

Maybe there is something else to learn in Stan Meyer's electron extraction process.  I have to wonder what happens to groups of atoms when you blow off their surrounding electrons.  "Like likes Like..."  Maybe they begin to cluster together tightly.  Put the electrons back and they spread out.  Seems simple enough.  Now we just need a sure fire way to move the electrons.

There may be something hidden in here that would be applicable.  Haven't read through it all yet, but looks promising:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/eg-contents/


BobN

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1920, on May 13th, 2013, 10:46 AM »
Quote from Axil on May 13th, 2013, 10:09 AM
Quote from k c dias on May 13th, 2013, 07:32 AM
AXIL - GREAT REPLY - THANK YOU!!

I am glad SOMEONE is paying attention! :D
I am intrigued by clustering. IMHO, it is at the bottom of many subjects discussed on this site, including HHO.

I want to pay attention; close attention. I would love to get feedback from experimenters about how they are trying to produce molecular clustering.

Producing clusters is just a matter of engineering to optimize it.

Please, give me more experimental info to pay attention to.
Making clusters is done all the time in the semiconductor business. They use Argon and Xenon clusters regularly for etching and in some cases deposition.
Most etchers make the clusters by injecting the gas under pressure through a precision nozzle into a vacuum chamber.
Making the clusters has been done for years, getting them to collapse quickly after an expansion is the problem. A special gas treatment cycle could be made, but their is no indication that is what Papp did in his engine.

k c dias

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1921, on May 13th, 2013, 02:29 PM »
Quote from Axil on May 13th, 2013, 10:09 AM
Quote from k c dias on May 13th, 2013, 07:32 AM
AXIL - GREAT REPLY - THANK YOU!!

I am glad SOMEONE is paying attention! :D
I am intrigued by clustering. IMHO, it is at the bottom of many subjects discussed on this site, including HHO.

I want to pay attention; close attention. I would love to get feedback from experimenters about how they are trying to produce molecular clustering.

Producing clusters is just a matter of engineering to optimize it.

Please, give me more experimental info to pay attention to.
Axil,

Thanks!  I'll let you know if I can do any good - and it looks like I may be all alone with the experimentation along these lines...

Oh well, C'est la vie!!


Willard Elliott

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1922, on May 14th, 2013, 03:20 PM »


To all builders,

Some of you may not looked at the references in my first post to the group. For your use in replicating the Papp moter I will provide a link to the description of one of them here: http://www.photonis.com/en/content/102-nightvision-how-it-works
It is by this method that the gasses in the 6 cubic inche chamber expands by three to five times its volume with no temperature increase when he fires the electromagnetic circuit every 60 degrees on the down stroke and conducts the excess electrons away on the upstroke. He feeds these, properly attenuated to the capacitor for the downstroke firing of the other cylinder.  It is only by this ping pong effect that the engine is able to run on virtually no input power once it is started.  Jimmy Soborie has much more detail on this in his patent application.
As The patent has been in the public domain long enough I freely give this to you.
I am certain that this will help you in your replication,

Willard

k c dias

RE: Let's build A "Popper" Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
« Reply #1923, on May 14th, 2013, 04:00 PM »Last edited on May 14th, 2013, 04:02 PM by k c dias
Quote from Willard Elliott on May 14th, 2013, 03:20 PM

To all builders,

Some of you may not looked at the references in my first post to the group. For your use in replicating the Papp moter I will provide a link to the description of one of them here: http://www.photonis.com/en/content/102-nightvision-how-it-works
It is by this method that the gasses in the 6 cubic inche chamber expands by three to five times its volume with no temperature increase when he fires the electromagnetic circuit every 60 degrees on the down stroke and conducts the excess electrons away on the upstroke. He feeds these, properly attenuated to the capacitor for the downstroke firing of the other cylinder.  It is only by this ping pong effect that the engine is able to run on virtually no input power once it is started.  Jimmy Soborie has much more detail on this in his patent application.
As The patent has been in the public domain long enough I freely give this to you.
I am certain that this will help you in your replication,

Willard
Willard,

A 3 to 5 pressure increase is not enough.  For multiple hits on the down stroke (or nearly constant pressure push on the piston), you need a 73 times pressure increase to have the performance of the Papp engine.

A 5x pressure increase is what JPR claims.  And we all know how well that is working for him...