"Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"

~Russ

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #501, on November 6th, 2016, 11:57 AM »
the strange thing is, i have seen bubbles form between the plates. and not at the plate its self. this is normally a smaller bubble. unlike brute force where you see big bubbles forming on the plates until there big enough to come off the plate..

i really believe this is not the " normal"   electrolysis.

you cant see it well in this video but its there i have seen it
Quote from ~Russ on November 4th, 2016, 09:49 AM
hows this for real testing :


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kPcZ7fZTS8

~Russ


gpssonar

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #503, on November 6th, 2016, 12:34 PM »Last edited on November 6th, 2016, 04:31 PM
Thanks Ris, very good video. Watch the video Ris posted then read this. As you can see the polarization process is started when a voltage is applied to the capacitor plates. It don't matter if it's brute force or not. When you apply a voltage to a capacitor the water molecule will align since we are using natural polarized water as the dielectric. It's just the nature of a dielectric to polarize in a capacitor. If you took notice in the video it showed once aligned it cancels out charges. As you know the water molecule has two hydrogen and one oxygen so there would be two cancels on the neg plate compared to one cancel on the positive plates. Question again: if the battery is left on, would they be more charge accumulate on the neg side than on the positive side?
 

Gunther Rattay

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #504, on November 6th, 2016, 01:06 PM »Last edited on November 6th, 2016, 01:15 PM
@sulaiman
it's obvious - if ronnie has a functional stan meyer like config up and running stan is proven to be correct.
if ronnie hasn't  we are stuck somewhere  in the middle ...

Ris

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #505, on November 6th, 2016, 01:11 PM »Last edited on November 6th, 2016, 01:14 PM
bloody hell and bloody hell again I have to sleep over that brain is frying
bloody hell can not be that simple




Matt Watts

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #509, on November 6th, 2016, 05:15 PM »Last edited on November 6th, 2016, 05:25 PM
So by the logic in that video (Good find Ris), if we have a dry cell (K = 1) that measures 10pF, without even taking another measurement, we know immediately when the cell is filled with water (K = 80), the capacitance has just increased to 800pF.

That much is pretty easy and it completely defines the working range of our cell.
Quote from gpssonar on November 6th, 2016, 12:34 PM
As you know the water molecule has two hydrogen and one oxygen so there would be two cancels on the neg plate compared to one cancel on the positive plates. Question again: if the battery is left on, would they be more charge accumulate on the neg side than on the positive side?
Yes, I agree, more charge would accumulate on the negative plate.  The tougher question is what happens with the voltage in this unbalanced system?  And where do you place a reference point?  That's the "bloody hell and bloody hell again" spot for me.  It's like an asymmetric capacitor where the two plates are of different dimensions.  I think T. Townsend Brown was probably the only one that really comprehended such a scenario.
Quote from gpssonar on November 6th, 2016, 02:19 PM
Everyone sleep on that tonight.
Guess I'll have to sleep on it, because I sure don't have an answer for it at the moment.


~Russ

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #510, on November 6th, 2016, 08:19 PM »
Quote from Matt Watts on November 6th, 2016, 05:15 PM
So by the logic in that video (Good find Ris), if we have a dry cell (K = 1) that measures 10pF, without even taking another measurement, we know immediately when the cell is filled with water (K = 80), the capacitance has just increased to 800pF.

That much is pretty easy and it completely defines the working range of our cell.


Yes, I agree, more charge would accumulate on the negative plate.  The tougher question is what happens with the voltage in this unbalanced system?  And where do you place a reference point?  That's the "bloody hell and bloody hell again" spot for me.  It's like an asymmetric capacitor where the two plates are of different dimensions.  I think T. Townsend Brown was probably the only one that really comprehended such a scenario.

Guess I'll have to sleep on it, because I sure don't have an answer for it at the moment.
Matt the tube cell is also asymmetric.

You can see the calulations in my spread sheet. (thanks webmug) So their is also a factor that the charge can be less asymmetric acording to how you connect the cell!!

A while back I got deep in to this But need to refresh my head!!

~Russ

mercury101

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #511, on November 6th, 2016, 08:46 PM »
Ronnie
I am not sure about your question. But one thing i do know is oxygen is one of the only atoms that is reactive with magnetic influence. In a liquid state compaired with hydrogen and other gasses it is the only one in liquid forn that will form a bridge across two earth magnets with an air gap.  Other gasses pas through and do not bridge. So with polarization i often  wonder brute force or not what is actually happening seeing as hydrogen is not as magnettically affected as oxygen is.  I also wonder what all happens when the two gasses are brought to a higher energy level

Merc

Lynx

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #512, on November 6th, 2016, 09:28 PM »
My intuitive notion is that there's equal amount of charge on both sides (anode and cathode) on the cell tubes, which leaves one of the hydrogen atoms with it's naturally net positive charge, until........the next step........?

~Russ

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #513, on November 6th, 2016, 09:36 PM »
Quote from Lynx on November 6th, 2016, 09:28 PM
My intuitive notion is that there's equal amount of charge on both sides (anode and cathode) on the cell tubes, which leaves one of the hydrogen atoms with it's naturally net positive charge, until........the next step........?
from my understanding of basic eletronics and capacitors.

The charge MUST remain = on both plates

However that's also if the plates are the same airea. Unless the charge gets more or less dense on those non = airea s.

However. I'm interested in Ronnie's way of looking at it.

I'm just. It sure. Even after speninding a night of researching.

~Russ

Matt Watts

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #514, on November 6th, 2016, 10:32 PM »Last edited on November 6th, 2016, 10:43 PM
Quote from ~Russ on November 6th, 2016, 08:19 PM
Matt the tube cell is also asymmetric.
That's true it is, but...

Ronnie explained to me the tube sets have to be in pairs--one plus/minus and the other minus/plus.  So to me that means the tube sets are balanced.  Also why Ronnie told me plate cells can be used--they are naturally balanced.

The asymmetry to me means the imbalance with the environment, not the conditions you have setup in the circuit.  Bearden was all over this asymmetry stuff.  So think for a minute guys.  Ronnie gave us clues...

If he ran his cell for ten minutes and shut it off for an hour and stupid me stuck my finger in there, WHY would it knock the piss out of me?

I'll tell you why I think it would beyond Ronnie saying that it would.

It would zap me because I'm at a different electrical potential than the water in the cell is.  My body is charged one way in a neutral state with the earth and the cell is charged in a much different way, like a cloud about ready to rock a thunderbolt.

Like a thunderbolt.   Could be a clue...


Nature figured it out a long time ago.
Quote from ~Russ on November 6th, 2016, 09:36 PM
The charge MUST remain = on both plates
And you would be right, but the that equal charge doesn't have to be the same as the environment around it.  In effect, running that cell just tore a hole in the local space, charge-wsie.  It's not balanced to the environment at all any more.  It's gone way out there into la la land.  Then the coils start crackling like bacon cooking.  Another clue...

You don't suppose the environment is trying to find a way to plug that hole you just tore do you?  "Voltage heading off to infinity if the electronics allow for it."

Talk about opening an aperture to Universal Energy.  Ripping electrons out of stable atoms is bound to open some kind of aperture.







~Russ

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #520, on November 6th, 2016, 11:07 PM »Last edited on November 6th, 2016, 11:36 PM
lol.. OK well i guess we can think together...

i got one for you,

take this circuit... if the L is some what big...

tell me, if there is 500V on the battery... and i flip the switch ...  how much voltage will be in the cap???

Somthing for you all to think about!!

Will see if anyone gets it right.

~Russ

Off to bed

HHO-Dan

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #521, on November 7th, 2016, 03:18 AM »
About 1000v+..after C1 charges there is no longer a load to hold the feild on L1 and it will discharge into C1
Got to get something right.....
Note: GPS Twin core bobbins all cleaned up now time to make a new cell I lost my tubes from last year!
Sorry for being grumpy last night guys just wish I had 1 solid number for the twin core.


newguy

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #522, on November 8th, 2016, 12:43 AM »Last edited on November 8th, 2016, 01:21 AM
Quote from HHO-Dan on November 6th, 2016, 06:51 AM
Here is where I'm am at.............
We have 12 numbers we need to know...
L1-L2-S1-P1-C-1Cell-1(C-1)
Most of us are not smart enough to do the math to get this correct
Well....How about 1 real number? With the twin core you made
Cell=?
L-1=?
L-2?
S-1?
P-1?
Quote from gpssonar on November 6th, 2016, 06:59 AM
Dan there is more to it than just a capacitance value. Voltage plays a big role in this. If you look at this photo of Stan's, the first level is the polarization process. You want this process to take place with around 2 volts on the primary. If you tune to resonance at 2 volts and you see no gas being produced at all then you know there is something wrong. By leaving it at resonance at 2 volts, raise the voltage from 2 volts 4,6,8,10,12 somewhere in that voltage range you should see some gas being made. What ever that voltage is that you see the gas being made let's say 6 volts. That should tell you, the turn ratio is off on the secondary, because you want it to take place at 2 volts to the primary not 6 volts. This is where everything gets tricky to adjust. In order to keep the impedance match, what you have to do is take turns off the chokes and add them to the secondary to increase the voltage. By doing this you change the inductance which will change the resonate frequency. So it's a balancing act that your shooting for. Again if the polarization process takes place at 6 volts and it's suppose to start at 2 then you've lost 4 volts in the process that you can no longer do anything with.
Thank you .


firepinto

Re: "Understanding How Stan Meyers Fuel Cell Works"
« Reply #524, on November 8th, 2016, 06:55 AM »
Quote from Matt Watts on November 6th, 2016, 05:15 PM
So by the logic in that video (Good find Ris), if we have a dry cell (K = 1) that measures 10pF, without even taking another measurement, we know immediately when the cell is filled with water (K = 80), the capacitance has just increased to 800pF.

That much is pretty easy and it completely defines the working range of our cell.


Yes, I agree, more charge would accumulate on the negative plate.  The tougher question is what happens with the voltage in this unbalanced system?  And where do you place a reference point?  That's the "bloody hell and bloody hell again" spot for me.  It's like an asymmetric capacitor where the two plates are of different dimensions.
I'm a little rusty, but sounds like the electron extraction circuit may be designed to put some balance in the right place at the right time.