Hi warriors
if i understood it properly we could have a ring with 36 spaces and use 2 for the coils and leave the third empty.
is that correct?
so i ve done this. it still has not been tested. im planning to cut this soon.
just sharing...

All nighter.

Got all the wires striped and taped. Color coaded. Ect. 

Got the cap MMC set up for .15uf 2000v

And did a lot of testing.

I did get to a point where I was seeing somthing interesting.  Power factor was around .1-.2 on the input. And output was .6-.8. And we were at around 2w in and 8W out. Not sure what was going on. Could have been an error. But I'm not sure. I think its around 4:45 min on the video. Then I go back and show it again.

Video will be posted when it's done processing.

Bad thing is I don't how missed a pair on the one coil. So I have one less coil on the L2. So i just left the one pair open.... Was not happy but it is what it is.

So that's 11 COILS in series and 11 COILS to short. In this video I had them all in series.

~Russ

96 wires ...freekin crap. Lol. Ok fine. -2

I'm feeling your pain Jeremy. :)

haha.....well at least you know you tried everything you could to get this project off the front of your brain  :)   i bet it has only opened more questions....but you can rest knowing you put a herculean effort out. very, very nice work man....try not to sleep the whole week   ;)

First off. Id like to thank all the fellows at overunity.com

And aywhere else for that matter.

There are a lot of questions  about. Schmatic's. Mesurments. Power analysis.
DOS settings.  And a bunch more.  If you have some incite. Please share it.

As you know and I expressed im on a learning curve. The instrument is only as good the operator. I'm not publishing schmatics and mesuremtns in a short 3 min video for a reason. This is called exploration.

I don't take one bit of information and try it and call it a scam or a fake. I take the steps they would have taken.  Tryal and error. There are 100d's of ways to conect all the windings. There are Manny ways to make something work. And for that there are Manny Manny more ways to make it fail.

So. Its live open science. The long videos that everyone ( except a few) are scanning will not help you unless you watch them and really payatention. Yes. One day I will compile all my findings and things will be clear. U till then if you want to play along you need to put forth the efforts I have and at lease watch the"  work days. "

Ok. So why am I posting this. Well it's to say thank you all for being open minded and awaiting the results with some kind of result that will be benifital for understanding these systems we "play" with

Again for those of you who are way more advanced in this understanding please step forward here at this forum and make sure I don't make the same mistakes with my mesurments as have been posted before.

That's why we do this open. Its becuse each of us play a roll. And if my roll is to be the guy who can build crap and show some results then those who are advanced in measurements or other step forward and help.
This is the reason I do this live. Its so have others that know more help in the understanding as I climb this learning curve.


Any how. I have a lot more work ahead of me. To even get to a point where in happy with my mesurments and results.

With any good project. Extreemly through testing will be had before I'm satisfied with my results. As should be your expectations.

Much love to all who support a real good open source project.

Thanks for reading.

Now I'm going to ignore this for a week while I take the first vacation that my wife and I have had for 8 years. ( with out the 5 kids )

:)

~Russ Gries

Good luck. This now playing around :)

https://youtu.be/tl0qopTBQA0

~Russ

 Russ is going to go for a while but buying wire does anyone have the
thoughts and whys of:

-a copper core of the 6 strands shorted as a core, the outside 6 strands
linear.

-one picture above shows a normal twisted outside.

-why an 18 AWG would have reduced or nullify the output power.   

-is the wire coated or bare and how important that might be with
 the shorting of the inner 6.

The validation has no DC-DC converter but the over-unity validated anyway
how could you guess.

I want to buy some wire.
 
 


Buying Wire 
   

Some notes on doing measurements with a scope with built in measurement functions:
With short memory scopes like the small tektronix TPS/TDS series, you need to have good and complete waveforms visible in the scope or else measurements will be off. Viewing the power (math) trace helps. If it looks good then it's a start. Always a good idea to compare scope measurements with a known load. Sinewaves (or square waves) must be used when doing the manual calculation. Resistive load, and RMS amps and RMS volts.

Now one theory about the power extraction of the coil, is that there's the audio range frequency as the exiting components, creating the magnetic vortices and creating the LC resonance on the secondary winding. Power can definitely be transferred (Russ has confirmed it) on that specific frequency, because the transformer leakage inductance is cancelled out by the capacitor. Very good.

Next thing is that the LC frequency most likely needs to match the coils self-resonance. It has to be measured, so that we can apply the right frequency to get a standing wave or waves in the coil/transformer. Match this frequency with the cap and things are most likely cooking good ;-) 007 used 2.5uF and said that that one worked much better than the 0.15 uf cap..

Next theory is that the ether is exited/stirred in the above way, creating a high-frequency component on the secondary of the coil. Could well be in the ultra-high frequency range where it's very very hard to detect.
That power will go acros most things because of the high freqency. It does however have energy/power in it and it would appear that germanium diodes can be used to rectify the signals and turn it into a DC (those diodes are still used for RF applications - thank God). However, as is known from transmission line theory (see wikipedia and books) and related theory, one needs to have impedance matcing in order to transfer the power. So that means that one needs to match the impedance of the load to the source, in order to get the full effect. Perhaps in that way the OU power will be made available.

In the DC/DC converter there may be a PFC /Power Factor Correction) circuit before the actual DC/DC converter. The power factor correction may have been modified a bit to create a non-ohmic load, i.e. to allow it to be tunable.
However a switchable LC box should also do the trick. This matching however can't be happening on the ultra high frequency range because any discrete compoenent or low frequency tricks like PFC does not work at all at these frequencies.
Discrete components stop working at a few GHz at best- after that it's resonators, waveguides and transmission lines.
Most of teslas interesting work was done using non-discrete components. Like the pancake coil, it's a non-linear transmission line with distributed capacitance and inductance and causing all sorts of interesting EM fields that have interesting effects. Even more so if you stretch it out into a tapered shape.

Calculating the self resonance of coils is a trial and error or imperically based line of work. I have seen no real math that can calculate these frequencies, except for some very simplified RF air coils. If anyone has seen any usefull math for it, let us know.

Last thought is that 007 referred to the 6 strands of wire as a copper CORE (not cord). That would indicate that the mass of copper acts as a core for the magnetic field in the coil. Using copper has been mentioned in some documents as a very potent catalyst for OU power (to the degree of using extreme caution). Stanley Meyer also mentions the effects of magnetic fields on the electrons of copper.
** Correction as of June 17th. It's the case of iron, not copper.

As with most OU devices, one expect would coherence of atomic lattice vibrations resulting in a dropping temperature. Also time expansion/contraction, change of mass of objects in the field and their gravitational pull and finally influence on what is called the concious field, with which we seem to be interacting with and affecting every day of our lifes (and past that). I guess people have studied the works of Wilbur Smith, who was a down to earth RF electronics engineer working in the fifties in Canada for their department of transportation. As Marko says, this coil can be used for a lot of things.

We need more people working on this and bringing out their measurements/results (also for protection). Also experiments with the coil driving a HHO cell is most likely another application. Probably the vortex coil is much more effective than any coil or transformer that Stanley Meyer managed to build. That's also why the bucking field configuration should be tried out as well (se hand drawn schematic in an earlier post). The principle with the RF energy applies to the cell, which needs to have the right impedance and have the electrodes isolated where the voltage is high. Natural CaCO3 (lime) deposition from slow electrolysis in mineral water can also be used (conditioning). Use nickel or chrome surfaces of the electrodes to avoid generating radioactive isotopes in the cell, as transmutation will occur.
OK I went kinda off-topic there.. ;-)

Quote from ~Russ on June 15th, 2016, 09:55 AM

Good luck. This now playing around :)

~Russ

Two things. The LED bulbs are not LED's, they are filament lamps, where the filament is enclosed in a glass tube. So they should be a resistive load.
The resistance indicated on the other caps is the parallel resistance due to the finite resistivity of the dielectric of the cap (paper and oil..?).
So it's not "designed in" as such and it does not make the cap unsuable with those high resistance values.

you guys got some nice work going on the coil! props!
i finally finished putting the first 12 strains on the coil :)
got to wait till the rain stops to make the next 12 strains
cheers Jeroen

a couple things ive noticed about my coil that havent made it into any videos or anything:

i get no change in wire resistance when shorting other windings....in any form. i dont know if thats because russ was measuring something else (whatever is measured in ohms....reactance? my brain is tired)....or russ' meter puts more current through the wires to test resistance than mine, affecting the coil and reading more.

the winding ratio (L1 to L2) plays a huge part on power transfer. i got the best results by far with a 1:1 winding ratio. all other arrangements performed substantially worse.

i like sandwiches.

increasing resistance on L2 (double the windings for a 1:2 ratio) lowered the resonant frequency. more testing needed.

the 'dual LED' trick running the coil with one end open (shown at :050 here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOrC1icUgnk ) is still the greatest mystery ive seen firsthand in regards to this coil and sets it apart from every other coilform ive tested it on.

i am still collecting data on the coil characteristics UNloaded so that i can attempt to build a regular linear coil with similar properties to act as a CONTROL COIL for load experiments. any help sorting out a good procedure for that would be helpful.

well, time to finish my coffee now....
jeremy

Quote from jeremy gwilt on June 17th, 2016, 07:48 AM

a couple things ive noticed about my coil that havent made it into any videos or anything:

i get no change in wire resistance when shorting other windings....in any form. i dont know if thats because Russ was measuring something else (whatever is measured in ohms....reactance? my brain is tired)....or russ' meter puts more current through the wires to test resistance than mine, affecting the coil and reading more.

Russ was using the LCR meter at 1 kHz to measure resistance. Since the coil is also inductive, the resistance (total impedance) will change with inductance which changes when you short other pairs together. Nothing mysterious about it. Russ needs to use a normal meter at DC - as I've said twice now. Presumably the meter can show impedance instead as a real and complex number - I don't know - I haven't looked up and read the manual for it.

Quote from jeremy gwilt on June 17th, 2016, 07:48 AM

the winding ratio (L1 to L2) plays a huge part on power transfer. i got the best results by far with a 1:1 winding ratio. all other arrangements performed substantially worse.

i like sandwiches.

increasing resistance on L2 (double the windings for a 1:2 ratio) lowered the resonant frequency. more testing needed.

the 'dual LED' trick running the coil with one end open (shown at :050 here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOrC1icUgnk ) is still the greatest mystery ive seen firsthand in regards to this coil and sets it apart from every other coilform ive tested it on.

What's at 050 - ??
I don't get it.

i am still collecting data on the coil characteristics UNloaded so that i can attempt to build a regular linear coil with similar properties to act as a CONTROL COIL for load experiments. any help sorting out a good procedure for that would be helpful.

Quote

If you change the geometry - especially regarding windings and distances between them, the coils will definitely be different.

Quote from Viking on June 17th, 2016, 12:15 PM

What's at 050 - ??
I don't get it.

its a trick i learned from tinselkoala i believe, when he was building his PLL exciter. both LEDS will light up at certain frequencies in towers, but on this rodin the lights stay on for a very large range of freuencies....which none of my other coils do. that is all.

as for the control coil.... i think it fair that at least some attempt is made. of course geometry will change results.....it is the differences that i want to know   :)

ya....that was the wrong link haha....its been fixed

Quote from jeremy gwilt on June 17th, 2016, 01:01 PM

its a trick i learned from tinselkoala i believe, when he was building his PLL exciter. both LEDS will light up at certain frequencies in towers, but on this rodin the lights stay on for a very large range of freuencies....which none of my other coils do. that is all.

as for the control coil.... i think it fair that at least some attempt is made. of course geometry will change results.....it is the differences that i want to know   :)

yeah i use somewhat kinda circuit (using 555 and 2 leds anti parallel) for tuning tesla coils :)
i have a diagram on that somewhere.
you can ofcourse change the oscillator to a function generator or what ever chip that oscillates.
works both in open coil situation (where the end of the coil will be a capacitance to ground)
and also in closed coil.
in open coil situations the led goes bright
in closed coil situations the led goes dim.

I am also curious to see what happens when we resonate the coil in this type of situation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtI1CPBSm-o

i've tested this principle and it does work!
i believe the bifilar coil in this situation act's like or a capacitor or its somehow magneticly coupled.
or maybe both.

i finished the second coil finally.
got to use some tyraps and then im off doing the wires.
slow progress..... but still progress :)

While doing a test winding of the coil, I found out that it helps to number the slots, starting from 0 at the rings slot and ending at 23.
Then I made a MATLAB script to calculate the slot that the wire bundle passes for each turn on the same former.
It's shown below, where I started with slot 10 (modify to start somewhere else). In that way there's more check on things and the arithmetic is interesting. In fact I'd like to see someone do a match analysis to calculate wire length, log spiral proportion (is it really PHI ?)  and a 3D plot. On a continuous form this mostly looks like log spiral forms and sine/cosine (complex exponent). Perhaps somebody knows a teenageer (or otherwise) genious with too much time on his/her hands and who likes a math challenge. Please report back findings.
>> x=[0:23]*11+10

x =

  Columns 1 through 14

    10    21    32    43    54    65    76    87    98   109   120   131   142   153

  Columns 15 through 24

   164   175   186   197   208   219   230   241   252   263

>> p=mod(x,24)

p =

  Columns 1 through 14

    10    21     8    19     6    17     4    15     2    13     0    11    22     9

  Columns 15 through 24

    20     7    18     5    16     3    14     1    12    23

 Hello guys and gals if present,

 I actually got to talk to Mr Rodin yesterday. Nice conversation we had and I think I might have surprised him in a sense.

 I just wanted to get you guys to think about what could be hosting such a huge magnetic field detected around the coils. DO NOT IGNORE THEM. They are very real. Let me explain.

 What in your mind will channel a magnetic field?

 I think everyone would agree that Ferric materials do a pretty good with higher permeability materials, which of course are kinda out of reach cost wise.

 What if I told you there was a totally unlimited supply of the cheapest and best and I mean BEST magnetic material around. The cost you ask?
 FREE. Well essentially free.

 Plasma is all around you. Literally all through you. It is the very thing Tesla used in his magnifying Transmitter. Plasma. It is the super fluid at room temperature. It is highly attracted to higher voltage sources and once you maintain it.. Well it becomes a super magnet. A super magnet that can be shaped and rotated just by the voltage and Frequency of impulses that the plasma reacts to.. Impulses attract plasma more evenly and more strongly then any other method but your method still shows well.

 Nice to see a real interest in the Rodin coil and Marko could not find a better person to ferret out his design. If I can help with things Let me know. I can't really replicate the coil but I might be able to help you tweak the design to perform better. I look forward to trying to help with that. Nice work guys!

 Russ, Your the MAN! I like the hat... Oh by the way you need better caps. How about some of those new easy to make graphene caps?
 
 Oh my bad. To get impulses just follow this system:

 http://www.tfcbooks.com/images/lectures/1892-02-03/005.gif

 Remember start small with impulses and ramp it up slowly both in period and pressure.
 If you want to know how it is supposed to work then ask away. I might be able to help. We are floating in a sea of plasma and you have made the first plasma drive element. Given better materials and maybe thick copper pipes we could make a massive drive system that could be heavily shielded around the sides. Hey the shielding could actually be the energy scoops. Hmmmm.... you could take power off them like letting the air out of a bike tube that had no end to the pressure. The scoops would be reflecting pannels and then open to furnish power for a short period letting the magnetic field bounce back and scoop some more off the next period. Hmm the possibilities are endless. Oh and self cooling when the plasma enters the coil system.... Nice side effect...

 Ok remember the voltage determines the stiffness of the plasma field. It could go from no effect to full lock on and spin the magnetic field so fast with the higher pressure of the voltage determining the lock on ability to the inner plasma core.

 And one more thing. The impulses come from the spark gap being filtered by the magnetic stream running across the gap fed by the cap. What you put the impulses into should convert the impulses into real energy. Like a coil rebounds from being pinged. So the transformer on either side of the impulse generator does not necessarily need to be there. Again have fun and start slowly.

Hello jbignes5.

Appreciate your input and I agree that plasma is (another ?)  key to extracting energy from the vacuum. It has been demonstrated by certain people in a certain European country who Marko most likely has been in contact with at some point.
But if you really want to contribute to this discussion you need to be more concrete and to aid on that, here are some questions:
1. How do you define plasma ?
2. How do you suggest to use the vortex transformer/coil in that connection ?
3. Why to you think ferric materials are expensive ? Off the shelf shapes are not very expensive.
4. Can you make a sketch of your proposed setups please ?
5. If you know of any adversere effect on biological systems when working with the transformer, please enlighten us, as nobody would like to be knocked out sick for weeks as a result of working with this stuff.

It's funny, when reviewing the 007 demo, two parts of the video is missing the audio. On might suppose it's because of a technical issue and not that it has been CENSORED ??
Anyway looking at the images, of which very very few (if any) are clear enough to say anything definite, I can't see any bundles of 6 shorted wires nor even two of them. It looks more like 6 or more are going back in a bucking configuration, while the other half is continuing on. The output to input voltage ratio is 215/46=4.7 with the rectifier load. My guess is that just one wire is carrying 1A and the rest is bucking and stepping up the voltage to a factor of 5-6. However the field coupling back to the primary is presumably almost absent...  Why... ?? Do the electric and magnetic fields not propagate at the same speeds in this geometry ?
Attached a screenshot of the right side of the connections.
Also attached a schematic of how I believe L1 (primary) and L2 (secondary) is connected (only one of them shown).

Quote from Viking on June 19th, 2016, 01:55 PM

Hello jbignes5.

Appreciate your input and I agree that plasma is (another ?)  key to extracting energy from the vacuum. It has been demonstrated by certain people in a certain European country who Marko most likely has been in contact with at some point.
But if you really want to contribute to this discussion you need to be more concrete and to aid on that, here are some questions:
1. How do you define plasma ?
2. How do you suggest to use the vortex transformer/coil in that connection ?
3. Why to you think ferric materials are expensive ? Off the shelf shapes are not very expensive.
4. Can you make a sketch of your proposed setups please ?
5. If you know of any adversere effect on biological systems when working with the transformer, please enlighten us, as nobody would like to be knocked out sick for weeks as a result of working with this stuff.

1: In my best research plasma is a dynamic particle based super conductor to high voltages. It will condense around sources of very high voltages and seek a balance to discharge into after condensing. It is very hard to explain. The best analogy is this: Plasma is a form of matter that can change at our will it's form shape texture and tesile strength. It is a super conductor to electrical potential. Since it is a super conductor the higher density would allow it to act or have water like properties. I am pretty sure it is the separator in water that keeps hydrogen from truly touching oxygen. we all know what happens when matter truly touches right? As a rule nothing touches in the universe. This is because matter displaces plasma and the structures below are the reason why they don't touch. All is induction through these superconductors. A super fluid if you will. In it's cold state it is neutral to it's adjacent sides appearing to be nothing more then empty space. But it is far from empty and it's density is so very complex, you could say fractal based, in fact..
 The Sierpinski Triangle is the preferred charge carrier for the particles of plasma.

 I'll link it here in both polarities:

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_triangle#/media/File:Sierpinski_pyramid.png

 One negative and one positive is as far as I got with that. This is because one has infinite space and one has infinite surface area.These are dynamic structures in the plasma itself. From many, many differing sizes just above the finite level (lowest, if there is such a thing) but the shape is very important. Iconic isn't it?
 Did you check the direction of the tips of the smaller particles in each dynamic particle??
 Ill edit more to answer the rest...

 Maybe the ancients knew way more then we give them credit for. Maybe they discovered the very same technology because it is the real technology of nature. Maybe...

 I just remembered another piece to the what is plasma question.
 Take a look at this..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmC0ygr08tE

 This shows some of the nature of a droplet of the very stuff it is floating on, silicon. Now think about plasma being 3d instead of 2d like in that video. Somehow something divided the plasma and i think it is like this video in nature. The surface would be a double layer, which is well known in the plasma physics toolbox. That double layer is where matter collects and resides making atoms and guiding the shells around them. The droplet of plasma pulses in and out from the pressure the whole Universe is at for cold plasma with a slight compressing of the droplet. What ever that level is, is to be discovered yet.

 Maybe what is dividing the plasma is the further agitation of flowing plasma. Spinning off more droplets as plasma flows from point to point in the Universe.

Quote from Viking on June 19th, 2016, 01:55 PM

Hello jbignes5.

Appreciate your input and I agree that plasma is (another ?)  key to extracting energy from the vacuum. It has been demonstrated by certain people in a certain European country who Marko most likely has been in contact with at some point.
But if you really want to contribute to this discussion you need to be more concrete and to aid on that, here are some questions:
1. How do you define plasma ?
2. How do you suggest to use the vortex transformer/coil in that connection ?
3. Why to you think ferric materials are expensive ? Off the shelf shapes are not very expensive.
4. Can you make a sketch of your proposed setups please ?
5. If you know of any adversere effect on biological systems when working with the transformer, please enlighten us, as nobody would like to be knocked out sick for weeks as a result of working with this stuff.

Sorry if I'm roto posting I need to keep these separate because I tend to jumble things up a bit in my attempt to explain it.
 
 2. What connection? The impulse one?

 Ok wait let me introduce you to impulse methods first. There is a well known lecture Tesla did in the late 1890's
 I would read everything up to the lighting section. It explains everything Tesla did to discover how it operates, both the circuit and the plasma it attracts.

http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-02-03.htm

 If you want directed help you can start at figure 3 and go from there. Most aspects are covered and even transforming motion from the impulses in the form of a rudimentary one wire motor design. There is a section that talks about the plasma that can be formed into shapes. It describes the texture of the plasma as well and he even boasted to be able to make it stiff or rigid.

 Oh and the caps are not needed on the discharge circuit. That just magnifies it more. Kinda like giving it more punch. I would say the caps are for the high energy version, which should be looked at later for safety reasons. Start small I always say...

 3. When compared to free, anything is way too expensive. Plus where on the market can you find a material that will change it's density to facilitate more magnetic conduction at your will?

  How would we go about calculating the permeability of plasma? Can anyone help with that? That is not sarcasm.. Ok so a dynamic permeability core based on voltage applied? Hmmm.. Priceless don't you think?

 4. I'll be doing some work soon for the sketches to better explain this stuff.

 5. A) I believe the magnetic portion or emf smog of traditional systems is already very bad for us. And the degree of effect of that is based on individual response to the emf smog.
     B) with this new method of producing impulses there is a very real danger but it is based on the period of impulses and their strength. If the impulses are of low period or frequency they tend to energize all matter in it's area of effect and then rebound out of matter very strongly. If matter has not been energized in a repetitive fashion then the energy will want to radiate back out of matter as fast as possible. You could liken this to oscillating the pressure up and down in a balloon. smaller gradients of successive impulses never let it completely radiate out of the matter. This keeps the matter stable and filled with plasma. But and this is a big but, If you were to present 1 impulse per second or even a single impulse anything that was not sufficiently held together from it's mass, well that mass would rip itself apart explosively. Tesla reported that he could explode thin wires like the finest dynamite of that time. All you need to do is make sure there is a train of impulses of sufficient period or impulses per second. So there should be a ramp up and down of the impulses to let matter adjust normally to the impulse field and then held there.

 The impulse field has a wide range of effects and Tesla found out that 2k impulses per second was safe to biological systems. There is a wide range of environmental effect though. From cool breezes <-cold plasma entering the system to heated air <-energized air and gasses. I'll have to go back over the effects list to see if I can get a better understanding of additional effects in the field.

 As far as humans are concerned Tesla said he was also energized and felt better from being in the field.

 I had a chance to go back to my studies of the Rodin coil and the background math and geometry involved then and this was the coil I got out:

 http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/rodincoildesignac.png

 And this is the form I designed:

 http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/rodincoilframe.jpg

 This design is very inefficient for winding but you get the idea of how we could make one. Now that we have 3d printing it would be very easy to design a form to wind the coil exactly the way Marko had intended. The bifilar wrap is also a bit skewed from Marko's math and geometry.

 This is the template i used:

 http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/Rodincoilformabc.png

 I'm sorry it is photobucket but it is the only thing I have those studies on. I'll be moving them soon..

 I believe the mapping he did of the torus was the plasma condensed inside of the coil. Not sure about that yet.

Did we get a schematic or wiring diagram from 007?

 The process he was describing is very simple. Why do we need s schematic?

 On the subject of my take on the coil. For obvious reasons my design was a bit off but the general sense i get from the coil and Marko's math is that the vw symbol is a direct wiring method and the geometry is very very important. The 9 is the aperture to hold onto a single point of the plasma field and just like a spider does, you can sense ALL vibrations that the field is channeling. These vibrations come in all flavors and all events in the Universe at the same time.

 Here is a video of what i think is holding onto the thread in the O spot:

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hHv5iKbRTc

 There is some very important stuff in that video. Check the plasmoid out.

 The angles that are facilitated with a proper coil allow the system to trap a single point of space. Once you lock on to that single piece of plasma you should be able to sense any disturbance in any direction in the plasma field instantly. Put yourself as the spider sensing the slightest vibration to effect the plasma field in all directions. Those vibrations are converted into movements within the plasma that has condensed around the aperture. In effect turning into a speaker of the Universe vibrating.

 Now, this connection is bidirectional as well. Any input would be transmitted out to the Universe at the speed of the plasma. Communication on any frequency can be isolated and made unique as well. Communication to anything within the plasma field. The possibilities are endless.

 Now When I envision space as it is now there are pockets of pure plasma. Whole plasma that has not been agitated into an emulsified space plasma. The very same plasma that allows matter to exist. The divided plasma. Solid plasma acts like the divided plasma only that it spans huge areas of space. When it is solid transmissions jump to the other side without any resistance. Like a shortcut across space.

 On the subject of pure plasma, When plasma gets condense enough it will eventually condense back into it's solid form. As in the curious effect we call a black hole. I am guessing you can figure out how that could be bad right? As long as we do not allow the plasma to solidify then we are a,ok. We just have to remember to not pull so much vibration out of the plasma that it settles or condenses further to this point. I don't think we could do such a thing but for safety sake we should devise a way to get feedback of the plasma to observe it's density. It is worth knowing though.

 What Marko was focusing on was mapping the plasma torus. Knowing how the torus flows will dictate how you pull energy(Vibrations) from it due to proper angles of the fields.

 My design included the crisscross pattern which is where I and others went wrong. 007's discovery is that parallel shielding and emitter wires allow for excitation and self containment by induction of the plasma. Brilliant idea. So my form is right but the pattern of elements or wires is wrong. The crisscross method will not be sufficient to contain the plasma because it can not induce into the reflector shorted coils, which my version of the wrapping does not allow or the reflecting wires which are not included as well.

 I did some more research into the topic of the torus and this is what I got:

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toroidal_inductors_and_transformers#/media/File:Toroidal_Transformer_Poynting_Vector.jpg

 What you are seeing is the model of all matter. From the atom to planets to the Universe. It's a fractal.

 In the picture I showed you, you can apply the Rodin coil as I have shown you previously. With the crossing being at the compression point.


 Now think about the torus and apply that to this video...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuVgXJ55G6Y