Ok I did some digging on this and you only have half of the setup that Newman had...
Go back and check the WO8300963A1.pdf file and go to page 55. You have figure 5 but only the motor part. There is a second coil that stacks on the opposite end of the primary coil. This other coil is labeled 206 with load on it. You can put it besides the primary with loose coupling or what he termed longitudinally or stacked opposite of the magnet side as in the case of his patent machine.
The patent machine had two coils on one form with the magnet spinning on one end of one coil called the primary or motor coil or coil # 205. The secondary coil is the generator coil or load coil or coil # 206.
You have built coil 205 with the spinning magnet off to the side. You now need to put a second coil besides the coil you got and hook your load to that one or feed it back to the commutator to boost the speed or charge the bats from the load coil as far as I am reading it.
In essence this is the Tesla rotating transformer That I emailed you about. This is yet another version of that. In Tesla's version he used the 90 degree difference between the rotor and field coils to facilitate the rotating transformer part. If you checked or slowed the rotor coil it would bring the rotor and field coils out of sync and a huge current would be generated in the rotor coil as the fields of the field coils cut the rotor coil generating huge currents to try to bring it back into synchronous balance.
Look at the patent I will include here again from Tesla.
https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-390721-dynamo-electric-machine Now compare it to the Newman 1981 patent on page 55 diagram 5.
and start around page 29 or so to see the description as he understood it.
They are basically the very same thing. Although I am suspecting he didn't know to much about the process. He did try to explain it but his definition was flawed. Now that we know the magnetic field is always outside of the wire we can infer he was partially right that the atoms aligned and allowed a flow of magnetic plasma to form around the wire. More turn of wire=higher voltage=more plasma to condense around the wires.
Take some time and compare the two. Just hear me out on this. Look closely at the two patents and look at the fields and how they cut the coils in each one.
What is different is the idea of mass as a converter and not a source of energy. Newman's device didn't consume anything, hence e=mc2 is a pointless idea. A certain mass that is segmented more will develop a stronger magnetic field for less input. I think Newman was grasping to find answers to what he was seeing and couldn't explain it because of a lack of understanding of that point. After all it was Tesla who figured that out after replicating the Faraday generator. His improvements to the Faraday generator were due to the segmenting of the disk. But I digress..
Is it possible that a special form of bifilar coil was used not in serial mode but in partial parallel mode? Like your abha coil?
P.S. Don't get me wrong I am not bashing Newman at all but he himself admitted he was a country boy. Self taught with what was available to him. We now know a bunch more about the environment and new way to understand that environment. Plasma science has opened up new avenues and a better understanding of induction and how a capacitor can store it's charge between the plates in the dielectric. Something is there holding that charge and it is not current.