see the twins, it has been established this is the case. plus a re -occuring comet that skips the sun..
temple one heartly two. the twins. also known as, elinin, ison, sliding spring, enkie, and lemon. plus or minus.
now we wait till the sun goes black, and blots out the sun. a term used called the occult.
black sun, yellow sun.

as you see this is not a comet. on the right side with bow shock.
as i had said this confirmed , as you can now see the spark gap is triggered, massive magnetic filliment, and cme to follow great quake.
volcanic eruption, tidal surge, massive storms will now spawn. as earth follow the tourque. angular momentum change. emf..


discharged in small radius objects as described in ice age model. As demonstrated Walter Lewin MIt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhpTU2kN5Ew#
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQvmJjiM124#
present day, warming model, cause and effect chain, scientific method.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/natl/flash-avn.html Yes massive storms, wow i amamzed at how well cause and effect works with earth rotational energy, and atomospheric drag.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud7fHTswj5klet the record. show, bull sheet.
CrismaFire2 weeks ago
I hope once we clean out the trash in America's government, we arrest all Global Warming liars for fraud. They deserve at least 2 years behind bars. They keep pretending the World is fixing to be destroyed so they can profit. Man made Global Warming as they claim is a scientific impossibility. Thankfully most Americans aren't that STUPID to believe in that fairy tale.
johnmburt1960
1 week ago
+Jonathan Herman
And let's not forget, every OTHER study on variations in solar activity finds that it's not the cause of global warming.
Jonathan Herman
1 week ago
+johnmburt1960 Of course. There are always people who just won't/don't/can't agree with the mainstream accepted scientific theory.
Gregor J. Rothfuss via Google+2 weeks ago
never mind, this talk of global wobbling convinced me that global warming is a hoax.
+Joel Webber Very well said. You should run for congress
Joel Webber
2 weeks ago
Snowball's chance in hell
:)
Aki Minasian2 weeks ago
it's very FRIGHTENING to think such STUPID people are on the House Committee of Science
:(
John Titor
6 days ago
+dwolfcoach yes, you are obviously an intelligent individual... using retardican.... and no example or evidence to support your claims...
dwolfcoach
6 days ago
+John Titor Did you watch the video? Evidence served!
Cyrus Manz1 day ago (edited)
Obama's head of science explains "global wobbling"...
...in front of a science house committee hearing , explaining that human caused warming has offset the effects of an ice age which should be happening now !!!
I don't know about you, but I am finding it exceedingly disturbing that individuals with this kind of mindset hold key policy positions at the highest levels of this administration, not to mention that Mr. Holdren is also on the record for this famous quote;
to convince society and its leaders that there is no alternative but the cessation of our irresponsible, all-demanding, and all-consuming population growth.
This video of the hearing speaks loud and clear about what we are dealing with, (and I thought PERJURY was a crime but apparently I was wrong )
.
#climatechange #globalwarming
View all 3 replies
Mik Mok
1 day ago
If our CO2 emissions have ''offset the effects of an iceage that should be happening now'' then great ~ who in their right mind craves an iceage?
Jeeeez are they stupid?
Cyrus Manz
23 hours ago (edited)
+Greg Mee Once one starts believing that humans can effectively control the planet average temperatures, then of course sky becomes the limit(pun intended!) when it comes to imaginable possibilities of what this new power can do.
These alarmists should be celebrating their own manufactured findings not alarming each other's pants off about it.
randomflashbacks2 weeks ago
Yes it did take hundreds of thousands of years to end. It's a very simple answer to that question. He says it like it's gonna help him in the argument.
Jonathan Herman
2 weeks ago
Of course, it's not like one day it was 100 below on average and a decade later it was a comfortable 70. It took tens of thousands, hundred thousand years of OVERALL gradual increase in temperature. Sure, there were probably years during that hundred thousand years where it was even colder, or even hotter but overall the mean temperature was increasing. They just don't understand that sort of thing though. It's far too sophisticated a level of critical thinking for them. Resting somewhere between 4th and 5th grade.
Fiasco Linguini3 weeks ago
This ignorant slob takes two minutes to ask a 10 second question, then interrupts the scientist before he can finish answering. What a douche-bag!
Jonathan Herman
2 weeks ago
Doesn't even give him 10 seconds to answer his 2 minute question that could have took 10 seconds. It's all a show. He wanted the people watching and reading to think he made a good point that NO ONE had ever thought of and then proceeded to make sure you didn't hear the answer.
Chester Finecat3 weeks ago
Willfully ignorant person who is intimately familiar with the characteristics of ice meltiing in the whiskey glass and the party line.
mconnaghan3 weeks ago
The climate denialists get the answers. They just refuse to accept them.
View all 2 replies
LordLlurch
1 week ago
Oh, they do accept them. They just refuse to understand them.
Reply
Shyhalu3 weeks ago
stockman is a Flacking idiot.......
Sadly, most scientists today don't know that republicans do not understand timescales and big numbers, not even when its money.
Asking them to envision 100,000 years is like asking them to envision a color not on our color scale, they simply can't do it.
John Titor
6 days ago (edited)
+Shyhalu Yes, this is a single video, but you made a generalization, not an educated conclusion based on the video.
+Shyhalu You must be retarded. Hasn't anyone ever told you that generalizing is bad? The fact that your conclusion drawn from this video was the generalization of the entire party is proof enough of your idiocy. Additionally, you seem to struggle with the concept of a logical argument, so i will try to explain my point better. If you want to state a generic argument, that's fine, just don't state is as fact without evidence supporting it. Additionally, generalizing is a bad practice in general, and if you do use it, try to use it sparingly, or you could find yourself in trouble. Baseless assertions and generalizations like yours make you seem like a one-sided idiot with no concept of politics or logic. Again, i should point out i actually agree with your point, but the way you assert it makes you seem ignorant.
Read more
Replycmfluteguy3 weeks ago No wonder that fewer than 6% of American scientists are republicans.
Reply
12
Eric14492
2 weeks ago
I did not know that. Very interesting. 55% are Democrats, 52% are liberal and 14% are very liberal. Not that surprising, but it does show how mislead the rest of the country is.
These Representatives are not stupid. They are actually, for the most part, very intelligent. But they have an agenda to dispute and demean the data for solely economic reasons. Upton Sinclair once noted that It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his paycheck demands that he doesn't understand.
View all 3 repliesJonathan Herman
2 weeks agoI don't know. I'm of the opinion that they are overall, stupid as Flack. Dumb as a box of rocks. That they got to their position by simply playing the game right and being a little lucky. I'm not sure all of them don't believe the bullPoo they're spewing. I don't want to give them that much credit.
Jonathan Herman
2 weeks ago (edited)
+tibor warski They very well are probably bought on this subject as they are on most others. That doesn't mean they still aren't too ignorant to realize it's actually not the truth. You repeat something long enough, trying to convince others you end up convincing yourself and believing it.
Reply paulceltics6 days ago
GLOBAL WARMING YOU IDIOT! Desertphile3 weeks
Excellent.
Reply
Warren Lauzon2 weeks ago
Stockman is a total freaking idiot. It is really totally sad that such fools are on a tech committee. How does this anti-science idiot keep getting elected?
Reply
Kevin Bolger2 weeks ago (edited)
Poor man thought he had solved the Global Warming Conspiracy. I feel like someone set him up... Like whoever gave him that information and told him to run with that argument was probably smart enough to know that the President's lead Science Advisor would be able to give exactly that response.
Reply
·
5
Lynda Jones2 weeks ago
This man knows nothing other than the money in his bank account and where he puts his dick. What a sellout!
drNovikov2 weeks ago
"Think about it, if your ice cube melts in your glass, it doesn’t overflow" -- the ice is not in your glass, it is outside. What happens when snow melts in the mountains? The valley gets flooded!
Reply
·
Cheryl T3 weeks ago (edited)
Stockman thought he was holding an ace. Turns out that he was holding the "I'm another arrogant uniformed politician" ca19
TheLamelyNamed3 weeks ago (edited)
Hoo Haa!! Real scientist kung fu smackdown of really really REALLY dumb motherFlackers who shouldnt even be politicians.
Reply
Leesa Michaels3 weeks ago
Listening to an idiot pretending he has even the slightest grasp of Science spitting-up the crap that Stockman spits-up is like listening to a petulant 2 year old demanding he be listened to. The Ice melting in a Glass is the obvious indication of Stockman's non-grasp of science.
Stockman is a Flacking "Moran." I hate these willfully ignorant Oil Corporation Whore Flackers.
Reply
15
Jonathan Herman
2 weeks ago
"It's displacement. It doesn't over flow." No, it may not over fill, well unless you put a lot of ice into the cup... I mean, what a totally irrelevant comment designed to, at first glance, fool you. Think about it for two seconds and you see how totally moot the point he thought he was making is. HA. It's insane. Like dude, you're arguing with someone who surely knows more about his field of expertise than you do Mr. Congressman. You're grasping.
Thanks Matt for the acknowledgment on ice age model. watch the movie last post, do you have questions that need answering?
I make the case i put it out there and its swept under the rug. will i get credit for this no.
is it up to me to tell the world what places are safe and what places are not? no.
I will say Africa would be # 1 on my list, as we know Ebola is a Lie, so they just don't want you going there that's all.
Soon enough we may be trapped in the USA also.
I just want to make sure everyone here agrees on the accuracy of the model, and how prediction, and verification supports my cause and effect chain to a high degree of accuracy.. so thanks guys for the support. Its your Job To Tell The Wold..
O:-)