Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP

Gunther Rattay

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #150, on November 16th, 2012, 11:04 AM »Last edited on November 16th, 2012, 11:08 AM by bussi04
Quote from Amsy on November 16th, 2012, 09:11 AM
Quote from bussi04 on November 16th, 2012, 04:47 AM
Quote from Amsy on November 16th, 2012, 04:20 AM
Quote from adys15 on November 16th, 2012, 03:30 AM
Thouse hv bursts will end up 10v...even if you increase the impedance of the wfc.ohm's law bulshetU=I*R=10V from 20kv...where r=10M...bulPoo...
I can agree to this.
There is no chance to hit a low resistance like water with 20kV.
So on every secondary side of high voltage transfo the voltage will brake down, because it nearly a dead short circuit.
You can calculate which power would be necessary to reach 20kV on the water.
P=U²/R --> so you can replace the variable U with 20kV and R with a very tiny value, like 20 ohms or something for water because of the ions inside.
For comparison:
Air does have a large ohmic resistance. Replace the variable R with a very high value and you will see whats happening. The VIC has a hugh difference in function when ideling or like dead short with water.

But we have not only high pulses.
There is an Diode-L-CR-L Network which is been feeded with positive (diode) voltage pulses. So that the voltage can rise on the secondary, it is necessary that the resistance will go up. For example: Meyer did this by replacing the coils with stainless steel wire to get ~12kOhms /coil. Thats a good value. Depending which power is feeded in on the primary side, U secondary=sqrt(PxR).
So because of the large coils, the high frequency and the R inside the coils, the current is inhibited, thats a good basic to prevent electrolyses. But which Effect will this have on the C?
The C will be loaded with every puls. But how high is the ending voltage in the C. Does the C load to the value of the peaks? Or maybe lower because of the voltage dividing effect of the network?

Basically there is no magic behind producing high voltages out of a flyback or an Obit or something like this. It is always depending on the complete Z on the secondary side. When high enough you reach high voltage.
regards!
h2opower´s experiment shows that 10 isolated steel tubes in line in destilled water driven by a VIC of a primary, 1 secondary, 2 magnet wire coils, 2 steel wire coils can be stressed to 500 - 1000 V. that means 50 to 100 V over a single cell. And there is step charging.

water as a dielectric is a good isolator for at least 50 µs until dielectric breakdown. so imagine the pulsing core configuration as a charge pump being supplied by moderate RMS amps at the primary and supplying high peak amps phase shifted to voltage for a short time at vic output. or think about the vic being a damped LCL oscillator with specific magnetic flux (because of the steel wire) with primary pulse excitement.

it´s a dynamic system! as you can´t expect a car engine working fired by a sequence of matches (wrong timing and wrong adjustment) you cant´t expect Meyer´s WFC work beyond the limits of operational parameters. those are core, inductance, capacitance, resistance, length, distance, pressure, water quality, voltage and timing.
Because it is a dynamic system I think the PLL is not fast enough to balancing the changin effects in the WFC.
Also more than one water type should work...Stan said it worked with all types of water and when there are more contaminents (dirt,salt,...) in the water the frequency of the PLL was automatically rising.
I was thinking also on a charging pump application for the capacity of the WFC. Unfortunately the low resistance of water will always short out this capacity. So no load can be saved.
Do you have a source to the 50µs? This looks quite fast. So the step charging musst be finished after this period of time. The frequency of the short pulses musst be quite higher to gain voltage like in a charging pump.

Yeah thats right, but also for meyers circuits the laws of electrotechnical circuits operation are valid. Btw. do we know which high voltage is necessary to ionize or split water without amps.

Thanks, Amsy :)
Quote from adys15 on November 16th, 2012, 07:48 AM
Quote from bussi04 on November 16th, 2012, 04:47 AM
Quote from Amsy on November 16th, 2012, 04:20 AM
Quote from adys15 on November 16th, 2012, 03:30 AM
Thouse hv bursts will end up 10v...even if you increase the impedance of the wfc.ohm's law bulshetU=I*R=10V from 20kv...where r=10M...bulPoo...
I can agree to this.
There is no chance to hit a low resistance like water with 20kV.
So on every secondary side of high voltage transfo the voltage will brake down, because it nearly a dead short circuit.
You can calculate which power would be necessary to reach 20kV on the water.
P=U²/R --> so you can replace the variable U with 20kV and R with a very tiny value, like 20 ohms or something for water because of the ions inside.
For comparison:
Air does have a large ohmic resistance. Replace the variable R with a very high value and you will see whats happening. The VIC has a hugh difference in function when ideling or like dead short with water.

But we have not only high pulses.
There is an Diode-L-CR-L Network which is been feeded with positive (diode) voltage pulses. So that the voltage can rise on the secondary, it is necessary that the resistance will go up. For example: Meyer did this by replacing the coils with stainless steel wire to get ~12kOhms /coil. Thats a good value. Depending which power is feeded in on the primary side, U secondary=sqrt(PxR).
So because of the large coils, the high frequency and the R inside the coils, the current is inhibited, thats a good basic to prevent electrolyses. But which Effect will this have on the C?
The C will be loaded with every puls. But how high is the ending voltage in the C. Does the C load to the value of the peaks? Or maybe lower because of the voltage dividing effect of the network?

Basically there is no magic behind producing high voltages out of a flyback or an Obit or something like this. It is always depending on the complete Z on the secondary side. When high enough you reach high voltage.
regards!
h2opower´s experiment shows that 10 isolated steel tubes in line in destilled water driven by a VIC of a primary, 1 secondary, 2 magnet wire coils, 2 steel wire coils can be stressed to 500 - 1000 V. that means 50 to 100 V over a single cell. And there is step charging.

water as a dielectric is a good isolator for at least 50 µs until dielectric breakdown. so imagine the pulsing core configuration as a charge pump being supplied by moderate RMS amps at the primary and supplying high peak amps phase shifted to voltage for a short time at vic output. or think about the vic being a damped LCL oscillator with specific magnetic flux (because of the steel wire) with primary pulse excitement.

it´s a dynamic system! as you can´t expect a car engine working fired by a sequence of matches (wrong timing and wrong adjustment) you cant´t expect Meyer´s WFC work beyond the limits of operational parameters. those are core, inductance, capacitance, resistance, length, distance, pressure, water quality, voltage and timing.
I tried puting 2 wfc in series but the voltage droped even more...what a surprise!
Which voltage? voltage measured over one WFC? Or the overall voltage of the VIC?
There is another dynamics between the magnet wire chokes and the steel wire chokes and there is a capacitance involved due to the bifilar winding.

the appended excerpt from "High-Voltage electrical breakdown of water" shows different measurements for dielectric breakdown time. table 2-2 at page 7 shows 0.25 ms for plain water.




adys15

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #151, on November 16th, 2012, 11:20 AM »
Quote from bussi04 on November 16th, 2012, 11:04 AM
Quote from Amsy on November 16th, 2012, 09:11 AM
Quote from bussi04 on November 16th, 2012, 04:47 AM
Quote from Amsy on November 16th, 2012, 04:20 AM
Quote from adys15 on November 16th, 2012, 03:30 AM
Thouse hv bursts will end up 10v...even if you increase the impedance of the wfc.ohm's law bulshetU=I*R=10V from 20kv...where r=10M...bulPoo...
I can agree to this.
There is no chance to hit a low resistance like water with 20kV.
So on every secondary side of high voltage transfo the voltage will brake down, because it nearly a dead short circuit.
You can calculate which power would be necessary to reach 20kV on the water.
P=U²/R --> so you can replace the variable U with 20kV and R with a very tiny value, like 20 ohms or something for water because of the ions inside.
For comparison:
Air does have a large ohmic resistance. Replace the variable R with a very high value and you will see whats happening. The VIC has a hugh difference in function when ideling or like dead short with water.

But we have not only high pulses.
There is an Diode-L-CR-L Network which is been feeded with positive (diode) voltage pulses. So that the voltage can rise on the secondary, it is necessary that the resistance will go up. For example: Meyer did this by replacing the coils with stainless steel wire to get ~12kOhms /coil. Thats a good value. Depending which power is feeded in on the primary side, U secondary=sqrt(PxR).
So because of the large coils, the high frequency and the R inside the coils, the current is inhibited, thats a good basic to prevent electrolyses. But which Effect will this have on the C?
The C will be loaded with every puls. But how high is the ending voltage in the C. Does the C load to the value of the peaks? Or maybe lower because of the voltage dividing effect of the network?

Basically there is no magic behind producing high voltages out of a flyback or an Obit or something like this. It is always depending on the complete Z on the secondary side. When high enough you reach high voltage.
regards!
h2opower´s experiment shows that 10 isolated steel tubes in line in destilled water driven by a VIC of a primary, 1 secondary, 2 magnet wire coils, 2 steel wire coils can be stressed to 500 - 1000 V. that means 50 to 100 V over a single cell. And there is step charging.

water as a dielectric is a good isolator for at least 50 µs until dielectric breakdown. so imagine the pulsing core configuration as a charge pump being supplied by moderate RMS amps at the primary and supplying high peak amps phase shifted to voltage for a short time at vic output. or think about the vic being a damped LCL oscillator with specific magnetic flux (because of the steel wire) with primary pulse excitement.

it´s a dynamic system! as you can´t expect a car engine working fired by a sequence of matches (wrong timing and wrong adjustment) you cant´t expect Meyer´s WFC work beyond the limits of operational parameters. those are core, inductance, capacitance, resistance, length, distance, pressure, water quality, voltage and timing.
Because it is a dynamic system I think the PLL is not fast enough to balancing the changin effects in the WFC.
Also more than one water type should work...Stan said it worked with all types of water and when there are more contaminents (dirt,salt,...) in the water the frequency of the PLL was automatically rising.
I was thinking also on a charging pump application for the capacity of the WFC. Unfortunately the low resistance of water will always short out this capacity. So no load can be saved.
Do you have a source to the 50µs? This looks quite fast. So the step charging musst be finished after this period of time. The frequency of the short pulses musst be quite higher to gain voltage like in a charging pump.

Yeah thats right, but also for meyers circuits the laws of electrotechnical circuits operation are valid. Btw. do we know which high voltage is necessary to ionize or split water without amps.

Thanks, Amsy :)
Quote from adys15 on November 16th, 2012, 07:48 AM
Quote from bussi04 on November 16th, 2012, 04:47 AM
Quote from Amsy on November 16th, 2012, 04:20 AM
I can agree to this.
There is no chance to hit a low resistance like water with 20kV.
So on every secondary side of high voltage transfo the voltage will brake down, because it nearly a dead short circuit.
You can calculate which power would be necessary to reach 20kV on the water.
P=U²/R --> so you can replace the variable U with 20kV and R with a very tiny value, like 20 ohms or something for water because of the ions inside.
For comparison:
Air does have a large ohmic resistance. Replace the variable R with a very high value and you will see whats happening. The VIC has a hugh difference in function when ideling or like dead short with water.

But we have not only high pulses.
There is an Diode-L-CR-L Network which is been feeded with positive (diode) voltage pulses. So that the voltage can rise on the secondary, it is necessary that the resistance will go up. For example: Meyer did this by replacing the coils with stainless steel wire to get ~12kOhms /coil. Thats a good value. Depending which power is feeded in on the primary side, U secondary=sqrt(PxR).
So because of the large coils, the high frequency and the R inside the coils, the current is inhibited, thats a good basic to prevent electrolyses. But which Effect will this have on the C?
The C will be loaded with every puls. But how high is the ending voltage in the C. Does the C load to the value of the peaks? Or maybe lower because of the voltage dividing effect of the network?

Basically there is no magic behind producing high voltages out of a flyback or an Obit or something like this. It is always depending on the complete Z on the secondary side. When high enough you reach high voltage.
regards!
h2opower´s experiment shows that 10 isolated steel tubes in line in destilled water driven by a VIC of a primary, 1 secondary, 2 magnet wire coils, 2 steel wire coils can be stressed to 500 - 1000 V. that means 50 to 100 V over a single cell. And there is step charging.

water as a dielectric is a good isolator for at least 50 µs until dielectric breakdown. so imagine the pulsing core configuration as a charge pump being supplied by moderate RMS amps at the primary and supplying high peak amps phase shifted to voltage for a short time at vic output. or think about the vic being a damped LCL oscillator with specific magnetic flux (because of the steel wire) with primary pulse excitement.

it´s a dynamic system! as you can´t expect a car engine working fired by a sequence of matches (wrong timing and wrong adjustment) you cant´t expect Meyer´s WFC work beyond the limits of operational parameters. those are core, inductance, capacitance, resistance, length, distance, pressure, water quality, voltage and timing.
I tried puting 2 wfc in series but the voltage droped even more...what a surprise!
Which voltage? voltage measured over one WFC? Or the overall voltage of the VIC?
There is another dynamics between the magnet wire chokes and the steel wire chokes and there is a capacitance involved due to the bifilar winding.

the appended excerpt from "High-Voltage electrical breakdown of water" shows different measurements for dielectric breakdown time. table 2-2 at page 7 shows 0.25 ms for plain water.
i read that,not understand much.off topic who has/is willing to post theyr facebook name to comunicate much faster,or join russ fb group  http://www.facebook.com/groups/173731776018133/

Gunther Rattay

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #152, on November 20th, 2012, 01:10 AM »
Quote from Badger on November 13th, 2012, 10:19 AM
I was planning on going the route of the Arduino PulseGen, but now I'm reconsidering.  Bussi, that would be great if you could post some more info on the pulse generator you're using, I think I would like to give that a try.  Wish they would email me back... I'm not even sure if they will to ship to US or not.  Like you say, we need more experimenters posting data and results!
Badger,

here you are  

http://open-source-energy.org/?tid=469&pid=9806#pid9806

 ;-)

I have just finished my 2 very first videos at youtube. More to come ...

geenee

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #153, on November 21st, 2012, 03:23 PM »Last edited on November 22nd, 2012, 06:52 AM by geenee
i thought somethings.Stan said "20kv".this mean from coil.nothing from wfc. in wfc can't measure voltage.

maybe i am  wrong.maybe wfc's voltage will be very high.but something with pulse frequency,rms voltage is low.

*Stan never show direct wfc's voltage.but show input voltage or feedback voltage.

thanks
geenee

adys15

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #154, on November 23rd, 2012, 04:23 PM »
Quote from geenee on November 21st, 2012, 03:23 PM
i thought somethings.Stan said "20kv".this mean from coil.nothing from wfc. in wfc can't measure voltage.

maybe i am  wrong.maybe wfc's voltage will be very high.but something with pulse frequency,rms voltage is low.

*Stan never show direct wfc's voltage.but show input voltage or feedback voltage.

thanks
geenee
probably you read that.note:it has 600v diode....



adys15

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #157, on November 27th, 2012, 02:42 PM »
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 02:25 PM
Ok, my EE hopes to test some circuits today.
He will finish switch wiring on the cell.
Here are some photos of assembled cell.
Cheers,
JP
Wow,congratulations on your build J.P. that's the most beautifull wfc i have ever seen,and closest to Stan's demo.It's like it has reborn from rust:x
Hope to see good gas production like Stan's demo...
Thanks!B.r. Ady


MeyerandMe

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #159, on November 27th, 2012, 03:06 PM »
Quote from Lynx on November 27th, 2012, 02:56 PM
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 02:25 PM
Ok, my EE hopes to test some circuits today.
He will finish switch wiring on the cell.
Here are some photos of assembled cell.
Cheers,
JP
Wow, what's this?
Are you ready to have a go at it?
If it works, will the rest of us be able to...........replicate it? :D
Our circuit and coils will tell the tale.
We will be able to activate from 1 to 9 tube arrays.
Note I didn't make any "slots" to tune the individual tube sets. I don't think that is needed but time and testing will tell.
I hope to share everything exactly as we are doing if we have the results we want.
Here is a coil we will test.[attachment=2631]
I have all my cell build sketches and photos to put on a "How to Build" CD or a web page.
I have more than $2000 in the cell itself. Most of that is machine shop labor.
I will post results when I know more.

Cheers,
JP

Lynx

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #160, on November 27th, 2012, 03:10 PM »
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 03:06 PM
Quote from Lynx on November 27th, 2012, 02:56 PM
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 02:25 PM
Ok, my EE hopes to test some circuits today.
He will finish switch wiring on the cell.
Here are some photos of assembled cell.
Cheers,
JP
Wow, what's this?
Are you ready to have a go at it?
If it works, will the rest of us be able to...........replicate it? :D
Our circuit and coils will tell the tale.
We will be able to activate from 1 to 9 tube arrays.
Note I didn't make any "slots" to tune the individual tube sets. I don't think that is needed but time and testing will tell.
I hope to share everything exactly as we are doing if we have the results we want.
Here is a coil we will test.
I have all my cell build sketches and photos to put on a "How to Build" CD or a web page.
I have more than $2000 in the cell itself. Most of that is machine shop labor.
I will post results when I know more.

Cheers,
JP
Extreme awesomeness :D
Here's hoping for the best then!!!!

adys15

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #161, on November 27th, 2012, 03:13 PM »
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 03:06 PM
Quote from Lynx on November 27th, 2012, 02:56 PM
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 02:25 PM
Ok, my EE hopes to test some circuits today.
He will finish switch wiring on the cell.
Here are some photos of assembled cell.
Cheers,
JP
Wow, what's this?
Are you ready to have a go at it?
If it works, will the rest of us be able to...........replicate it? :D
Our circuit and coils will tell the tale.
We will be able to activate from 1 to 9 tube arrays.
Note I didn't make any "slots" to tune the individual tube sets. I don't think that is needed but time and testing will tell.
I hope to share everything exactly as we are doing if we have the results we want.
Here is a coil we will test.
I have all my cell build sketches and photos to put on a "How to Build" CD or a web page.
I have more than $2000 in the cell itself. Most of that is machine shop labor.
I will post results when I know more.

Cheers,
JP
Is that a VIC built on a toroid pulsed with a 556 and mosfet? i thought you use the SCR-/ bifiliar chokes method.Anyway good luck with your experiments!

MeyerandMe

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #162, on November 27th, 2012, 03:25 PM »
Quote from adys15 on November 27th, 2012, 03:13 PM
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 03:06 PM
Quote from Lynx on November 27th, 2012, 02:56 PM
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 02:25 PM
Ok, my EE hopes to test some circuits today.
He will finish switch wiring on the cell.
Here are some photos of assembled cell.
Cheers,
JP
Wow, what's this?
Are you ready to have a go at it?
If it works, will the rest of us be able to...........replicate it? :D
Our circuit and coils will tell the tale.
We will be able to activate from 1 to 9 tube arrays.
Note I didn't make any "slots" to tune the individual tube sets. I don't think that is needed but time and testing will tell.
I hope to share everything exactly as we are doing if we have the results we want.
Here is a coil we will test.
I have all my cell build sketches and photos to put on a "How to Build" CD or a web page.
I have more than $2000 in the cell itself. Most of that is machine shop labor.
I will post results when I know more.

Cheers,
JP
Is that a VIC built on a toroid pulsed with a 556 and mosfet? i thought you use the SCR-/ bifiliar chokes method.Anyway good luck with your experiments!
I'll have to let you know our ultimate set up.
We were using stansdream 8Xa but then switched.
Stan did things more than one way.
That toroid is pushing 10,000V.
The circuit is an Alex Petty design with some modifications.
My EE was testing this but I don't have the results.
He was looking at wave forms and other characteristics.
I am not sure exactly what he wants to see besides gas production with this set up.
We should know more about results soon.

Cheers,
JP

Jeff Nading

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #163, on November 27th, 2012, 03:29 PM »
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 03:06 PM
Quote from Lynx on November 27th, 2012, 02:56 PM
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 02:25 PM
Ok, my EE hopes to test some circuits today.
He will finish switch wiring on the cell.
Here are some photos of assembled cell.
Cheers,
JP
Wow, what's this?
Are you ready to have a go at it?
If it works, will the rest of us be able to...........replicate it? :D
Our circuit and coils will tell the tale.
We will be able to activate from 1 to 9 tube arrays.
Note I didn't make any "slots" to tune the individual tube sets. I don't think that is needed but time and testing will tell.
I hope to share everything exactly as we are doing if we have the results we want.
Here is a coil we will test.
I have all my cell build sketches and photos to put on a "How to Build" CD or a web page.
I have more than $2000 in the cell itself. Most of that is machine shop labor.
I will post results when I know more.

Cheers,
JP
Wow, Jp you are serious as a heart attach with a $2000.00 investment. :huh: I built an 11 cell, a little larger, when I was working a 40 hour week, cost $600.00, mainly in the SS steel tubing. Still have yet to finish it.:cool::D:P

adys15

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #164, on November 27th, 2012, 03:37 PM »
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 03:25 PM
Quote from adys15 on November 27th, 2012, 03:13 PM
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 03:06 PM
Quote from Lynx on November 27th, 2012, 02:56 PM
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 02:25 PM
Ok, my EE hopes to test some circuits today.
He will finish switch wiring on the cell.
Here are some photos of assembled cell.
Cheers,
JP
Wow, what's this?
Are you ready to have a go at it?
If it works, will the rest of us be able to...........replicate it? :D
Our circuit and coils will tell the tale.
We will be able to activate from 1 to 9 tube arrays.
Note I didn't make any "slots" to tune the individual tube sets. I don't think that is needed but time and testing will tell.
I hope to share everything exactly as we are doing if we have the results we want.
Here is a coil we will test.
I have all my cell build sketches and photos to put on a "How to Build" CD or a web page.
I have more than $2000 in the cell itself. Most of that is machine shop labor.
I will post results when I know more.

Cheers,
JP
Is that a VIC built on a toroid pulsed with a 556 and mosfet? i thought you use the SCR-/ bifiliar chokes method.Anyway good luck with your experiments!
I'll have to let you know our ultimate set up.
We were using stansdream 8Xa but then switched.
Stan did things more than one way.
That toroid is pushing 10,000V.
The circuit is an Alex Petty design with some modifications.
My EE was testing this but I don't have the results.
He was looking at wave forms and other characteristics.
I am not sure exactly what he wants to see besides gas production with this set up.
We should know more about results soon.

Cheers,
JP
verry cool,but you are using a very good toroid painstakingly wound,2000$ beautifull cell,and A.P. circuit that is verry ''poor'' sort to say...Whatever,if it works with your setup fine,but i testet it for  5 days and no sighn of resonance what so ever,i hate that circuit,it does noting that Stan said it should do..no square wave,no fine tuning the freq. with a pot. no nothing,just slaming some caps and hope for the best.......forged my revolt but i cant understand how he got thouse results with that simplee crkt....I am eager to hear if it worked or not:x


MeyerandMe

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #166, on November 27th, 2012, 04:09 PM »Last edited on November 27th, 2012, 04:18 PM by MeyerandMe
Quote from Jeff Nading on November 27th, 2012, 03:29 PM
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 03:06 PM
Quote from Lynx on November 27th, 2012, 02:56 PM
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 02:25 PM
Ok, my EE hopes to test some circuits today.
He will finish switch wiring on the cell.
Here are some photos of assembled cell.
Cheers,
JP
Wow, what's this?
Are you ready to have a go at it?
If it works, will the rest of us be able to...........replicate it? :D
Wow, Jp you are serious as a heart attach with a $2000.00 investment. :huh: I built an 11 cell, a little larger, when I was working a 40 hour week, cost $600.00, mainly in the SS steel tubing. Still have yet to finish it.:cool::D:P
Well, I might have been able to do it for a bit less but I doubt it.
I was getting a good deal on machining.
I might have been able to use less expensive SS tubes.
As I stated from the beginning, I wanted to duplicate Stan's original cell as close as possible so....
Here is most of the costs.
Remember, I got my first 8xA from stansdream.com for free and my EE put together the Petty circuit which cost me nothing except for diodes.

$7.32   12v5a Transformer Radio Shack
$56.00   Variac Ebay
$11.79   18g wire
$3.90   bolt tool for coil winding
$55.51   Stainless nuts-bolts
$44.61   9 switchs
$150.   labor Machining
$50.   SS strips for exciters
$137.   SS Tubes
$305.86   Plastic tube, top/bottom, base
$15.82   Taps for gap screws
$16.5   E cores
$10.   SSteel for exciter plate
$500.   Cap Labor Machining
$200.   2 plates Labor Machining
$15.   1 ft Aluminum channel switch plate
$25.05   plug/wire, wire ends, rubber feet
$120   labor Machining Base-bottom plug
$50.   Labor Machining
$5.99   Pressure gage
$20.   Labor Machining
$3.54   plumbing pipe
$33.28   Pipe/valve
$20.   Exciter Plug labor Machining
$5.   Exciter plate labor
$19.16   diodes
------------------
$1881.33  Total

The Labor total is $1,065 by itself.

I thought it was over $2,000 total so I guess I was adding the cost of an 8xA from stansdream.
My EE is not charging me to help as he has a good reason to see it work and he has gotten a ton of information from me to get up to speed on Meyer's work and methods.
Anyways, after 26 years, this money, thousands of other dollars, and years of talking, explaining, researching, and waiting I might have a successful cell.

Cheers,
JP
Quote from adys15 on November 27th, 2012, 03:37 PM
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 03:25 PM
Quote from adys15 on November 27th, 2012, 03:13 PM
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 03:06 PM
Quote from Lynx on November 27th, 2012, 02:56 PM
Wow, what's this?
Are you ready to have a go at it?
If it works, will the rest of us be able to...........replicate it? :D
Our circuit and coils will tell the tale.
We will be able to activate from 1 to 9 tube arrays.
Note I didn't make any "slots" to tune the individual tube sets. I don't think that is needed but time and testing will tell.
I hope to share everything exactly as we are doing if we have the results we want.
Here is a coil we will test.
I have all my cell build sketches and photos to put on a "How to Build" CD or a web page.
I have more than $2000 in the cell itself. Most of that is machine shop labor.
I will post results when I know more.

Cheers,
JP
Is that a VIC built on a toroid pulsed with a 556 and mosfet? i thought you use the SCR-/ bifiliar chokes method.Anyway good luck with your experiments!
I'll have to let you know our ultimate set up.
We were using stansdream 8Xa but then switched.
Stan did things more than one way.
That toroid is pushing 10,000V.
The circuit is an Alex Petty design with some modifications.
My EE was testing this but I don't have the results.
He was looking at wave forms and other characteristics.
I am not sure exactly what he wants to see besides gas production with this set up.
We should know more about results soon.

Cheers,
JP
verry cool,but you are using a very good toroid painstakingly wound,2000$ beautifull cell,and A.P. circuit that is verry ''poor'' sort to say...Whatever,if it works with your setup fine,but i testet it for  5 days and no sighn of resonance what so ever,i hate that circuit,it does noting that Stan said it should do..no square wave,no fine tuning the freq. with a pot. no nothing,just slaming some caps and hope for the best.......forged my revolt but i cant understand how he got thouse results with that simplee crkt....I am eager to hear if it worked or not:x
I understand your frustration.
I have been reading everyone's posts closely about these other circuits.
I have yet to see anyone's data of successful circuits to follow other than "produced gas" or some wave forms. No one says "this exact circuit" works and "here is my data."
I try to keep my EE focused and he has read all my materials from Stan but like everyone he gets ideas of how to set up a circuit.
He said he modified the Petty circuit but I don't know what he did different.
He says he spends all his time thinking about the designs so we will see the results of all the lost sleep soon.

Cheers,
JP


gpssonar

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #168, on November 27th, 2012, 05:27 PM »
That is a great looking piece of work. As far as the slots for tunning, those slot are there not realy for tunning, they are cut to match the surface area of the inner tube.  Alot of people think they are there for sound or ringing. Each choke has to have the same Cap. and Res. when hook to the cell, in order for it to be the same you have to match the surface area of the inner and outer tubes.

Hope this helps everyone,
gpssonar

epgsetusfree

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #169, on November 27th, 2012, 06:51 PM »
Quote from MeyerandMe on November 27th, 2012, 02:25 PM
Ok, my EE hopes to test some circuits today.
He will finish switch wiring on the cell.
Here are some photos of assembled cell.
Cheers,
JP
The workmanship is superb. The use of adjustable nylon/teflon bolts would allow for
x-y translation of the inner stainless tube to shake bubbles loose. I can tell that great
care has gone into the machining of the bottom perspex tube cap. An excellent build.


MeyerandMe

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #171, on November 27th, 2012, 08:55 PM »Last edited on November 27th, 2012, 09:02 PM by MeyerandMe
Quote from gpssonar on November 27th, 2012, 05:27 PM
That is a great looking piece of work. As far as the slots for tunning, those slot are there not realy for tunning, they are cut to match the surface area of the inner tube.  Alot of people think they are there for sound or ringing. Each choke has to have the same Cap. and Res. when hook to the cell, in order for it to be the same you have to match the surface area of the inner and outer tubes.

Hope this helps everyone,
gpssonar
Ok, let's answer that with numbers.
We can calculate the inner and outer surface areas here:
http://www.onlineconversion.com/object_surfacearea_tube.htm

My tube dimensions are .5 in inner tube O.D. and .625 in. outer tube I.D for matching surfaces.
The tube's matching surface areas are about 17.5 inches.
The actual length is 18 inches.

The small tube r is .1875.
The small tube R is .250
Length 18
That Small tube OD surface area is 28.27 sq/in.

My large tube OD is .75 in.
The large tube ID is .625 in.
For the calculator the small r is .3125
The large R is .375.
Length 18 in.
The Large tube inner surface area is 35.34 sq/in.

So  35.34 - 28.27 = 7.07 sq/in. is the difference

Does it look like there is 7.07 sq/in removed from Stan's outer tubes?
Also we don't know how long Stan's tubes were exactly.
I do think Stan had .5 and .625 in matching surfaces.

There are 18 slots.
Each slot is let's say a generous, 1.5 inches by .1875.
1.5 times .1875 = .280 sq/in.
.280 times 18 = 5.04 sq.in.

7.07 - generous 5.04 = 2.03 sq/in difference in matching surface area.
The calculation seems too far off.

Meyer's slots may only be 1.25 long and .100 wide.
[attachment=2634]
This yields.
1.25 times .100 = .125 sq/in. times 18 = 2.25 sq/in.
7.07 - 2.25 = 4.82
That leaves quite a bit to remove to match surfaces.

Somebody check my math.

It doesn't look good to me that the matching surface area is an issue at this point.

If we did this for total surface area rather than matching surfaces this would be an even larger difference so...

If and when, or not,  we get some serious gas we can balance 1 set tube this way and see if it improves output. I don't think it's needed. Stan never said anything about it to me but that doesn't mean it won't help. I think it is more about the shape of the electrical fields between whatever surfaces you are using. I can maybe make a test with one tube much longer than another when we have gases.

Cheers,
JP



Amsy

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #173, on November 28th, 2012, 01:41 AM »
Hy JP,

very impressive cell! :) Great work!

So, when you will finish the transformer, can you explain some details?
Specially the secondary overall resistance including all chokes and electrical impendance.


MeyerandMe

RE: Meyer Demo Cell Replication for University Testing by JP
« Reply #174, on November 28th, 2012, 12:26 PM »
Quote from Amsy on November 28th, 2012, 01:41 AM
Hy JP,

very impressive cell! :) Great work!

So, when you will finish the transformer, can you explain some details?
Specially the secondary overall resistance including all chokes and electrical impendance.
Frankly, I think we will have to figure out and use an alternator set up to get this array working to Stan's level.
I don't think we can make a big enough coil to get his gas production without the alternator. The Pulse Frequency Generator black box in the Estate photos has no coil inside. [attachment=2638][attachment=2639][attachment=2640][attachment=2641][attachment=2643][attachment=2643][attachment=2645][attachment=2646]
There really isn't any other circuits or boards in the black box or elsewhere that I can see.
I'll share what makes sense and works or share what fails as best I can.
I am trusting my EE to make some good notes.

Cheers,
JP