Hy JP!Did you manage to get Alex's circuit to work?i tested diffrent caps and variations of wfc,coils,diodes..bateries...nothing worked,the voltage staid low,and the signals looked the same as input....
Be aware that the only way you can replicate alex's setup is by preventing leakage. Alex did this by not submerging his tube completely in water but by only placing water between the inner and outer tube so the outside of the outer tube has contact with the air only. If there is any leakage at all it will not work.
He showes in one of his vides the cell submerged in water,i tried it all believe me almost a week of testing and nothing.my test tube has water just in between ,to make it easy to understand it has a upsidedown bottle treaded on the inside of the outer tube and it is isolated by air....tried with smaler tube submered and not completely submerged..and the results wore the same...the signal looks just like the input.The only thing i haven't tried is distiled water...Cheers!!!
Ok, if it doesn´t seem to work there is a single way to proceed here at the forum ...
Alex has to redo the experiment and show that it works. scientific method is based on replication. so an experiment must be confirmed by replication.
Alex starting this research path should jump in and support until replication is done by a second source. the setting seems to be that simple that redoing the experiment should be no problem at all.
somewhere else here at the forum people think about receiving the Keshe reactor technology information to RWG research or to make some here at the forum a US representative for that technology.
Wow!
to be serious we must implement professional interaction and cooperation to get any kind of project successfully done here. it´s not donation but technical and scientific competence that creates results. there are no technical products and processes done without exact calculation.
so where are the calculation an simulation threads?
few of us here seem to have scientific background so there is an increased demand for personal support. let´s make this playground a laboratory and interested experimentators a competence team.
that will make the move from a team with a dream to a real dream team
:-)any idea?
yes, I use the windows frontend type and I also use the lcd display version. the lcd version has 2 rotary encoders for parameter input and operation control.
I will post a detailled description of the pulse generator here at the end of the week with some photos and maybe a youtube video.
Another user I know for the circuit is my research partner h2opower, a former member of this forum. he has used the harmonic search function for his VICs and WFCs to raise voltage up to more than 1000 V.
Observing an oscilloscope showing the voltage over the cell shows frequency dependent voltage dynamics. i.e. those step charging dynamics evolve in the minute range once the right frequency is found. finding the right frequency is comfortable because you can change frequency in user defined steps. i.e. frequency change step 0.5 hz or frequency change step 223 hz as you demand.
you also have exact frequency and duty control and all values have real time display. a built in isolated system bus prepares for complex motor system control i.e. CAN-bus.
This unit you speak of seems to be far more accurate than my Arduino PulseGen setup I am using. Are you able to tell yet if having this highly accurate resolution is key to finding resonant frequencies? I mean does 0.5Hz in a 47.000KHz range make a noticeable difference? I ask because it seems apparent to me I may well be stepping right over key frequencies without knowing it.
Years ago I built an engine management system for a race car when crank trigger circuits were just become the established norm. In order to have the precision necessary, I ended up building a custom PLD PWM that was clocked by a 10MHz source with 24-bit accuracy giving me the ability to precisely manage injection and spark within tenths of degrees of crank rotation at 10,000+ RPM. It made all the difference in the world on the track.
the resonance effect and the step charging effect are unstable conditions. that means that there are many frequency and mark/space conditions that show no relevant effect on gas production or stay cool condition.
but there are some special pulsing frequency conditions in the VIC where Meyer effects raise. to search for them it´s no perfect choice to use a 555 timer and a 10 kOhm potentiometer where any single 1/2 mm change will result in a frequency change in the hundreds of hz at higher frequencies or in the miliseconds of space. at least you need to zoom the scales.
compare the resonance and step charging condition to an unstable dynamic process balancing a robot as shown at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yn88BwA2YtI. there is no way to balance the robot by prodding by hand. in our case hands stands for a simple pot.
there is only a small parameter slot for proper operation at VIC/WFC and that is exactly what the pulse generator from
www.source-for-informations.com serves for research support. once the operation conditions are found the same configuration can be reprogrammed for end product style operation.
Innovationsshop are using the same propeller processor as in the video with it´s extraordinary real time processing capacity.