Theory, my chalk board.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #150, on March 15th, 2015, 05:52 PM »Last edited on March 15th, 2015, 06:13 PM
Quote from Matt Watts on March 15th, 2015, 04:28 PM
Care to do a real world demonstration?  You don't have to part the red sea, maybe just a swimming pool for starters.

Or should we just put your name in bright lights and call it good?
maggnetflipper already shewed the most important part.
therefore u also can make your own swimming pool, and use pi to solve for 16, and contain that in a tetra, like the image above Russ can print one, i suggest  at least a foot from point to point many more if u want to use earth as part of your recovered energy....


3d print with insulating dielectric, add the contacts at points later...

that's step one.,
cheers..




one such devise can be made to produce rotation with magnets, like i have done as a child :heart:. and is identical to the image here.
but mine had a MIND OF ITS OWM. O:-)

simple..

pss due it in two parts to allow the open and close. a another way i can us air for a test run. i can add venture tubes, many advancements follow.,. its all u to create.


to use the best ideas, and see the earth fly like a jet with radial waves as thrust. enough to move a planet... spherical radial, as if the planet had many jets.. course changes may be made by capping a jet..   . hundreds of presentations. iou...


tornatic radial waves due to  propagation.  very easy to focus now this energy.. party time...

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #151, on March 15th, 2015, 06:19 PM »Last edited on March 15th, 2015, 06:24 PM
Quote from freethisone on March 15th, 2015, 05:52 PM
maggnetflipper already shewed the most important part.
therefore u also can make your own swimming pool, and use pi to solve for 16, and contain that in a tetra, like the image above Russ can print one, i suggest  at least a foot from point to point many more if u want to use earth as part of your recovered energy....


3d print with insulating dielectric, add the contacts at points later...

that's step one.,
cheers..




one such devise can be made to produce rotation with magnets, like i have done as a child :heart:. and is identical to the image here.
but mine had a MIND OF ITS OWM. O:-)

simple..

pss due it in two parts to allow the open and close. a another way i can us air for a test run. i can add venture tubes, many advancements follow.,. its all u to create.


to use the best ideas, and see the earth fly like a jet with radial waves as thrust. enough to move a planet... spherical radial, as if the planet had many jets.. course changes may be made by capping a jet..   . hundreds of presentations. iou...


tornatic radial waves due to  propagation.  very easy to focus now this energy.. party time...
NOW DECADES  LATER I SAY I CAN PROVE IT. U WILL FIRST NEED A BOX,, LOL


BUT NOW U WILL BAND THE AXIS OF THAR SPINNING TOP WITH NEO MAGNETS OF THE CORRECT PROPORTIONS.

THIS IS MY PERPETUAL MOTION DEVICE I HAVE INVENTED. ALL PROCESSED TO BE SHARED AMONG THE PEOPLE..

THE BAND IS RELATIVE TO THE AXIS, AND IF U NEED TO SEE IT IMAGINE THE BAND FORMS AN EQUATOR,,,

there is no parting of the sea,only what i have already done as a child, and theorize that this is the case.

if u do it. and prove the theory of what i have discovered decades ago. you and anyone can share in my  victories...

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #152, on March 15th, 2015, 06:34 PM »
Quote from freethisone on March 15th, 2015, 06:19 PM
NOW DECADES  LATER I SAY I CAN PROVE IT. U WILL FIRST NEED A BOX,, LOL


BUT NOW U WILL BAND THE AXIS OF THAR SPINNING TOP WITH NEO MAGNETS OF THE CORRECT PROPORTIONS.

THIS IS MY PERPETUAL MOTION DEVICE I HAVE INVENTED. ALL PROCESSED TO BE SHARED AMONG THE PEOPLE..

THE BAND IS RELATIVE TO THE AXIS, AND IF U NEED TO SEE IT IMAGINE THE BAND FORMS AN EQUATOR,,,

there is no parting of the sea,only what i have already done as a child, and theorize that this is the case.

if u do it. and prove the theory of what i have discovered decades ago. you and anyone can share in my  victories...

[/quote


I now give you the table. i give you the energy is flat notion. did i say earth is flat notion?


this is how my devise will operate, perhaps exactly as the earth and will completely stop at some point in the future..

tides would be more frequent, the moon all out of whack. looking more and more like the parting of the sea...

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #153, on March 15th, 2015, 06:37 PM »Last edited on March 15th, 2015, 06:46 PM
Quote from freethisone on March 15th, 2015, 06:34 PM
Quote from freethisone on March 15th, 2015, 06:19 PM
NOW DECADES  LATER I SAY I CAN PROVE IT. U WILL FIRST NEED A BOX,, LOL


BUT NOW U WILL BAND THE AXIS OF THAR SPINNING TOP WITH NEO MAGNETS OF THE CORRECT PROPORTIONS.

THIS IS MY PERPETUAL MOTION DEVICE I HAVE INVENTED. ALL PROCESSED TO BE SHARED AMONG THE PEOPLE..

THE BAND IS RELATIVE TO THE AXIS, AND IF U NEED TO SEE IT IMAGINE THE BAND FORMS AN EQUATOR,,,

there is no parting of the sea,only what i have already done as a child, and theorize that this is the case.

if u do it. and prove the theory of what i have discovered decades ago. you and anyone can share in my  victories...[/quote


I now give you the table. i give you the energy is flat notion. did i say earth is flat notion?


this is how my devise will operate, perhaps exactly as the earth and will completely stop at some point in the future..

tides would be more frequent, the moon all out of whack. looking more and more like the parting of the sea...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ug2bKCG4gZY#


this is the operation of my device, and so must be the earths..

and now i say the mirror reflection in cold pace would cause the object rather then stop. to be torqued by external forces  flipping it over like a  pancake.

measured as a distance from the table,or mirror of our imaginary plane in space. if supposed to be the table of our reflection.
(  riddles, funny thing about riddles...) over with a force that reflects that was applied. starting it all over again, at a slower beat rate then before..

AS U SEE SIMPLE DEDUCTION COULD PROVE A CAUSE FOR TIME SLOWING OR SPEEDING UP..

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #154, on March 15th, 2015, 07:03 PM »
Quote from freethisone on March 14th, 2015, 11:35 AM
Mystery of the pyramids solved, by me freethisone..

what new wonder do u present.


the center of mass could be said to be twice as tall all the great pyramid.


do we need a pyramid at the 4 corners region of earth?

reference ford, reference magnet flipper. and vinny stvincent on youtube.
reference Jon for spinning magnets.

more importantly i have given credit to some of my sources.



the pyramid contains a vortex of magnetic current, the flux lines i report are exactly that of a tornado,

the pyramid top reflects the energy. ps i solved the mirror riddle..

in a mirror form to create the tetra gram , or  merk a ball.


its its there were the two energy's focus point just like russ did with hit little metal  he melted. for magnetizing magnets...see russ vid for detailed.


theory is everything, and just because u dont give credit does not mean they are all considered  original ideas.


what new wonder do u have?






http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/delphicoracle/g/DelphicOracle.htm
WATCH

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #155, on March 15th, 2015, 07:05 PM »Last edited on March 15th, 2015, 07:15 PM
Quote from freethisone on March 15th, 2015, 05:52 PM
maggnetflipper already shewed the most important part.
therefore u also can make your own swimming pool, and use pi to solve for 16, and contain that in a tetra, like the image above Russ can print one, i suggest  at least a foot from point to point many more if u want to use earth as part of your recovered energy....


3d print with insulating dielectric, add the contacts at points later...

that's step one.,
cheers..




one such devise can be made to produce rotation with magnets, like i have done as a child :heart:. and is identical to the image here.
but mine had a MIND OF ITS OWM. O:-)

simple..

pss due it in two parts to allow the open and close. a another way i can us air for a test run. i can add venture tubes, many advancements follow.,. its all u to create.


to use the best ideas, and see the earth fly like a jet with radial waves as thrust. enough to move a planet... spherical radial, as if the planet had many jets.. course changes may be made by capping a jet..   . hundreds of presentations. iou...


tornatic radial waves due to  propagation.  very easy to focus now this energy.. party time...
fasten the axis of the handle at the angle precede on a metal plate, now spin not in the center, about 30 degrees. from its center of axis..

spin the plate.

everything u need to make my devise i place before u.   the picture of the old ball in chain should be used . every aspect u see.


now i say its angle is of the letter A  and i may place the axis and fasten it to the spinning table..

first experiments by you or anyone  will merit me as the inventor, and the first  to prove it, and work with me as co founder.
.. O:-) O:-)

i am the only one knows how to orientate the second magnet.. or to clarify what magnetic orientation needs to be achieved..  a small secret a good scientist could overcome..  because it was my invention.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #156, on March 15th, 2015, 07:33 PM »Last edited on March 15th, 2015, 07:56 PM
Quote from freethisone on March 15th, 2015, 07:05 PM
fasten the axis of the handle at the angle precede on a metal plate, now spin not in the center, about 30 degrees. from its center of axis..

spin the plate.

everything u need to make my devise i place before u.   the picture of the old ball in chain should be used . every aspect u see.


now i say its angle is of the letter A  and i may place the axis and fasten it to the spinning table..

first experiments by you or anyone  will merit me as the inventor, and the first  to prove it, and work with me as co founder.
.. O:-) O:-)

i am the only one knows how to orientate the second magnet.. or to clarify what magnetic orientation needs to be achieved..  a small secret a good scientist could overcome..  because it was my invention.
in order to get the desired effect y mus affix the ball in a cup, and so the Angle can very up to a certain degree,, about 30 degrees 45 degrees.  so the axis is a ball in its yoke on the plate that spins offset slightly to the center of the plate that must, and must never have its angel past 45 to 60 degrees of the spinning plate. 

 be of the right proportions, and magnetic fields of specific orientation provided. and i have done this in the past. and still i did not provide every aspect and its function.

it is the solar system model, as i have imagined when i did the experiment myself..


this enough of a small wonder for you Matt?

 hey thanks for the riddles..

i included this image and some finger paints to get you interested.

obviously anyone who can do a better drawing, or make a 3d model will get credit for helping me.


definitely a vector quantity..


this now i use formula and have solved for the operation of the eD lee flywheel..

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #157, on March 15th, 2015, 08:07 PM »Last edited on March 15th, 2015, 08:13 PM
there is other ways  i can  do this in reverse order. i can make the axis fixed, or add secondary angle to pivot points, i have have axis of wooden arm perpendicular to table and so on..

in theory the axis still may be completely vertical, but very tall.. if the ball lean from left or right u will have earths center of mass..

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #158, on March 15th, 2015, 08:16 PM »
Quote from freethisone on March 15th, 2015, 07:33 PM
in order to get the desired effect y mus affix the ball in a cup, and so the Angle can very up to a certain degree,, about 30 degrees 45 degrees.  so the axis is a ball in its yoke on the plate that spins offset slightly to the center of the plate that must, and must never have its angel past 45 to 60 degrees of the spinning plate. 

 be of the right proportions, and magnetic fields of specific orientation provided. and i have done this in the past. and still i did not provide every aspect and its function.

it is the solar system model, as i have imagined when i did the experiment myself..


this enough of a small wonder for you Matt?

 hey thanks for the riddles..

i included this image and some finger paints to get you interested.

obviously anyone who can do a better drawing, or make a 3d model will get credit for helping me.


definitely a vector quantity..


this now i use formula and have solved for the operation of the eD lee flywheel..
just to refresh your memory of a string with 2 tensions, and its vector quantity.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDkuHX4BraU#ws

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #159, on March 15th, 2015, 08:27 PM »
now i say due to the 2 tension again at , and the one at the end of the rope. measured there  the effectual is 0 again.

 science itself predicts this to be true.

James clerk Maxwell a problem in dynamics..

we are dealing with more than just 2 tensions. we include a 3rd and so on...

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #160, on March 15th, 2015, 08:27 PM »
Quote from freethisone on March 15th, 2015, 08:27 PM
now i say due to the 2 tension again at , and the one at the end of the rope. measured there  the effectual is 0 again.

 science itself predicts this to be true.

James clerk Maxwell a problem in dynamics..

we are dealing with more than just 2 tensions. we include a 3rd and so on...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWHJqQY5Nfw

what new wonder do you present. thank you have a great day..


freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #162, on March 15th, 2015, 09:40 PM »
i can now make a prediction to the simple spinning of a record, i hold the top in my hand tilt the wheel until upside down, the record will stand still, until the torque  has left the system. therefore i can prove it, and you can too..
 angular momentum of a spinning rpm record... flipped  upside down, or a basket ball trick to show it....

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #163, on March 15th, 2015, 09:46 PM »
Precession
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Precession (disambiguation).
Precession of a gyroscope

Precession is a change in the orientation of the rotational axis of a rotating body. In an appropriate reference frame it can be defined as a change in the first Euler angle, whereas the third Euler angle defines the rotation itself. In other words, the axis of rotation of a precessing body itself rotates around another axis. A motion in which the second Euler angle changes is called nutation. In physics, there are two types of precession: torque-free and torque-induced.

In astronomy, "precession" refers to any of several slow changes in an astronomical body's rotational or orbital parameters, and especially to Earth's precession of the equinoxes. See Astronomy section (below).

Contents

    1 Torque-free
    2 Torque-induced
        2.1 Classical (Newtonian)
        2.2 Relativistic
    3 Astronomy
        3.1 Axial precession (precession of the equinoxes)
        3.2 Perihelion precession
    4 See also
    5 References
    6 External links

Torque-free

In torque-free precession, the angular momentum remains fixed, but the angular velocity vector changes. What makes this possible is a time-varying moment of inertia, or more precisely, a time-varying inertia matrix. The inertia matrix is composed of moments of inertia calculated with respect to separate coordinate axes (e.g. x, y, z), or basis sets. If an object is asymmetric around its principal axis of rotation, the moment of inertia with respect to each basis will change with time, while preserving angular momentum. The result is that the component angular velocities around each axis will vary inversely to each axis' moment of inertia. Poinsot's ellipsoid is a geometrical analog of the functions that govern torque-free motion of a rotating rigid body.

The torque-free precession rate of an object with an axis of symmetry, such as a disk, spinning about an axis not aligned with that axis of symmetry can be calculated as follows:

    \boldsymbol\omega_p = \frac{\boldsymbol I_s \boldsymbol\omega_s } {\boldsymbol I_p \cos(\boldsymbol \alpha)}[1]

where \scriptstyle \boldsymbol\omega_p is the precession rate, \scriptstyle \boldsymbol\omega_s is the spin rate about the axis of symmetry, \scriptstyle \boldsymbol I_s is the moment of inertia about the axis of symmetry, \scriptstyle \boldsymbol I_p is moment of inertia about either of the other two equal perpendicular principal axes, and \boldsymbol \alpha is the angle between the moment of inertia direction and the symmetry axis.[2]

When an object is not perfectly solid, internal vortices will tend to damp torque-free precession, and the rotation axis will align itself with one of the inertia axes of the body.

For a generic solid object without any axis of symmetry, the evolution of the object's orientation, represented (for example) by a rotation matrix \scriptstyle \boldsymbol R that transforms internal to external coordinates, may be numerically simulated. Given the object's fixed internal moment of inertia tensor \scriptstyle \boldsymbol I_0 and fixed external angular momentum \scriptstyle \boldsymbol L, the instantaneous angular velocity is \scriptstyle \boldsymbol\omega(\boldsymbol R) \;=\; \boldsymbol R \boldsymbol I_0^{-1} \boldsymbol R ^T \boldsymbol L. Precession occurs by repeatedly recalculating \boldsymbol \omega and applying a small rotation vector \scriptstyle \boldsymbol \omega dt for the short time \scriptstyle dt; e.g., \scriptstyle \boldsymbol R_\text{new} \;=\; \exp([\boldsymbol\omega(\boldsymbol R_\text{old})]_{\times} dt) \boldsymbol R_\text{old} for the skew-symmetric matrix \scriptstyle [\boldsymbol\omega]_{\times}. The errors induced by finite time steps tend to increase the rotational kinetic energy, \scriptstyle E(\boldsymbol R) \;=\; \boldsymbol \omega(\boldsymbol R) \cdot \boldsymbol L / 2; this unphysical tendency can be counter-acted by repeatedly applying a small rotation vector \scriptstyle \boldsymbol v perpendicular to both \scriptstyle \boldsymbol \omega and \scriptstyle \boldsymbol L, noting that \scriptstyle E(\exp([\boldsymbol v]_{\times}) \boldsymbol R) \;\approx\; E(\boldsymbol R) \,+\, (\boldsymbol \omega(\boldsymbol R) \,\times\, \boldsymbol L) \cdot \boldsymbol v.

Another type of torque-free precession can occur when there are multiple reference frames at work. For example, Earth is subject to local torque induced precession due to the gravity of the sun and moon acting on Earth's axis, but at the same time the solar system is moving around the galactic center. As a consequence, an accurate measurement of Earth's axial reorientation relative to objects outside the frame of the moving galaxy (such as distant quasars commonly used as precession measurement reference points) must account for a minor amount of non-local torque-free precession, due to the solar system’s motion.
Torque-induced

Torque-induced precession (gyroscopic precession) is the phenomenon in which the axis of a spinning object (e.g.,a gyroscope) describes a cone in space when an external torque is applied to it. The phenomenon is commonly seen in a spinning toy top, but all rotating objects can undergo precession. If the speed of the rotation and the magnitude of the external torque are constant, the spin axis will move at right angles to the direction that would intuitively result from the external torque. In the case of a toy top, its weight is acting downwards from its centre of mass and the normal force (reaction) of the ground is pushing up on it at the point of contact with the support. These two opposite forces produce a torque which causes the top to precess.
The response of a rotating system to an applied torque. When the device swivels, and some roll is added, the wheel tends to pitch.

The device depicted on the right is gimbal mounted. From inside to outside there are three axes of rotation: the hub of the wheel, the gimbal axis, and the vertical pivot.

To distinguish between the two horizontal axes, rotation around the wheel hub will be called spinning, and rotation around the gimbal axis will be called pitching. Rotation around the vertical pivot axis is called rotation.

First, imagine that the entire device is rotating around the (vertical) pivot axis. Then, spinning of the wheel (around the wheelhub) is added. Imagine the gimbal axis to be locked, so that the wheel cannot pitch. The gimbal axis has sensors, that measure whether there is a torque around the gimbal axis.

In the picture, a section of the wheel has been named dm1. At the depicted moment in time, section dm1 is at the perimeter of the rotating motion around the (vertical) pivot axis. Section dm1, therefore, has a lot of angular rotating velocity with respect to the rotation around the pivot axis, and as dm1 is forced closer to the pivot axis of the rotation (by the wheel spinning further), because of the Coriolis effect, with respect to the vertical pivot axis, dm1 tends to move in the direction of the top-left arrow in the diagram (shown at 45°) in the direction of rotation around the pivot axis.[3] Section dm2 of the wheel is moving away from the pivot axis, and so a force (again, a Coriolis force) acts in the same direction as in the case of dm1. Note that both arrows point in the same direction.

The same reasoning applies for the bottom half of the wheel, but there the arrows point in the opposite direction to that of the top arrows. Combined over the entire wheel, there is a torque around the gimbal axis when some spinning is added to rotation around a vertical axis.

It is important to note that the torque around the gimbal axis arises without any delay; the response is instantaneous.

In the discussion above, the setup was kept unchanging by preventing pitching around the gimbal axis. In the case of a spinning toy top, when the spinning top starts tilting, gravity exerts a torque. However, instead of rolling over, the spinning top just pitches a little. This pitching motion reorients the spinning top with respect to the torque that is being exerted. The result is that the torque exerted by gravity – via the pitching motion – elicits gyroscopic precession (which in turn yields a counter torque against the gravity torque) rather than causing the spinning top to fall to its side.

Precession or gyroscopic considerations have an effect on bicycle performance at high speed. Precession is also the mechanism behind gyrocompasses.
Classical (Newtonian)
The torque caused by the normal force – Fg and the weight of the top causes a change in the angular momentum L in the direction of that torque. This causes the top to precess.

Precession is the result of the angular velocity of rotation and the angular velocity produced by the torque. It is an angular velocity about a line that makes an angle with the permanent rotation axis, and this angle lies in a plane at right angles to the plane of the couple producing the torque. The permanent axis must turn towards this line, because the body cannot continue to rotate about any line that is not a principal axis of maximum moment of inertia; that is, the permanent axis turns in a direction at right angles to that in which the torque might be expected to turn it. If the rotating body is symmetrical and its motion unconstrained, and, if the torque on the spin axis is at right angles to that axis, the axis of precession will be perpendicular to both the spin axis and torque axis.

Under these circumstances the angular velocity of precession is given by:

    \boldsymbol\omega_p = \frac{\ mgr}{I_s\boldsymbol\omega_s}

In which Is is the moment of inertia, \scriptstyle \boldsymbol\omega_s is the angular velocity of spin about the spin axis, and m*g and r are the force responsible for the torque and the perpendicular distance of the spin axis about the axis of precession. The torque vector originates at the center of mass. Using \scriptstyle \boldsymbol\omega = \scriptstyle \frac{2\pi}{T}, we find that the period of precession is given by:

    T_p = \frac{4\pi^2 I_s}{\ mgrT_s}

In which Is is the moment of inertia, Ts is the period of spin about the spin axis, and \scriptstyle \boldsymbol\tau is the torque. In general, the problem is more complicated than this, however.

There is a non-mathematical way of visualizing the cause of gyroscopic precession. The behavior of spinning objects simply obeys the law of inertia by resisting any change in direction. If a force is applied to the object to induce a change in the orientation of the spin axis, the object behaves as if that force was sent 90 degrees ahead, in the direction of rotation. Here is why: A solid object can be thought of as an assembly of individual molecules. If the object is spinning, each molecule's direction of travel constantly changes as that molecule revolves around the object's spin axis. When a force is applied, molecules are forced into a new change of direction at places during their path around the object's axis. This new change in direction is resisted by inertia.

Imagine the object to be a spinning bicycle wheel, held at the axle in the hands of a subject. The wheel is spinning clock-wise as seen from a viewer to the subject’s right. Clock positions on the wheel are given relative to this viewer. As the wheel spins, the molecules comprising it are travelling vertically downward the instant they pass the 3-o'clock position, horizontally to the left the instant they pass 6 o'clock, vertically upward at 9 o'clock, and horizontally right at 12 o'clock. Between these positions, each molecule travels a combination of these directions, which should be kept in mind as you read ahead. The viewer then applies a force to the wheel at the 3-o'clock position directed away from him. The molecules at the 3-o'clock position are not being forced to change direction; they still travel vertically downward, unaffected by the force. The same holds for the molecules at 9 o'clock; they are still travelling vertically upward, unaffected by the force that was applied. However, molecules at 6 and 12 o'clock are being "told" to change direction. At 6 o'clock, molecules are forced to veer toward the viewer. At the same time, molecules that are passing 12 o'clock are being forced to veer away from the viewer. The inertia of those molecules resists this change in direction. The result is that they apply an equal and opposite force in response. At 6 o'clock, molecules exert a push directly away from the viewer. Molecules at 12 o'clock push directly toward the viewer. This all happens instantaneously as the force is applied at 3 o'clock. This makes the wheel as a whole tilt toward the viewer. Thus, when the force was applied at 3 o'clock, the wheel behaved as if the force was applied at 6 o'clock—90 degrees ahead in the direction of rotation.

Precession causes another peculiar behavior for spinning objects such as the wheel in this scenario. If the subject holding the wheel removes one hand from the axle, the wheel will remain upright, supported from only one side. However, it will immediately take on an additional motion; it will begin to rotate about a vertical axis, pivoting at the point of support as it continues its axial spin. If the wheel was not spinning, it would topple over and fall if one hand was removed. The initial motion of the wheel beginning to topple over is equivalent to applying a force to it at 12 o'clock in the direction of the unsupported side. When the wheel is spinning, the sudden lack of support at one end of the axle is again equivalent to this force. So instead of toppling over, the wheel behaves as if the force was applied at 3 or 9 o’clock, depending on the direction of spin and which hand was removed. This causes the wheel to begin pivoting at the point of support while remaining upright.
Relativistic

The special and general theories of relativity give three types of corrections to the Newtonian precession, of a gyroscope near a large mass such as Earth, described above. They are:

    Thomas precession a special relativistic correction accounting for the observer's being in a rotating non-inertial frame.
    de Sitter precession a general relativistic correction accounting for the Schwarzschild metric of curved space near a large non-rotating mass.
    Lense–Thirring precession a general relativistic correction accounting for the frame dragging by the Kerr metric of curved space near a large rotating mass.

Astronomy

In astronomy, precession refers to any of several gravity-induced, slow and continuous changes in an astronomical body's rotational axis or orbital path. Precession of the equinoxes, perihelion precession, changes in the tilt of Earth's axis to its orbit, and the eccentricity of its orbit over tens of thousands of years are all important parts of the astronomical theory of ice ages.
Axial precession (precession of the equinoxes)
Main article: Axial precession
Precessional movement
Precession of the equinox in relation to the distant stars
Small white disks representing the northern stars on a black background, overlaid by a circle showing the position of the north pole over time
The path of the north celestial pole among the stars due to the precession. Vega is the bright star near the bottom

Axial precession is the movement of the rotational axis of an astronomical body, whereby the axis slowly traces out a cone. In the case of Earth, this type of precession is also known as the precession of the equinoxes, lunisolar precession, or precession of the equator. Earth goes through one such complete precessional cycle in a period of approximately 26,000 years or 1° every 72 years, during which the positions of stars will slowly change in both equatorial coordinates and ecliptic longitude. Over this cycle, Earth's north axial pole moves from where it is now, within 1° of Polaris, in a circle around the ecliptic pole, with an angular radius of about 23.5 degrees.

Hipparchus is the earliest known astronomer to recognize and assess the precession of the equinoxes at about 1° per century (which is not far from the actual value for antiquity, 1.38°).[4] The precession of Earth's axis was later explained by Newtonian physics. Being an oblate spheroid, Earth has a non-spherical shape, bulging outward at the equator. The gravitational tidal forces of the Moon and Sun apply torque to the equator, attempting to pull the equatorial bulge into the plane of the ecliptic, but instead causing it to precess. The torque exerted by the planets, particularly Jupiter, also plays a role.[5]

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #164, on March 15th, 2015, 09:49 PM »Last edited on March 15th, 2015, 09:52 PM
science is always changing, remember we said earth wobbled?   we said it would tilt?

the only way u could imagine it as a wobble, instead of a tilt  is by taking the earth in compare  a oscillating plate.
as a plate. or Euler disk.

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/watch?v=ug2bKCG4gZY O:-)

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #165, on March 15th, 2015, 10:00 PM »Last edited on March 15th, 2015, 10:17 PM

free this one page

Walter clearly let the cat out of the bag when he said if this force was greater then this will go down, i simply add a torque on the axis,
knowing earth center of mass can save your lives.


i can make a device to prevent that effect. in a tunnel that also spins on a axis.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #166, on March 15th, 2015, 10:25 PM »Last edited on March 15th, 2015, 10:51 PM
Quote from freethisone on March 15th, 2015, 10:00 PM

free this one page

Walter clearly let the cat out of the bag when he said if this force was greater then this will go down, i simply add a torque on the axis,
knowing earth center of mass can save your lives.


i can make a device to prevent that effect. in a tunnel that also spins on a axis.
let me demonstrate my devise with this umbrella in a yoke...


i therefore inventor of said invention predict this is the case. have done experiments, and with science can demonstrate...

now place the glas with umbrella on a  record player and spin it. or simply use geometry to orange the magnets for a vector potential.. with out adding a force.

only that witch nature prescribes.. remember the moray antenna? its a simple reminder that results can be quickly achieved,

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #167, on March 16th, 2015, 09:14 AM »Last edited on March 16th, 2015, 09:17 AM
the fly wheel by freethisone. this is a simple way to describe the flywheel. not everything is included. variables..

 :cool: :cool:
wheel is my battery, and mass,, there is a coil, and there is a flute,  there is an a frame with its floating connections, there is an antenna and  pickup coil.

there is a speaker, and microphone.  there are chambers, and floating grounds. they have its brushes and stator.
 
and its magnetic influence. it obeys the laws of physics.  it creates a torque,  even a special radio to chat with. much more a transformer. a run away dynamo if allowed so.
 O:-) O:-)
and it has a bug on a monkeys back...

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #168, on March 16th, 2015, 12:19 PM »
matt u got some nerve, asking me for information, and then not leaving anything related to what i said, please remove your video from my chalk board it has no relevance unless you care to summarize everything i put forth upon your request..


what is your point matt with this video and how does it relate to my chalk board were i include theory and invention?


better just to remove it and ill edit later this thread.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #169, on March 16th, 2015, 12:45 PM »Last edited on March 16th, 2015, 12:49 PM
when i say i solved a puzzle i really mean it... perigee...


stupid holes at nasa, in seconds i vanquished them.







sure ill give this guy knowledge of what was to happen, and surly i have solved for edl. phi



THE CORRECT ANSWER IS DELTA


freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #171, on March 16th, 2015, 12:59 PM »Last edited on March 16th, 2015, 01:07 PM
will my name go up in lights, and  ice age model predicts a great quake?

today is 3-16-2015

and on 02-16 2016.

and will the 5 6 and the 9 prevail. on the 22nd day.
was a great quake produced when the day leading to 3-14-15 was achieved. this will be the greatest time a force is applied and the angle of torque,

ice age model poems for you

From another point of View, a binary relation.

I watching, I weening, taking on order, moving right along..

I dynamic, in motion, gaining momentum..

Breathing, and bending, flowing like water.

I poynting, i moving, and traveling in your direction.

I simply stunning gravitational effect.

I reeling, this feeling, bending space.

vivid, I static, I simply fanatic.

There's Bright colors, with flashes, and magmatic pragmatic effect.

Far flowing, I growing, aging with wisdom.

I simply stunning thermal dynamic success.


freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #173, on March 17th, 2015, 08:28 PM »
yes its true the same thing we do with mag lev trains can applies to movieing 100 ton blocks of magnets for miles along a magnetic path.
many things are still missing.

who will be the first to solve for phi. i think vinny already got very close.

it was freethis one who has presented many new wonders for science to try and dispute.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #174, on March 17th, 2015, 09:50 PM »
step by step, they  didn't even need a road at all, , they could have floated it right over the sand..

the wonder never stops  edl. wonders its a sweet 16 party..   now its time to build it..