Theory, my chalk board.

freethisone

Theory, my chalk board.
« on April 22nd, 2011, 09:34 PM »Last edited on November 28th, 2011, 07:07 AM by freethisone
space time
Greetings, this thread is dedicated to my interests, ramblings, and ideas.
I have been a long time student in the arts, and have learned many things over the years. On the other hand nothing is written in stone, and are subject to change.
if you wish to post anything to this blog feel free to do so. I will introduce patents ideas, theory, and innovation. The blog is dedicated to the pioneers of my interests, and study's. Peace all, and be well. A big thank you to Russ who started this open source.:P

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT-94c1Q6Ms  This movie here shows how plasma is made by ionizing magnetic gas. This example shows how the gas becomes polarized, and therefore photon energy must be  created. In a manner that involves frequency changes/Oscillation. This causes the gas to become a polarized / ionization of  greater order. Harmonic, because it is caused to have a constructive  wave length acting on the medium, and magnetic/conduction rise, and fall in the atomic structured dipoles. Constructive ionization by said virtual flux wave/polarization, with Sulfur smoke as the medium. this is the jest of what we got.

In a similar manner we will work on the EPG, if there is anything that strikes a note for me, and that is key harmonics. of the 2nd, and the 3rd, and of the 4th   magnitude. what other discovery can be found in the information that supports these claims? It is the electron accelerator, laser and  radar type inventions ...
Key aspect for understanding energy in the EPG system.  

For instance, Some types of particles can absorb more energy then others. This is the case of a magnetic particle fluid, and in this case, we must carefully measure with formula for maximum absorption. The energy from a radar type transmitter. This radiation, ionization can be absorbed, and or reflected in many types of materials.. For example The patent #  or the stealth bomber absorbing a radar signature, or Reflected to show areas of rain from weather images. some of that radar energy is lost in the clouds.:@ but in the EPG  to add particle charge on tiny metal dipoles.

Russ  had suggested the carbon spark gap. It may prove to be a nice added feature due to the absorption of energy, that will most likely cause a virtual photon flux  And a EMF. with or without specialized materials.

The metal is the conductor in the fluid, and also the preserved dipole. There needs to be a nice mix, and the electron support a positive charge. Not a whole lot of difference, then negative charged dipoles. What is the amount of energy that a specific gas can support upon full absorption?

The resulting 2nd ,3rd, and 4th harmonic is in electron spin were it is supported, before the electron pair is ejected, and goes BYE BYE
After a nice saturation of virtual flux, Photon energy is introduced to cause a scattering of energetic electrons ,  and also the photon EM radiation.
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT-94c1Q6Ms  
I'm happy with that.


MIT 1

MIT part 2 dipoles

MIT part 3 harmonics

MIT part 4
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #1, on April 23rd, 2011, 01:30 AM »Last edited on May 2nd, 2011, 11:04 AM by freethisone
one of my ideas to make a better solar panel, rather then the use of photocell for the use of solar, or radiant energy. Similar to Tesla who had sent a shinny metal plate up a flag pole that is grounded, and connected to a capacitor i had surmised that one could theoretically do the same thing at ground level. In the form of a table.
 
Items needed. 1. a shinny aluminum, or even copper surface polished 4 by 4 square.
2. a mica backing for the 4 by 4 sheet, to insulate the underside of this conductor.
3. A capacitor such as that found in a TV. electrolytic or other is then connected to the positive charge, that coming from the conductor of polished metal that is well insulated on one side. Tesla said it is well known this energy is to be positive, because it is in receipt of the radiant rays of particles with charge, wile the grounding wire supply a negative charge, and therefore is a source of negative power. The earth ground. A vast reservoir of negative energy.
4.the first wire is connected to the shinny metal conductor that is well insulated on the underside, and then connected to a small electrolytic cap. for experimental purposes, the second wire is then connected to a second conducting body, and is connected to the second terminal of the cap. the ground wire with a metal plate or conductor is placed into the earth ground for a free negative charge.
Now we will have a continual flow of energy flowing to the cap.

RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #2, on April 23rd, 2011, 02:33 AM »Last edited on November 29th, 2011, 05:37 PM by freethisone
A Problem in Dynamics
An inextensible heavy chain
Lies on a smooth horizontal plane,
An impulsive force is applied at A,
Required the initial motion of K.
Let ds be the infinitesimal link,
Of which for the present we’ve only to think;
Let T be the tension, and T + dT
The same for the end that is nearest to B.
Let a be put, by a common convention,
For the angle at M ’twixt OX and the tension;
Let Vt and Vn be ds’s velocities,
Of which Vt along and Vn across it is;
Then Vn/Vt the tangent will equal,
Of the angle of starting worked out in the sequel.
In working the problem the first thing of course is
To equate the impressed and effectual forces.
K is tugged by two tensions, whose difference dT
Must equal the element's mass into Vt.
Vn must be due to the force perpendicular
To ds’s direction, which shows the particular
Advantage of using da to serve at your
Pleasure to estimate ds’s curvature.
For Vn into mass of a unit of chain:cool:
Must equal the curvature into the strain.
Thus managing cause and effect to discriminate,
The student must fruitlessly try to eliminate,
And painfully learn, that in order to do it, he
Must find the Equation of Continuity.
The reason is this, that the tough little element,
Which the force of impulsion to beat to a jelly meant,
Was endowed with a property incomprehensible,
And was "given," in the language of Shop, "inexten-sible."
It therefore with such pertinacity odd defied
The force which the length of the chain should have modified,
That its stubborn example may possibly yet recall
These overgrown rhymes to their prosody metrical.
The condition is got by resolving again,
According to axes assumed in the plane.
If then you reduce to the tangent and normal,
You will find the equation more neat tho’ less formal.
The condition thus found after these preparations,
When duly combined with the former equations,
Will give you another, in which differentials
(When the chain forms a circle), become in essentials
No harder than those that we easily solve
In the time a T totum would take to revolve.
Now joyfully leaving ds to itself, a-
T tend to the values of T and of A.

The chain undergoes a distorting convulsion,
Produced first at A by the force of impulsion.
In magnitude R, in direction tangential,
Equating this R to the form exponential,
Obtained for the tension when a is zero,
It will measure the tug, such a tug as the "hero
Plume-waving" experienced, tied to the chariot.
But when dragged by the heels his grim head could not carry aught,
So give a its due at the end of the chain,
And the tension ought there to be zero again.
From these two conditions we get three equations,
Which serve to determine the proper relations
Between the first impulse and each coefficient
In the form for the tension, and this is sufficient
To work out the problem, and then, if you choose,
You may turn it and twist it the Dons to amuse.

James Clerk Maxwell




ã T. E. Bearden 1993

Some Definitions

The Quantum Mechanical Vacuum: First we need some definitions. We start by assuming the quantum mechanical vacuum.1 Empty "spacetime" is filled with an incredibly intense flux of virtual particles. It is a plenum, not an emptiness. We shall be interested only in the fantastic flux of virtual photons, for we are discussing electromagnetics.

Energy and Potential: Energy is any ordering, either static or dynamic, in the virtual particle flux of vacuum. EM energy is any ordering, either static or dynamic, in the virtual photon flux (VPF) of vacuum. That is, for a particular kind of "field" energy, we simply choose the so-called quantum particle of that field, and consider only that kind of virtual particle flux.

Potential is any ordering, either static or dynamic, in the virtual particle flux of vacuum. Hey! That's exactly the same definition as energy. Quite correct. Energy and potential are identically the same. Neither is presently defined correctly in physics.

Energy is normally defined as "Energy is the capacity to do work." That's totally false. Energy has the capacity to do work, because work is correctly defined as the dissipation (disordering; scattering) of energy (order). The scattering of energy is work. It is not energy! I.e., energy is not definable as its own scattering!

Look at it this way: A man has the capacity to catch fish. That is true, but it is not a definition, since a definition must in some sense be an identity. You cannot say that a man is the capacity to catch fish! That may be a submitted definition, all right, but it is false. Similarly, energy has the capacity to do work; that is one of its attributes. But energy IS the ordering in the VPF (we are referring from now on primarily only to EM).

Scalar and Vector Potentials: The scalar potential is any static (with respect to the external observer) ordering in the VPF of vacuum. The vector potential is any dynamic (with respect to the external observer) ordering in the VPF of vacuum. We shall be interested in the electrostatic scalar potential. So it is a static ordering -- a stationary template -- in the VPF of vacuum, much as a whirlpool is a stationary ordering (template, form) in the rushing flow of a river.

The Scalar Potential Has An Internal Structure

The Structure of the Scalar Potential: According to rigorous proofs by Whittaker2 and Ziolkowski,3 any scalar potential can be mathematically decomposed into a harmonic series of bidirectional wave pairs. Figure 1 shows this Whittaker/Ziolkowski (WZ) structure. In each pair, the forward-time wave is going in one direction, and its phase conjugate (time-reversed) replica wave is going in the other. According to the so-called distortion correction theorem4 of nonlinear phase conjugate optics, this PCR wave must precisely superpose spatially with its partner wave in the pair. The two waves are in-phase spatially, but 180 degrees out of phase in time. The wave is made of photons, and the antiwave (PCR wave) is made of antiphotons. It follows that, as wave and antiwave pass through each other, the photons and antiphotons are coupling and uncoupling with each other, because the antiphoton is a PCR photon, and PCR's precisely superpose spatially with their partner. A photon or antiphoton has wave characteristics, because it has a frequency; if the wave aspects are perfectly ordered and perfectly correlated, then so are the photon's particle aspects.

A Potential Is An Ordering Across the Universe: So we have -- astoundingly -- perfect VPF inner ordering infolded in the electrostatic scalar potential! We also have perfect wave/antiwave ordering infolded in there. When you collect a simple set of charges on a small ball or in a region, the scalar EM potential from that set of charges reaches across the universe. In it you have an infinite harmonic series of phase-locked time-forward EM waves going out from the charges to all distant points of the entire universe. And you have an infinite harmonic series of phase-locked time-reversed EM waves coming from all points of the universe, back to the "collected charges" source.

A Potential Is A River of Energy: The point is, you have established a mighty, hidden, 2-way river of energy between that collection of charges and every other point in the universe. There is infinite energy in each of those infolded waves and antiwaves. But in a localized region, the energy density in each wave is finite. Since in finite circuits the potential interacts with a localized set of mass, we shall be concerned with the local energy density (joules/coulomb) of the potential.

But forget the conventional myth of visualizing the potential as pushing a unit charge in from infinity "against the force field" -- there isn't any force field in the vacuum, as is well-known in quantum mechanics. Also, Newton's third law requires all forces to occur in pairs -- each pair consisting of a force and its 3rd law reaction force. From that viewpoint alone, there is no such thing as an EM forcefield or force field wave in the vacuum. There are just gradients of the vacuum potential present in the vacuum. In the vacuum, an EM wave is actually a wave of the phase locked gradients of the electrostatic scalar potential and of the magnetostatic scalar potential. And each such gradient wave is simultaneously accompanied by its phase conjugate gradient wave, because of Newton's third law.

Newton's third law requires forces to occur in pairs of equal but antiparallel forces.

Both wave and antiwave co-exist simultaneously in the vacuum EM wave.5 Therefore it's a stress potential wave, not a force field wave. It's more like an electromagnetic sound wave,6 and so it is a longitudinal wave, not a transverse wave. In the EM vacuum wave's interaction with matter (the so-called "photon" interaction), the wave normally half interacts with the electron shells of the atom, giving translation forces, while the anti-wave half interacts with the atomic nucleus, giving the Newtonian 3rd law reaction (recoil) forces (waves). The EM wave in vacuum is an electrogravitational wave.

Energy Is Internally Infinite and Unlimited: A static potential -- which is identically excess energy -- is internally dynamic and infinite. Energy is internally infinite and unlimited! But it has a finite energy density in a local region of spacetime. Since energy interacts with matter locally, we shall be concerned with the local energy density (joules per coulomb).

A Principle of Great Importance: The only way you can have a "chunk" or finite amount of energy to dissipate in a circuit as work is to first have a potential's local energy density interact with a local finite mass collector. The normal interacting mass collector is the free electrons (the free electron gas) in the circuit. You can have, e.g., (joules/coulomb x coulomb); (joules/gram x grams); (joules/m3 x m3); etc.

Voltage, Force, Potential Gradients, Loads, and Work: Now let's look at circuitry aspects. Conventionally they are a mess. Voltage is "essentially" defined as the "drop in potential." In other words, it's the dissipation (disordering) of a "finite amount" of potential gradient. But the only way you can get a "finite amount" of infinite energy/potential gradient is by first interacting the potential gradient's internal, finite, excess energy density with a finite "collector" mass. E.g., (joules/coulomb available for collection) x (coulombs collecting) = excess joules collected on the interacting coulombs, available for dissipation.

So voltage is really the dissipation of a finite collection of excess EM energy/potential gradient. The dissipation of potential or of its gradient is not potential! You cannot logically define either potential or energy as is own dissipation!

We presently use the notion of "voltage" in two completely contradictory ways in electrical physics. Here's how we got the confusion: We take a potential gradient (which has a local energy density), and we "collect" it across some charged masses in a locality -- usually the free electrons in the free electron gas in our circuitry. That is, we express the finite energy density of the potential gradient (before collection onto charges) in the local region in terms of energy per coulomb. The potential gradient actually is a change to the ambient potential, and so it contains an excess energy density (the magnitude may be either positive or negative). We then collect this potential (actually this potential density) on a certain number of coulombs, which places tiny little gradients of potential across (coupled to) each free electron. The local excess energy density of the potential gradient multiplied by the amount of collecting mass gives the amount of excess energy collected (on the interacting charges/coulombs). On each collecting particle, that little gradient, together with the coupling particle, constitutes a tiny force. F is not just equal to ma (non relativistic case); instead, F º (ma), where (mass x acceleration) is considered as a unitary, inseparable thing. So that little potentialized electron (that little EM force) moves itself around the circuit. In the load (scatterer), the little potentialized electron (the little force) is subjected to jerks and accelerations, thus radiating energy (shucking its gradient). Since this is done in all directions in the scatterer (load), that gets rid of the gradient, reducing the "little force" (potentialized electron) to zero because the little potential gradient is lost due to radiation.

Collecting And Dissipating Energy

Energy Dissipation and Collection: Without further ado, we consider the scalar potential's local energy density in terms of joules per coulomb. That is, in a specific glob of charges (i.e., in finite circuits), the amount of energy collected from a potential gradient onto the finite number of charges receiving/collecting it, is equal to the number of joules of energy per coulomb that is in the potential gradient, times the number of coulombs collecting (receiving) the potential gradient. The current is the activated (potentialized) coulombs per second that dissipate their potential gradients during that second. The current multiplied by the time the current flows gives the activated coulombs that dissipated their activation (potentialization) during that flow time. Dissipating, activated coulombs multiplied by the excess energy collected per activated coulomb gives the energy dissipated (the work or scattering done) in the load.

We define collection as the connection of a potential gradient (a source) to the charged masses in a circuit element (the element is called the collector), which for a finite delay time does not allow its potentialized free electrons to move as current. In the collector, during this delay time these trapped electrons are "activated" by potential gradients being coupled to them.

Technically, that delay time in the collector is known as relaxation time,7 in the case of the free electron gas8 (in a wire or in a circuit element). A collector then is a circuit element that has a usable, finite relaxation time. During that relaxation time, the trapped electrons are potentialized without movement as current; each collecting/receiving free electron gets a little gradient across it, but no current yet flows. In other words, during this finite relaxation time (collection time), we extract potential from the source, but no current. Thus we extract energy (potential), but no power (which is voltage x amperage). During the relaxation time, we extract from the source only a flow of VPF, which is continually replaced in the source by the vacuum's violent VPF exchange with the source's bipolarity charges. We do not extract power from the battery/source during relaxation time, but we extract free energy density. That free energy density, coupling with a finite quantity of electrons, gives us a collected finite amount of energy. With that background, let's start again, and go through this in a useful "free energy" manner.

The Electron Gas. We refer to the conventional model of the free electron gas in a wire.9 Although the electrons in this gas actually move by quantum mechanical laws and not by classical laws, we shall simply be dealing with the "on the average" case. So we will speak of the electrons and their movement in a classical sense, rather than a quantum mechanical sense, as this will suffice very well for our purposes.

When one connects a circuit to a source of potential gradient (say, to a battery), the first thing that happens nearly instantly is that the potential gradient races onto the coupling wire and heads down it at almost the speed of light. As it goes onto the wire, this gradient "couples" to the free electrons in the free electron gas. However, inside the wire, these electrons can hardly move down the wire at all; they can only "slip" once in a while, yielding a "drift" velocity of a fraction of a cm/sec.10 On the surface, things are just a little bit different. Most of the "current" in a wire, as is well-known, moves along the surface, giving us the "skin" effect. [For that reason, many cables are stranded of finer wires, to provide more skin surface per cm3 of copper, and hence more current-carrying capability per cm3 of copper.]

So, initially, little gradients of potential appear on and across each free electron, with a single little Ñf on each electron, and coupled to it. The couplet of [Ñf·me], where me is the mass of the electron, constitutes a small DEe. [This is rigorous; the conventional EM notion that an E field exists in the vacuum is absurd, and it is well-known in QM that no observable force field exists in the vacuum. As Feynman pointed out, only the potential for the force field exists in the vacuum,11 not the force field as such. Or as Lindsay and Margenau pointed out in their Foundations of Physics, one does not have an observable

force except when observable mass is present.12]. We have stated it even stronger: Not only is F = ma, but F º ma (nonrelativistic case).13 Since no observable mass exists in vacuum, then no observable F exists there either.

Force, Coupled Gradients, and Electron Translation

Electrons Coupled to a Potential Gradient Move Themselves. The point is, when activated by a "coupled potential gradient," the activated electron moves itself until it loses its activation (its coupled potential gradient).

Let me say that again, in a little more detail. Forget the standard notion that a force field such as the E-field causes electrons to move. Also forget the notion that the E-field is given by E = -Ñf. In foundations of physics, those equations are known to be incorrect for the vacuum. EM force fields are known (in QM foundations theory) to be effects, existing only in and on the charged particles, and not existing separately at all,14 or in the vacuum at all.15 Instead of E = -Ñf, in the vacuum the correct equation would be something like this: PE = -Ñf. In this case, we have correctly stated that the potential gradient PE provides the potential for producing an antiparallel E-field in and on a coupling/collecting charged mass, and the magnitude and direction of that potential gradient will be given by -Ñf, if and only if a charged mass particle is first introduced so that it couples to PE.

At any rate, the activated/potentialized electron moves itself. The reason is that it constitutes a force. Force º (mass x acceleration) (non relativistic case). So the potentialized/activated electron is continuously accelerating. However, it is prevented from easily moving down the wire directly. To begin to do that, it essentially has to first move to the outer skin of the copper conductor.

The Collector: We now consider a circuit element that we called a collector. (It could be a special coil made of special material, a capacitor with doped plates rather than simple conducting plates, or any one of a number of things). The objective is for the collector to be made of special material so that it has a free electron gas whose electrons are momentarily not free to move as current (they continue to move violently around microscopically, but essentially with zero net macroscopic translation) for a finite delay (relaxation) time, while they are settling themselves upon the surface and preparing to move as current. Let's call the electrons NNTE (no net translation electrons) during that finite delay (relaxation time). During that "no-current" delay time, the NNTE electrons become potentialized/activated by the potential gradient impressed across the collector. So at the end of the NNT time, the NNTE electrons are potentialized, and each is of the form [Ñf·me].

The Secret of Free Energy

Two Circuits/Two Cycles: We are going to use two circuits and two cycles, as shown in Figure 2:

(1) We shall connect a collector to a primary source of potential (to a battery) during the short time that current does not yet flow, but potential does. (In other words, during the relaxation time of the collector, we allow the VPF to flow onto the NNTE electrons of the collector and potentialize (activate) them, but do not yet allow the electrons themselves to flow as current, but only to move transversely in the wiring and collector.) This is cycle one of a 2-cycle process: This is collection of a specific amount of current-free potential gradient -- power-free energy -- off the potential-source (the battery) onto a collector. During the collection cycle/time, current does not and must not flow (we are discussing the ideal case). We are freely "charging up" the collector as a secondary battery/source.

(2) At the end of the collection (potentialization/activation) time/cycle in circuit one, the potentialized collector (the charged secondary source) is sharply switched away from its connection to the primary potential source (the battery), and at the same time it is instantly switched into a separate closed circuit with the load. This is important: In cycle two, the potentialized collector (with its finite amount of excess trapped EM energy) and the load are connected in a completely separate circuit, and one that is closed, with no connection at all to the original source of potential (in this case, to the battery). Specifically, this "load and potentialized collector" circuit is completely separate from the primary source; during cycle two the primary source (the battery) is not connected to anything.

In other words, all we've taken from the primary source (the battery) is current-free, force-field-free potential gradient. So to speak, we've taken a "chunk of potential gradient" from the source, nothing else. You simply multiply the potential gradient's local energy density (the so-called "voltage", which is really excess joules per coulomb) by the number of coulombs of charge that is "activated" (that "collects" this voltage or excess joules/coulomb) in the collector. Specifically, we have not taken any power from the battery itself, and so we have not done any internal work inside the battery upon its internal resistance, by a "closed circuit electron flow" back into the battery. We have not permitted such a flow.

Instead, we are using the activated collector as a temporary, secondary battery. We will utilize this secondary battery in a conventional manner to power the load, which will also kill the secondary battery (dissipate its trapped EM energy). But that will not affect the primary source. The primary source is never used to directly power the load. It is only used as an infinite source of potential gradient (i.e., as an infinite source of energy density).

The Standard Power Extraction Circuit

The Conventional Circuit: We digress momentarily: In the standard electrical method, the potential source (which is a bipolarity) is connected across the load. This connects both the external load and the internal resistance of the battery itself in series, as the "total circuit load." Electrons then pour through the external load circuit and through the internal battery resistance, from the "electron rich" polarity of the source to its "electron poor" opposite polarity. The scattering of energy in the internal battery resistance is actually doing work to upset the chemistry that is maintaining the battery's charge separation (the bipolarity). In this manner, the source's separation of charges (which is the "gate" furnishing the potential/energy gradient) is being destroyed as the current flows, and this in turn destroys the source of the potential gradient.

In other words, normally we, engineers, are trained to kill the bipolarity, which kills the potential source itself! Incredible as it may be, we, engineers and scientists, have been trained to utilize the free "trapped EM energy" furnished by nature through the source, to destroy the source of the energy/potential, with the same vigor as they power the external load! In fact, our teachers simply have never learned any other way to do it except this deliberately "self-destructive" manner!

A Waterwheel Analogy

Imagine, if you will, a waterwheel that powers a mill, with a sluice gate upstream in a river, that diverts some river water into the sluice carrying water to the wheel when the sluice gate is opened into the river. The diverted water flows down to the waterwheel, turning it, and the spent water is fed back into the river below the mill site. Now what fool would connect a pulley onto the waterwheel, with a rope running from the pulley to the sluice gate, so that when the wheel rotated, part of the rotational power also was utilized to close the sluice gate and shut off the water, stopping the waterwheel? If one did so, when the sluice gate was opened, the waterwheel would rotate only until the sluice gate was closed, shutting off the water. Then one would laboriously have to pay to reopen the sluice gate again, then again, then again. No self-respecting "waterwheel engineer" would do such an unthinkable, insane thing. But that's exactly what we engineers, electrical physicists, and scientists have been trained to do! We have no energy engineers or energy scientists at all; instead, we have all been power engineers and power scientists. We have all been energy source killers! In this paper, we shall try to do better, and rectify "one of the most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in history," as Tesla called the conventional electromagnetics.16 By being energy engineers, we shall only have to pay for our energy source once, and then we shall draw as much energy from it as we wish.

External Load Power Is Free; Only The Power In The Source Costs

Here's the magic secret of free electrical power: The power in the external load is absolutely free, and it always has been free.17 In any load circuit, the only power you have to pay for, and have ever had to pay for, is the power you incorrectly use to kill your own primary source. The only power that "costs" more effort/dollars is the power erroneously utilized inside the source to "close the gate" and kill the primary source. Your electric power company doesn't pay for any of the collected energy on your load circuits that is dissipated to power your house. Instead, the power company charges you for its own ignorance. It charges you for its insane use of its own freely extracted electrical energy to continually kill the bipolarity in each of its generators, thus continually killing the free electrical source of that generator's energy.18

In any electric circuit, we can continue to indefinitely power the external load indirectly from a source, so long as we are not so naive as to use any of the free energy we extract from the primary source to dissipate back inside the primary source itself and shut it off!

And we can easily and freely multiply electrical potential. As an example, given a single good source of potential, a hundred radial wires can be connected to the source. The same potential will now appear at each of the ends of the hundred wires. A switcher/collector unit can then operate from each radial line's end, and power external loads, without "loading" the original primary source. This "cascading" can be continued indefinitely. A single power plant, e.g., can power the entire electrical grid of the United States. And a single automobile battery can power a large, agile, electric automobile at highway speeds, with sports car acceleration, with unlimited range, without "refueling," and with no noxious chemical exhaust.

Obvious Impacts

Environmentalists should immediately see that the chemical pollution of the biosphere by mechanista and processes to obtain energy can be dramatically reduced, to almost negligible levels. There need be no huge oil tanker spills, for there need be no huge oil tankers. There need be no worrisome radioactive wastes from nuclear power plants, or abandoned hazardous nuclear plants when their life is finished, because there need be no nuclear power plants. There need be no noxious exhausts from jet airplanes (which are really what is diminishing the ozone layer and punching holes in it), automobiles, trucks, buses, innumerable coal-fired and oil-fired power plants, etc.

The Electronic Smog Problem

In fairness we point out that, as the usage of free electrical energy mushrooms, we will be dramatically increasing the low-level EM signal density of the environment, and that too is biologically detrimental. Although beyond the scope of this paper, that cumulative biological damage mechanism has also been uncovered by this author. A formal paper is presently in preparation for presentation in March 1993 at the annual meeting and conference of the Alabama Academy of Science.19 The paper will also present an entirely new definition of cancer, give its exact long-term cumulative mechanism, and give an exact, scientifically proven mechanism for eliminating cancer, leukemia, and other debilitating diseases such as AIDS. For our purposes here, we simply state that we understand the EM "electronic smog" biological damage mechanism, and how to go about developing a total counter for it. Eventually, we would see a small "counter unit" added to each power unit, alleviating the "electronic smog" problem and preventing biological damage.

Only Dissipate Energy From a Collector, Not the Source

Completion of the Collection Cycle: But to return to the completion of our collection cycle (cycle one). During collection, we have not extracted power from the source. That is vital. We have not moved the gate through which our source is furnishing free energy. We have not diminished our primary source. From our previous definitions of potential, we have indeed extracted trapped energy from the primary source, because we placed its "local energy density" across a certain finite collector/mass, instead of extracting power (dissipating energy inside the source or battery to spoil its chemistry and deplete its charge separation).

 

All Energy Is Free

Here's the incredible truth. The entire universe is filled with mind boggling free energy everywhere, in the simplest of things. Simply scrape your feet on the carpet, and you will collect perhaps 2,000 "volts" on your body. At that time, hidden EM energy is flowing from every point in the universe to your body, and from your body back to every point in the universe. We know that all macroscopic matter is filled with stupendous amounts of electrical charge. So an incredible river of energy -- a great flux -- is driving every single thing, from the smallest to the largest. Opening a gate to extract trapped EM energy is simple. Just collect a bit of charge, or scrape your feet hard, or comb your hair briskly. All we have to do is not be stupid and close the gate once we've got it opened!

God has been most kind. We have nothing but free energy everywhere. All energy is furnished to us freely! It's our own blindness that has made us into energy source killers. All we have to do is open our eyes to the truth of nature's incredible energy bounty. We must just freely collect that bountiful fruit from Nature's tree, instead of chopping down the tree and killing it.

Dissipating The Collected Energy

The Work Cycle: We focus again on cycle two. Shortly after the now-potentialized collector is connected to the load at the beginning of cycle 2 (the power cycle, or energy dissipation cycle, or work cycle), the potential gradient across the potentialized collector is connected (transferred) across the free electrons in the load circuit. We assume that the material of the collector and the switching time have been designed so that, shortly after switching to the loading/work cycle, the activated/potentialized free electrons in the electron gas in the collector reach the skin of the collector, and are free to move as current.

So just after the beginning of cycle two, each of the free electrons in the load circuit now is potentialized and free to move down the wiring. Each potentialized (activated) electron has its own little individual potential gradient across it and coupled to it, due to the overall potential gradient from the collector. Remember, prior to coupling to charges, this potential gradient moves through the circuit at light speed. An EM potential gradient coupled to a charged mass constitutes an EM force field (excess trapped EM energy per coulomb, times the number of collecting coulombs). Now each little free electron with its potential gradient forms a little E-field (force/charge), and that little E-field (force/charge) is free to move. That's all it takes to move (accelerate) the little activated electron's mass through the load (the scatterer). We strongly stress that the potentialized/activated electron moves itself. It doesn't care whether or not the external battery is attached or not. It is its own little motorboat, with its own little engine driving it.

As the little potentialized electrons reach the load (the scatterer), they bang and clang around in there erratically. That is, the "scatterer" (load) causes spurious accelerations ("scatterings") of these self-driven electrons. As is well-known, when a charge is accelerated, it radiates photons. What actually happens is that these little "jerked around" electrons shuck off their little potential gradients in the load (in the scatterer, or the "jerker-arounder") by emitting/radiating photons in all directions. Hence the heat that is produced in the load; the heat is just these scattered photons. The theory of calorimetry already states that all the excess energy (on the potentialized electrons) will be dissipated as this heat (scattered EM energy).

When all the potentialized electrons have radiated away their potential gradients in the load (scatterer), they are no longer potentialized. The free electron gas is again "quiescent" and no longer potentialized/activated (again, we are talking about "on the average" from a classical viewpoint).

Repetition and Review

Notice What We've Done: We took some trapped EM energy density (a chunk of potential gradient, a "voltage" before current flows) from the source, by switching that potential gradient (energy density, which is joules per coulomb) onto a collector (containing a certain number of coulombs of trapped charges) where the potential gradient activates/potentializes/couples-to these temporarily non translating electrons. So the finite collector collected a finite amount of excess energy [joules/coulomb x collecting (trapped) coulombs] on its now-excited (activated) free electrons. Then, before any current has yet flowed from the source, we switched that potentialized collector (with its temporarily restrained but potentialized electrons; with their finite amount of excess trapped EM energy) away from the source and directly across the load. Shortly thereafter, the relaxation time in the collector expires. The potentialized electrons in the collector are freed to move in the external load circuit, consisting of the collector and the load, and so they do so. The scattering "shock collisions" due to the erratic electron accelerations in the load shake off the little potential gradients on the conduction electrons, emitting photons in all directions, which we call "heat." In shaking off the photons, the electrons lose their little potential gradients, hence lose their activation (excess EM energy).

Rigorously, we have extracted some energy in trapped form, and allowed it to dissipate in the load, "powering the load" for a finite discharge/dissipation time and doing work.20 Contrary to the conventional electrical power engineering, we have also done this without doing any work inside the source to diminish its ability to furnish potential gradient.

What Is Energy In An Electric Circuit?

Energy in an Electric Circuit: Here's the principle loud and clear. Energy in an electric circuit involves only the potentialization and depotentialization of the electron carriers in that circuit.21 It involves only the potential gradient (the joules per coulomb) collected by the circuit to potentialize its electrons, and the number of coulombs of electrons that are potentialized during the collection phase. Electric circuits simply utilize electrons as carriers of "potential gradients," from the source to the load, where these gradients and the activated electrons constitute excess trapped EM energy. In the "shocking/scattering" occurring in the load, the jerking (acceleration) of the electrons causes these activated (trapped-energy-carrying) electrons to shuck off their potential gradients by emitting them as scattered photons (heat).

If one is thoughtless enough to allow the primary potential source to remain in the circuit during the "work" phase, then one is using the potentialized electrons to also go back into the primary source and scatter energy from its internal resistance (internal load), thereby disorganizing the organization that was producing the source potential and energy in the first place. If one does that, then all the while one is getting some work (scattering of energy) in the load, one is also steadily getting some work done inside the primary source to steadily destroy it! Literally, one is killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.

Continued Operations: But back to our circuit. After we complete one full collection/discharge cycle, we wish to continue producing work in the external load. So we simply switch the collector back away from the load and onto the primary source, collect some more current-free potential, and again independently switch the collector with its repotentialized free electrons back across the load. We can repeat this two-cycle process to potentialize the external load and power it as long as we wish, from a battery or other source of potential, and never take any power at all from the primary battery. We do not need to drain the battery or source at all, in order to power a load, unless we attempt to power it directly. Powering the external load is always free!

Nature has been most kind, and we have been most ignorant. You can have all the trapped electrical energy you wish, from any source of potential, for free. You can power all the external loads you wish, for free, by using a collector as a secondary source, and simply shuttling potential between the primary source and the collector.22 But you cannot have power for free from (in) the potential source. If you allow current flow in your collection cycle, you are depleting the separated charges inside the battery that are furnishing the source potential.

The Coal-Fired Locomotive

Rigorous Analogy of a Coal-Fired Locomotive. Now here's an exact analogy, to assist in understanding. Imagine a coal-fired train, and a fireman shoveling coal. He has an external load/scatterer of energy (the fire in the firebox under the boiler). He has a primary source of potential/energy (the coal car). No fireman in his right mind would ignite the coal in the chute of the coal bin, to try and get some heat energy into the firebox! [That is, he would not attempt to extract power from the source. Yet that's exactly what all we engineers are trained to do at present.] Instead, the fireman takes out (collects) a finite amount (a shovelful) of coal (trapped energy). Coal per se (the potential gradient) has a certain energy density per unit volume (trapped joules per unit volume of coal) and the shovel (collector) has a certain volume. Accordingly, the shovelful of coal contains a certain amount of trapped joules of energy. In the fireman's shovel (the collector), the energy remains in totally trapped form, as coal not afire and without its trapped energy being dissipated as work. [He doesn't act like a fool and ignite the coal in the shovel either!] He then throws that shovel of coal (collected trapped energy) onto the fire (scatterer), completely separately from the coal bin/source. He continues to repeat his shoveling cycle, and each shovelful of coal added to the fire dissipates additional energy, powering the load.

The Free Energy Principle

All potential gradient (trapped excess energy density) is free for the taking.23 The potential is due to the violent VPF exchange between the vacuum and the separated bipolar charges furnishing the source potential gradient. The energy of the entire universe is flowing through that source potential. You can have as much of this internal VPF flux energy (potential) as you wish, as often as you wish, so long as you don't demand current (which is power, or the rate at which the energy is being freed and dissipated). It's really simple. You can have all the trapped energy you wish, from any source. You cannot connect to the source and start to dissipate the energy as power, however, without starting to close the "gate" from which your free trapped energy is coming.

In other words, here's the iron rule: If you draw current, you kill the bipolarity gate furnishing the potential gradient (source of energy density). In that case, you kill the source. If you do not draw current, you do not kill the bipolarity gate and you do not shut down the source. In that case, you can continue to "use" it and extract trapped EM energy from it forever.

Definitions Again

Definitions: I'll put down some simple equations, that may help to explain it more exactly. First we repeat some definitions.

Energy is any ordering imposed upon the virtual particle flux of vacuum. EM energy is any ordering imposed upon the virtual photon flux of vacuum. Static energy is an ordering (a template) which is stationary with respect to the external observer. Dynamic energy is an ordering (a template) which is not stationary with respect to the external observer.

Potential: Any ordering imposed upon the virtual particle flux of vacuum. Scalar potential is an ordering (template) that is not moving with respect to the external observer. Vector potential is an ordering (template) that is moving with respect to the external observer.

The scalar EM potential is any static (with respect to the external observer) ordering imposed upon the virtual photon flux of vacuum. Etc.

Note again that energy and potential have exactly the same definition. Potential is in fact trapped energy. Scalar EM potential is static EM energy (to the external observer) or trapped (collected) EM energy. In other words, if one takes off a differential of potential onto a fixed number of coulombs, one takes off a certain magnitude of trapped EM energy. In other words, one takes out a shovelful of coal from the coal car.

Importance of Separation of Charges

We Must Not Dispel the Separation of Charges In Our Source: The difference in our coal-fired train analogy and our electrical circuit is that, in the coal train, the coal in the coal car is not automatically and continually replenished. Also, the coal in the coal car has already been collected by the mass of the coal car, so it is not infinite. In the electrical circuit, the potential gradient in the primary source is continually replenished, automatically, and it is infinite (though it has a finite energy density). The reason is simple. EM potential (in the normal sense) is actually a virtual photon flux exchange between the vacuum (the entire vacuum, all over the universe) and a charged particle or collection of charged particles.24 Thus the potential (gradient) is a powerful energy flux, pumped by the vacuum and the entire universe, that continues automatically, so long as we do not allow the collected charges in our bipolarity source to be dissipated. In terms of a battery, we achieved separation of charges inside the battery by chemical action, and we paid for that initially. Once separated, the charges essentially stay separated (because of the chemistry) unless we foolishly do something to dissipate them, such as upsetting the chemistry, so they are no longer separated positive from negative. So if we don't do anything to these separated charges, they continue to be driven by their fierce exchange of virtual photon flux with the vacuum/universe. If we then simply extract some of that flux exchange, without moving the charges, we are directly "gating" trapped EM energy from the vacuum/charged particle VPF exchange.25

The Potential Is Infinite And So Is Its Energy Content

You Can't Dip The Ocean Dry With a Spoon: Let's say that another way. The charged particles in our potential source are in a constant, seething, equilibrium exchange of trapped EM energy with the entire universe. That energy exchange is so enormous that, if we gate some of it out to collect on some other "temporarily frozen" charges and potentialize/activate them, the vacuum flux doesn't even miss it. It's like dipping a spoonful of water out of the restless ocean. The hole is instantly filled, and the water replenished. We can dip with that spoon as much as we wish, and the ocean will never run dry, but will simply continue to furnish us water, spoonful by spoonful.

The same is true in our electric circuits. We can have all the potential (trapped EM energy density) we wish, for free, from a single source, so long as we do not allow work to be done inside the source to close off our "gate" and kill our primary source.

The Twisted Concept of Voltage

Before We Develop Some Pseudo-Equations: In the equations we wish to develop, we have one problem, due to the lack of insight of conventional electrical physicists. That is, they have insisted upon "measuring" and expressing both the infinite potential (nondissipated) and a certain quantity of potential (dissipated) in volts. So they say "a potential of so many volts." That's nonsense, and totally erroneous. Rigorously, a voltage is a drop or a dissipation of so much (a finite amount of) collected excess potential/energy. You "measure" the voltage in a voltmeter by impressing a potential gradient upon the electron gas in the circuitry, wherein you collect or get in your voltmeter so much [(joules/coulomb) x coulombs]. A tiny current (coulombs/second) from this internal collection then flows for a finite time through the resistance of the voltmeter. So you dissipate (joules/coulomb) x (coulombs/second) x (seconds), which gives a certain amount of energy dissipated as work in moving the needle of the voltmeter. The voltmeter is calibrated so that it effectively indicates the collected energy per coulomb that was dissipated, and it calls that entity voltage. It involves a finite amount of energy that has already been dissipated as work, and it's a measure of the local energy density of the potential in terms of joules/coulomb. It is not a measure of the potential proper. It's after the fact; the extracted (collected) potential gradient it actually refers to existed in the past, before the work (dissipation of the collected trapped energy) was done. To refer to the potential before its dissipation as "voltage" is precisely the same as confusing the future with the past. A "potential (difference) of so many volts" is actually a statement that "a potential difference of so much energy per coulomb" could be dissipated in a load, if it were connected to the load so that a finite amount of energy was collected, and this finite load-collection was allowed to dissipate as power (volts/coulomb x coulomb/sec) for a finite time, yielding work. It's even worse, but it would take a textbook to straighten out this one error in EM theory.

So we'll leave it at that, and we'll adapt the notion of potential the way it is corrupted in electrical circuit theory. There it's used not really as energy, but rather as excess energy per coulomb of potentialized charge. I apologize for that difficulty, which is not of my own making, but I must use the conventional notion if we are to greatly clarify the pseudo equations.

The Equations of Free Energy

The Pseudo-Equations: Let us use the following subscripts and letter convention, and develop the nomenclature needed:

T = trapped                                d = dissipated or dissipating

m = translated (moving)              K = energy

V = volts = potential drop (potential dissipated) = previously collected potential radiated away as heat in a load, doing work on the load in the process. Unfortunately, we shall also have to speak of a potential gradient that is not being dissipated, so we shall have to speak of "trapped volts" which is erroneous, but complies with the common usage.

f = electrostatic scalar potential.              Coul = coulombs

i = amperes = Dissipating potentialized coulombs per second flowing, so amps are something translating, always. Amps are excited coulombs, per second, that are dissipating their excitation. With superconductivity excluded, you only have amps when you have a potential drop across a load. So we will speak of amps as "dissipating," meaning that potentialized electrons are traveling through a load, dissipating their activation (gradients) in the load by radiating scattered photons (heat).

n = number of electrons in a coulomb = 6.3 x 1018 electrons/coulomb

Here are the pseudo equations (superconductivity is excluded):

ampm = could/sec = n electronsm/sec = n electronsd/sec [1]

Df = VT (as conventionally referred to). It would be volts if all [2] of it were dissipated, but it is not yet dissipated, so it is sort of "trapped volts". Erroneous, but the common use. So we will speak (somewhat distastefully) of "trapped volts" and "dissipated volts."

Vd x ampd x sec = watts x sec = power x time = work = Kd [3]

Vd x could/sec x sec = (work) = Kd [4]

In the switching, we switch KT to Kd so

KT Þ Kd [5]

But VT x coulT = KT [6]

Or

[VT] = [KT] / [coulT] = trapped energy/trapped coulomb [7]

[KT] = [VT] x [coulT] = amount of trapped energy, each cycle [8]

So that's what we were getting at. The amount of trapped energy you can transfer (in other words, how much coal you get in one shovelful) depends upon the number of trapped electrons you have in the trapped free electron gas in the collector, and the potential gradient you apply to those trapped coulombs to potentialize them.

Relaxation Time and Semiconductors

Relaxation Time: The time it takes for the free electrons in a conductor (or material) to reach the skin of the wire after potential is applied, is, of course, called the relaxation time. During that time, the free electrons in the gas are "trapped" insofar as producing current (dissipation of the potential) is concerned. However, immediately after the relaxation time ends, current begins and dissipation of the trapped energy begins.

In copper, the relaxation time is incredibly rapid. It's about 1.5 x 10-19 sec. However, in quartz it is about 10 days! So as you can see, we need to get somewhere in between these two values, and so we will have to "mix" or "dope" materials. We must get a sufficiently long relaxation time so that we can switch and collect comfortably in cycle one, then switch into cycle two for dispersion of the freely collected energy in the collector. However, the relaxation time we get must also be short enough to allow quick discharge in the load, as soon as we switch the primary source away from the collector. Actually, we need a degenerate semiconductor material instead of plain copper.

Degenerate Semiconductor Material: A semiconductor material is intermediate between a good conductor and an insulator. It's a nonlinear material, and doped. A degenerate semiconductor material is one which has all its conduction bands filled with electrons, and so it thinks it is a conductor. That is, a degenerate semiconductor is essentially a doped conductor, so to speak. As you can see, we can increase the relaxation time in our "conductors" connected to the source by making them of degenerate semiconductor material. What we're talking about is "doping" the copper in the wire, and in the collector, so that we can have plenty of time to collect, and switch, and discharge, and switch, and collect, etc.

Now in a doped conductor (degenerate semiconductor), we can tailor the relaxation time by tailoring the doping. We must dope the copper before we make the wire. Why would we wish to do that? We want to overcome the single problem that so far has defeated almost all the "overunity" researchers and inventors.

WHEN YOU CONNECT TO A SOURCE, YOU CAN ONLY EXTRACT CURRENT-FREE POTENTIAL -- FREE "TRAPPED EM ENERGY" -- DURING THE ELECTRON RELAXATION TIME IN THE CONNECTING CONDUCTORS AND SUCCEEDING CIRCUIT COMPONENTS. AFTER THAT, YOU'RE STEADILY EXTRACTING POWER, AND THE ENERGY EXTRACTED FROM THE SOURCE IS BEING PARTIALLY DISSIPATED IN THE RESISTANCE/LOADING OF THE CIRCUIT, AND PARTIALLY DISSIPATED IN THE INTERNAL RESISTANCE OF THE SOURCE. IN THE LATTER DISSIPATION, YOU'RE ALSO DISSIPATING YOUR SOURCE BY DOING WORK ON IT INTERNALLY TO KILL IT.

Good Copper Wire: Bane of Overunity Inventors: Many destitute inventors, tinkering and fiddling with overunity devices, finally get something (a circuit or device) that does yield more work out than they had to input. At that point, they usually conclude that it's simply the specific circuit configuration and its conventional functioning that produces the overunity work. However, usually as soon as this configuration is more carefully built with very good materials, boom! It isn't overunity anymore. The inventors and their assistants then desperately bang and clang away, getting more frustrated as the years pass. The investors get mad, sue for fraud, or get in all sorts of squabbles. The scientists who tested it and found it wanting, pooh-pooh the whole thing as a scam and a fraud, or just a seriously mistaken inventor. Scratch one more "overunity" device.

Most of these inventors got their successful effect (and possibly erratically) when they were struggling with inferior, usually old, usually corroded materials. Actually, the more inferior, the better. The more contaminated/doped, the better!

The moment you wire up your circuit with good copper wire connected between the battery or primary source and any kind of load including the distributed circuitry loading itself, you can forget about overunity. You will lose it in the copper, after the first 1.5 x 10-19 second!

Think of a really good conductor such as copper as an essentially linear material. Linear means energy conservative. Overunity can only be done with a highly nonlinear effect. So your "conductors" have to be made of nonlinear materials. In fact, they have to be made of degenerate semiconductor material. For the type of circuitry we are talking about, the copper has to be doped and then made into "doped copper" wiring. You also have to utilize the primary battery only to potentialize a collector (secondary battery/source), and then use this secondary battery source to conventionally power the load while also killing itself.

The Wiring And the Collector Must Be of Degenerate Semiconductor (DSC) Material.26 A good materials scientist/engineer, together with a decent electrodynamicist, can readily design and tailor some doped copper wiring so that the material in the wiring is a degenerate semiconductor material, with a target (desired) relaxation time. That's what you should use to make the wiring to connect up your source to the collector with, and that type of material is also what you use in your collector. You can use either a coil or a capacitor as the collector, but its "conductive" material has to be degenerate semiconductor material -- in short, it must be doped to have the proper relaxation time. From the collector to the load, however, obviously you want to use a good conductor material. Ordinary copper will do nicely there.

Once you do that, you're in business. When making the DSC material, simply tailor the relaxation time to something which is easily switched. For example, take one millisec. With a relaxation time of that long, switching is easy. In fact, one could even use good mechanical switching. Or easily use inexpensive ordinary solid state switching, without having to go all the way to nanosecond switching.

Then, in the collector, you calculate the number of "trapped coulombs" you have. Take the "trapped voltage" (current-free potential's energy density per coulomb) you extract from the source during the electron relaxation time after the collector is connected. Multiply the number of trapped coulombs in the collector by the trapped voltage during collection, and you have the amount of energy in joules that you extract FOR FREE, without paying for it, from the source during every collection cycle.

Sources, Collectors, and Power

Tapping Vacuum Energy. You're getting the excess electrical energy directly from the vacuum, as we briefly pointed out above. The vacuum will freely replenish all the "trapped voltage" you extract from the primary source during the electron relaxation time. It won't replenish a single bit of "dissipated voltage" (power) you extract from the source.

Note that the same considerations apply in the collector. It's got to have a somewhat longer electron relaxation time. Its electrons stay "unrelaxed" during the collection cycle, and allow for some additional switching time to connect to the load. The "trapped voltage" across the collector multiplied by the number of trapped coulombs in it, gives the number of joules of FREE EM ENERGY you extract and get into and onto the collector (the shovel). In other words, that's your "shovelful of coal." You then throw the "shovelful" onto the fire/load -- you simply disconnect the collector from the primary source and connect it across the external load. The collector (secondary battery) now powers the load and its own internal resistance, "killing" itself while furnishing the energy for powering the external load as well.

The Source Can Be Almost Anything: You can use as a source a simple elevated wire, to "tap" potential from the 200-300 volts/meter between earth and ionosphere. Here again, you need to utilize calibrated, doped wire.

Finally, you must adjust the repetition switching in accordance with the discharge time through the load. In other words, you have a serial process as follows:

(1) extract trapped energy (potential) from the source onto the collector, Dt1.

(2) Switch the collector off the source, onto the load, during time Dt2.

(3) Wait while the collected energy in the collector discharges through the load, during time Dt3.

(4) Switch the collector back off the load and onto the potential source, during time Dt4. That completes one cycle.

The serial timing simply is [Dt1 + Dt2 + Dt3 + Dt4].

If you balance all the doping and the materials design, and correlate the switching, you can get all the free energy you wish. Properly utilized, a single car battery can be used to power an electric automobile indefinitely.  Or even to power a battleship.  In the real world, of course, you will inevitably have a tiny bit of loss as you go, because there's a finite (though high) resistance between the two poles of your battery. Handling that is a piece of cake. Simply run a separate little collection circuit to collect a little bit of trapped EM energy from the slowly leaking source, and ever so often feed the collected energy back into the battery as power, to "reseparate" the charges (charge the battery) and replace the small amount of the primary source's potential gradient that has been lost. The battery, load, and "trickle charger" then become a closed-circuit free-energy source that will last for years and years.

Limited Only By One's Imagination: Of course you can see many variants; this is just the "master key." You can have multiple collectors, collecting trapped energy simultaneously or in sequence off a single source, and pooling their collected energy to more powerfully power the load. You can utilize a very high "voltage", such as in the Swiss electrostatic overunity device, to increase the energy collected per coulomb in each switching (in each shovelful) in accord with equation [8]. For a battery, you can set a separate little collector/load device to trickle-charge the battery, overcoming the small normal "leakage current" that does occur in batteries and in real circuits and devices. The opportunities are endless. You can put in a unit to take mostly only power-free energy from the "power line" feeding your business or home, reducing your utility bill by -- say -- 90%. Or you can simply build a small home power unit to do the whole job, for only a few hundred dollars. This simple secret can be used to power the world, cheaply and cleanly, and to clean up the biosphere.

 

Conclusion

 

Well, there you have it. I've given you the benefit of what required most of my adult life to discover. The definitions advanced in this paper are rigorous. It took years of sweat and tears to come up with them. They're simple, but they will change your entire understanding of electromagnetics, power, and energy once you grasp them. Please read them, and ponder them, several times. One or two readings will not be sufficient to fully grasp what is said here.

Also, hopefully, by this time, the reader is beginning to experience the same emotions as I experienced when I finally discovered how simple it all really was. First one wants to laugh for about two hours at how truly ignorant we've all been. Then one wants to cry for about two hours for the same reason. This could all have been done a century ago, if we had ever really understood electromagnetics.

We've had this electromagnetics around for over 100 years -- Maxwell's book was published in 1873. We got it wrong, starting right with Maxwell and his use of the material ether, which was almost universally assumed at the time. Still, by using quaternions, Maxwell succeeded in packing a great deal more in the model than even he himself recognized. When the vector aspects interacted to form a zero resultant translationally, those active interactants were still in there and still fighting and interacting. The scalar component of the quaternion remained, and infolded those struggling vectors and functions of them inside itself. In short, it captured the case where the electromagnetic energies are involved in translation actions which nullify each other translationally (electromagnetically). However, the energies are still in there in the continuing interactants inside the zero vector resultant. As such, they are trapped EM energy. And it is the trapped EM energy inside a mass -- not the mass per se -- which is responsible for gravitation. In other words, Maxwell's theory already correctly captured the unification of the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field in 1873.

Then Heaviside et al forced Maxwell's theory into a vector framework, throwing out the scalar component, and discarding the unification of gravitation and electromagnetics along with it. Serious errors were made and still exist in many of the fundamental definitions; in fact, many of them aren't definitions at all. Nearly every engineer and physicist can readily calculate potentials -- all, of course, on the "dissipation" side where the potentials are actually the amount of potential that was collected upon a collector and then dissipated. I could find hardly a single physicist who really knew what a scalar potential was prior to a finite amount being collected and dissipated as voltage. Yet 99% of them firmly believed they understood the potential.

So now you have the results of this researcher's long and arduous quest for the golden fleece. Please go forward with it, to make this a better and cleaner world for everyone.

Just remember that the control and use of energy is personal power. The control and use of absolute energy is the control and use of absolute personal power. In the old adage, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Please use it wisely.
Practical Overunity Energy Devices
Copyright © T. E. Bearden - May 13, 1994
Association of Distinguished American Scientists



~Russ

RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #3, on April 23rd, 2011, 07:26 PM »
Quote from freethisone on April 22nd, 2011, 09:34 PM
Peace all, and be well. A big thank you to Russ who started this open source.:P
A big thanks to matt for doing what he is doing. This page would not be here with out the efforts put forth! Now its up to us all to make this World abetted place.

God bless! ~Russ

Forum Administrator

RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #4, on April 23rd, 2011, 10:32 PM »
Lets keep this rockin guys.  Work on invites!

freethisone

RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #5, on April 24th, 2011, 04:57 AM »Last edited on May 11th, 2011, 03:23 PM by freethisone
Patent 1067974 The beginning of understanding for the creation of magnetic gas for the EPG.   Is the epg a optically pulsed electron accelerator?  4715038 this patent will bring you to a new understanding of the forces that have been introduced by inventors of the laser, and the electron laser itself.   In the second patent we advance the idea of creating magnetic gas patent 5132586
one other way to create the magnetic particles, impractical as it may. the experiment is called the exploding wire technique. when the wire explodes the wire particles created would be of the proper size. up to 10 nanometers. take for instance a neon sign, now bring a magnet near the glass tube. will the gas spread away and create a void were the magnet is placed? could the neon that is electrified already be a magnetic gas? check it out for yourself to find the answer.
 
next take the neon sign, this time don't plug it in, take a red green or blue laser pointer,, and aim it at the glass tube will the neon glow inside?
these ideas are used to determine the full extent of the properties of a plasma based gas, such as that near the corona of the sun. to determine the property of ozone gas one needs only to look at how the spark gap creates this without question. a blue plasma of ozone used in conjunction with high energy UV light.
 
as we determine the properties of these gasses under different condition we then begin to understand the polarization for this gas can be made manifest by the use of RF signals imparted on the gas to create the rise and fall of electrons, and the subsequent photon emissions of this gas.
The EPG in its simplest form.  take a look at patent 6020990 here we learn about the radio or RF in its connection to the optical/photon.
 
To avoid the need for expensive equipment this design is shown to create your very own EPG with inexpensive parts.  
 
Items needed, a spool of magnet wire, to create the induction coils, and primary winding.  A TV fly back transformer, for the production of ozone, and  magnetic particles. A 12 volt battery to supply DC current to the fly back transformer. One or more UV LED bulbs, a double AA battery to supply energy to the UV light. A Joule thief circuit to energize said UV bulbs. Practical as it may seem the energy needed to power the bulbs will be very small. Many variations can be implemented to get a similar result. 2 small electrodes of small diameter, and smooth surface, the positive, and negative wires from the fly back transformer is attached to these conductors, to create the spark gap that in-turn creates ozone, and particles within the system. 2 Small quartz crystals can also be used for experimenting with the fly back transformer. The reason these crystals are to be tried is due to a specific frequency that will contain RF signals, therefore we can get a very nice resonant wave form, and perhaps is the key of polarization to the gas. What will cause these atoms to reach a higher energy level, were the electrons rise, and fall in there orbits to create additional photon energy in the system? Perhaps A magnetic pulse, or the imparting of flux into the atom itself, that would cause a change in mass.
The mass of an atom is measured from the outer shell of the electron orbits.  take a look at patent 6020990 here we learn about the radio or RF in its connection to the optical/photon.

CO2 would be an interesting magnetic fluid.

  Consider the Drude electron gas
more info will follow to complete this draft, as i inspire to do so..
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #6, on April 25th, 2011, 07:00 PM »Last edited on December 1st, 2011, 12:22 AM by freethisone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yblGWkT0RjM


THE FINAL SECRETS OF FREE ENERGY  :angel::heart::cool:

Many of us share the same Interests, and study.
I love the big bang theory.  I may not believe in the big bang itself.
I love space, here I am, what am I doing here another mystery.
I study Philosophy, I draw conclusions. I use the scientific method.
I wonder if, I wonder Why, did I think this, did I think that?
A band of brothers, are we connected? Does our thoughts spread out and propagate in all directions? Did you get the call?
School of rock, school of hard knocks, school of fish.
Form a union, form a sculpture, form my mind. A picture tells a thousand words.
Symbols the study of. Binary code, binary words, I speak in a parable, the meaning of life.
What are The waters, what is the light? I thank God for life.
Open your eyes, open the door, open your mind, open your heart, Window to the soul.
What is the meaning of I am?
I like poetry, but was it I who moved the pen?
These are my mysteries. Say high, Will tomorrow ever die?

What is the meaning of life? Who am I? And how do I get where I am supposed to be?

I can only state by my experiences, and the out comes may not be the same. It takes time to reflect in the mirror.
your individual presumption, even asking. : what is it?" A determination of what they actually are is needed.
Words echo in my mind. Seemingly we have connections.
we draw on experience, and when our experiences fail we adapt, even though we make the same mistakes.
? My take on cause and effect. were certain particular influences are striking the same cords.

The human experience. All of us who have preceded experience, and also determine many of the same conclusions we do today.
We have not been accepted, and must demonstrate genuine substance, the very material of our being. Leading to determinations, and meaning of the words" I am."
We are unique individuals, together we are greater. The numbers accounting for the whole.
All of that has not reseeded, even what preceded will come again. We are after all exactly the same.
You can even plot that on a chart.

If I had to continue fanning the flames for more energy. What is E-Motion? it Is energy in motion. What is the magic mirror? The window of your inner soul.
Because we are neither hot, nor cold, because some choose to be Luke warm, evolution is hinder, the rotation, and resolutions. The standards we place on ourselves.
Many snippets, ringing the same bell. I was cold, I had to fan the flames, so I would not be chilli. Liberty Bell.
The tones changing, mildly in some instances resonating, even quaking, this mural is in fact moral, It makes up our very being .

Philosophy is inherent to human nature, and all life. The process based on learning traits, and experiences we all have.
Always wondering what is our purpose, never drawing a conclusion is tardy in school.
The connection of our mind, our body, and experience lead us to considerations self evident analogy, and if we are careful to perform without ego gain virtue.
If you search for answers they are provided. Provided from the vast melting of consciousness in the eternal realm. Purely instinctive, but capable of understanding.

If this had not been the case, then as a whole social skills, and the development of moral fiber would be impossible, and we would be dis-functional.
like the vulture, or locusts of corporate greed .The underworld in the literal scene, are the snakes in the proverbial grasses.
The fly on the wall. striving to evolve they remain as a whole unable to do so, and are destroyed by the very thing that was inherent to there nature.
As such unable to comprehend, confounded, and by nature cannot be an integral part of the whole.

The sleepy dorm mouse opens doors, The scribe is evolving, and the thieve is locked up never to open one again..
We are in a sense trapped inside our bodies, even the mind much like the thief. the difference is we understand the process of evolving. We understand the importance of virtue. The thief, he will always be the same.
Without connection we cannot test the soul. without similarity, we would never discover the truth, and meaning of life.
The acid test is this life. when i was younger my sister had told me i had to learn to read between the lines.
Only after years of discipline was i even able to comprehend what she was actually saying. the parables of meaning. the ability of reaching outwards, stepping onto the plateau of our very limits. hoping in the end to reach a even higher flight.
I thank you for sharing, adding to the pool that is our understanding. Nothing Hidden will remain hidden indefinitely, o ha so true.   :heart:

The writing on the wall has changed.

Ice age 3 d -model described. Yes Doctor? The precession is continuity torquing. It continues to follow the slipping top analogy.
Its simply spinning. Its simply stunning, its simply continues to rotate I will exaggerate your observations. Its simply up to you to observe.

As it rotates earthquakes become time variable according to rotational speed. The axis it i pointing, it following the spinning top.. its simply slipping. its simply a stunning effect. There is a pressure of fluid within the core. Its simply splitting, its Humphrey Dummpie. Its described ,and self verifying. Its simply continues.
Its bursting, of a water balloon. Its simply to soon., Its simply predictable. Its following its secondary oscillation. Beating like a drum. The wave is in front. Its simply like a pointy boat or arrow. Its simply caused by this star. There is, simply no way around. The time frame was predictable. Its simply solar rotation. Its simply lunar precession. @3 days of solar rotation, and according to speed it will split like a cord. Ripping the seams. Its
It was simply well known. Its simply a des-cry. An utter dis-( By grace). I am simply sorry. It simply was well known to be true. lighting up like a tree on Christ mass day. Its spilling on two sides. The start of the predictable out come is time variable. It also follow along the net force inducing. Its also bouncing and skipping along. simply bending space. Its simply expanding.  As the earth spheroid preforms like an egg.

What is relativity? Its simply, Cause and effect..




:angel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbWfCI9Kqx8

schedule for update.

what is that wheel works of the universe? i can only assume that because our moon, and earth are coupled. there is a difference of potential charge. again this is 2 objects in space. if we had a wire long enough we plug one to the moon and 1 to the earth. therefore there is a difference in potential charge. what ever charge is left over then  can be used as free energy. because the moon always faces only one side to earth. the back side be an insulator, the front side the conductor. Tesla proved this. since the upper atmosphere is 1 charge, and the earth another charge and potential. the ground  source be negative, there is a difference in potential charge that can be used. this is why he said for his radiant energy  device the higher the better. that creates the difference in potential charge. he did formulate this charge. if i can remember right, or at least close, the difference in charge is close to 400 to 800 thousand volts. now lets just use the earth ground as one source of negative potential. then the positive side would be that conductor up the flag pole, the higher the better.  
I also consider what the universe has to offer as a usable charge? on the other hand what is universal in the universe? Tesla advances the working of wireless transmitting. Lets just say the obvious, the universe is a source of both particles and waves.  
when any radiation is considered as a usable source of energy consider the stars.  
all stars are a source of both particles and waves, radio emission. The reservoir that is the obvious tappable energy. magnetic radio noise. that noise is white noise, and operate's in the UHF frequency. ultra high frequency. why would this technology be outlawed? because it is a source of free energy. An old TV receiver can be adapted to receive this energy as a charge, through induction of the wave particle emission. to the uhf antenna. white noise.
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yblGWkT0RjM

In this experiment I only wanted to eliminate any source of lens effect from the camera, when i got it home and looked at it, i was surprised to find a change of sound as i passed the metal conductor between the camera, and the sun. what i decided as for the cause, i deemed the holes in the conductor as allowing only a specific frequency of solar radiation to pass through the holes. fast forward to the end to hear the change in sound as i was speaking.  Vorticity ethereal objects.


more info when i inspire to do so.

Thomas E. Bearden


A SIMPLE FREE EM ENERGY FLOW DEVICE

   Even in the hoary old CEM/EE model, continuous free flow of EM energy from a static source does creep in and cannot be eliminated. E.g., consider an electron or charged capacitor laid on a permanent magnet, so that the E-field of the electrical component is at a 90 degree angle to the H-field of the magnet. By standard Poynting energy flow theory, an energy flow vector S from that static arrangement is present, is continuous, is maximized, and is ongoing. The energy comprising the “static” EM field is in motion, as given by the simple formula S = E ´ H.
This problem is sometimes noted by scientists, but “what is in motion, and how” has not been resolved because classical electrodynamic and electrical engineers erroneously assume that both the E of the electret and the H of the permanent magnet are “static” fields, not involving any sort of “energy flow”. That of course is false. It ignores the fact that any EM field is already a set of ongoing EM energy flows (Whittaker, 1903, 1904). Hence both the “static” E and the “static” H are already ongoing EM energy flows continuously extracted from the active vacuum by the associated source charges (magnetic poles or electrical charges as the case may be) (Bearden, 2000, 2002).
   So one can easily build or assemble an EM energy device continuously producing a real, free flow of EM energy from the vacuum, where the device itself has COP >>1.0. The COP = ∞ since the operator need input no energy at all to maintain the continuous free EM energy flow once the device is assembled.
Further, the free flow of Poynting energy (and—unrecognized by present scientists—a giant free flow of Heaviside curled energy) will continue indefinitely. This example of the continuous production of giant negative entropy completely falsifies the present old second law of thermodynamics, which must be changed and corrected as previously shown. The device is an example of a negative entropy-producing system performing as has been shown theoretically possible (Evans and Rondoni, 2002). The best that electrical engineering has to offer in explanation is similar to Buchwald’s comment recognizing the problem. Quoting:
“[Poynting’s result] implies that a charged capacitor in a constant magnetic field which is not parallel to the electric field is the seat of energy flows even though all macroscopic phenomena are static.” (Buchwald, 1985, p. 44).
In the atoms and molecules of matter present since the creation of the present universe, every such crossed E ´ H field combination has been steadily pouring out EM energy freely for some 1.3 ´ 1010 years, and the energy flow has not yet run down or even diminished. We are universally surrounded by charges freely producing negative entropy, and our scientists have not even recognized it! Basic EM energy flow is free, universally throughout the universe. Evoking a continuous free EM energy flow is child’s play: simply assemble some charge or a dipole, or crossed E and H fields, and then leave the assembly alone and do not permit it to be destroyed or scattered. Capture all the energy you wish, but in asymmetric circuits and systems which never destroy their source of free energy transducer and flowing from the seething vacuum.
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #7, on April 26th, 2011, 06:47 PM »Last edited on May 12th, 2011, 10:41 PM by freethisone
the different types of coil windings.  
 
First the Rodin coil, the geometry of the coil is exquisite, although i have seen many coils reproduced by experimenters, none of these coils actually follow the design description. the path of the current allows these simple coils to run at a very high efficiency. Let me just say for the record the efficiency will be even greater when wound properly as Rodin has explained. the need for switched DC current is used.  the explanation for why the coil is a great design. Because the path way of the electrical current is in both direction, there is less frictional losses due to resistance from the back emf. Is he perhaps using the natural back emf, but then giving the pulse of current at the time it begins to collapse in the direction of this collapse? Then there would be an increase in magnetic flux in the opposite direction. Be very careful these coils are made for high flux rates, therefore some type of shielding should be used to protect against magnetic radiations.
 
The second coil is the Tesla bifilar wound coil. Nikola Tesla explains that a standard coil of 1000 turns with a potential of 100 volts across it will have a difference of 0.1 volt between turns. A similar BIFILAR coil will have a potential of 50 volts between turns.
a simple explanation we see how the path way of the current is again modified to reduce or eliminate  the counter electromotive force inductive reactant.  
with that said i have seen many people make this coil, and they only follow the 2 wire description, perhaps it is simple to reproduce in this manner.  
The fact still remains as Tesla had explained this can be made with 2 wires, 4 wires, 6 wires, and up.  the more pathways you open up the greater the voltages between turns. quadruple the pathways, and use 8 wires instead of 2. from a 50 volt potential to a 200 volt potential difference between windings.

A quote from the web, for calculating the potential difference."Nikola Tesla explains that a standard coil of 1000 turns with a potential of 100 volts across it will have a difference of 0.1 volt between turns. A similar BIFILAR coil will have a potential of 50 volts between turns.
In that the stored energy is a function of the square of the voltages the energy in the BIFILAR will be ... 50 squared / .1 squared = 2500 / .01 = 250,000 times greater than the standard coil"

RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #8, on April 26th, 2011, 10:06 PM »Last edited on May 3rd, 2011, 10:46 PM by freethisone
IMHO this is the greatest device ever known to man. running from a static field that is pulling radiant energy into the specific metal base. (Brass) from the vacuum it flows into the coils.
easy easy peezy to make.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kdup42Epq0o&feature=related

this example must be in every inventors tool box.
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #9, on April 28th, 2011, 01:02 PM »Last edited on November 28th, 2011, 07:14 AM by freethisone
Vibrations and waves MIT lecture
 
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUzh5CQvAI4&feature=related  

In this lecture we learn about some very key features of energy, and its magnetic radiation.  
To advance the study of free energy, we learn how waves become polarized in relation to the transmitter. Microwave.
in real trial to find the ideal 1/4 wave length. start with very long conductors, then chop them off.
one experimental idea is to take many points of a conducting wire, 4 meters in long  spit in half at the 2 meter mark, the frequency be 75MHZ , we are working with 1 kilo-volt free power.  each single straight wire will receive polarized energy from the source.  the connections of free output, will  be at the 2 meter mark were the wire is split. the second connection to the renaming 2 meter long wire. each wire and its output be connected to the 2 meter mark of the first wire, and the same at the second wire that is also 2 meters long.
one such source can be the sun.  take a look at this movie to see were I'm going with this.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zMAWztZ6TI  in this case there is no need for a wire for the reception of free energy, but
it is possible to get free energy by use of a single wire, like Tesla had described by running a wire above the roof of a house, and connecting a single wire to this wire there will be  a source of energy. like in this lecture by Walter lewin we lean the type of energy that can be free. if we had 3 wires connected in series will there be an increase in free amperage? this brings me to the experiment i present. take a wooden form, or a flat board 20 inches by 20 inches, drill in it holes in a a fashion as to be able to introduce a conducting wire  through each hole. now you will have lets say 100 holes, and 100 wire points. it would look similar to a bed of nails. Directional we aim the wire north east south west,  so as to point it at the sun. As the sun radiates with its RF frequency we hope to capture it, as polarized energy. The so called bed of nails is the receiver for the use of this type of free energy. if we wish to exclude any unwanted radiation we can place in front of the bed of nails a conducting plate that has holes of a certain size as to allow only  radiation waves of specific frequency to pass to the conducting points of wires. we can also connect in series, and or parallel to these points of conducting wires on the back side. It is the polarization of these radiation that will act upon the conducting wires. Similar to a vandegraff generator were you point a FL tube directionally toward the generator to light the bulb, due to these  specific polarized emitting frequency.  is this  white noise, or radiant energy ? it is in fact hard and soft rays that exert a pressure on mass in space.

A fellow youtuber, interpretation of time, pointing energy.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=so0SavfXS3w

now note the Morley antenna pictured. See its even more simple then my design. No bed of nails here, but the lines across his antenna is a bed of nails like my idea, just much more simple. Now look at the bed of nails used by HARP antenna, in Alaska.
 
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #10, on April 28th, 2011, 06:34 PM »Last edited on May 1st, 2011, 11:55 PM by freethisone
The building up process of understanding, Thomas E. Bearden some of his material is presented again..


 Lorentz symmetry in an electrical circuit forcibly equalizes its back emf and forward emf, and in a magnetic circuit it forcibly equalizes the back mmf and the forward mmf. The power company’s power system transmission lines and circuits all enforce Lorentz symmetry, thus assuring that we continue to pay the power company to engage in a giant wrestling match inside its own generators and always lose. To borrow a phrase from Nikola Tesla, the ubiquitous use of this self-crippling circuit is
“…one of the most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in history." (Tesla, 1919).
By deliberately violating the normal operation of this self-symmetrizing circuit, the system can be forced to violate Lorentz symmetry, hence permitting COP > 1.0. But because of the ubiquitous use of this terrible circuit, the false mystique has erroneously solidified in the scientific community that COP > 1.0 energy-from-the-vacuum (EFTV) electromagnetic circuits cannot be built and that the second law of thermodynamics cannot be violated. To the contrary, several areas in physics are already known to violate the second law. These areas are listed in some of the leading thermodynamics texts (Kondepudi and Prigogine, 1998 and 1999, p. 459) and are known and accepted by leading nonequilibrium thermodynamicists. One such area is the use of strong gradients (in EM circuits and elsewhere).
In addition, every statistical fluctuation in a system initially in equilibrium (in a state of maximum entropy) produces negative entropy and thereby lowers the system entropy from its initial maximum value. Quoting Maxwell:
"The truth of the second law is … a statistical, not a mathematical, truth, for it depends on the fact that the bodies we deal with consist of millions of molecules… Hence the second law of thermodynamics is continually being violated, and that to a considerable extent, in any sufficiently small group of molecules belonging to a real body." (Maxwell, 1878).
Precise fluctuation theorems exist for calculation of these effects (Evans and Searles, 1994; Crooks, 1999). Often the effect can be of significance; in certain chemical solutions the negative entropy effects from fluctuations can exist in up to a cubic micron of fluid, and can last for up to two seconds (Wang et al., 2002). In aqueous solutions a cubic micron may contain about 30 billion ions and molecules, and in that region some of the chemical reactions are running backwards.
That EM energy is always positive energy, and that the mass of electrical charges is always positive. To the contrary, with its electron lifted out and departed, a persisting Dirac sea hole has negative mass-energy. As a source charge each hole will also produce negative energy EM fields and potentials. Currents of such negative mass-energy holes (the so-called “dark matter”) and their resulting negative energy EM fields (the so-called “dark energy”) can be evoked and explored in actual circuits, as has been shown (Bedini and Bearden, 2004).
But even Dirac, who despised negative energy and devoted much of his effort to trying to get rid of it, did take the mistaken view that the hole would be observed as a positron—basing it on the assumption that when the hole was moved away, the space originally occupied by the hole will have lost its excess negative mass-energy and negative charge, and thus has become more positive in charge and with a positive-going increase in positive mass-energy. Of course this positive increase in the local space charge is not a direct observation of the departed hole itself, or of any physical interaction with the hole itself. Neither is the positive-going increase in mass-energy of the vacated space. It is just a reaction of a sudden sharp (and momentary) change in the negative charge of a region of space that started from a more negative charge condition and went to zero, and of the change in positive direction in the negative mass-energy of a region of space. It is the replacement of a negative mass-energy electron by a combined positive mass-energy electron and negative mass-energy electron (the replacement of the hole by a piece of ordinary vacuum). A certain charge change in space is thus observed as a positive-going charge change, after the hole has departed that position. But that is most certainly not an observation of the departing hole, and it is not identically the hole.
This mistaken notion of “observation of the hole itself as a positron” has been applied in materials since in interacting with a material lattice (as in the observing instrument) the hole almost always first eats an available electron and—together with the electron—the two as a couplet disappear back into the vacuum as a “piece of the Dirac Sea” (a piece of normal vacuum) without any radiation whatsoever.8 This leaves behind an excess net positive charge in the lattice, and that net charge has positive mass-energy and positive energy EM fields. The hole, on the other hand, has negative mass-energy and negative energy EM fields.
So an excess positive charge is not the hole at all, because the hole is already departed elsewhere. Normal electron hopping in a material lattice with an extra positive charge results in the excess positive charge (the lattice positron) migrating around as a “lattice positron current”. But it has been largely—and erroneously—accepted in solid state physics as “identical” to the hole. To settle the issue, simply evaluate the hole and its fields prior to the hole moving or interacting with anything, so that observation has not occurred.
In this case, remarks by Farmelo are of direct interest. He stated:
"Dirac's idea was that 'empty space' actually contains electrons that obey the negative-energy solutions of the equation. He suggested that the negative-energy states are normally 'full', just like the electrons that fill up the low-energy states of heavy atoms, according to the Pauli principle. This means that positive-energy electrons can't make transitions to these negative-energy states, explaining why ordinary electrons don't continually disappear into space. ... by 1931 he had changed his mind and come to a much more radical conclusion: 'A hole, if there was one, would be a new kind of elementary particle, unknown to experimental physics, having the same mass and opposite charge to the electron.' …By the time Dirac came to collect his Nobel prize in physics, towards the end of 1933, he was in the enviable position of the theorist who has been proven right after his colleagues had almost unanimously dismissed his most imaginative work as misguided and even perverse. His hole theory was soon superseded by quantum field theory (which he did much to invent and came to abominate), so one can only wonder at his ability to use a wrong theory to produce one of the most triumphant predictions of modern science." (Farmelo, 2002, p. 48).
That EM waves in space are transverse; e.g., given propagation along the z-axis, the E-field might be taken as oscillating along the x-axis and the H-field along the y-axis. This assumption of the transverse EM force-field wave in space is false. To explain its falsity, we must explain how the field is measured, and the implications.
Consider the Drude electron gas (Drude, 1900) in a conductor (as in a simple antenna or in a detecting instrument). The electrons continually hop off an atom, into the electron gas, onto another atom whose electron had gone wandering, etc. All the electrons have spin as well, and so we can roughly compare an electron to a spinning gyro if the analogy is not pushed too far.
When an EM signal moves through space longitudinally along a wire at nearly the speed of light, the electrons do not move (migrate) that way or at that speed at all. Longitudinal force is indeed developed in the Drude gas electrons by the diverged Poynting component. When a longitudinally-forced Drude gas electron tries to move longitudinally down the wire, it is repelled back nearly equally by all those electrons beyond it. So viewed as a gyro, the electron’s spin axis is essentially constrained longitudinally. The restrained spinning electron acts as a gyro, and so it precesses (in the wire) at right angles to the longitudinal disturbing force generated by the potentialization energy flow. The longitudinally restrained electron precesses laterally across the cross section of the wire, when "pushed" parallel to the wire with a longitudinal force. As the potentialization signal oscillates to and fro longitudinally, the precessing electrons oscillate to and fro transversely, mostly within the wire’s cross section.
In a conductor whose Drude electrons experience longitudinal to and fro forces from the longitudinally oscillating “signal from space” interaction, these electrons spend most of their time moving axially back and forth (transversely) in the wire, due to their lateral gyro-precession reaction to the longitudinal forces. The electrons do slip longitudinally just a wee bit (particularly at the surface of the wire), and so they do move down the wire with only a small "drift velocity"—usually of a few inches per hour!
In space, the EM wave is a compression and rarefaction of the energy density of vacuum—i.e., of the stress energy of the vacuum. In short, it is analogous to a “sound wave”, and hence longitudinal.
We detect the electron transverse precession movement and direction, so we detect transverse electron gyroprecession waves in the wire. Even for electrons in space away from wires, due to their masses the electrons are relatively very sluggish and inertially-restrained longitudinally, and so they still mostly precess transversely to and fro. The “effect” force field waves in charged matter are transverse electron gyroprecession waves. The “causative” EM waves in space are force-free longitudinal precursor waves of oscillating curvature changes in spacetime—and thus oscillating changes in the intensity of the virtual particle flux of the vacuum.
The detection of electron precession waves and theorizing of EM transverse waves in the conductor and in space were accomplished and fixed before the electron was even known or discovered. Hence no such thing as the electron, its gyroelectron precession effect, or the Drude electron gas itself was even suspected. Since transverse waves were detected in the receiving conductor and instrument, everyone thought that the EM waves coming in from space had just been "intercepted" in the wire. Thus it was assumed that the incoming EM waves in space must obviously be transverse force field waves also.
That is precisely how the pioneers of electrodynamics got the totally mistaken notion of the transverse EM wave in space. They believed in the material ether also, so to them there was not a single point in the universe where mass was absent. If there had been a material ether with spinning material particles to precess, then those transverse force fields (in the ether) would indeed have existed. No such ether exists, and no such transverse EM waves exist in the matter-free vacuum.


The luminiferous material ether was experimentally falsified in 1887, more than a century ago (Michelson and Morley, 1887). Not a CEM/EE equation was ever changed to rid the CEM/EE model of its false assumption of (1) the material ether, (2) force fields in space, (3) transverse EM force field waves in space, etc., and (4) the other falsities we listed and discussed above.
Tesla was very much aware that the EM waves in massless space were longitudinal, not transverse. He was perplexed that electrodynamicists did not understand this. Of the transverse wave theory, he stated:
"The Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a while, but I do not hesitate to say that in a short time it will be recognized as one of the most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in history." (Tesla, 1919).

By using Bedini methods, both dark energy and dark matter and their phenomenology can be produced, investigated, and utilized in the laboratory in specialized negative energy EM circuits and asymmetrical systems using pulsed sharp gradients to generate the sources and the phenomenology.
We strongly urge the physics and astronomy communities to investigate and explore negative energy and negative mass in appropriate circuits with appropriate sharp gradients. Such research can resolve the dark matter and dark energy questions, resulting in an appreciable advance in our understanding of nature and the physical universe.


RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #11, on April 28th, 2011, 07:44 PM »Last edited on May 25th, 2011, 05:11 PM by freethisone
Two of my discoveries, not very intuitive. the Egyptians loved magnets.
 
First The Ankh was, for the ancient Egyptians,
the symbol (the actual Hieroglyphic sign) of life but.
The ANKH does in every way, and most likely functioned as a field magnet.
very powerful i would bet money on this one. See pictures below. The Sumerian glyph shows the operation of the force field on the magnetic pole of this glyph. south or north magnetic field.
 
 Second the Egyptian Scarab Beetle Scarabs are associated with the Egyptian
god, Khepri. It was Khepri that pushed the sun across the sky. The earths precession of equinox period. Beginning on Feb 16 2010. we therefore experience this movement on earth, crustal shifts.
 the scarab in every way represents, a modern day magnetic dipole. Although we see the scarab has 3 main segments, it may also represent a magnetic triplet. one could also consider the Ankh as a 3 pole field magnet.
 
that's it my discovery.

Elerctric fields are the subject i wish to address.
 Now to generate a movement on a rotational axis if done correctly. Take metal hollow spear, now a second sphere but smaller. Connect the 2 balls by way of metal conductor, a stout wire.

In the second test setup with a wooden dowel. we charge each sphere till they are not equal in charge. a rotation should occur. You just need an axis of rotation between the 2 balls that are connected.
 
In Maxwell dynamics, I hope to create a movement in the EMF in a single sphere, by way of point charges on conducting plates. Place on one sphere to cause it to have the greater charge potential. Our charge, or electrons move from side, to side of the sphere. To move the charge across the spherical plate in the other direction, to cause an EMF, or an acceleration.
 By way of whatever electric potential we choose.

What if I take a conducting sphere, hang it from a string, although i would rather have two spheres of different sizes on a wooden apparatus to support the spheres, so the charge is not grounded after we place a point charge on each sphere. To have a difference in potential on each sphere to make them move on a center axis, that is in communication with each other. Connect by stout conducting wire, to each sphere, Then we can try with no conducting connection between each sphere. Only connected by wooded dowel. Each sphere with its own potential charge, insulated from each other, to see the nature of point charges in space time.
 
I always thought this would work easy peezy, but i don't have any spheres lol. You can add the charge on each sphere with a static charge positive or neg. or by wireless transmitting, and charge each sphere with a difference in potential to get them to rotate upon the center axis. this would work best if the electric field be created around the mass. later we can alter the magnetic field by way of movment, and charged plates. add tiny spears around large spheres to make the planets move around the sun, and planets, and moons. Proportional to newton law of mass - energy . Perhaps the best way to do this, so that the charges don't drain off the spears to quickly, is to hang both spears by thin threads, or fishing line. The axis can now be at the center of a wooden dowel that connects the two threads suspended from above. next we use long resistors between the 2 sphears were we would have used stout wire to change the charge of a plate quickly.
 
This was a most excellent discovery i would like to share.

i have a question for you. what better way to control the path to a certain degree a planets orbital path around our sun?
 
because of this we can toe an asteroid, and control its speed perhaps, also the potential charge of an object or mass would have a great affect on the asteroid, these be positive potential charges. mass plus movement equals energy.
 
one way what i would do, by adding a mass near the local electric field of an object, or second mass to control the other object in cold cold space by potential charge in the object or mass caused by Velocity of the object through a local external field. This mas be a material that is ferrous? this will add great potential to the point of superconductivity.
 
now i have altered the path of the magnetic field, and caused the attraction of the object. so if the potential be near, or greater then the mass of a binary system. Then the electric field would also change to a degree the controlled angle of trajectory.


 .
Quotes
" 1/4 wave length Tesla always said"...



Walter Lewin MIT Point charges spring 2002


MIT LEC Walter lewin wireless transmission
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #12, on April 29th, 2011, 08:59 PM »Last edited on May 3rd, 2011, 08:39 AM by freethisone
Thomas E. Bearden gave us useful information, and advanced the understanding of negative and positive entropy. by including the provided formula to grasp the particle now claimed by mainstream EE. In the outlines of this material were M=E but not squared. We learn asymmetry over symmetry, we induce trickle charges at high gradients (Switching costs) we act with magnetic pulses. Acting on the center of the atom, In this manner creating mass in atomic structure.
 
 Dipole electron pairs are created from the spark gap, mass is induced by manner of virtual flux at the center of mass . Ejection of free electron dipoles continue, during, ans after absorption of flux charge.  It is both neg, and positive oscillations in spin vector electron orbits. Mass is reduced, or converted in a positive EMF from the fluid. With an acceleration we get an EFM. The photon. and electron has a link.
 
 We marvel at it's Formula, and there spins.  A set polarization  for work. Energy  is the relative harmonic oscillations of photon, and daric dark energy.  
 
The Wankel motor stands out with its asymmetrical circuitry as in Tomas s' battery charger. This is for the art of dipole preservation.. In this fashion is a tall order of infinite free energy, by acting upon the electron in its state of charge. We then free charge from vacuum, to act on the source...  
 
To advance this practice even further. with T T we have a symbol, were we place the coils. The asymmetrical magnetic field induce upon coils 1, and 2. Wound on such T T form, so that the coils are wound on each side with opposite turns on each spool.  
 (were we pluck our harps?) and energized our trickle charge high gradient spike. Both positive, negative electron pair particle is so intrigued. The dariac hole is reduced EM fields produced. The magnetic positive charge we seek in M=E.
It is both an anti/posie electron pair  particle, and photon radiation.  
  It is under influence, and is a preserved in our dipole production, That from the spark gap.  
We begin to Prepare our minds to correctly, and act on negative entropy, through ejected particle, and photon radiation, as to the static vacuum space.  
 
Its a negative, and positive entropy. It exists in the formula were M=E  
Electrons are our created dipoles with charge, and mass.
The higher orbit positive electron, together with its anti electron particle. Is to our amuse.  
 
 
If it were not for the sluggish effect of free electron dipoles in such fluid, there would be no need for created magnetic gradients to cause photon source emissions, by said electron ejection in our choice of fluid. we would only need the laser light, and some harmonics in wave length of photon sources to cause faster ejection rates of neg pos entropy electron pairs.
   
Stanley points out how the energy is sluggish in its medium, although some electron dipoles move faster, from point to point in space . It is not very much.  
The destruction of a paired electrons, is not lost but preserved, and radiates back To cause photon emission, and EM positive work.  
 
Free energy that is >then a positive input charge, due to vacuum state inductions. Dipoles on steroids are suspended in gas, or fluid.  Moving very slowly. Hi gradients flux fields will act on these energetic particles. It is by the creation of dipoles at the spark gap, and through any manner of above mentioned that the atom will increase in mass until said supernova..  
 
 
We cause ionization by two conductor plate charges.  With greater efficiency through coupled harmonic oscillations. By micro radiation's in red, and blue spectrum, and wave formation. Constructive action upon the dipole electron pair.  
It is the plucking of electron paired orbitals, existing side by side in nature. It is negative entropy causation.  
   
Dark matter it was always there, The particle was well known. It was never lost. Ignored.  
   
M= E , and the wheel works of the universe is produced at any point in space, as we delight.  

What an inspiration. credits due to the following file.. :cool:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpdGRZk_Vd4 Have a laugh on me.
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #13, on May 1st, 2011, 10:40 AM »Last edited on May 1st, 2011, 12:34 PM by freethisone
Rare book by James Clerk Maxwell. Downloaded page by page.  happy to share this with you. :cool:
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #14, on May 1st, 2011, 01:17 PM »Last edited on October 4th, 2011, 08:26 AM by freethisone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HWlAoabr2wTesla, the iron core induction coil to follow..


COP >  iron core

THE DISCOVERY OF MAGNETIC DOMAINS in ferrous materials. how to act on these charges some 10 to the 20 atoms or much greater. polarize in such a way. as to flow flux paths through the coil. there is a lag time in the core in the core, caused by magnetic domains/ dipoles.   if we had a coil much longer, and of much greater thickness in ferrite core. you could move the domains causing induction in the coil. see movie in the link below. the new inventions such as the permanent magnet generators. are of interest.  Tesla based iron core one wire magnet motors are an added feature. and i will introduce these diagrams in the future.
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #15, on May 1st, 2011, 11:30 PM »Last edited on November 28th, 2011, 07:20 AM by freethisone
From Tom Bearden web .
To: (Correspondent),

Here is an update on the rigorous Klimov work, proving conclusively that one can find a process that will extract and use excess free energy from the vacuum (EFTV). The work has also been independently replicated, and they are moving to the amplification of lasers with this type of prototype EFTV technology.

Notice the clear statement that the initially excited electron (after being hit by the incident solar radiation photon) first dives momentarily into the seething virtual state vacuum, popping back up with a great deal of additional energy (having been taken on from its submergence in the virtual state vacuum flux). The superexcited electron then abruptly decays into up to seven normally-excited electrons.

So here we have the very clear and rigorous scientific proof that one can indeed extract free and usable EM energy from the vacuum, accomplished in a great national laboratory. It has also been replicated independently in a second great laboratory. It is now proceeding forward for potential use in amplifying laser emission, using the excess energy acquired and used from the seething virtual state vacuum.

 Note that it only takes one single white crow to prove that not all crows are black.

This Klimov work is the rigorous "white crow" that proves you really can extract and use free extra EM energy from the seething vacuum. And it's been done in the hard science community, by two great labs, and now replicated by other researchers in other labs as well.

And note the stated COP theoretically achievable being 700% for this first process. The researchers have already easily achieved COP = 200% (they express COP as percent rather than decimal number 7.0 and 2.0).

Now contrast this to the sad archaic old EE model used by all our electrical engineers to do their "power" systems. That old 1880s/1890s model assumes there is  no active vacuum at all, and hence one cannot take excess energy from the vacuum because it's "just emptiness" in that model's silly century-old assumptions. It was also deliberately symmetrized in 1892, to exclude all such "asymmetrical" systems and retain only those EM systems that self-enforce COP<1.0 (for the electrical part of the system).

Notice particularly that the Klimov excess energy effect is "asymmetric". After the "user's" arranged input from the active physical environment (the original solar radiation photon that strikes the first electron), that struck electron then freely takes on additional energy -- directly from the seething vacuum -- on its own. This "super-excited" electron then decays into up to seven "normally excited" electrons. And that is an "asymmetrical" operation, a priori.

Hence the system can and does legitimately exhibit COP >1.0.

Scientifically, with its independent replications, the Klimov and related work and experiments are all the proof that is required by the scientific method, to rigorously prove that energy-from-the-vacuum is a viable concept capable of being realized and used in real, operational systems.  

Very best wishes,

Tom

1 inc (below)

 

Absolute Proof that Operational COP>1.0 EM Systems Are Possible and Eventually Practical

 

Brody, Herb. Victor Klimov in Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico has constructed a solar cell which can absorb the light of a specific wave length in such a way, that one photon can energize more than one electron. As soon as the electron absorbs a photon, it disappears for a very short moment into the quantum field. Being in the virtual state the electron can borrow energy from the vacuum and thereafter appears again in our reality. Now the electron can energize up to 7 other electrons. This leads to a theoretical coefficient of performance (COP) of 700%. A COP = 200% can be readily achieved and it has been. The experiment has also been replicated successfully by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden Colorado. [Herb Brody, "Solar Power - Seriously Souped Up." New Scientist, May 27, 2006, p 45].  

     Quoting: “Make solar cells as small as a molecule; and you get more than you bargained for. Could this be the route to limitless clean power?"].

     Comment by T.E.B.: Note that the super-excited electron, after emerging from the seething virtual state vacuum immersion, actually splits into two or more electrons! So the output current of the solar cell process is freely amplified by excess energy from the local virtual state vacuum. Note that at about COP = 3.0, one could conceivably add clamped positive feedback of one of those output electrons back to the "dive back into the seething virtual state vacuum" input, replacing the original electron input, and the unit would be "self-powering" (powered by energy from the vacuum) while putting out the other two electrons as output.
     Or by using some of the output current in a radiation-producing process, one could have the positive feedback input as a radiation photon, to replace the initial solar input entirely. In this fashion, once "jump started" by some source of solar radiation, the resulting "solar panel" system would become totally self-powering, taking all its input and output energy directly from the seething vacuum itself

     Additional references; Richard D. Schaller, Vladimir M. Agranovich and Victor I. Klimov; "High-efficiency carrier multiplication through direct photogeneration of multi-excitons via virtual single-exciton states."  Nature Physics  Vol. 1, 2005, pp. 189-194.
     Richard D. Schaller, Melissa A. Petruska, and Victor I. Klimov; "Effect of electronic structure on carrier multiplication efficiency: Comparative study of PbSe and CdSe nanocrystals"; Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 87, 2005, 253102.

     Richard D. Schaller, Milan Sykora, Jeffrey M. Pietryga, and Victor I. Klimov, "Seven Excitons at a Cost of One: Redefining the Limits for Conversion Efficiency of Photons into Charge Carriers," Nano Lett. Vol. 6, 2006, p. 424.

     Victor I. Klimov, "Spectral and Dynamical Properties of Multiexcitons in Semiconductor Nanocrystals," Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2007, p. 635.

     M. C. Hanna, A. J. Nozik. "Solar conversion efficiency of photovoltaic and photoelectrolysis cells with carrier multiplication absorbers," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 100, No. 7, 2006, p. 07450.
     Sung Jin Kim, Won Jin Kim, Yudhisthira Sahoo, Alexander N. Cartwright, Paras N. Prasad, "Multiple exciton generation and electrical extraction from a PbSe quantum dot photoconductor," Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2008, p. 031107.
     Alberto Franceschetti, Yong Zhang, "Multiexciton Absorption and Multiple Exciton Generation in CdSe Quantum Dots," Physical Review Letters, Vol. 100, No. 13, 2008, p. 136805.

     G. Allan, C. Delerue, "Role of impact ionization in multiple exciton generation in PbSe nanocrystals," Physical Review B, Vol. 73 (20), 2006, p. 205423.

     Hsiang-Yu Chen, Michael K. F. Lo, Guanwen Yang, Harold G. Monbouquette, Yang Yang, "Nanoparticle-assisted high photoconductive gain in composites of polymer and fullerene," Nature Nanotechnology, Vol. 3 (9), 2008, p. 543.

     M.C. Beard, R.J. Ellingson, "Multiple exciton generation in semiconductor nanocrystals: Toward efficient solar energy conversion," Laser & Photonics Review, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2008, p. 377.

     Quoting: "Now Victor Klimov and colleagues at the Alamos National Laboratory have designed nanocrystals with cores and shells made from different semiconductor materials in such a way that electrons and holes are physically isolated from each other. The scientists said in such engineered nanocrystals, only one exciton per nanocrystal is required for optical amplification. That, they said, opens the door to practical use in laser applications."  ["Scientists Create New Type of Nanocrystal," PHYSORG.COM, Nanotechnology, May 24, 2007.

     Seo, Hye-won; Tu, Li-wei; Ho, Cheng-ying; Wang, Chang-kong; Lin, Yuan-ting. "Multi-Junction Solar Cell," United States Patent 20080178931, July 31, 2008. A photovoltaic device having multi-junction nanostructures deposited as a multi-layered thin film on a substrate. Preferably, the device is grown as InxGa1-xN multi-layered junctions with the gradient x, where x is any value in the range from zero to one. The nanostructures are preferably 5-500 nanometers and more preferably 10-20 nanometers in diameter. The values of x are selected so that the bandgap of each layer is varied from 0.7 eV to 3.4 eV to match as nearly as possible the solar energy spectrum of 0.4 eV-4 eV.

     J. R. Minkel, "Brighter Prospects for Cheap Lasers in Rainbow Colors," Scientific American (website), May 25, 2007.

 

     Quoting Klimov, Victor"     "Carrier multiplication actually relies upon very strong interactions between electrons squeezed within the tiny volume of a nanoscale semiconductor particle. That is why it is the particle size, not its composition that mostly determines the efficiency of the effect. In nanosize crystals, strong electron-electron interactions make a high-energy electron unstable. This electron only exists in its so-called 'virtual state' for an instant before rapidly transforming into a more stable state comprising two or more electrons." [Lead project scientist Victor Klimov, quoted in "Nanocrystals May Provide Boost for Solar Cells, Solar Hydrogen Production," Green Car Congress, 4 Oct., 2008.]

To: (Correspondent),

Here is an update on the rigorous Klimov work, proving conclusively that one can find a process that will extract and use excess free energy from the vacuum (EFTV). The work has also been independently replicated, and they are moving to the amplification of lasers with this type of prototype EFTV technology.

Notice the clear statement that the initially excited electron (after being hit by the incident solar radiation photon) first dives momentarily into the seething virtual state vacuum, popping back up with a great deal of additional energy (having been taken on from its submergence in the virtual state vacuum flux). The superexcited electron then abruptly decays into up to seven normally-excited electrons.

So here we have the very clear and rigorous scientific proof that one can indeed extract free and usable EM energy from the vacuum, accomplished in a great national laboratory. It has also been replicated independently in a second great laboratory. It is now proceeding forward for potential use in amplifying laser emission, using the excess energy acquired and used from the seething virtual state vacuum.

 Note that it only takes one single white crow to prove that not all crows are black.

This Klimov work is the rigorous "white crow" that proves you really can extract and use free extra EM energy from the seething vacuum. And it's been done in the hard science community, by two great labs, and now replicated by other researchers in other labs as well.

And note the stated COP theoretically achievable being 700% for this first process. The researchers have already easily achieved COP = 200% (they express COP as percent rather than decimal number 7.0 and 2.0).

Now contrast this to the sad archaic old EE model used by all our electrical engineers to do their "power" systems. That old 1880s/1890s model assumes there is  no active vacuum at all, and hence one cannot take excess energy from the vacuum because it's "just emptiness" in that model's silly century-old assumptions. It was also deliberately symmetrized in 1892, to exclude all such "asymmetrical" systems and retain only those EM systems that self-enforce COP<1.0 (for the electrical part of the system).

Notice particularly that the Klimov excess energy effect is "asymmetric". After the "user's" arranged input from the active physical environment (the original solar radiation photon that strikes the first electron), that struck electron then freely takes on additional energy -- directly from the seething vacuum -- on its own. This "super-excited" electron then decays into up to seven "normally excited" electrons. And that is an "asymmetrical" operation, a priori.

Hence the system can and does legitimately exhibit COP >1.0.

Scientifically, with its independent replications, the Klimov and related work and experiments are all the proof that is required by the scientific method, to rigorously prove that energy-from-the-vacuum is a viable concept capable of being realized and used in real, operational systems.  

Very best wishes,

Tom

1 inc (below)

 

Absolute Proof that Operational COP>1.0 EM Systems Are Possible and Eventually Practical

 

Brody, Herb. Victor Klimov in Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico has constructed a solar cell which can absorb the light of a specific wave length in such a way, that one photon can energize more than one electron. As soon as the electron absorbs a photon, it disappears for a very short moment into the quantum field. Being in the virtual state the electron can borrow energy from the vacuum and thereafter appears again in our reality. Now the electron can energize up to 7 other electrons. This leads to a theoretical coefficient of performance (COP) of 700%. A COP = 200% can be readily achieved and it has been. The experiment has also been replicated successfully by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden Colorado. [Herb Brody, "Solar Power - Seriously Souped Up." New Scientist, May 27, 2006, p 45].  

     Quoting: “Make solar cells as small as a molecule; and you get more than you bargained for. Could this be the route to limitless clean power?"].

     Comment by T.E.B.: Note that the super-excited electron, after emerging from the seething virtual state vacuum immersion, actually splits into two or more electrons! So the output current of the solar cell process is freely amplified by excess energy from the local virtual state vacuum. Note that at about COP = 3.0, one could conceivably add clamped positive feedback of one of those output electrons back to the "dive back into the seething virtual state vacuum" input, replacing the original electron input, and the unit would be "self-powering" (powered by energy from the vacuum) while putting out the other two electrons as output.
     Or by using some of the output current in a radiation-producing process, one could have the positive feedback input as a radiation photon, to replace the initial solar input entirely. In this fashion, once "jump started" by some source of solar radiation, the resulting "solar panel" system would become totally self-powering, taking all its input and output energy directly from the seething vacuum itself

     Additional references; Richard D. Schaller, Vladimir M. Agranovich and Victor I. Klimov; "High-efficiency carrier multiplication through direct photogeneration of multi-excitons via virtual single-exciton states."  Nature Physics  Vol. 1, 2005, pp. 189-194.
     Richard D. Schaller, Melissa A. Petruska, and Victor I. Klimov; "Effect of electronic structure on carrier multiplication efficiency: Comparative study of PbSe and CdSe nanocrystals"; Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 87, 2005, 253102.

     Richard D. Schaller, Milan Sykora, Jeffrey M. Pietryga, and Victor I. Klimov, "Seven Excitons at a Cost of One: Redefining the Limits for Conversion Efficiency of Photons into Charge Carriers," Nano Lett. Vol. 6, 2006, p. 424.

     Victor I. Klimov, "Spectral and Dynamical Properties of Multiexcitons in Semiconductor Nanocrystals," Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2007, p. 635.

     M. C. Hanna, A. J. Nozik. "Solar conversion efficiency of photovoltaic and photoelectrolysis cells with carrier multiplication absorbers," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 100, No. 7, 2006, p. 07450.
     Sung Jin Kim, Won Jin Kim, Yudhisthira Sahoo, Alexander N. Cartwright, Paras N. Prasad, "Multiple exciton generation and electrical extraction from a PbSe quantum dot photoconductor," Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2008, p. 031107.
     Alberto Franceschetti, Yong Zhang, "Multiexciton Absorption and Multiple Exciton Generation in CdSe Quantum Dots," Physical Review Letters, Vol. 100, No. 13, 2008, p. 136805.

     G. Allan, C. Delerue, "Role of impact ionization in multiple exciton generation in PbSe nanocrystals," Physical Review B, Vol. 73 (20), 2006, p. 205423.

     Hsiang-Yu Chen, Michael K. F. Lo, Guanwen Yang, Harold G. Monbouquette, Yang Yang, "Nanoparticle-assisted high photoconductive gain in composites of polymer and fullerene," Nature Nanotechnology, Vol. 3 (9), 2008, p. 543.

     M.C. Beard, R.J. Ellingson, "Multiple exciton generation in semiconductor nanocrystals: Toward efficient solar energy conversion," Laser & Photonics Review, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2008, p. 377.

     Quoting: "Now Victor Klimov and colleagues at the Alamos National Laboratory have designed nanocrystals with cores and shells made from different semiconductor materials in such a way that electrons and holes are physically isolated from each other. The scientists said in such engineered nanocrystals, only one exciton per nanocrystal is required for optical amplification. That, they said, opens the door to practical use in laser applications."  ["Scientists Create New Type of Nanocrystal," PHYSORG.COM, Nanotechnology, May 24, 2007.

     Seo, Hye-won; Tu, Li-wei; Ho, Cheng-ying; Wang, Chang-kong; Lin, Yuan-ting. "Multi-Junction Solar Cell," United States Patent 20080178931, July 31, 2008. A photovoltaic device having multi-junction nanostructures deposited as a multi-layered thin film on a substrate. Preferably, the device is grown as InxGa1-xN multi-layered junctions with the gradient x, where x is any value in the range from zero to one. The nanostructures are preferably 5-500 nanometers and more preferably 10-20 nanometers in diameter. The values of x are selected so that the bandgap of each layer is varied from 0.7 eV to 3.4 eV to match as nearly as possible the solar energy spectrum of 0.4 eV-4 eV.

     J. R. Minkel, "Brighter Prospects for Cheap Lasers in Rainbow Colors," Scientific American (website), May 25, 2007.

 

     Quoting Klimov, Victor"     "Carrier multiplication actually relies upon very strong interactions between electrons squeezed within the tiny volume of a nanoscale semiconductor particle. That is why it is the particle size, not its composition that mostly determines the efficiency of the effect. In nanosize crystals, strong electron-electron interactions make a high-energy electron unstable. This electron only exists in its so-called 'virtual state' for an instant before rapidly transforming into a more stable state comprising two or more electrons." [Lead project scientist Victor Klimov, quoted in "Nanocrystals May Provide Boost for Solar Cells, Solar Hydrogen Production," Green Car Congress, 4 Oct., 2008.]
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #16, on May 3rd, 2011, 11:00 PM »Last edited on October 4th, 2011, 08:25 AM by freethisone
what does this mean? all the information points to smaller, and smaller dipoles. the result is we can finally measure the energy in mass. so 1 magnetic dipole is what we are able to measure. A very tiny mass, with a surprising energy radiation.

consider 1 tiny dot for a mirror, will it reflect less light than if it was larger. the answer will surprise you. the answer is no, if it reflects any photons at all. each photon has the same energy as another photon, they have the same level of energy contained in a plank length. if i reflect 1 million photons over a large mirror the reflected photons spread as time goes on, and away from you. if i make a parabolic dish more photons will hit the reflector then with a flat surface.

the stream of photons, have a mass, but is equal to the strength of single photon alone, because these are photons.  if i make a big solar panel more photons hit, but not the strength of the force that causes the emf for solar power..

Surface area is not the key here. It is the emf of a single photon we wish to measure.  The smallest amount of photons we can thereby reflect. Each one with the same energy as the last.  


maxwell equation
 power vs surface area. movie photon    
photon part 2
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #17, on May 7th, 2011, 08:37 AM »Last edited on October 4th, 2011, 08:25 AM by freethisone
consider the effect of each action, acting on the medium of choice.
I make a list.

1. make a dipole, with the spark gap, we make them small. with a electric field pulse we make dipole line up.. For the self-induced EMF in a coil by changing the current (or the voltage), only the rate of change counts, not the amount of change. Thus a large momentary magnetic field can be produced by an abrupt change of a very small current or of a very small voltage. The rate of change of the magnetic field also creates an electric field, and so the more abrupt the magnetic field change, the greater the momentary E-field that is produced

2. cause the dipoles to move , we pulse with non uniform electric field. 5000 Guss as example, 300 amp high gradient electric field.. flash of bright UV light to cause dipole absorption, and scattering of EM charges.

3. cause a photon, through decay of electron orbitals for example, electron pairs in argon, 03, 02. h02, neon etc.. by flux density through a photon radiation. UV scatterers. how much energy can an atom absorb, before it has a change in atomic structure?

4.use argon to an advantage, electron spin component in structure. transferable EM radiation to charged dipoles..

5.Use of infra red light
source virtual photon magnetic component. A ray that stays steady.

6.use of UV light, cause a pressure. inductive component? acts to scatter particles, at a pressure.
source a scatterer of dipoles, through surface pressure, of flux density per square meter.

7.use of radar, or Radio MHZ to KHZ range inductions. A source of charge, to charge particles to a full, or partial absorption of there natural properties through said radar source, radio modulation.. Harmonic sound modulation, on the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th level electron spin, natural state. Aids to  cause a steady standing wave.
the advancement of this is the ability to send an electric current down track tube. there is a component that moves close to the speed of light. electrons remain source charges. particle accelerators. dipoles.

8. use of energetic photon source , quartz crystalline. (fine powder) inner medium is reflective. these crystals would add energy, a photon source of positive emf.

9. use of magnetic dipoles, tiny as possible. hematite is used, carbon should be used. shinny surfaces on charged dipoles should be used. although carbon may tend to absorb a charge with less effort.

10. types of propagation? longitudinal spherical wave, standing wave. sound modulation should be a primary function, harmonics on electron spins. crystalline structures. virtual state photon manipulation. spark gap and small natural dipoles such iron oxide. can be doped on spark gap.

11. perception, argon gas in this case to cause a decay of electron pairs from its natural structure.

12. dielectrics, and wave guides. photon source vs pressure density of accumulated dipoles.

each variable should be expanded on, and will be available as we uncover the vacuum static field.

polarized energy in one case, by magnetic dipoles with charge north, south electric fields.
by scattering, and creation of EMF through virtual vacuum photon electron spin pairs. move a dipole.

Dirac sea hole, is the state of atom, were the electron is drawn closer to the nucleus of the atom, before is expelled. (photon source) Emf im going so far as to predict, a  loss of electron pairs, cause a strong emf.
infra red magnetic component, surface pressure causes an increase in mass.Expansion.


add charge on dipoles, UV burst scatter them, cause collisions,  cause a increase in pressure density on charged dipoles. cause particle collisions.  destruction of electron pair, transfer of charge through medium A photon, anti electron emission? source of charge.


Gauge theory south file.
12..lc21
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #18, on May 11th, 2011, 02:15 PM »Last edited on October 4th, 2011, 08:24 AM by freethisone
MEG Aharonov-Bohm Effect, Watergas, Negative Energy, Negative Probabilities, Precursor Engineering, Extending the Scientific Method, and EM Limitations

Tom Bearden
7 April 2008

Dear (Correspondent),

I very much appreciate your kindness in sending me the information, and the new work with polarized daylight is very significant indeed!

One of these days I hope to get Prof. Michael Berry to take a look at how we use the Aharonov-Bohm effect in our patented Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (MEG). We are able to use the Aharonov-Bohm effect to first energize the surrounding vacuum outside the transformer core with curl-free A-potential, then perturb the core normally so as to send out A-field perturbations into that energized external vacuum (into its A-potential). From the perturbed local A-field vacuum the MEG receives back (from all directions) excess E-field energy pulses by the simple equation dA/dt = – E. The result is that the local altered vacuum – when subsequently perturbed – then sends back free E-field energy to our unit as an extra, free energy input from the active vacuum environment. By insuring some coherence in the received E-field signals, we also insure that the return excess energy input is usable EM energy from the altered local vacuum/spacetime. On my website, www.cheniere.org, there is a set of drawings of how the AB process in the MEG actually works, so that one can see it visually. See  HYPERLINK "http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/On%20the%20Aharonov-Bohm%20Effect1.doc" http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/On%20the%20Aharonov-Bohm%20Effect1.doc .

As you know, force fields exist only in matter, since mass is a component of force by the simple equation F = d/dt(mv). Placing m = 0 in that equation shows that in massless space, “force” does not exist. So instead of EM force fields in massless space, instead there exist precursor “conditions of spacetime” as pointed out by Nobelist Feynman. What we call “EM force”, then, rigorously is the ongoing interaction of that “precursor field” with charged matter q.

As the great John Wheeler points out, “Space acts on matter, telling it how to move. In turn, matter reacts back on space, telling it how to curve.”  [Wheeler's principle, as stated in W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1973, p. 5].

Wheeler also pointed out the dominance of the interacting spacetime with matter and effects in matter. Quoting: “…elementary particles represent a percentage-wise almost completely negligible change in the locally violent conditions that characterize the vacuum...In other words, elementary particles do not form a really basic starting point for the description of nature. Instead, they represent a first-order correction to vacuum physics.”

So the Aharonov-Bohm effect (together with many others) shows that it is possible to directly condition or change (or “engineer”) the local spacetime itself, and then use it to affect the physical system embedded in that altered local spacetime.

What we call “force” is the ongoing interaction of the “condition of spacetime itself” with matter.

The bottom line is that (1) the vacuum/spacetime can first be preconditioned locally (precursive engineering), without using force or work (which is translation of force), and (2) then the altered and energized vacuum/spacetime can be stimulated to provide excess EM energy freely back to the system. The system then has TWO energy inputs: (1) the one we pay to make, and (2) the one the surrounding activated vacuum gives us for free. So, like a windmill in a free EM energy wind, our unit can exhibit COP>1.0, even though its energy efficiency is always less than 100%.

We are presently awaiting funding for our MEG (there are five inventors) and when we receive that funding we will then strongly move to put legitimate COP>1.0 electrical power generating systems on the market. That will require about a year and a half of very intense final research and development to better and automatically control the coherence of the return signals, etc.  I’m very much hoping I live to see the MEG on the market and being used worldwide.

And as you know, once one has COP of 3.0 or so, then with clamped positive feedback of part of the output, one can produce an “asymmetric” system which is “self-powered” (more correctly, with all its input energy freely received from the locally excited and interacting vacuum).

So “energy from the vacuum” is no more eerie than a common windmill or solar power cell array. Given the necessary input energy from the active surrounding environment, the system is legitimately permitted to function as an analogue to a common heat pump – which has an efficiency of only about 50%, but which normally has a COP = 3.0 to 4.0. In short, the heat pump wastes half of all its input energy from whatever source, but it receives so much excess energy from its activated environment that it can still output more heat energy than the electrical energy the operator himself pays to input. No violation of thermodynamics or of physics is involved. Instead, there is involved just a way to directly and freely alter the local environment so it is energized, and then to trigger it into sending free energy into one’s system to be collected and power the loads.

Note that such asymmetrical overunity electrical systems are specifically excluded from the normal electrical engineering model. The Heaviside equations were deliberately symmetrized in 1892 by Lorentz, at the instigation of J. P. Morgan, just prior to the formation of modern electrical engineering. It was done specifically to remove the asymmetrical “energy from the active vacuum” systems that Nikola Tesla had discovered. Tesla had labeled them as “energy from the active medium” systems. Tesla had just destroyed the dream of Morgan and Edison for their great DC power empire (a DC power plant every two miles in cities and built-up areas) by putting in practical AC generators at Niagara Falls. Since AC could be transmitted fairly efficiently for long distances and DC could not, then with AC power one did not require most of those expensive DC power plants. So the world adopted AC power stations and transmission. With that blow to his dreams of empire, the ruthless Morgan was immediately determined to destroy Tesla utterly and his backer Westinghouse also. And he thoroughly accomplished both goals.

Here is just one statement by Tesla of what he intended to do. Quoting:

"Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic – and this we know it is, for certain – then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." [Nikola Tesla, in a speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1891. Quoted from back cover of his biography, Margaret Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of Time].

During an address in 1897 Tesla stated:
     “We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores which are forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not imply consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel sure that the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the operation of engines on any point of the earth by the energy of the medium...” [Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897 commemorating his installation of generators at Niagara Falls.].

Sadly, my personal physical condition is so bad I cannot travel (33 years of biological warfare modified mycoplasma poisoning, that my own Government folks made secretly back in the late 50s in a joint program with Canada, and then sprayed it (in Florida and several places in Canada) for testing its dispersion. Its strength was reduced by 2000 times, which was supposed to make it “safe” – about like being “just a little bit pregnant”. The spraying passed it into the mosquito population as carriers and thus unleashed this new and terrible malady.

I caught that crazy mess in 1968 while stationed in Canada at Camp Valcartier as the U.S. Liaison officer to the Canadian Armament Research & Development Team. With that awful stuff buried inside my red blood cells, the hemoglobin hardened and one’s blood could simply not take on and transport sufficient oxygen. I was hospitalized three times in Canada and almost died. Tests back then revealed nothing. So No one knew what I had for 33 years, while it slowly damaged everything in my body. I lived thanks to a very crazy procedure that the French doctors in Quebec performed, which – we know today – placed the organisms into a sort of prolonged hibernation. They resurged in my body in 2001, again almost killing me and giving me a heart attack. By sheer coincidence, my family doctor (as a young doctor) had treated some of the Army sergeants on that program, and found out about the crazy BW-modified mycoplasma and the unique test to identify the organism. He had the test in his own lab, and gave it to me – and it proved that indeed I had the BW-modified mycoplasma in my red blood cells.

So finally my bizarre ailment was positively identified by direct and decisive test at the end of  2001 after my heart attack. Then I spent 2002 as my “year on antibiotics” to get the crazy mycoplasma organisms when they came out of the red blood cells as a host cell was dying after its normal lifespan of three or four months. We got rid of the mycoplasma at long last, but everything inside me – brain, nervous system, organs, blood vessels, muscle system, skeletal system and joints –was damaged irretrievably by the 33 years of steady damage.

So I can stand about two minutes, walk about 100 feet, but cannot travel. But thankfully I can drive locally and care for my beloved wife after her stroke followed by two heart attacks.

Anyway, thank you very much for the information; Prof. Michael Berry is one of my scientific heroes and I would dearly like to hear him in person at that conference!

I previously sent a write-up back to IOP, which may be of some interest to you. It opens up a vast new area of science by extending the present scientific method itself. Please note that negative energy was arbitrarily removed from quantum field theory and from the Dirac electron theory by artifice in order not to have to face the awesome implications of “negative probabilities” mathematically. By adding back the negative energy (e.g., as per the important and brilliant work of Prof. Dan Solomon) into quantum field theory and Dirac electron theory, then one suddenly is able to directly engineer the precursor spacetime/vacuum flux itself, before it interacts with matter to form forces and force fields.  

By engineering and using negative energy from the vacuum, one is also directly engineering “negative probabilities”, and that is a dramatic extension to the present scientific method. One can directly change (and even “dissolve”) any “positive observed state or condition in matter or material systems” (which “observed state” is just a state with 100 percent positive probability when one considers the underlying space-time, and vacuum processes with positive energy only). By adding negative probabilities, one reduces the 100% positive probability (the observed state or condition) to less than 100%. With sufficient negative probability added to the ongoing vacuum/charge interactions, the net probability of the observed H-O-H state can be reduced to zero – its total absence.

So with a little judicially used negative energy stimulated in water, one can cause the water’s observed water molecule’s H-O-H force bonds to just fall apart and disappear (in their ongoing interaction with the locally now-altered negative energy vacuum and its negative probabilities). In that way, one gets H2 and O2 gas nearly freely, paying only a little switching and control costs to condition the vacuum properly (the vacuum conditioning itself is force-free and work-free). With precursor engineering and negative energy/negative probabilities, one does not have to pay for tearing the H-O-H bonds apart by brute force, as is done in normal positive energy/positive probabilities electrolysis.

Applied to cancer, e.g., one also can reverse the cancerous physical condition (such as that cancer in the human body) as already shown by Professor Kanzius, with validation in animal experiments already performed successfully. See  HYPERLINK "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kanzius" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kanzius.

If Professor Kanzius can avoid suppression by the big pharmaceuticals, then with follow-on successful human trials and FDA approval, we will also finally have a totally different kind of “positive cure” for cancer. And in theory, the use of negative energy and negative probabilities method can be adapted to cure any other illness or undesirable physical condition as well – including such conditions as HIV, diabetes, etc. – and eventually even mental retardation and reversal of aging.

Meanwhile, I’ve worked with several inventors who used (and are using) negative energy to show that, by preconditioning the local vacuum prior to its interaction with charged matter in our EM systems, then true “excess energy freely from the vacuum” systems can be built and utilized. Producing sharp gradient pulses of normal EM energy across little regions of the vacuum will “pop out” some of those filler electrons from the Dirac Sea (that is actually the Lenz Law effect), leaving behind the emptied Dirac holes. These are negative mass-energy matter (negative mass energy electrons, not positrons!), and so one has produced a sort of “negative energy froth” in the local Dirac Sea. The Dirac holes are actually what is being sought as “dark matter” by our astrophysicists, and as source charges their associated concomitant negative energy EM fields are what is being sought as “dark energy”.

So the “dark matter” our astrophysicists are so desperately seeking is easily evoked on the lab bench and studied directly. Dark matter simply consists of Dirac holes, remaining after one has popped out their filler electrons with sharp gradient pulses, leaving behind the holes (again, they are negative mass-energy electrons, not positrons). So Dark Matter is actually an engineering of the local spacetime/vacuum itself; specifically, of the Dirac Sea. As source charges, these negative mass energy electrons (Dirac Sea Holes) emit negative energy photons, so that their “static fields” are actually negative energy EM fields. Of course thermodynamically they are also nonequilibrium steady state (NESS) systems as well, consisting of constant flow of real photons, whose energy has been extracted from the seething virtual state vacuum via the broken symmetry of the source dipolarities.

I have one inventor friend (Bedini) who has used negative energy (dark energy) and Dirac holes (dark matter) in his highly improved battery charging circuits for 30 years. He is presently bringing such highly improved battery chargers into production and they will be going on the market. He also has released the secret of how he (very practically) evokes and controls such negative energy phenomenology, and now more than two dozen independent experimenters worldwide have successfully replicated Bedini COP>1.0 systems.

Presently unknown to the scientific community, our own U.S. Department of Energy has quietly developed and used a fabrication (special extrusion) process to form asymmetric permanent magnets – e.g., physically symmetrical permanent bar magnets but with deliberately asymmetric field strengths laterally on the two sides of each magnet – and patented it as a result of a DoE grant to the inventor. Presently our DoE thus has been very quietly building and controlling true self-powering permanent magnet motors (taking all their input energy from the seething vacuum via the broken symmetry of the dipole in the asymmetry magnet), while continuing to hide it from the U.S. President, the Congress, the scientific community, and the American Public.

To see this, see the following patents:
     (a) Vijay K. Chandhok and Bao-min Ma. “Method for producing a noncircular permanent magnet”.  United States Patent No. 4,915,891, issued April. 10,1990.
     Abstract: A method for producing a noncircular magnet having asymmetric magnetic properties along axes thereof. A particle charge of composition from which the magnet is to be produced is placed in a container, heated and extruded within the container to compact the particle charge to substantially full density. The particle charge may include at least one rare earth element. The particle charge may be extruded through a noncircular extrusion die, specifically a rectangular die.
     (b) For the way the Department of Energy paid to develop having it done, and had one of the inventors repatent it, see Vijak K. Chadhok, WO/2001/084569 A1 “Method for Producing through Extrusion an Anisotropic Magnet with High Energy Product”, International Patent, 9 Mar. 2001. Quoting: “This invention was made with government support under a small business research and development grant for "A Simple Process to Manufacture Grain Aligned Permanent Magnets" awarded by the U. S. Department of Energy (Grant No. DE-FG02-97-ER82313). The Government has certain rights to this invention.”
     (c) Chadhok then got yet another patent himself in 2004. See Vijak K. Chadhok, “Method for producing through extrusion an anisotropic magnet with high energy product”, U.S. Patent No. 6,787,083 issued on Sep. 7, 2004.
     Abstract: A method for producing an anisotropic magnet with high energy product through extrusion and, more specifically, by placing a particle charge of a composition from the which magnet is to be produced in a noncircular container, heating the container and particle charge and extruding the container and particle charge through a noncircular extrusion die in such a manner that one of the cross-sectional axes or dimension of the container and particle charge is held substantially constant during the extrusion to compact the particle charge to substantially full density by mechanical deformation produced during the extrusion to achieve a magnet with anisotropic magnetic properties along the axes or dimension thereof and, more specifically, a high energy product along the transverse of the smallest cross-sectional dimension of the extruded magnet.

So the U.S. Department has had powerful self-powering permanent magnet motors since 2001 and has hidden it from the U.S. President, the Congress, the scientific community, and the American public.  

As you are aware and as was pointed out by Nobelist Lee, whenever we have a broken symmetry then something previously virtual has become observable. Every charge is a priori a part of a dipole, when one also considers its polarized surrounding vacuum. The “magnetic pole” is actually the “magnetic charge”.  In modern physics, a tiny classical charge is actually two infinite charges – the bare charge in the middle (infinite charge with infinite energy) and the surrounding charge of the altered vacuum (infinite charge with infinite energy). Our instruments peering through the screening polarized vacuum at the bare charge in the middle see only a finite difference, and that is the “classical” finite value of the charge.

It is easy to evoke a proven “free EM energy flow – a real and free EM energy wind” from the vacuum, whenever one wishes, for a small sum (such as $10 U.S.). E.g., lay a normal permanent bar magnet on the bench. Lay an electret on top of it so that the E-field of the electret is at right angles to the H-field of the magnet. Then by the standard Poynting EM energy flow theory in every EM text in the EM departments of every university, that silly gadget will then sit there and freely pour out real, usable Poynting EM energy flow S, given by S = E X H.

So getting an everlasting free EM energy wind from our vacuum/spacetime environment is simple and cheap and easy.

But to separately intercept, collect, and (separately) dissipate some of that “free EM energy wind” energy to power our loads freely, it requires an asymmetrical “electrical windmill” system. Well, sadly our EEs have never had such a system even in their theory; all remaining asymmetrical Maxwellian systems in the original Heaviside vector equations were deliberately removed by Lorentz by his symmetrization of the Heaviside equations. So from the very beginning, our electrical engineers have never been able to conceive, design, build, and deploy such asymmetrical systems.

And the present standard EE model is not Maxwell’s theory! Maxwell’s theory is 20 quaternion-like equations in 20 unknowns, and it contains all sorts of asymmetric EM systems as well as those highly limited symmetrical systems known to electrical engineering. Tesla, e.g., was able to deliberately shuttle the collected potential energy around in a circuit at will, and this has been clearly shown by a great electrodynamicist, T. Barrett, one of the pioneers of ultrawideband radar. See T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41. Barrett shows that EM expressed in quaternions allows shuttling and storage of potentials in circuits, and also allows additional EM functioning of a circuit that a conventional EM analysis cannot reveal. He shows that Tesla’s patented circuits did exactly this. Tesla – who was originally trained in physics, before “electrical engineering” even existed, was thus able to operate in Maxwell’s original higher group symmetry theory, and not just in the silly and horribly flawed old classical EM model of today.

Barrett was so impressed by this capability of Tesla that he, Barrett, extended the methodology a bit and obtained two patents. They are:

Terrence W. Barrett, "Active Signalling Systems," U.S. Patent No. 5,486,833, Jan. 23, 1996. A signaling system in time-frequency space for detecting targets in the presence of clutter and for penetrating media. 14 U.S. patents cited. 22 claims, 37 drawing sheets.
Terence W. Barrett, "Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Networks for Conditioning Energy in Higher-Order Symmetry Algebraic Topological Forms and RF Phase Conjugation," U.S. Patent No. 5,493,691. Feb. 20, 1996.
With the development of precursor engineering, then all of this portends a great new and dramatic leap forward in physics, whenever more legitimate scientists pick it up (such as Kanzius, Solomon, etc.). As one pale example, I enclose a draft paper which sets out a sort of “Manhattan Project” which could be performed by the scientific community to very quickly solve the escalating world energy crisis – quickly, cleanly, and permanently. And also solve much of the global warming problem at the same time, by eliminating most of the harmful emissions connected with automobiles, power plants, etc. Please particularly note the seventh program – precursor engineering. Precursor engineering is the deliberate and direct engineering (force-free and work-free) of local spacetime/vacuum itself before the altered vacuum is then interacted with matter to form force fields (force is rigorously the ongoing interaction with charged matter of such a precursor field (massless, force-free) in spacetime/vacuum.

Finally, we point out that general relativity actually involves extensive precursor engineering of the active spacetime/vacuum. This means that, in general relativity, the conventional positive energy (and positive probabilities) conservation of energy, momentum, etc. laws can be (and are) violated easily and readily. While many physicists strongly resist even the thought of this, it was pointed out very quickly by the great Hilbert, after Einstein’s publication of general relativity.

Quoting Hilbert: "I assert... that for the general theory of relativity, i.e., in the case of general invariance of the Hamiltonian function, energy equations... corresponding to the energy equations in orthogonally invariant theories do not exist at all. I could even take this circumstance as the characteristic feature of the general theory of relativity." [D. Hilbert, Gottingen Nachrichten, Vol. 4, 1917, p. 21.].

Quoting Logunov and Loskutov: "In formulating the equivalence principle, Einstein actually abandoned the idea of the gravitational field as a Faraday-Maxwell field, and this is reflected in the pseudotensorial characterization of the gravitational field that he introduced. Hilbert was the first to draw attention to the consequences of this. … Unfortunately, … Hilbert was evidently not understood by his contemporaries, since neither Einstein himself nor other physicists recognized the fact that in general relativity conservation laws for energy, momentum, and angular momentum are in principle impossible." [A. A. Logunov and Yu. M. Loskutov, "Nonuniqueness of the predictions of the general theory of relativity," Sov. J. Part. Nucl., 18(3), May-June 1987, p. 179].

But a high caliber modern physicist will be aware of this very odd fact. E.g., quoting Sir Roger Penrose: “We seem to have lost those most crucial conservation laws of physics, the laws of conservation of energy and momentum!” [Penrose then adds the Killing symmetry arbitrarily, to get conservation again, when the Killing vector applies and gravity is separated.]. “These conservation laws hold only in a spacetime for which there is the appropriate symmetry, given by the Killi

electron photon space time:D
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #19, on May 25th, 2011, 04:45 PM »Last edited on November 28th, 2011, 07:17 AM by freethisone
This was a most excellent discovery i would like to share. :cool:  Not really a new discovery.

I have a question, what better way to control the path to a certain degree a planets orbital path around our sun?
One way,  what i would do by adding a mass near the local electric field of the object. A second mass to control the other object in cold cold space. By Interfering with the potential charge in the first  object, or mass. This second mass be a material that is ferrous, and is similar to the first.
Now I have altered the path of the magnetic field, and caused the attraction of the object. If the potential be near, or greater then the first mass of a binary system. The electric field would also change to a degree, A way to influence, or control angle of trajectory, or its orbit. Nothing new I guess but cool..  Make a tractor beam.

silly speculations?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsWDUqJQcpk
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #20, on June 2nd, 2011, 02:01 PM »Last edited on November 28th, 2011, 02:52 PM by freethisone
In the interest of photon energy and the production of light. freethe STONE lol  "there is great interest in this phenomena. I have pondered this, and had discovered that the theoretical implications of induction through frequency, and of hi potential has a greater Key to the fulfillment of the universe. Induction is such a natural way as to cause electrical potentials in insulated bodies in cold space. When induction occurs here on earth volcano eruptions, and expansion takes place. These inductions are caused by identical inductions of high frequency, and potentials in cold space.Electric field, or medium. A pressure of the medium of space,  an increase in local space time electric field configurations, net force = flux change.  A cause for induction in earth core system, and that's core heating.  "Now we may inductively work on every atom is cold space through a transfer of energy from the vacuum field."


If i bring 2 objects in an electric field, the electric potential of that local space has increased, therefore there is induction in other objects in the local space time configuration due to the increase in electric field charge or mass.  its  movement thereby creates changing magnetic fields in ferrous materials, and its local magnetic configuration changes along with the electric potential of the object, or plate..

Did the star of Bethlehem Point to the manger. yes indeed it did.

We simply determine time sensitive cycles by observation.
we simply relay the message to future generation.
we simply look for evidence of the star today. That much is clear. A given statement is not self falsified, it remains true.
we simply don't assume, and include more information, we can safely reach conclusions.
I simply say we have a clear object poynting. I simply say creating an increase of net flux, or a force interacting.
simply show how one must determine.
I include reinforcing factor.
we ask if this is possible, and assume it is. It is a verifying factor. It (accounts for the wealth of knowledge in a given frame.)
we reflect on what we see, and then relate it to reality.
we are attempting to verify. time frames give rise, and are verifying factors. apply what is self evident.
The vector energy is relative to the observer. we assume this as a given, and is changing.

We find validating scientific evidence. we present it for conclusions. The axiom it is true, therefore we continue along these lines until the likely hood of it occurring in the future is verified. .
when the amount of observable input is sufficient, we learn gravity points by itself. we find the given angle provided by an even more ancient time frame. verify the claim of axiom. all is true until proven otherwise.
the dipole relating to a cassimir effect, and red shift. the star seen today in the east. the flux and energy is inducing a net force in the vacuum of space, in relation with the apparent electric field. if it is poynting it is generating the flux, and energy as described. attribute with observable data, and the conclusions are by certain well known scientific principles.
Always charge for success in every relation. Always describe the how, and why. If a object can point as a vector in space. this is due to location pinpointing energy. it is a changing relation, gravity is plume waving. It is an automatic generating force. We say it is so, and therefore use data to make the determination of the task at hand,
this simply means gravity type lensing would occur, it also states all by itself that is true.
the object stated is a star. the other a possible companion, is verifying in relation. No other assumption is needed. The object that is poynting.
Energy in a system, Verifiable today. it has also been verified yesterday, and is verifiable in the future.
each picture I posted is in relation to well known scientific principles. representative by the symbols provided. It is relative to an observer, it still continues in the line of scientific study today. The specific year of first observation is therefore estimated. The ball has been passed for you to observe. external net force precession.
Great earthquakes resulting in net force, torque times delta T.

cheers. Gravity described by, Walter Lewin. Find all the lectures, and review. Feed your head, determine facts relative, and relation.

:cool::cool::cool:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3omwHv3Cmog&list=PLB2F36F063F4B220D&index=1&feature=plpp_video

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE  NIKOLA TESLA, OF NEW YORK, N. Y. SYSTEM OF ELECTRIC LIGHTING. SPECIFICATION forming part of Letters Patent No. 454,622, dated June 23, 1891. Application filed April 25, 1891. Serial No. 390,414. (No model.) To all whom it may concern: Be it known that I, NIKOLA TESLA, a subject of the Emperor of Austria-Hungary, from Smiljan, Lika, border country of Austria-Hungary, and a resident of New York, in the county and State of New York, have invented certain new and useful Improvements in Methods of and Apparatus for Electric Lighting, of which the following is a specification, reference being had to the drawings accompanying and forming a part of the same. This invention consists in a novel method of and apparatus for producing light by means of electricity. For a better understanding of the invention it may be stated, first, that heretofore I have produced and employed currents for very high frequency for operating translating devices, such as electric lamps, and, second, that currents of high potential have also been produced and employed for obtaining luminous effects, and this, in a broad sense, may be regarded for purposes of this case as the prior state of the art; but I have discovered that results of the most useful character may be secured under entirely practicable conditions by means of electric currents in which both the above-described conditions of high frequency and great difference of potential are present. In other words, I have made the discovery that an electrical current of an excessively small period and very high potential may be utilized economically and practicably to great advantage for the production of light. It is difficult for me to define the exact limits of frequency and potential within which my discovery is comprised, for the results obtained are due to both conjointly; but I would make it clear that as to the inferior limits of both, the lowest frequency and potential that I contemplate using are far above what have heretofore been regarded as practicable. As an instance of what I regard as the lowest practicable limits I would state that I have obtained fairly good results by a frequency as low as fifteen thousand to twenty thousand per second and a potential of about twenty thousand volts. Both frequency and potential may be enormously increased above these figures, the practical limits being determined by the character of the apparatus and its capability of standing the strain. I do not mean by the term “excessively small period” and similar expressions herein to imply that I contemplate any number of pulsations or vibrations per second approximating to the number of light-waves, and this will more fully appear from the description of the nature of the invention which is hereinafter contained. The carrying out of this invention and the full realization of the conditions necessary to the attainment of the desired results involve first, a novel method of and apparatus for producing the currents or electrical effects of the character described; second, a novel method of utilizing and applying the same for the production of light, and, third, a new form of translating device or light-giving appliance. These I shall now describe. To produce a current of very high frequency and very high potential, certain well-known devices may be employed. For instance, as the primary source of current or electrical energy a continuous-current generator may be used, the circuit of which may be interrupted with extreme rapidity by mechanical devices, or a magneto-electric machine specially constructed to yield alternating currents of very small period may be used, and in either case, should the potential be too low, an induction-coil may be employed to raise it; or, finally, in order to overcome the mechanical difficulties, which in such cases become practically insuperable before the best results are reached, the principle of the disruptive discharge may be utilized. By means of this latter plan I produce a much greater rate of change in the current than by the other means suggested, and in illustration of my invention I shall confine the description of the means or apparatus for producing the current to this plan, although I would not be understood as limiting myself to its use. The current of high frequency, therefore, that is necessary to the successful working of my invention I produce by the disruptive discharge of the accumulated energy of a condenser maintained by charging said condenser from a suitable source and discharging it into or through a circuit under proper relations of self-induction, capacity, resistance, and period in well-understood ways. Such a discharge is known to be, under proper conditions, intermittent or oscillating in character, and in this way a current varying in strength at an enormously rapid rate may be produced. Having produced in the above manner a current of excessive frequency, I obtain from it by means of an induction-coil enormously high potentials—that is to say, in the circuit through which or into which the disruptive discharge of the condenser takes place I include the primary of a suitable induction-coil, and by a secondary coil of much longer and finer wire I convert to currents of extremely high potential. The differences in the length of the primary and secondary coils in connection with the enormously rapid rate of change in the primary current yield a secondary of enormous frequency and excessively high potential. Such currents are not, so far as I am aware, available for use in the usual ways; but I have discovered that if I connect to either of the terminals of the secondary coil or source of current of high potential the leading-in wires of such a device, for example, as an ordinary incandescent lamp, the carbon may be brought to and maintained at incandescence, or, in general, that any body capable of conducting the high-tension current described and properly enclosed in a rarefied or exhausted receiver may be rendered luminous or incandescent, either when connected directly with one terminal of the secondary source of energy or placed in the vicinity of such terminals so as to be acted upon inductively. Without attempting a detailed explanation of the causes to which this phenomenon may be ascribed, I deem it sufficient to state that, assuming the now generally accepted theories of scientists to be correct, the effects thus produced are attributable to molecular bombardment, condenser action, and electric or etheric disturbances. Whatever part each of any of these causes may play in producing the effects noted, it is, however, a fact that a strip of carbon or a mass of any other shape, either of carbon or any more or less conducting substance in a rarefied or exhausted receiver and connected directly or inductively to a source of electrical energy such as I have described, may be maintained at incandescence if the frequency and potential of the current be sufficiently high. I would here state that by the terms “currents of high frequency and high potential” and similar expressions which I have used in this description I do not mean, necessarily, currents in the usual acceptance of the term but, generally speaking, electrical disturbances or effects such as would be produced in the secondary source by the action of the primary disturbance or electrical effect. It is necessary to observe in carrying out this invention that care must be taken to reduce to a minimum the opportunity for dissipation of the energy from the conductors intermediate to the source of current and the light-giving body. For this purpose the conductors should be free from projections and points and well covered or coated with a good insulator. The body to be rendered incandescent should be selected with a view to its capability of withstanding the action to which it is exposed without being rapidly destroyed, for some conductors will be much more speedily consumed than others. I now refer to the accompanying drawings, in which— Figure 1 is a diagram of one of the special arrangements that I have employed in carrying out my discovery, and Figs. 2 and 3 are vertical sectional views of modified forms of light-giving devices that I have devised for use with the system. I would state that as all of the apparatus herein shown, with the exception of certain special forms of lamp invented by me, is or may be of well-known construction and in common use for other purposes, I have indicated such well-known parts therefor by conventional representations. G is the primary source of current or electrical energy. I have explained above how various forms of generators might be used for this purpose; but in the present illustration I assume that G is an alternating-current generator of comparatively low electro-motive force. Under such circumstances I raise the potential of the current by means of an induction-coil having a primary P and a secondary S. Then by the current development in this secondary I charge a condenser C, and this condenser I discharge through or into a circuit A, having an air-gap a, or, in general, means for maintaining a disruptive discharge. By the means above described a current of enormous frequency is produced. My object is next to convert this into a working-circuit of very high potential, for which purpose I connect up in the circuit A the primary P' of an induction-coil having a long fine wire secondary S'. The current in the primary P' develops in the secondary S' a current or electrical effect of corresponding frequency, but of enormous difference of potential, and the secondary S' thus becomes the source of the energy to be applied to the purpose of producing light. The light-giving devices may be connected to either terminal of the secondary S'. If desired, one terminal may be connected to a conducting-wall W of a room or space to be lighted and the other arranged for connection of the lamps therewith. In such case the walls should be coated with some metallic or conducting substance in order that they may have sufficient conductivity. The lamps or light-giving devices may be an ordinary incandescent lamp; but I prefer to use specially-designed lamps, examples of which I have shown in detail in the drawings. This lamp consists of a rarefied or exhausted bulb or globe which encloses a refractory conducting body, as carbon, of comparatively small bulk and any desired shape. This body is to be connected to the secondary by one or more conductors sealed in the glass, as in ordinary lamps, or is arranged to be inductively connected thereto. For this last-named purpose the body is in electrical contact with a metallic sheet in the interior of the neck of the globe, and on the outside of said neck is a second sheet which is to be connected with the source of current. These two sheets form the armatures of a condenser, and by them the currents or potentials are developed in the light-giving body. As many lamps of this or other kinds may be connected to the terminal of S' as the energy supplied is capable of maintaining at incandescence. In Fig. 3, b is a rarefied or exhausted glass globe or receiver, in which is a body of carbon or other suitable conductor e. To this body is connected a metallic conductor f, which passes through and is sealed in the glass wall of the globe, outside of which it is united to a copper or other wire g, by means of which it is to be electrically connected to one pole or terminal of the source of current. Outside of the globe the conducting-wires are protected by a coating of insulation h, of any suitable kind, and inside the globe the supporting-wire is enclosed in and insulated by a tube or coating k of a refractory insulating substance, such as pipe-clay or the like. A reflecting-plate l is shown applied to the outside of the globe b. This form of lamp is a type of those designed for direct electrical connection with one terminal of the source of current; but, as above stated, there need not be a direct connection, for the carbon or other illuminating body may be rendered luminous by inductive action of the current thereon, and this may be brought about in several ways. The preferred form of lamp for this purpose, however, is shown in Fig. 2. In this figure the globe b is formed with a cylindrical neck, within which is a tube or sheet m of conducting material on the side and over the end of a cylinder or plug n of any suitable insulating material. The lower edges of this tube are in electrical contact with a metallic plate o, secured to the cylinder n, all the exposed surfaces of such plate and of the other conductors being carefully coated and protected by insulation. The light-giving body e, in this case a straight stem of carbon, is electrically connected with the said plate by a wire or conductor similar to the wire f, Fig. 3, which is coated in like manner with a refractory insulating material k. The neck of the globe fits into a socket composed of an insulating tube or cylinder p, with a more or less complete metallic lining s, electrically connected by a metallic head or plate r with a conductor g, that is to be attached to one pole of the source of current. The metallic lining s and the sheet m thus compose the plates or armatures of a condenser. This invention is not limited to the special means described for producing the results hereinabove set forth, for it will be seen that various plans and means of producing currents of very high frequency are known, and also means for producing very high potentials; but I have only described herein certain ways in which I have practically carried out the invention. What I claim is— 1. The improvement in the art of electric lighting herein described, which consists in generating or producing for the operation of the lighting devices currents of enormous frequency and excessively high potential, substantially as herein described. 2. The method of producing an electric current for practical application, such as for electric lighting, which consists in generating or producing a current of enormous frequency and inducing by such current in a working circuit, or that to which the lighting devices are connected, a current of corresponding frequency and excessively high potential, as set forth. 3. The method of producing an electric current for practical application, such as for electric lighting, which consists in charging a condenser by a given current, maintaining an intermittent or oscillatory discharge of said condenser through or into a primary circuit, and producing thereby in a secondary working-circuit in inductive relation to the primary very high potentials, as set forth. 4. The method of producing electric light by incandescence by electrically or inductively connecting a conductor enclosed in a rarefied or exhausted receiver to one of the poles or terminals of a source of electric energy or current of a frequency and potential sufficiently high to render said body incandescent, as set forth. 5. A system of electric lighting, consisting in the combination, with a source of electric energy or current of enormous frequency and excessively high potential, of an incandescent lamp or lamps consisting of a conducting body enclosed in a rarefied or exhausted receiver and connected directly or inductively to one pole or terminal of the source of energy, as set forth. 6. In a system of electric lighting, the combination, with a source of currents of enormous frequency and excessively high potential, of incandescent lighting devices, each consisting of a conducting body enclosed in a rarefied or exhausted receiver, said conducting body being connected directly or inductively to one pole or terminal of the source of current, and a conducting body or bodies in the vicinity of said lighting devices connected to the other pole or terminal of said source, as set forth. 7. In a system of electrical lighting, the combination, with a source of currents of enormous frequency of excessively high potential, of lighting devices, each consisting of a conducting body enclosed in a rarefied or exhausted receiver and connected by conductors directly or inductively with one of the terminals of said source, all parts of the conductors intermediate to the said source and the light-giving body being insulated and protected to prevent the dissipation of the electric energy, as herein set forth. NIKOLA TESLA
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #21, on June 6th, 2011, 09:05 AM »Last edited on November 28th, 2011, 07:34 AM by freethisone
I want to add some of my work with the study of the precession, and the equinox of axial shift.
because i was able to find these MIT lectures by x-ray astronomer Walter Lewin, he was able to inspire, and draw my attention to the period in with Earth axis shifts.
lecture 24 gives formula, and meaning to today's world crisis. There is expansion going on here, along with a reversal in cold air mass. The new ice age already 1 year in progress.
A change in the angular momentum of earth rotational speed, cause for flooding from oceanic tides. Cause for extreme weather patterns and record cold, and snow in the northern hemisphere. More i can add in, the case of solar radiation, and the interaction from the radioactive onslaught of  particles, and gas streaming into our world as we speak
solar radiation does its part ionizing, and changing the atmospheric gas material of our world into other more dangerous elements such as 03, and arsenic. The amount of methane and sulfur dioxide reaching our air is increasing so rapidly that there is cause for alarm. We as a race should join together to educate the people of the incredible dangers we now face.

The  EPG  system of operation, and Earth science are of my special study today. I love to look at rocks, and play with magnets. like a little kid on a field day the ocean of information becomes available to the man who searches for answers.

the time frame i wish to introduce is a 20 year period. it is because when we examine smaller, and smaller time periods, and plot them on a chart future, and past events become more likely, and understood.

There are several key features of gravity, and Geo thermal events here on earth that have there connection to local space time, electric fields, and changing magnetic fields.
The Sun has its connection to expansion through thermal conductivity. Inductions in earth core system occur under these same conditions.
The earth, and its magnetic alignment with local space time electric fields.If a second object be introduced in this local  field magnetic configurations change and realign.
The potential, and kinetic energy due to moving fields, caused by an object only a change in direction or speed can cause this) movement across the electric field lines in local space time. energy is caused by movement across magnetic field lines. we need to make an emf by a change in the direction of a mass or conducting magnetic dipole..
Earthquakes, and volcano eruptions are defined in connection with angular momentum on the axis of earth rotation. Apply a torque.
The cause for new weather patterns across the globe are well defined.More to come.
The problems with ozone production in the environment solar, and nuclear influences. Rareification and ionization of gaseous material.
The production of methane, and natural gas in the oceans, sulfur dioxide is in the air, and mass fish kills in our oceans. Methane is melting very fast, as are oceanic currents changing rapidly.
The destruction of the earth magnetic field strength, and the problems UV radiation has as it is passing through. The UV index goes to 15 not 10. we have been above 10 for  a good wile now, 12 to 18 months perhaps. Jamaica is a concern with UV angering from 13 to 15 daily.
Examine lunar precession influence, and theory. These ideas are not realistic, as for the lunar mass cannot cause a torque on earth axial rotation.
Discovery of the objects that cause an external force that is placed on the axis of earth rotation. ( found and are being traced around the world today.)
What does angular momentum have to do with  storm formations? (increase of spin momentum in Earth rotation, under certain conditions.) KING TIDES near earth center of mass rotation..

These are just some of the facts that i draw these conclusions from.

Einstein describes the precession in his own words, but its hard to locate his work on the internet. covering processional theory.
Quote
Some one replied, and  said :I don't recall having run across an example of a geometry where there is repulsion

I did say:

This is my confusion, virtual photon constitutes the field. I bring your attention to this interpretation of what constitutes the field, or virtual vacuum, or photon field what have you.

My interpretation below, as stated from wiki " virtual photons (which constitute the field,) and (generate a net force,) either an (attraction or a repulsion) depending on the specific arrangement of the two plates."

I know The typical example is of two uncharged metallic plates in a vacuum, without any external electromagnetic field.

Quote
for the record this holds true. If I had arranged the plates properly. I say there is also a repellent force.
I have place my plates, or spheres in the electric field, arranged them so they repel, and accelerate them together. The Field is Outer Space. In search of a gravity type response, or increase in flux of the field stated. This is leading to inductions across the entire solar system, and verified Einsteins 3 principles of relativity at the same time.
I give you not only The reason 2 charged spheres may have the same given charge. I also accelerate them together creating a gravitational lensing effect, or according to GR a red shift.
Why did Einstein assume only mercury? Jupiter, Venus, mercury, and Earth also experience perturbations. We can now verify the condition, stating all planets have been perturbed.

How do we acquire the charge on the spheres, and cause the virtual photon field to generate a net force? By acquiring the same replant charges in the first place, and accelerating them together.
This effect is verifying, it has occurred, and continues to do so.

The first task is by arranging two like charges of a material that would not have any attracting force in the ISCM, or outer-space. You might say, How can that be all body's attract?

Two dipoles of same high potential, generating pointing energy.

I your concern may lead to a better understanding of the process of torque induced precession.

It has been found to be a progression of axial shift. Over a 3 to 5 year period starting in early months of 2010.

Freethestone "a shift in plate movement apparent.
a time period of great awareness, and a low or crisis for the civilizations of the time frame"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yT-3Fk4e88
more later.

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/61581-casimirr-effect/  The work i have advanced, i think we have found a common law of gravity. cheers
RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #22, on July 18th, 2011, 06:13 AM »Last edited on September 4th, 2011, 03:10 PM by freethisone
https://www.youtube.com/user/2010TheCountdown#p/u/1/dvkOynNbCZ0new discovery pass over of 2011 is 3 months late. this means the second sun rose and passed over. April 17 2011 was the time we have been waiting for.


today is July 18, 2011 and the object is passing over Antarctica.  in 2012 we may see the same passover in the northern side.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYpKQT6e6Fs

on 7-17-2011, we are 3 months delayed in our orbit. 4-17-2011 is passover, easter?
very hot for April?:blush:


~Russ

RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #23, on July 18th, 2011, 09:23 AM »
Quote from freethisone on July 18th, 2011, 06:13 AM
new discovery pass over of 2011 is 3 months late. this means the second sun rose and passed over. april 17 2011 was the time we have been wainting for.


today is july 18, 2011 and the object is passing over antartica.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYpKQT6e6Fs

on 7-17-2011, we are 3 months deayed in our orbit. 4-17-2011 is passover, easter?
very hot for April?:blush:
Thats quite intresting!

~Russ

freethisone

RE: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #24, on July 24th, 2011, 09:20 AM »Last edited on July 24th, 2011, 05:34 PM by freethisone
anti gravity section

this is my first draft, and i want to add much information on the anti gravity, and also the special circuit, and how it relates too the ionic breeze machine. by sharper image

patents and all info on anti gravity will be presented at a future time..

Dr Townsend Brown is one such pioneer with Tesla as the father of this information.
first is some specific research to polish up on..

    Most scientists today will admit a weak COUPLING EFFECT DOES EXIST BETWEEN GRAVITATION ANDELECTRICITY but any practical use of this coupling effect they deny! Standing almost alone in this belief Mr. Brown has maintained his position regarding the matter stubbornly, faithfully, and devotedly. If a simple, two-plate electrical condenser  is suspended by a cord in such a way as to allow itcomplete freedom to to move in any direction, except downward of course, and this condenser is charged with the proper amount and pressure of direct electric current the instrument will swing toward the side holding the positive charge. If this same condenser is discharged, the positive and negative wires switched and connected oppositely, when recharged the condenser will swing in the OPPOSITE DIRECTION.

    If the condenser is placed upon one side of a balanced beam with enough weight opposite it tocontinue the balance and if the positive pole is pointed up, when the condenser is charged the weight on the opposite side of the beam will fall and the entire condenser will rise! This shows that some of the "weight" of the condenser has been relieved. If the positive pole now is reversed, when the condenser is again charged the weight on the opposite end of the beam will be lifted! This illustrates gravitic affect. This is the Biefeld-Brown Effect. As far is now known it is the only method of affecting the gravitational field electrically! However, apparently there are several other research programs now under way attempting to establish an electro-gravitic relationship.

    One of the mysteries of this Effect is that it appears to be affected over time! Time does not do awaywith the Effect completely, but it does appear to minimize it temporarily. This was noted first by Brown during experiments located in a closed room. He watched his discs through a telescope from outside the room. Brown observed that after a time the discs did not swing quite so far as initially, in either direction, with the same electric charge. I understood from Mr. Shank that this point was discussed with Albert Einstein but what Mr. Einstein had to say remains unknown to me. The phenomenon might be accounted for by subtle atomic structural breakdowns in the dielectric material, or in the plate material, or both. After a time, following a complete discharge, these breakdowns mend themselves.The intensity with which the Biefeld-Brown Effect may act is determined by five factors. Ultimate intensity cannot possibly be obtained by a combined use of all five factors - each in their separate ultimates! A compromise must be made. This is not as grave a disadvantage as it might seem at first, for it will allow an almost endless arrangement of factors in any given disc or ship. The best combination of these then may be chosen and applied to a wide variety of practical conditions which will surely arise in everyday aeronautical or astronautical flight.

Proximity Of Plates:

    The first factor regulating the intensity of the Effect is controlled by the closeness at which the condenser's plates can be set. If the charging pressure - or voltage - is high then the plates will have to be farther apart than for lower voltages -using the same dielectric. If it is necessary to charge the condenser quickly a higher voltage is needed than if more time can be taken. Hence, the closer the condenser plates the greater the Effect gained - other circumstances remaining the same.

Dielectric Constant:

    The second factor is the ability of the material chosen as a dielectric to store electrical energy. There are many kinds of dielectrics: glass, mica, rubber, paper, bakelite, air, ceramics, and many of the plastics. A dielectric is any material which opposes the flow of an electric current and at the same time is capable of storing the electrical energy as an "elastic stress." The action resembles the squeezing of a soft rubber ball. The muscles in your hand represent the electric voltage. They squeeze the ball's sides together. The sides remain squeezed until your muscles release their pressure, then the sides jump back into their original shape. A dielectric will absorb an electric charge until its capacity has been reached. Then it will either hold that charge as long as the charging force is present, or it will rupture and the pressure will leak away, or if the accumulated pressure becomes greater than the charging pressure it will discharge itself back into the charging circuit! This last can raise the devil! Some dielectrics are capable of absorbing a great quantity of electrical energy if that energy is applied slowly at moderate pressure, but they break down if called upon to act quickly. Other dielectrics, like lead-free glass, can be charged and discharged thousands of times a second at high pressures. The measure of a dielectric's ability is called the "K" of the material. The higher the K, the greater is the Biefeld-Brown Effect.

Intensity:

    A third factor in creating intensity of the effect is the area of the dielectric's charging plates. The discs are used edgewise, and the greater their area, the greater the Effect obtained.

Voltage:

    A fourth factor has to do with the voltage, or pressure used to charge the condenser's plates. The higher the voltage, the greater the Effect. Also, the higher the voltage the shorter the time required to charge a given condenser size. But the voltagemust not be so high as to puncture the dielectric, the condenser is permanently, or temporarily ruined - depending upon its ability to "heal" itself. Solid dielectrics cannot healthemselves. Fluids heal themselvesalmost as soon as punctured. (the reason for using oil filled capacitors).

Mass, (Surface Area):

    The fifth and last factor is the mass of the dielectric. The greater the mass, the larger the effect. These points all are important. They make it clear that by a not too complicated electrical arrangement which allows the changing of many positive pole positions at will an astronautical vehicle could be controlled. Since a circle contains the greatest number of square units of surface for a given dimension (a toroid has even greater surface area), it seems obvious that a shallow, disc-shaped vehicle could use this type of energy field to greatest advantage. It would be charged differently than the models because it could carry its own charging equipment on board. The input energy of some models tested in California quite some time ago (they do not represent present experimental attainments) was about 50 watts, or the requirements of a small light bulb. The weight of these units was about 1200 grams, or around 42 ounces, or near two and 6/10 pounds. The efficiency of propulsion was 2%. Unless scientific findings are discounted, we must assume the voltage of atmospheric electricity rises as the distance from the earth's surface increases. At low altitudes we sometimes record an increase of 100 volts for every three feet in elevation. Butthis increase rises in altitude. It is believed that in that ionosphere a potential of 100 volts may occurwithin only four inches! Even though a discoid-shaped vehicle could be relatively thin, compared to its diameter, still it would be many times four inches thick. Hence, it would be subjected to tremendous differentials of external electric pressure over its extreme dimensions. How will this affect the Biefeld-Brown Effect - or any electrically propelled vehicle? Some say, not at all. Others see it as a sizable barrier! Anti-gravity devices apparently are being experimented with from a number of directions. Once any one of them becomes practical a whole new horizon will unfold before mankind.
     

    There is a present day rumor that the B-2 Stealth Bomber is in fact using a electrogravitic propulsion system in addition to the primary twin General Electric low profile engines. Once up in the air, and when a certain speed is reached, the Electrogravitic power system is engaged and the main GE engines are eased back. The leading edge of the mono-winged craft is treated with depleted uranium, (a super high dielectric material), and positively charged. The exhaust is negatively charged providing the "Biefeld-Brown Effect", thus causing an electromotive force moving the craft forward in the direction of the positively charge wing. This has proven to be a very efficient propulsion system compared to the amount of energy it takes to initialize and maintain the effect.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nP4zQ4R8vJg