Theory, my chalk board.

firepinto

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #225, on March 22nd, 2015, 08:46 PM »
Quote from freethisone on March 22nd, 2015, 07:10 PM
to any member who think they can lay claim to my devise, i show the first working prototype.

you better not think multiplying voltage is your idea. u had no clue...  doctor?  failure to give credit will result in a foul..
I think you need to explain more.  What device, and who are you referring to?  From  your post attachments I'm having to think that you claim to have invented electrical breaker panels, bar stools, foot rails, and carpet covered staircases?  :blink:

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #226, on March 22nd, 2015, 09:26 PM »Last edited on March 22nd, 2015, 09:47 PM
Quote from firepinto on March 22nd, 2015, 08:46 PM
I think you need to explain more.  What device, and who are you referring to?  From  your post attachments I'm having to think that you claim to have invented electrical breaker panels, bar stools, foot rails, and carpet covered staircases?  :blink:
by learning the scientific principles, and building devises that are from a source,,   open source..

again this is why i am on my chalk board no names of are mentioned, this is open, and members who do specific work by use of schismatics



so i simply say no claimed against my devices, or inspired devises go without mentioning that.

no war is being started. plus you have been a great help tpo me and my work over the years. i was Russ, biggest fan. .when i post here it is fore every ones benefit. what do you want me to say to the 8 or ten members here? that its great they post to learn and pat on the back, but when we have something even simpler it goes ignored?
i say as a prediction, science will be calling by its scientific names, and descriptions..

thank for the pat on the back...firepinto. rather then ask a question, and say i am accusing some one of something.?
because im not. but recognize the principles  so they may not lay claim to my specific devices.

why has no one ever discussed it among the community they are a part of?  all i see is a bunch of words that break apart the forum.. i am not..
this is my question to me. and my board is for me too.

seems faIR TO ME,  HAVE A GOOD ONE THANK FOR THE VISIT. ...

cheers..


freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #228, on April 21st, 2015, 12:59 PM »Last edited on April 21st, 2015, 07:15 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgUz4JkMB_o#

more on radial waves. and objects of large mass, charge,


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ra9yKpYTGbQ#ws

i like angus, so he had the right idea about tesla. but better still it is radial.  perhaps i can incorporate to Faraday disk.

the test i propose, a duel set of angus wangus coils wired together for vortex based math... vortex bifillar coils. my idea step them up as p and s. i can make fractal or multiplying biffilar vortexing coils..

her is some more gold, the diameter O:-) of the coil is important...

i see radial waves of inductance..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqgWrTJtQnk#


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqgWrTJtQnk#

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #229, on April 28th, 2015, 06:41 AM »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvTWxrLzHZU#ws

good movie what was learned?

the magnetic filament are more like a chain. these berk-er currents are used in the magnetic flywheel.
these filament of plasma are not parallel, but act more like the water flowing through the cans of a kelvin battery.
the flow, and charge then diverge, and snap back together. magnetism is demonstrating particles that converge by pressure, and attracting charges at a distance. very similar to cloud seeding in modern weather warfare.  as a cold area is produced, water vapor turns to ice, particles of precipitates converge to form a cloud. just like plasma and charges in space. now what have i learned about magnets, and inertial gravitation?

that field lines in space are like rivers. like a hundred billion billion rivers flowing down hill, twisting, and turning, and making new connections as it meanders through a vessel we call space,,

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #230, on April 28th, 2015, 06:28 PM »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8he8afjQyd8#ws

i love a tesla turbine hover car. now we can build one. with many special improvements.

a  tire that can hover, or fly, because it is a circular wing. a tesla turbine should give enough air flow to do the trick..
search other bladeless fans., and also fans that use  electrostatics to cause air flow.  sharper image? them sob.. another tesla work.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #231, on May 2nd, 2015, 01:40 PM »Last edited on May 2nd, 2015, 01:47 PM
unbelievable simple advancement to Tesla turbine for self powered full generating, and pumping prefect. simply afterwards a plasma can be created. simply water may be charged in the process. simply my greatest of all solution to free energy the Tesla turbine including a valve..

i have these designed systems of generation,, but i will give you a chance to make a patent.. c O:-) O:-)ccheers..

i am inviting MR Thessalonian too respond or contact me.. as i did ask for vinny to contact me, and i had spoken with inverter 3. and he is a great guy. he is a member but haven't seen him of late.

the last 40 day that were under observation of ice age model has produced exactly as it had predicted.  i will be showing the last 80 in full, and how i had said 2 sets of events would lead to a predictable out come. volcanic eruption on a massive scale. and earthquakes of great magnitude that fell in the time frame as a predicted event to continue to prove ice age models cause and effect chain.  it has been a highly accurate model and is a present model that makes predictable outcomes in short time frames.  simple ..noble O:-) prize..

i have answered the questions and we have a new wonder. what new wonder do you have?

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #232, on May 2nd, 2015, 02:07 PM »
what was just born? a new theory. for i assume it is possible to use the sun to cut lime stone, i now say a high stream of water pressure can do the same.


high probability high pressure power type washers were used to cut stones to build the pyramids.

10000 20000 50000 100000  psi is assumed...  this type of water cutter can sculpt a home by use of three dee printer on a large scale

new invention apparatus for building structures out of pure stone. on site geometry billion dollar invention.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #233, on May 3rd, 2015, 04:12 PM »
i had said a continually increasing voltage can do the same for water as electricity can do for a coil and iron rod,

learning what is proposed is logical. the increasing voltage will cause said saturation of dielectric medium. ie water.

a voltage limiter is then set forth to control the spikes of over-saturation, leading to a voltage drop time on off, and a rising voltage again to reach over saturation of the dielectric..

this is my theory and invention, you are welcome to build one if you like.

the scientific principles i set forth is the stripping of water molecules at the magnetic force, inertia is keeping them together. overloading, and then operating on the water at the steel tubes, that is were the cassimir force takes control.  pulling the only magnetic bond there was. between o2 and h. so you see a sheathing apparatus i proposed is all that is necessary to gain knowledge results...


it was keeping them together in the first place.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #234, on May 4th, 2015, 04:33 AM »Last edited on May 4th, 2015, 05:12 AM
wiki   

An electromagnetic pump is a pump that moves liquid metal (or any electrically conductive liquid) using electromagnetism. A magnetic field is set at right angles to the direction the liquid moves in, and a current is passed through it. This causes an electromagnetic force that moves the liquid.

Applications include pumping liquid metal through a cooling system.  i say for ionized gas too.

A magnetic field (brc) always exists around the current (I) carrying conductor. When this current carrying conductor is subjected to external magnetic field (Bap), the conductor experiences a force perpendicular to the direction of I and Bap. This is because, the magnetic field produced by the conductor and the applied magnetic field try to align with each other. The similar effect one can see between any two magnets.

The same principle is used in electromagnetic pump. The current is supplied through a conducting liquid. And two permanent magnets are arranged to produce magnetic field Bap as shown in the figure. The supplied current has current density (J) and the magnetic field associated with this current can be called as 'Reaction magnetic Field (brc)'. The two magnetic fields Bap and brc try to align with each other. This causes the mechanical motion of the fluid.


principles of epg, ie current carrying water.. kelvin battery, Tesla turbine etc..

Method and apparatus for magnetic separation of ions  research.  one such search  results.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED
APPLICATION
This application is a Utility application that claims pri
ority to an earlier ?led US. Provisional Application No.
60/324,236, ?led Sep. 21, 2001, and expressly incorporates
by reference the provisional application.
BACKGROUND
This disclosure pertains to a method of separating oppo
sitely charged ions. Particularly, the disclosure pertains to a
method of separating oppositely charged ions using mag
netic ?elds, and more particularly to a method of separating
oppositely charged ions in a high temperature environment.
This disclosure also pertains to a method of separating
thermally dissociated hydrogen and oxygen ions from high
temperature dissociation of Water using magnetic ?elds for
the production of hydrogen and oxygen gas.
Prior art teaches the use of a parabolic dish to concentrate
solar energy into a reaction chamber Where Water is injected
and dissociated into its constituent parts due to the extreme
temperatures achieved. While this method achieves ef?cient
dissociation of the Water molecule into its ionic constituents,
it fails to address a satisfactory means of separating the ions
after dissociation. Prior art methods exist for the separation
of ionic components from a gaseous stream, the majority of
Which involve the use of a membrane to separate the ions
based on their physical siZe or other physical characteristics.
Membranes have many drawbacks, the most signi?cant
being the cost of the materials involved


The apparatus and process separates any ions of opposing
charge into distinct streams for collection. The method for
achieving this separation is based on the fundamentals of
magnetism and the forces that are generated on charged
particles moving through a magnetic ?eld. The force that is
imparted on the particle by the ?eld is perpendicular to both
the direction of travel and the direction of the magnetic ?eld
lines. As illustrated in FIG. 1, particles of opposite charge
that encounter the same ?eld moving in the same direction
Will incur forces opposite one another. This is shoWn by the
force vector imparted on a particle moving With velocity
vector (v) in a magnetic ?eld As the moving particle
encounters this neW force the direction of travel Will be
changed. The formula for calculating the force generated on
charged particles moving in a magnetic ?eld is:
Where: F is the generated force, q is the particle charge,
v is the particle velocity and B is the magnitude of the
magnetic ?eld.
The equation formally shoWs that particles of opposite
charge Will experience opposing forces, and that the force
due to the magnetic ?eld is proportional to the velocity of the
particle and the magnitude of the magnetic ?eld. Therefore,
a particle moving at a high velocity in a relatively small
magnetic field Will experience a great enough force to
change its direction.
FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary apparatus for magnetic
separation of ions, or simply ion separator 10



i am taking interest in file one, and in file four down below. these are principles that are related to theoretical interpretations of the same..

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #235, on May 4th, 2015, 10:45 AM »Last edited on May 4th, 2015, 10:55 AM
the thing about flux and over saturation  is 2 different states of action. on the one hand a magnetic flux is contracting. it keeps all thing together. ferrous porosity.

a over saturation of flux sets up another condition, and that is of expansion.the core is now overflowing.

 i use these simple scientific principles to prove my ice age model.. the condition, or state of expansion due to increasing  flux or charge. a over saturation of the permeability of matter.  so my ice age model always continues to reinforce its theory.  expansion theory provides proof neutrinos are not a cause or explanation.

beside eddy currents there is that..this only validates further my claims.  over saturation of dielectrics result  as small contractions, as opposed to materials that are not overflowing with flux


a.stronger contraction would result in off time.. it always wants to pull together.matter, electrostatics, and ion wind muts therefore create a under saturated condition. and it does, as proven in my free energy member project.


cat whiskers... my theory  as evidence of Henry Cavendish explanation of over and under charged conductors,

so i fortify again not only ice age model, and add to the theory of expansion in all things earth core, atoms rare air. vapor.

what will happen when the charge, or overflowing cores contract?  there will be vast land drops and subduction.. this should hold true and  i will fortify the nature of change.

i only wish you understood why sucking out the oil from earth will cause a dielectric :@ break down..

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #236, on May 5th, 2015, 06:10 PM »Last edited on May 5th, 2015, 06:12 PM
is it possible to get 5 times the power from a single rive? if i use a damn?  if i want 5 times more power from the same river i get 5 times the power.

but because of the theory of linear motors we have thus created a river of any length.  but now i put a paddle wheel in the river, and another, and so on. did i create more energy? no.

did i create a perpetual river of any length?  yes and each paddle wheel in theory should produce the same speed as the river... cheers. a analogy...

taking what was learned from, Professor Eric Laithwaite- Motors Big and Small - 1971 O:-) O:-)

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #237, on May 5th, 2015, 06:24 PM »Last edited on May 5th, 2015, 06:28 PM
one assumption for imagination and anti gravity is, a  saucer shape causes eddy currents that act on a disk saucers the same way the Bernoulli principle works on a airplane wing. low pressure zone, but also lift. it rides on top, it simply needs enough dielectric, and generated magnetic force.







the effect is like riding high in the river of flow caused by  linear motor..  but can be advanced to other ideas. :heart: :idea:





freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #238, on May 6th, 2015, 06:42 AM »Last edited on May 6th, 2015, 07:57 AM
how to properly use a PM

by increasing its power to do work.  how?

it is true you can program a magnet at a specific power, or Gauss measurement. but did you know i can increase that even further by storing potential energy in the system..

by external forces i now state this is true..   used ice age model as proof, and also experiments in magnetism  also validates the premiss..

 wile it is true binary systems causes induction. it is also true by doing work on the charges a increased flux is now created.. the only increase made was adding external energy into the magnets. by pushing them together...

so again i use classical dynamics to explain the expansion processes in stars planets, and atoms.   by increase of external pressure..

if you dont understand i am being cryptic how to do this task with 2 pm magnets.


now i say i can also increase the speed of the river by use of N space by simply using dielectric materials between the spacings of the paddle wheels. i can even make the paddle wheel react differently depending upon the materials they are made of. i can also include increased flux to the river with the same principles of storing external energy in the system, or in the paddle wheels themselves.

by adding PM magnets, or adding conducting plates to increase the output of the conducting wires. capacitance, or by even adding a bank of capacitors to take the constant load off the mains.. :heart: :heart:


i can increase out put in another way. yes its true rotation alone at the shaft can generate power, by adding a copper disk to the shaft a Faraday generator is now created.


if i tap that disc with brushes i get a voltage. i thus still get a voltage at the spinning shaft caused by the flowing river.i can put places of slow currents in the river, and i now can make rapids.

also i can increase the flow of the rapids further with external forces. Pm magnets for starters. and contractions in magnetic lines of force. 

i can now add 8 shafts to a linear motor, and turn it into  a generate by making it into a circle without a center shaft at all..many advancements...  i for one like the idea of a 8 shafted generator producing 8 times the out put of a single center shaft.. cheers.. :P

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #239, on May 6th, 2015, 08:58 AM »
how to theoretically increase the power of a coil? by adding dielectric material aluminum is proposed...


how to make a super fibular Tesla coil?  by use of thick circle of aluminum, and winding the wire around its circumstance. terminated at a hole in the center of the plate..a pancake coil could be wound..


or simply adding capacitance by connecting the center O:-) terminal to the plate itself..

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #240, on May 6th, 2015, 08:39 PM »Last edited on May 6th, 2015, 08:43 PM
what does this really represent?

looks like 2 a horse shoe magnet in rotation along it central axis,, O:-)  metal filing test..


so what does this mean? it took two poles of a magnet in rotation to produce this effect..

Professor Eric Laithwaite- Motors Big and Small - 1971  at 14 min 56 seconds. there it is. :idea: :idea: :idea:


its two poles side by side in rotation. not one pole on top and one on the bottom...

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #241, on May 11th, 2015, 06:20 AM »
i can now make a car on a linear motor platform, adding lift to the suspension, and also allowing for 4 wheel drive.

the power plant will be added as a source of power. son..

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #242, on May 20th, 2015, 07:06 AM »Last edited on May 20th, 2015, 07:08 AM
hi, many members tell me they don't understand me. I can agree with that.  have you ever asked a question to clarify?  you should.. who ever you are..

I have study many things 20 years of serious work..

induction coils
Tesla works
many others things, including climate, precession, and free energy.

when I say I have solved the biggest problem with our understanding of induction coils  :'( I had to use theory to understand the principles at work..

I say I have many new wonders to share. but no one seems very interested..

so I continue as if I want to tell you something. you just need to read between the lines..

Searl effect solved... I can do the same thing with the center hub. I can magnetize it in the proper way..

I have many papers that tell me this is the case..

cook coil, is a off shoot of the first magnetic motor..
cook coil is a understood principle now, any one wishing to build it must realize it must be 4 to 6 feet per coil. And 3 inches thick iron..

what does all this mean? well it means nothing to you unless the questions are asked. if you don't ask you will never understand what I discovered..

cheers..

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #243, on May 20th, 2015, 07:19 AM »Last edited on May 20th, 2015, 07:30 AM
now I had discovered something that made good sense to me.

I want you to take a flat piece of steel.  about 2 inches wide, 8 to 13 inches long.

drill 6 holes in it. in the middle of its width. , that is on hole, space your holes 1 inch apart, or 1 and a half inches apart or 3 inches apart, or a variation of that.

If you do this experiment will tell me something about its inner workings..
you are simply making a magnet.

take now a insulated wire. weave it in and out, leave a little slack between each weave so you can pull the wire through.

will you end up with what I think you will end up with?  a alternating magnetic field beside each hole.
this means you can now wind a coil, and there will be a changing magnetic field in the outer wrapped coil.
 a motionless generator..

now I say if this showed you nothing at all that should be expected, then you need a steel ring, and not just a flat pieces of steel with two ends.

a ring or band of steel, aluminum or copper could be tried..






freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #244, on May 24th, 2015, 01:38 AM »Last edited on May 24th, 2015, 02:48 AM
Quote from freethisone on May 2nd, 2015, 02:07 PM
what was just born? a new theory. for i assume it is possible to use the sun to cut lime stone, i now say a high stream of water pressure can do the same.


high probability high pressure power type washers were used to cut stones to build the pyramids.

10000 20000 50000 100000  psi is assumed...  this type of water cutter can sculpt a home by use of three dee printer on a large scale

new invention apparatus for building structures out of pure stone. on site geometry billion dollar invention.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FIsrYzyvlg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iq8lMGoSLt0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBqgofmdKc8

proof of concept, stone cutting..

this is just a waste, and u will never get the precision you could with water.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsCWHwjaxhE
so one more for the ancients...

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #245, on May 24th, 2015, 09:20 AM »
consider the Aeather  is five times as fluffy , takes up more space. 5 times Aeather to 1 part mass..

incompressible? holds a five times higher pressure due to mass. equilibrium is reached. Then it is said to be at rest.

moving charges. the earth can be considered a mass that holds one part Aeather, and it happy  to reach equilibrium.  although it takes a 5 times higher force to penetrate the mass itself. because there is five times more volume of Aether fluid..


this is one of my hypothesis on the subject to be looked at as a radiation decay of matter, and therefore a vapor is produces.

because it is invisible to the eye.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #246, on May 25th, 2015, 09:12 AM »
the effect of a capacitor.   stores energy and is a static charge .   solenoid stores energy in the magnetic field.

how to make power the right way.  static needs no current,  therefore a conversion between static, then into a coil is the right way to generate power.

cop much greater then using current to make a magnetic field.  if u want to talk radiant energy then don't be a stranger..

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #247, on May 25th, 2015, 09:24 AM »Last edited on May 25th, 2015, 09:49 AM
how to properly use a cook coil inductor..

use the static charge generated from the atmosphere, and power the devise..

the magnetic field will continue to increase, as high current pulses set up resonance in the body..

the easiest test to prove this case is by use of different inductors in series or in hybrid configuration powered by any pulsed circuit made to set up longitudinal waves along the length of the conductor..
https://www.google.com/search?tbo=p&tbm=pts&hl=en&q=inassignee:%22J+W+Fishers+Mfg+Inc%22#hl=en&tbm=pts&q=metal+detector

the metal detector should be used to generate power.  link to understanding possible solutions to energy.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #248, on May 25th, 2015, 10:02 AM »Last edited on May 25th, 2015, 10:13 AM
I think the text failed.

I think there is some surprising information to be understood from metal detectors.


ah I got it, because of amplification, we can turn a metal detector into a amplifying drive to power a induction coil..

if I now bring a plate of steel to the coil it rings at high amplification. doing this to a coil of wire will
generate a powerful magnetic field..


freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #249, on May 25th, 2015, 10:16 AM »
why you may ask?

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to metal detectors, and speci?cally to
receiver coils used in pulse-induction-type metal detectors.
In such detectors, a primary magnetic ?ux pulse is directed
into the medium to be searched, and a secondary ?ux is
generated by eddy-currents in the target. The voltage induced
by the secondary ?ux is sensed by a receiver coil.
The primary ?ux also induces a voltage in the receiver coil,
and the target voltage cannot be effectively detected until the
effects of the primary ?ux have substantially subsided.
The energy absorbed by the receiver coil is not dissipated
immediately after the cessation of the coil pulse. The induc
tance and self-capacitance of the receiver coil constitute a
resonant circuit that oscillates until the absorbed energy is
dissipated. Usually a damping circuit is placed across the
terminals of the coil to minimiZe the oscillations.