Theory, my chalk board.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #275, on June 18th, 2015, 08:57 AM »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az1PTIehYKI

ahh yes the ultrasonic transmitter.

now we have the means to transmit the crystalline sound of vibration, and incorporate it in our endeavor.

the ultrasonic transmitting  induction coil...  hehe think it cant be done? guess again...

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #276, on June 19th, 2015, 12:09 PM »
It was said magnesium oxide was used to coat the roads of the ancients, and thousands of years later still remain true.
well there it is folks, magnesium oxide is a key feature of ancient technology. assignment find out all you can about this special coating, and what scientific principles we can incorporate into modern use..

it was also said browns gas renders spent fuel rods harmless with out any release of radiation in to  the environment. I think :P :Pg its time to show these chumps what we can do..

firepinto

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #277, on June 20th, 2015, 04:14 AM »
I sure will not be experimenting with spent radioactive fuel rods. 

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #278, on July 14th, 2015, 06:01 AM »
more gold for a motor.

the faraday disc gives the clue. and the windings of my new motor deify all odds, and parameters.

its is true the Rodin type coil will be a great improvement in any motor, but so will the pancake coil be.

this I use for a generator,  so will the center of my coil bring the highest accelerations in my shaft? this is the idea.

now it may be that stacked pancake coils blows the doors off the world energy crisis today..

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #279, on July 18th, 2015, 01:51 PM »Last edited on July 18th, 2015, 01:54 PM
Quote from Matt Watts on June 8th, 2015, 08:10 PM
Building it is the easy part.  Just wrap your coil with coaxial cable.

Understanding what is happing with this arrangement is a little more difficult.  First, one has to understand that certain fields can be shielded and others cannot.  With a coax cable, nothing is shielded on the outside conductor, but the inner conductor is a different story.  That difference is what makes such a device asymmetrical.
In physics

Asymmetry arises in physics in a number of different realms.
Thermodynamics

The original non-statistical formulation of thermodynamics was asymmetrical in time: it claimed that the entropy in a closed system can only increase with time. This was derived from the Second Law (any of the two, Clausius' or Lord Kelvin's statement can be used since they are equivalent) and using the Clausius' Theorem (see Kerson Huang ISBN 978-0471815181). The later theory of statistical mechanics, however, is symmetric in time. Although it states that a system significantly below maximum entropy is very likely to evolve towards higher entropy, it also states that such a system is very likely to have evolved from higher entropy.
Particle physics

Symmetry is one of the most powerful tools in particle physics, because it has become evident that practically all laws of nature originate in symmetries. Violations of symmetry therefore present theoretical and experimental puzzles that lead to a deeper understanding of nature. Asymmetries in experimental measurements also provide powerful handles that are often relatively free from background or systematic uncertainties.
Parity violation
Main article: parity (physics)

Until the 1950s, it was believed that fundamental physics was left-right symmetric; i.e., that interactions were invariant under parity. Although parity is conserved in electromagnetism, strong interactions and gravity, it turns out to be violated in weak interactions. The Standard Model incorporates parity violation by expressing the weak interaction as a chiral gauge interaction. Only the left-handed components of particles and right-handed components of antiparticles participate in weak interactions in the Standard Model. A consequence of parity violation in particle physics is that neutrinos have only been observed as left-handed particles (and antineutrinos as right-handed particles).

In 1956-1957 Chien-Shiung Wu, E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes, and R. P. Hudson found a clear violation of parity conservation in the beta decay of cobalt-60.[citation needed] Simultaneously, R. L. Garwin, Leon Lederman, and R. Weinrich modified an existing cyclotron experiment and immediately verified parity violation.[citation needed]
CP violation
Main article: CP-violation

After the discovery of the violation of parity in 1956-57, it was believed that the combined symmetry of parity (P) and simultaneous charge conjugation (C), called CP, was preserved. For example, CP transforms a left-handed neutrino into a right-handed antineutrino. In 1964, however, James Cronin and Val Fitch provided clear evidence that CP symmetry was also violated in an experiment with neutral kaons.

CP violation is one of the necessary conditions for the generation of a baryon asymmetry in the universe.

Combining the CP symmetry with simultaneous time reversal (T) produces a combined symmetry called CPT symmetry. CPT symmetry must be preserved in any Lorentz invariant local quantum field theory with a Hermitian Hamiltonian. As of 2006, no violations of CPT symmetry have been observed.
Baryon asymmetry of the universe
Main article: baryogenesis

The baryons (i.e., the protons and neutrons and the atoms that they comprise) observed in the universe are overwhelmingly matter as opposed to anti-matter. This asymmetry is called the baryon asymmetry of the universe.
Isospin violation

Isospin is the symmetry transformation of the weak interactions. The concept was first introduced by Werner Heisenberg in nuclear physics based on the observations that the masses of the neutron and the proton are almost identical and that the strength of the strong interaction between any pair of nucleons is the same, independent of whether they are protons or neutrons. This symmetry arises at a more fundamental level as a symmetry between up-type and down-type quarks. Isospin symmetry in the strong interactions can be considered as a subset of a larger flavor symmetry group, in which the strong interactions are invariant under interchange of different types of quarks. Including the strange quark in this scheme gives rise to the Eightfold Way scheme for classifying mesons and baryons.

Isospin is violated by the fact that the masses of the up and down quarks are different, as well as by their different electric charges. Because this violation is only a small effect in most processes that involve the strong interactions, isospin symmetry remains a useful calculational tool, and its violation introduces corrections to the isospin-symmetric results.
In collider experiments

Because the weak interactions violate parity, collider processes that can involve the weak interactions typically exhibit asymmetries in the distributions of the final-state particles. These asymmetries are typically sensitive to the difference in the interaction between particles and antiparticles, or between left-handed and right-handed particles. They can thus be used as a sensitive measurement of differences in interaction strength and/or to distinguish a small asymmetric signal from a large but symmetric background.

    A forward-backward asymmetry is defined as AFB=(NF-NB)/(NF+NB), where NF is the number of events in which some particular final-state particle is moving "forward" with respect to some chosen direction (e.g., a final-state electron moving in the same direction as the initial-state electron beam in electron-positron collisions), while NB is the number of events with the final-state particle moving "backward". Forward-backward asymmetries were used by the LEP experiments to measure the difference in the interaction strength of the Z boson between left-handed and right-handed fermions, which provides a precision measurement of the weak mixing angle.
    A left-right asymmetry is defined as ALR=(NL-NR)/(NL+NR), where NL is the number of events in which some initial- or final-state particle is left-polarized, while NR is the corresponding number of right-polarized events. Left-right asymmetries in Z boson production and decay were measured at the Stanford Linear Collider using the event rates obtained with left-polarized versus right-polarized initial electron beams. Left-right asymmetries can also be defined as asymmetries in the polarization of final-state particles whose polarizations can be measured; e.g., tau leptons.
    A charge asymmetry or particle-antiparticle asymmetry is defined in a similar way. This type of asymmetry has been used to constrain the parton distribution functions of protons at the Tevatron from events in which a produced W boson decays to a charged lepton. The asymmetry between positively and negatively charged leptons as a function of the direction of the W boson relative to the proton beam provides information on the relative distributions of up and down quarks in the proton. Particle-antiparticle asymmetries are also used to extract measurements of CP violation from B meson and anti-B meson production at the BaBar and Belle experiments.


the figure 8 is asymmetric physics

Asymmetry arises in physics in a number of different realms.
Thermodynamics

The original non-statistical formulation of thermodynamics was asymmetrical in time: it claimed that the entropy in a closed system can only increase with time. This was derived from the Second Law (any of the two, Clausius' or Lord Kelvin's statement can be used since they are equivalent) and using the Clausius' Theorem (see Kerson Huang ISBN 978-0471815181). The later theory of statistical mechanics, however, is symmetric in time. Although it states that a system significantly below maximum entropy is very likely to evolve towards higher entropy, it also states that such a system is very likely to have evolved from higher entropy.
Particle physics

Symmetry is one of the most powerful tools in particle physics, because it has become evident that practically all laws of nature originate in symmetries. Violations of symmetry therefore present theoretical and experimental puzzles that lead to a deeper understanding of nature. Asymmetries in experimental measurements also provide powerful handles that are often relatively free from background or systematic uncertainties.
Parity violation
Main article: parity (physics)

Until the 1950s, it was believed that fundamental physics was left-right symmetric; i.e., that interactions were invariant under parity. Although parity is conserved in electromagnetism, strong interactions and gravity, it turns out to be violated in weak interactions. The Standard Model incorporates parity violation by expressing the weak interaction as a chiral gauge interaction. Only the left-handed components of particles and right-handed components of antiparticles participate in weak interactions in the Standard Model. A consequence of parity violation in particle physics is that neutrinos have only been observed as left-handed particles (and antineutrinos as right-handed particles).

In 1956-1957 Chien-Shiung Wu, E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes, and R. P. Hudson found a clear violation of parity conservation in the beta decay of cobalt-60.[citation needed] Simultaneously, R. L. Garwin, Leon Lederman, and R. Weinrich modified an existing cyclotron experiment and immediately verified parity violation.[citation needed]
CP violation
Main article: CP-violation

After the discovery of the violation of parity in 1956-57, it was believed that the combined symmetry of parity (P) and simultaneous charge conjugation (C), called CP, was preserved. For example, CP transforms a left-handed neutrino into a right-handed antineutrino. In 1964, however, James Cronin and Val Fitch provided clear evidence that CP symmetry was also violated in an experiment with neutral kaons.

CP violation is one of the necessary conditions for the generation of a baryon asymmetry in the universe.

Combining the CP symmetry with simultaneous time reversal (T) produces a combined symmetry called CPT symmetry. CPT symmetry must be preserved in any Lorentz invariant local quantum field theory with a Hermitian Hamiltonian. As of 2006, no violations of CPT symmetry have been observed.
Baryon asymmetry of the universe
Main article: baryogenesis

The baryons (i.e., the protons and neutrons and the atoms that they comprise) observed in the universe are overwhelmingly matter as opposed to anti-matter. This asymmetry is called the baryon asymmetry of the universe.
Isospin violation

Isospin is the symmetry transformation of the weak interactions. The concept was first introduced by Werner Heisenberg in nuclear physics based on the observations that the masses of the neutron and the proton are almost identical and that the strength of the strong interaction between any pair of nucleons is the same, independent of whether they are protons or neutrons. This symmetry arises at a more fundamental level as a symmetry between up-type and down-type quarks. Isospin symmetry in the strong interactions can be considered as a subset of a larger flavor symmetry group, in which the strong interactions are invariant under interchange of different types of quarks. Including the strange quark in this scheme gives rise to the Eightfold Way scheme for classifying mesons and baryons.

Isospin is violated by the fact that the masses of the up and down quarks are different, as well as by their different electric charges. Because this violation is only a small effect in most processes that involve the strong interactions, isospin symmetry remains a useful calculational tool, and its violation introduces corrections to the isospin-symmetric results.
In collider experiments

Because the weak interactions violate parity, collider processes that can involve the weak interactions typically exhibit asymmetries in the distributions of the final-state particles. These asymmetries are typically sensitive to the difference in the interaction between particles and antiparticles, or between left-handed and right-handed particles. They can thus be used as a sensitive measurement of differences in interaction strength and/or to distinguish a small asymmetric signal from a large but symmetric background.

    A forward-backward asymmetry is defined as AFB=(NF-NB)/(NF+NB), where NF is the number of events in which some particular final-state particle is moving "forward" with respect to some chosen direction (e.g., a final-state electron moving in the same direction as the initial-state electron beam in electron-positron collisions), while NB is the number of events with the final-state particle moving "backward". Forward-backward asymmetries were used by the LEP experiments to measure the difference in the interaction strength of the Z boson between left-handed and right-handed fermions, which provides a precision measurement of the weak mixing angle.
    A left-right asymmetry is defined as ALR=(NL-NR)/(NL+NR), where NL is the number of events in which some initial- or final-state particle is left-polarized, while NR is the corresponding number of right-polarized events. Left-right asymmetries in Z boson production and decay were measured at the Stanford Linear Collider using the event rates obtained with left-polarized versus right-polarized initial electron beams. Left-right asymmetries can also be defined as asymmetries in the polarization of final-state particles whose polarizations can be measured; e.g., tau leptons.
    A charge asymmetry or particle-antiparticle asymmetry is defined in a similar way. This type of asymmetry has been used to constrain the parton distribution functions of protons at the Tevatron from events in which a produced W boson decays to a charged lepton. The asymmetry between positively and negatively charged leptons as a function of the direction of the W boson relative to the proton beam provides information on the relative distributions of up and down quarks in the proton. Particle-antiparticle asymmetries are also used to extract measurements of CP violation from B meson and anti-B meson production at the BaBar and Belle experiments.




in a manner of speaking, the inner winding is a coil, the outer is a plate. the battery is the terminal, the positive is the ground.

the stout wire is fat and has little resistance, the fine wire is not. also may be wound on inner and outer cores.


super conductor, large mass. so many ways to do this..



freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #280, on July 18th, 2015, 02:41 PM »Last edited on July 18th, 2015, 02:44 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po-yib77vgA


so what is this crap every one spinning a ball?

its a 50 k rpm generator alternator / motor.

so easy and on low current.

this is a easy over unity devise,,,

130 to 200 amps at 50,000 rpm. on a new alternator.  power supply? try 200 volts at 1 amp?

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #281, on July 18th, 2015, 05:43 PM »
oule


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Joule


Unit system
SI derived unit

Unit of
Energy

Symbol
J 

Named after
James Prescott Joule

Unit conversions

1 J in ... ... is equal to ...

   SI base units
   1 kg·m2/s2

   CGS units
   1×107 erg

   kilowatt hours
   2.78×10−7 kW⋅h

   kilocalories
   2.39×10−4 kcal

   BTUs
   9.48×10−4 BTU

   electronvolts
   6.24×1018 eV

The joule (/ˈdʒuːl/ or sometimes /ˈdʒaʊl/), symbol J, is a derived unit of energy in the International System of Units.[1] It is equal to the energy transferred (or work done) when applying a force of one newton through a distance of one metre (1 newton metre or N·m), or in passing an electric current of one ampere through a resistance of one ohm for one second. It is named after the English physicist James Prescott Joule (1818–1889).[2][3][4]

In terms firstly of base SI units and then in terms of other SI units:
\rm J = {}\rm \frac{kg \cdot m^2}{s^2} = N \cdot m = \rm Pa \cdot m^3={}\rm W \cdot s = C \cdot V
where kg is the kilogram, m is the metre, s is the second, N is the newton, Pa is the pascal, W is the watt, C is the coulomb, and V is the volt.

One joule can also be defined as:
The work required to move an electric charge of one coulomb through an electrical potential difference of one volt, or one '"coulomb volt" (C·V). This relationship can be used to define the volt.
The work required to produce one watt of power for one second, or one "watt second" (W·s) (compare kilowatt hour - 3.6 megajoules). This relationship can be used to define the watt.



the square meter is important, and  is my free energy devise.  a open surface, or even a electric fence.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #282, on July 20th, 2015, 03:37 AM »
right now  looking directly in the face of wireless energy induction.

on a scale of 5.5 mhz. internet.

but what about a 2 hp motor? tesla did it..

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #283, on July 28th, 2015, 03:37 AM »
Quote from freethisone on July 20th, 2015, 03:37 AM
right now  looking directly in the face of wireless energy induction.

on a scale of 5.5 mhz. internet.

but what about a 2 hp motor? tesla did it..
The bifilar coil (more often called the bifilar winding) is used in modern electrical engineering as a means of constructing wire-wound resistors with negligible parasitic self-inductance.[1]
Bifilar wound toroidal transformer.

A different type of bifilar coil is used in some relay windings and transformers used for a switched-mode power supply to suppress back-emf. In this case, the two wire coils are closely spaced and wound in parallel but are electrically isolated from each other. The primary coil is driven to operate the relay, and the secondary coil is short-circuited inside the case. When the current through the primary is interrupted, as happens when the relay is switched off, most of the magnetic energy is intercepted by the secondary coil which converts it to heat in its internal resistance. This is only one of several methods of absorbing the energy from the primary coil before it can damage the device (usually a vulnerable semiconductor) that drives the relay. The main disadvantage of this method is that it greatly increases the switching time of the relay.

When used in a switching transformer, one winding of the bifilar coil is used as a means of removing the energy stored in the stray magnetic flux which fails to link the primary coil to the secondary coil of the transformer. Because of their proximity, the wires of the bifilar coil both "see" the same stray magnetic flux. One wire is clamped to ground usually by a diode so that when the other "primary" wire of the bifilar coil no longer has a voltage applied across it by the switching transistor, the stray magnetic flux generates a current in the clamping coil with the primary side voltage appearing across it, causing an equal voltage to appear across the primary winding. If this clamping coil was not used, the stray magnetic flux would attempt to force a current to flow through the primary wire. Since the primary wire is switched off and the switching transistor is in a high resistance state, the high voltage which would appear on the semiconductor switching transistor would exceed its electrical breakdown or even damage it.

Bifilar coils impose an inductance in the common mode, but impose no inductance in the differential mode. Coils in such a combination are widely used to eliminate ingress or egress of common mode signals from electronic signalling circuits. This arrangement is used in transmission and reception magnetics of Ethernet cables[2] and conspicuously in the form of a ferrite bead clamped to the outside of USB, laptop power supply and HDMI cables.


freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #285, on August 5th, 2015, 04:57 AM »
the art of searl effect on a solenoidal inductor..

inner core step one, wire wrap the inductor step two, insulate teflon step 3, add

these are based on holow core inductors, steel. or ferrite as a test. flux will increase? the thought is the flux will only flow faster.

this is a cook coil inductor as proof of concept of searl effect particle flow..


freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #286, on August 6th, 2015, 08:39 AM »
Quote from freethisone on July 28th, 2015, 03:40 AM
Quote from freethisone on August 5th, 2015, 04:57 AM
the art of searl effect on a solenoidal inductor..

inner core step one, wire wrap the inductor step two, insulate teflon step 3, add

these are based on holow core inductors, steel. or ferrite as a test. flux will increase? the thought is the flux will only flow faster.

this is a cook coil inductor as proof of concept of searl effect particle flow..
http://www.archive.org/stream/electricalresear00caveuoft#page/52/mode/2up


fluid runs in

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #287, on August 15th, 2015, 04:13 PM »
Jan. 2, 1962 R. w. ROCHELLE


The present invention relates generally to amplifying
circuits and more particularly to a high gain magnetic
type ampli?er capable of amplifying with high ef?ciency
relatively small D.C. or A.C. signals.
in the conventional series opposed magnetic ampli?er,
a pair of saturable core transformers are excited by
series connected primary windings from an alternating
current source via a load resistor. Also wound on each
core is a control winding, and these windings are com
nected in series opposition through a control resistor to
a signal source. In the absence of a signal at this source,
the equal voltages induced into the control windings by
the alternating current source cancel out because of their
out-of-phase relationship and, consequently, there is no
interaction between these circuits. However, when a
signal voltage appears, it produces opposite effects in the
cores so that one core is advanced towards saturation and
the other retarded, and this difference in magnetization
level gives rise to a quiescent current in the load circuit.
The magnitude of this signal is negligible as long as both
cores are unsaturated, but as soon as one core saturates,
this current increases to a value approximately equal to
the control current times the ratio of secondary turns to
primary turns of the transformer.
In the A.C. operation of these ampli?ers, it is neces
sary, from a standpoint of e?iciency, that the frequency
and phase of the alternating current and the signal source
match.



so yes to motionless generators...

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #288, on August 19th, 2015, 04:47 AM »
simple deduction                                                                     .................................... n
  a line is a 2 pole magnet. my 3rd pole will  change the inertia point.s--------------n--iiiIII--s----------n

its a intersecting magnet on top vertical. and one pole in the center of the 2 poles of the line magnet represented.



freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #289, on September 5th, 2015, 02:29 PM »Last edited on September 5th, 2015, 02:33 PM
Quote from freethisone on August 19th, 2015, 04:47 AM
simple deduction                                                                     .................................... n
  a line is a 2 pole magnet. my 3rd pole will  change the inertia point.s--------------n--iiiIII--s----------n

its a intersecting magnet on top vertical. and one pole in the center of the 2 poles of the line magnet represented.
not to make a long story short but a hat, ufo, saucer will do wonders for motionless generation.

i say its a natural air foil, and is the right shape for emf changes.or sinusoidal loops over all its a slick manafold, and may be us.
Dr Townsend brown describes the foil shape as the best for the job,   i say its much more i make a weir hat for a reviver,

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #290, on September 9th, 2015, 04:00 AM »
Quote from freethisone on September 5th, 2015, 02:29 PM
not to make a long story short but a hat, ufo, saucer will do wonders for motionless generation.

i say its a natural air foil, and is the right shape for emf changes.or sinusoidal loops over all its a slick manafold, and may be us.
Dr Townsend brown describes the foil shape as the best for the job,   i say its much more i make a weir hat for a reviver,
as i advise myself to acknowledge vacuum flux as a shoe man resonance of all matter.



i say t is true we have a free way to tap it. we do it every day when we microwave a glass of water.


a base frequency for earth. a base for a steel structure. just like Tesla we have a earthquake devise..




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKyUQyRpJTQ

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #291, on September 10th, 2015, 06:04 AM »
rumors of war Russia off coast of Georgia, china off coast 12 miles from Alaska.
men  in black some  people i have seen were black top hats and black over coats, white shirt. etc..


sep 23 2015 meteorite bs posturing.

but yes there was a massive meteor strike u missed this week. the radiation levels off the charts, planet killer.

global murderers.


freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #292, on September 10th, 2015, 07:18 AM »Last edited on September 10th, 2015, 07:23 AM
now comes the theory, in a transformer core there is a flux moving in a direction, but as ed lee may have known there is a flux circulating in a pmh.


i simply wind my coil generator motor and transformer on the same core.,

then i have a motor creating the moving flux within a core tapped as a transformer. in other word only the travailing flux in the iron  core induces the charge in the transformer coil.


very different perhaps..

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #293, on September 10th, 2015, 07:56 AM »
if radio is based on Tesla patent, and a battery operated reviver can pick transmissions, then were oh were would i tap that energy like Tesla had done? at the speakers themselves. 100 thousand watt transmitter.  how do i now run a 1 hp motor?

did Tesla have a tunable reviver like we do today> t


freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #295, on September 11th, 2015, 06:19 AM »
simple ideas.

add a few vortex magnets to a hho cell in hopes to get tiny bubbles from agitating the water

see magnaflipper for details.

freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #296, on September 15th, 2015, 04:00 AM »
Quote from freethisone on September 10th, 2015, 07:56 AM
if radio is based on Tesla patent, and a battery operated reviver can pick transmissions, then were oh were would i tap that energy like Tesla had done? at the speakers themselves. 100 thousand watt transmitter.  how do i now run a 1 hp motor?

did Tesla have a tunable reviver like we do today> t

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEqjWaA9yDo

interesting effect



freethisone

Re: Theory, my chalk board.
« Reply #299, on September 16th, 2015, 03:42 AM »Last edited on September 16th, 2015, 03:54 AM
Quote from freethisone on October 27th, 2014, 08:13 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNawFOBuYW0#

Mirra the star

as i had said they had information. here you see the badges on the uniforms a full representation of the orbital objects, and its star,

the comet on the left of the shirt, the twins on the right, and the red sun above. captain also has a horus symbol representing the flying Eye..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PuPcdDlCls


the A on the uniform, star trek..

looks man made to me same craft


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_Np--5Unw8