The problem I have with showing my cell and production is this, Look at Stan he showed his and look how much he got ridiculed. A video and production does not tell the story about Stan's gas. People that has seen his, still calls him a fraud and a con even though he put up the numbers to prove it. This is what you need to know, a liter of Stan's gas is not equal to a liter of Faraday Gas. A good comparison to Stan's cell is to put it up against a Faraday cell producing the same liter of gas, put that in the same engine and see which one would idle the engine the longest. I would bet you money you would not be diluting the Faraday gas but you would have to dilute Stan's gas. So putting up numbers of a Stan Meyers cell or a video is useless if you ask me. It want tell you anything until you know how much the gas has to be diluted to run in an engine. And here is more food for thought. If you get it working the way it is suppose to. If you produce a liter of gas let's say at 12000 volts and I produce a liter of gas at 20000 volts your gas want be as powerful as mine, so if your cell produces the same amount liter to liter as mine, there is still no comparison. It all depends on how much you excite the gas with high voltage determines on how powerful it is. This can be found studying his Stackable resonate Cavity's or Gas Gun. What I would like to do at some point is to fill two separate balloons of equal size on with Faraday gas and Stan's Gas and light them on a video. To me that would be a better video for everyone.
I'll give you something else to think about which goes along with this.
Take a fluorescent bulb and ballast for instance and it's normal brightness. What do you think would happened to the bulb if the gas was excited to an even higher high voltage?