I'm posting this message here to lead you to ionizationx.com because I don't want to post a copy of a thread twice.
This could be the working principle of the Resonance VIC transformer and also the Injector VIC unit since it is a follow up improved version.
Let me know what you think!
The VIC is a system for restricting the flow of amperes while allowing voltage electrical stress to be propagated. It uses a principle called the electron bounce phenomenon, that is simply the separation of charges in conductor materials under time varying magnetic fields. For this a pulse is applied and is compressed during the collapse the field in its coils.
It involves the EbP Electron Bounce Phenomenon and Electron Clustering.
If there are few members who can not access the ionizationx site I would post the thread here if required.
Your results are very interesting indeed, the scope shots where you do not have the wfc connected seem almost perfect step charging images. You state that when you connect the wfc that the signal is not at all there anymore but could you post it anyways?
Allthough i have quite some electrical engineering knowlegde some things are difficult for me to grasp (guess happens to all of us sometimes :cool: ). Could you try to enlighten me a bit on what exactly triggers the electron bounce phenomena? I do understand why it could trigger amp restriction but i do not understand what makes the copper ions and electrons cluster on opposite sides of the coil? As far as my knowlegde reaches the only resistance to amp flow was the actual copper wire resistance itself. Do you know of any, non-meyer, information source about the ebp in inductive coils?
I try and make a couple of more scope shots.
At this moment I can not find this EbP exactly explained used by Meyer in other sources found on the Internet.
But maybe this could help:http://www.opamp-electronics.com/tutorials/static_electricity_1_01_01.htm
or "single fluid theory"
Electrons and Ben Franklin
Ben Franklin's "single fluid theory" showed that
a given body possessing a normal amount of
electric fluid was called neutral. During the
process of charging, the fluid was transferred
from one body to the other; the body with the
deficiency being charged minus and the body
with the excess charged plus . But no fluid is
lost. Ben's "single fluid theory" led to the
electron theory in 1900: electrons move about
conductors much as a fluid might move.
CURRENT ELECTRICITY IS THE OPPOSITE OF STATIC ELECTRICITY? Wrong.
"Static Electricity" appears whenever the negative charges within matter are separated from the positive charges. "Current" appears whenever the negative charges within matter are made to flow through the positive charges (or when positive flows through negative.) "Static" and "Current" are two separate kinds of events, they are not opposites.
"Static" is a separation; it is a stretching-apart, and it really has little to do with anything remaining static or stationary.
"Current" is a flowing motion. It has little to do with the separation of opposite charges.
"Static electricity" was misnamed, and it really should be called "charge separation" or maybe "stretched" or "pressurized" electricity. Since stretch is not the opposite of flow, Static is not the opposite of Current. And athough electric current really exists and electric charge really exists, there is no such material as either "current electricity" or "static electricity." See http://amasci.com/miscon/curstat2.html
on this topic.
Magnetic Field Coupling (71) of Figure (7-9) entering into and passing through Secondary Coil-winding (52) of Figure (7-8) causes and produces copper ions (643a xxx 643n) (Positive Charged atoms 542a xxx 542n having missing electrons) when moving external electromagnetic field strength (71a xxx 7In) is sufficient enough to dislodge electromagnetically charged electrons (64Ia xxx 64In) from copper atoms making up copper wire material (52). Collectively, the resultant positive electrical charged copper ions (642a xxx 642n) added together produces Positive Voltage Potential (629) being electrically applied to choke-coil (56); whereas, the "Liberated" negative electrical charged electrons (64Ia xxx 64In) added together provides Negative Voltage Potential (631) to the opposite end of Secondary Wire (52) being electrically connected to choke coil (62). Once Secondary Coil-winding (52) is de-energized by the removal (collapsing magnetic field during pulse off-time T2 of external Magnetic Field (71), the dislodged electrons (641a xx 641n) return to positive charged copper ions (642a xx 642n) ... terminating and switching off opposite voltage potential (629 - 631) when positive electrical state of the copper atoms changes back to net electrical charge of zero. Sustaining and maintaining the resultant induced Voltage Potential (Vo - Vn) without "Electron Discharged" (inhibiting electron flow) through Choke Coil (62) while, at the same time, inhibiting (preventing) any additional or other electrons from entering into Secondary copper wire-zone (52) by way of Choke Coil (56) is herein called "Electron Bounce Phenomenon" (EbP), as illustrated in (700) of Figure (7-9).
Note 1) The Electron Inhibiting Effect (631) of Figure (7-6) to cause "Electron Clustering" (Grouping/collecting negative charged particles at a given point) (700) of Figure (7-9) to produce ''Negative Voltage Potential" ( B- ) at one side of Water Gap (Cp) of Figure (7-8) is accomplished by low electrical power input (Tab 38) when Choke-Coil (62) of Figure (7-1) magnetic field (FL2) (690) of Figure (7-8) during pulse on-time (49) impede "Electron-Flow" since electron mass is composed of electromagnetic matter which interacts with magnetic field strength (FL2). Capacitance Charging Effect (628) prevents amp influxing away from Water Gap (Cp) in a similar manner ... producing "Electrical Stress" (SS' - RR') (B+/B-) across Water Gap (Cp) since both Choke-Coils (56/62) conducts voltage potential (Negative or Positive) during pulsing operations.