Radiant coil capacitor

evostars

Ripple anomaly
« Reply #250, on October 22nd, 2021, 01:33 PM »
in this new video, I show the ripple anomaly.
I wonder if we can somehow allign the ripple, with the impulse, so they add up into one big high voltage impulse.


https://youtu.be/HJ2eMPloYTw

particlezoo

Re: Radiant coil capacitor
« Reply #251, on October 22nd, 2021, 04:00 PM »
Similar ripples in bifilar coils have been documented on the webpage "Nuclear magnetic resonance of certain materials in the inductor" at the "Research website of Vyacheslav Gorchilin". He attributes it to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR).

In my opinion, the real reason for the ripple is Electron Dia-magnetic Resonance. Paired electrons have coupled magnetic fields, which form a magnetic ring, similar to attaching two horseshoe magnets to each other.

A uniform magnetic field exerts no magnetic force on such a magnetic ring when that magnetic ring is devoid of leakage flux. However, a current which passes through the ring can exert a torque on it.

When you apply a pulsed high voltage to a coil, you create a strong pulsed electric field through the insulation. The changing electric field produces an electric displacement current which passes through the atoms of the insulation. Then the paired electrons, with their ring-shaped magnetic fields, attempt to oppose the change of electric field by changing the orientation of their magnetic ring. Because of the weak diamagnetic response, the electric fields generated by the paired electrons oppose only about 1 part in 100,000 (or 10^-5) of the applied electric field.

However, if you have in addition to these pulse fields another field, but a steady one, that is a DC magnetic field of, say, 0.5 gauss, then what may happen? What happens is that the electrons in the pair, which have opposite spins and opposite magnetic moments, will experience opposite magnetic torques by that magnetic field. Therefore, they will precess at an angular frequency that depends on the ratio of the magnetic torque to the angular momentum. As a result, the symmetry axis of the magnetic rings in each atom will precess at right angles to the applied steady DC magnetic field.

The magnetic ring of an electron pair possesses both a toroidal magnetic field and a "poloidal" magnetic vector potential. By rotating the symmetry axis of the magnetic ring about an axis aligned with the DC magnetic field, one generates a rotating "poloidal" electric dipole perpendicular to both:

1) the applied DC magnetic field
2) the symmetry axis of the magnetic ring.

So for instance, suppose you applied an RF electric field of 100 volts / mm through the wire's insulation. This could be produced in effect by any adequately fast and intense pulse discharge as it so happens that rapid discharge pulses contain waves at a multitude of RF frequencies according to the mathematics of the Fourier transform.

Let the insulation's relative magnetic susceptibility be -0.00001 or -1.0*10^-5, which is about typical for many solid materials. 100 volts AC / mm multiplied by 10^-5 equals 1 volts AC / meter. 1 volts AC / meter is the insulation's diamagnetic EMF in response to the AC magnetic flux generated by the displacement current due to the 100 volts AC / mm electric field. However, the 1 volts AC / mm is a rotating electric field residing inside the insulation, and is generated by the rotating magnetic rings of the paired electrons of that insulation.

Therefore, after 1 quarter of a cycle of rotation past the time of peak applied electric field, the diamagnetic EMF will have rotated about the DC magnetic field axis to be parallel to the wire, instead of perpendicular. Thus, the insulation then behaves as a resonant dielectric wire which emits radiofrequency (RF) energy which is captured by electrons in the copper wire. The emission is effectively in the electromagnetic far-field regime as long as the skin depth is some fraction of the thickness of the wire. See the article section about "Speed of electromagnetic waves in good conductors" on Wikipedia to extrapolate why this effect is in the electromagnetic "far-field" and not the electromagnetic "near-field". This energy comes from the embodied kinetic energy of the paired electrons, which becomes "mechanically-available" when they provide a mechanical means by which to extract said energy, in the form of a "diamagnetoelectrically" induced rotating dipolar electric field.

Because the energy transfer occurs via the electromagnetic far-field, the electric current in the copper does not have to pass through the magnetic rings of the paired electrons in order to acquire their energy. Detached loops of electric field are jettisoned outward away from the rotating magnetic rings' orthogonally-induced rotating electric dipoles inside the insulator, and these electric loops (which are geometrically "poloidal") are captured by the copper wire and "squished" inside the copper itself, manifesting as an electric wave whose phase varies with the depth from the copper wire's surface (i.e. the "skin effect"). The response of electrons in the copper wire is to jettison their own looped electric fields, which are also geometrically "poloidal", and these electric field loops propagate into the insulation and exert an EMF onto the "poloidal" currents of the electron pairs. These "poloidal" currents are same ones responsible for the electron pairs' toroidal magnetic flux rings. Thus, in effect the inductive energy contained in the magnetic flux rings of these paired electrons is harnessed. The inductive energy is sustained by the embodied kinetic energy of the paired electrons, which in turn is sustained by the so-called "zero point field" which is responsible for maintaining the values of fundamental constants, such as the individual mass of an individual electron.

The rotation (or, rather, "continuous flipping") frequency of the magnetic rings of the paired electrons depends on both the magnitude and orientation of the applied DC magnetic field. At a magnetic field of 0.5 gauss, the magnetic rings will rotate at a frequency of 1.4 MHz. There exists both an axial applied magnetic field and a radial applied electric field (per cylindrical coordinates) between each turn of the bifilar coil. The source of the axial magnetic field between the winding turns may be a permanent magnet or simply due to the current in the coil. As the current in the coil changes, this may cause a shift in the magnetic field, thus affecting the precession frequency. Earth's magnetic field strength may play a role in some cases causing this frequency shift to be negligible in the case that Earth's magnetic field strength exceeds that of the coil's own magnetic field strength. In the event that both the applied magnetic field and applied electric field are reversing every half-period, the output voltage generated by the rotating magnetic rings is a pulsed DC, which agrees with the waveforms observed and documented by Vyacheslav Gorchilin in his article "Nuclear magnetic resonance of certain materials in the inductor".

In a Joseph Newman machine consisting of a 9000-lb (or 4 metric ton) copper coil inductor with a 700-lb (or 300 kilogram) ceramic magnetic rotor, which was analyzed by Dr. Roger Hastings (Reported in the article: "MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS OF JOSEPH NEWMAN'S ENERGY GENERATOR"), the measured magnetic moment of the permanent magnet rotor was "100 Tesla-cu.in" which is equivalent to 1304 ampere meter^2. So at the 2 foot radius of the heavy 9,000 lb coil, the applied field from the rotor would be 5.8 gauss, thus inducing electron precession at a frequency of about 16 MHz, which is in good agreement with the 13 MHz RF observed by Dr. Roger Hastings.

It is important to note that in Newman's machine, the mechanical commutator's capacitive discharge energy is not shunted to ground but rather is propagated transiently along the length of the inductor coil's copper wire. Due to the sudden change of voltage at the edge of the transient wavefront, it is at these very wavefronts that the high-intensity RF electric fields can be found. This is because the inductor coil behaves as a transmission line such that the rate of change of the electric potential over time shows as a gradient of the electric potential over the length of the copper wire, and consequently as a radial electric field existing between consecutive copper winding layers of the inductor coil (per cylindrical coordinates). The radial electric displacement current leading the center of the transient is reversed that of the radial electric displacement current lagging the center of the transient. Consequently, the frequency of that radial electric displacement current is directly tied to the propagation of that wavefront through the consecutive winding layers of the inductor coil. The electrons that are ahead of the transient's center experience supportive EMF and are carried forward like a surfer catching a breaking wave. Due to the limited speed of electrons, that energy is transported to the electrons even further ahead of the wavefront through the longitudinal "hydraulic effect" that electrons in a copper wire have on each other. Thus the energy acquired by the wire continues to be built upon as the transient progresses through the successive winding layers of the inductor coil.

Since only a tiny fraction of the Newman machine's coil inductor is subject to this high-intensity RF electric field at any one time during the propagation of the transient, only a tiny percentage of the 9000-lb (4 metric ton) coil is exploited for the generation of power, which according to me, as I explained in detail above, is due to Electron Dia-magnetic Resonance (EDR). The transient is reflected multiple times from both ends of the Newman Machine's coil inductor, and during the several hundred microseconds between each reflection it gains additional voltage (suggesting an increase in capacitive energy), which is observed as multiple additive discrete voltage steps at the oscilloscope probe end, revealing a graph with a deep reverse voltage flyback spike with a deep "staircase" consisting of many steps, as revealed in Hastings' report.

If the magnetic field of the inductor coil is enhanced by a material such as iron and whose leakage magnetic flux directly acts on the wire of that coil, the precession frequency of the electrons will be so high (>100 MHz) that the skin effect will suppress any acquisition by copper wire of the >100 MHz RF energy released from the paired electrons of the insulation covering the copper wire. If, on the other hand, the iron is wrapped with the inductor coil and flux leakage is all but eliminated, there still remains a magnetic hysteresis power loss which may exceed the power released from the paired electrons, obscuring any benefit from the Electron Dia-magnetic Resonance, especially at these high frequencies.

It must also be noted that if the circular diamagnetic polarization of the electron pairs' magnetic rings saturates, then there would exist a limit to the electric field generated by the continuous flipping of the magnetic rings - that is - with respect to any given frequency, such that the power transfer to the copper wire may be in useful amounts only above some high frequency, say, 1 MHz.

securesupplies

Re: Radiant coil capacitor
« Reply #252, on October 23rd, 2021, 06:42 PM »Last edited on October 23rd, 2021, 06:45 PM
I Guess that is the long hand of saying electron bounce phenonium

and if that is the case and Stanley A Meyer as he Stated Based on and Advanced Tesla, the Opposing Magnetic fields when magnified open the aperture to entice More NMR  to enter

in such case magnifying that influx  with a secondary  between the opposing fields ( such as the trifilar wind) 
whilst using a suitable fast 2 way switch to extract those electrons would create a compounded and controllable ( to capacitors and rectifying regulated ( 9xd) Circuit.) To use the power.

 Some time it is not what is missing or needed to be added but in fact what you need to take away or rearrange.
And thus is mastering the tech.

I believe this thread has every thing people need to do it.

securesupplies

Re: Radiant coil capacitor
« Reply #253, on October 23rd, 2021, 06:54 PM »Last edited on October 23rd, 2021, 06:57 PM
I put this here for your Thought
of why Stan Newman and and others used this

the fields of  bifilar L1 L3  support the
 controls compression of amps and raise volts. in L2 Scondary
When in a Spiral close configuration

not as separate coils.

 TEslad Meyer pancak.jpg - 635.98 kB, 4048x1508, viewed 22 times.


particlezoo

Re: Radiant coil capacitor
« Reply #254, on October 24th, 2021, 10:41 AM »Last edited on October 24th, 2021, 10:53 AM
Quote from securesupplies on October 23rd, 2021, 06:54 PM
I put this here for your Thought
of why Stan Newman and and others used this

the fields of  bifilar L1 L3  support the
 controls compression of amps and raise volts. in L2 Scondary
When in a Spiral close configuration

not as separate coils.
The diagram you attached is from Ivo in 2021, so clearly this indicates three stacked pancake coils. The "inside rim of the bifilar pancake coil" is indicated by the dot leading into the L1a "Top Choke" and L1b "Bottom Choke". The L2 "secondary" coil sandwiched in between is wound in the opposite direction. The L1a "Top Choke" is connected to the positive, while the L1b "Bottom Choke" is connected to the negative. A 50% duty cycle square wave is applied, producing a broad range of frequencies. Thus, the pancake coils form an oscillating electric dipole. Most of the electric flux of the dipole is concentrated in the space directly between L1a and L1b, where L2 resides. A magnetic field (due to L2) exists perpendicular to this electric flux between L1a and L2 and also between L2 and L1b (in the opposite direction).

As I have described in my previous post regarding Electron Dia-magnetic Resonance (EDR), the magnetic fields of two paired electrons loop into each other like the magnetic fields of two horseshoe magnets. Since each electron in the pair has opposite angular momentum and opposite magnetic moments from each other, under an applied magnetic field they will precess in the same direction. Thus, the magnetic field loop which they form together will rotate (or rather, flip) about an axis aligned with that magnetic field. The result is that the rotation of the magnetic loop of the electron pair (whose orientation was initially determined by the displacement current passing through that magnetic loop) generates an electric field perpendicular to that magnetic field. That induced electric field is 10^5 times weaker than the applied electric field through the dielectric due to it being a result of the diamagnetic response of the insulator (with the relative magnetic susceptibility being about -1.0*10^-5). However, because that induced electric field is rotated about the magnetic field axis, that electric field will end up lining up with the wire. Thus, this 10^-5 as strong electric field should be added up (or, rather, path-integrated) over the length of the wire as opposed to along the much shorter distance between "capacitor plates" L1a and L1b. The longer the wire relative to the distance between the "capacitor plates", the better - preferably on the order of 10^5 or more.

Since the electric field between L1a and L1b is generally in the same direction - axial, while the magnetic field between L1a and L1b is primarily radial, due to the magnetic field of L2, the effect (Electron Dia-Magnetic Resonance) I have described above is responsible for generating an EMF along the turns of the coils. However, the radial magnetic field between L1a and L2 is opposite that of the radial magnetic field between L2 and L1b. Therefore, voltage from this effect induced into L1a is opposite that of the voltage the effect induces into L1b. Therefore, if the outer rim of L1a is at an increased potential due to this effect, then the outer rim of L1b is at a decreased potential. Conversely for the inner rims of L1a and L1b. The effect produces poloidal AC power which passes from the outer rim of L1a to the outer rim of L1b (via displacement current), through L1b (via wire), from the inner rim of L1b to the inner rim of L1a (via displacement current), through L1a and back to the outer rim of L1a (via wire). The result is that a difference between L1a's current and L1b's current emerges, and so we have a hidden bucking-coil inductor-capacitor oscillator formed by L1a, L1b, and the distributed capacitance at their inner and outer rims. The presence of the blocking diode between L1a and L2 rectifies this poloidal AC power and thereby enables a build up of DC voltage which can be measured externally as uni-directional voltage ripples.

evostars

L2 ripple, sinq to L3 current
« Reply #255, on October 24th, 2021, 11:25 AM »Last edited on October 24th, 2021, 11:29 AM
I am able to detach the ripple from the turn off point of the mosfet.
In yellow the L2 voltage, in green (-20 phase shift due to frequency) the L3 current. orange=L3  voltage
The ripple, follows the negative current maximum of L3.
This is tuned with a 9nF (small) capacity over L3, and a 8.2 ohm load over L4. L2 has 135nF. Frequency is 130kc/s

This could mean, If I tuned the negative current max of L3, to the impulse, that the ripple amplifies the impulse.
For sure there is a relation between the ripple of L2 and the current of L3

 L2 appears not to be resonant

 SCR21.PNG - 76.28 kB, 1280x824, viewed 4 times.


evostars

Re: Radiant coil capacitor
« Reply #256, on October 24th, 2021, 11:54 AM »
The relation to the current of L3 and the ripple on L2, is related to the impulse of L2 that disrupts the current on L3.
I made a 1min movie to show this, I'll edit and post it as a short.

Since the effect of the impulse on L3 current  is delayed visible as a ripple on L2, I suspect, this is due to the distance between L2 and L3, which is now 15mm.
Tuning this distance might provide valuable information

evostars

unlisted video showing relation between L2 ripple and L3
« Reply #257, on October 24th, 2021, 12:14 PM »Last edited on October 24th, 2021, 12:27 PM
short video shows the distance (time) between the ripples of L2 (yellow)
are related to the impulse effect on the current of L3
L2 and L3 are distanced by 15mm
could this delayed reaction be from a "bounce back" from L3 to L2 of the impulse????
I should tune the distance again, and see the effect on the ripples

https://youtu.be/nWZn0Od1xAE

evostars

goals for overunity
« Reply #258, on October 24th, 2021, 03:46 PM »
high voltage fast impulse in primary coil.
secondary must have very high voltage
secondary has unbalanced resonance.

unbalanced resonance is essential, as this is what provides the power. When power is balanced as in regular resonance, positive and negative power is equal and total is zero.

with unbalanced resonance the positive and negative resonant cycles have unequal positive and negative power, total is not zero.

probably L3 L4 are series connected. power is tapped between L3 L4, maybe in a form of half wave resonance. whereby onehalf is different then the other half

secondary can shorten the duration of the impulse of the primary (excite it) when properly tuned.

impulse powers the unbalanced resonance but only the right side, right resonant half. the other half stays small.

peace :emperor:


securesupplies

Re: Radiant coil capacitor
« Reply #259, on October 24th, 2021, 10:26 PM »
trififlar pancake , interpretation is everything i guess

evostars

Extra coil understood
« Reply #260, on October 25th, 2021, 01:42 AM »Last edited on October 25th, 2021, 02:09 AM
Quote from securesupplies on October 24th, 2021, 10:26 PM
trififlar pancake , interpretation is everything i guess
yes, a "normal" secondary resonant coil, has balanced resonance. equal positive and negative cycles, which gives a resultant of zero.

but when we connect multiple unequal windings together (my L3 and L4 as one) we should be able to create a wave that is more negative than positive. resulting in a resultant negative power (generation).

this is the tesla Extra coil. a different series connected coil to the secondary with a series capacity connected to it.

when tuned right, the secondary with the extra coil can create a half wave resonance (instead of a quarter wave). this means the middle of L3 and L4 is swinging while the L3 ground and the capacity of the extra coil is stable (grounding in counterspace as Dollard said).

power is thus tapped again from the resonant point in the middle of L3 L4. (unbalanced half wave is max there)

this is also as the kapanadze grenate coil, which exist out of 3 coils, in the ratio 1:2:4 with one being counter rotated. one side being grounded by a series capacitor, other side straight to ground.



evostars

ripple amplifies impulse
« Reply #261, on October 25th, 2021, 05:57 AM »Last edited on October 31st, 2021, 02:06 AM
added L4 in series with L3
edit: outside rim L4, connected to inside rim L3, no load
orange is the signal of Open end of L4.
green is current of L4 at l3 connection.

added 9nF in parallel to L3.
525V 500nS impulse
3.36W input
resonant at 72.9 kc/s

l2 has 135nF in series

while tuning the ripples shifted towards the impulse (left) and when merged the impulse got high voltage.

as predicted current is max negative at impulse

AND current and voltage (green orange) are IN PHASE.
-9 degrees current phase shift at this frequency.

edit: current measured at L4 outside rim (after L3 series connection), voltage measured at inside rim L4 (open end)

very very interesting

 20211025_145138.jpg - 1969.74 kB, 4032x2268, viewed 6 times.

 SCR22.PNG - 59.52 kB, 1280x824, viewed 2 times.


evostars

reverse dc offset circuit for BogIrish
« Reply #262, on October 29th, 2021, 04:20 AM »
This circuit should reverse the DC offset.
making L3 positive, and L2 negative

For the negative DC offset of L2, another large cap to negative ground might be needed, but I don't think its nececary.
Not fully sure if this will work.

L3 will definetly become positive. but... L2 already should have a negative offset from the impulses...
and if so, than how come the positive offset is also posible.
I guess, builing testing= knowing

 reverse polarity DC offset.jpg - 308.54 kB, 1920x1080, viewed 12 times.


securesupplies

Re: Radiant coil capacitor
« Reply #263, on October 30th, 2021, 11:07 PM »Last edited on October 31st, 2021, 01:44 AM
very close now I feel

How about the Choke effect of L1 L3  on l2 the secondary which is in middle of the trifilar.
your drawing looks like your secondary is separate and not wired in or sitting between fields

Once voltage can go to infinity by magnification of input while choking amps you have it,

Notes For Evo

1 Matt Switch
2 Trifilar wind
3  Dc in and out put extract from secondary
4 the last lower drawing is missing the blocking diodes show on trfilar spiral

I do believe these 3 circuit are very close  to complete  the final arrangement is key

 TEslad Meyer pancak.jpg - 635.98 kB, 4048x1508, viewed 11 times.

 reverse polarity DC offset.jpg - 308.54 kB, 1920x1080, viewed 9 times.

 ssss.jpg - 65.91 kB, 1104x522, viewed 12 times.


evostars

In phase current and voltage in L4
« Reply #264, on October 31st, 2021, 03:45 AM »Last edited on October 31st, 2021, 04:06 AM
I measure L3 and L4 again of the previous setup again
parallel resonant L3 is 90 out of phase, with its current and voltage.
While L4 is in phase with its voltages and currents.
Now how can that be??

L4 is series connected to L3, and is open ended. has no tuning cap.

I measured current on both ends of L4, and it is in phase at both ends with the voltage at the open end of L4.
weird.

but no load...

edit. L3 and L4 voltages are in phase, but L4 voltage is amplified, L3 was 272Vpp and L4 is 580Vpp (so its not the same voltage, probably due to less capacity of L4.

current in L4 is less then L3. 2.4A in L3 1,8A in L4. But... as said it is IN PHASE...
ok.. lets put a load on it, and see if it collapses.

evostars

L4 Extra Coil power
« Reply #265, on October 31st, 2021, 04:24 AM »Last edited on October 31st, 2021, 04:26 AM
I put a 8.2 ohm 25W power resistor parallel over L4.
measured the inside rim of L4, with current (green) and voltage (orange) yellow is L2 voltage(inside rim).

The resisitve load has some inductance and detuned, So I tuned again to 125kc/s
at this frequency the 20mV/A current probe has -10 degrees phase shift.

The input power was 0.19A at 2x 4,9V =1.86watt

I made a picture of the resistor showing it actually does heat up.

I expected the L4 to flat line, under the load. but... No...
1.1563A peak to peak, with in phase 107.31V peak to peak...
How can this be?

impulse on L2 (yellow) was only  -270V

edit:
keep in mind, L4 is riding on top of the L3 wave, so the real voltage over L4 and the resistor is much lower

 power.jpg - 1051.67 kB, 2560x1440, viewed 3 times.

 img_thermal_1635678759301.jpg - 442.12 kB, 1280x720, viewed 4 times.

 SCR24.PNG - 77.43 kB, 1280x824, viewed 8 times.


securesupplies

Re: Radiant coil capacitor
« Reply #266, on November 1st, 2021, 09:25 PM »
your pancake stack is amazing
 i wonder what happens if trifilar pancakes in series wound


evostars

Re: Radiant coil capacitor
« Reply #267, on November 6th, 2021, 12:24 AM »
I'm reading Tesla again
https://magstar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Nikola-Tesla-On-His-Work-With-Alternating-Currents-and-Their-Application-to-Wireless-Telgraphy-Telephony-and-Transmission-of-Power-Leland-I.-Anderson.pdf

page 93
Tesla talks about electro magnetic radiation, saying he wants it at a minimum.
EM radiation is equal to the square root of the capacity (of the coil) devided by the inductance (which should be large)

he talks about a coil  constructed in a special way that gives a low resonant frequency (that is the bifilar patent coil)

further more, he says if the EM radiation is low, and the resistance is low, there is no way to leak the energy away from the resonant coil, and thus the impulses are accumulated.
(he talks about his secondary having pure undamped waves from the impulses)

Thank you Tesla. this document has great value to me.



evostars

N. C
« Reply #270, on November 14th, 2021, 02:38 PM »Last edited on November 15th, 2021, 02:23 AM
primary, low capacity, let it ring longer per impulse.
1 impulse per 3? oscillations of L2 primary
needs smaller cap.
Xl needs to be higher, more inertia.

so characteristic impedance of the primary is on the inductance side.

work to higher impedance on the secondary L3.

ah my head hurts. I don't get it. need to try this.

Need to look at the impedance formula for C and I again....

notes from email :

Series Q = Xl/wire resistance, gain in voltage

Parallel Q = V/Xl, gain in current

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Resonance is the ability to "strike" at the right time! And this is only dependent on the circuit length!

I have already created resonance in a circuit with only 2 caps and a LED.

And the LED worked no matter the direction.

Same applies to "standing waves".

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Permeability of free space = 12.5663706uH

Permittivity of free space = 88.5418782pF

These are the properties of our space.

F = 1 / (2 * pi * square root(12.5663706uH * 88.5418782pF))

F = ~4.7713Mhz

Xl = 2 * pi * 4.7713Mhz * 12.5663706uH

Xl = ~376ohm.

Without mad math I just confirm to you the “impedance of free space”

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Damped waves = “free” oscillations. You are not using them.

Inertia = Xl. You do not care.


When C is “near” L, Xl or Xc is very low. Or very little inertia.

If L is only 4 times bigger than C.

Xl or Xc = 2ohm only!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The Tesla extra coil came to my mind when I discovered the magic of tuned harmonics.

When I saw damped waves (free oscillations) going up instead of down.

Everything must be tuned and cascading in resistance.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx new mail

"please tell me more. cascading in resistance?

Yes, your start with low impedance then you go to higher impedance (your resonant system Xl).
Your energy is in that Xl.
Two solutions:
1 - Your LOAD is equal to Xl (and will receive 1/2 power) or is higher then Xl (and will receive power at proportion)
2 - Make a receiver that inverts the process. Primary high Xl, secondary low Xl. And your LOAD is the highest impedance.




damped waves going up? when?"

Simple test:
Two equal coils... Choose a frequency for a primary that XL > 500 and find the capacitor for that frequency (Xl=Xc). With this we have a primary series resonant system with Xl.
Now with the other coil find the capacitor that is (3 * the primary system frequency) and Xc must be also (Xc from primary system * 3).

The secondary system is faster then the primary. Agree?
And with 3 "free" oscillations. Agree?

Because the Xl of secondary is 3 * greater voltage have to adjust. A resonant rise will happen.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx new mail
Another thing if you want to test.
Supose after your calculations you find that your primary circuit frequency is 15khz.
Your "signal"/source can be 7.5Khz at 25% pulse.
You will have also 1 "free" oscillation in your primary circuit.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx new
Free oscillations going up and cascading of impedances.

You are right in the source "BEMF" but after that you must have tuned circuits.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Only resistance can "catch" energy.
A "thing" without resistance can not have any energy

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, tuned harmonics.
Just follow the sequence. frequency * n ; Xl * n
At extreme I created the 10th harmonic and even so I could see free oscillations going up. Of course the gain was weak.

When you charge a capacitor it stores 1/2 of the energy and the energy is in the dielectric. The dielectric is the "place" with highest resistance.
When you charge an inductor it stores 1/2 of the energy and the energy is ALSO in the dielectric. Again the "place" with highest resistance.

 teslaSaid.png - 186.6 kB, 593x898, viewed 20 times.


evostars

current amplification
« Reply #271, on November 20th, 2021, 01:59 AM »
yesterday I noticed the L3 current is amplified when the negative voltage impulse is on the negative voltage maximum on L2

This suprised me, as I remembered I needed it to be on the positive voltage maximum.

But now I realise, I was tuned to the TEM frequency, whereby L2 and L3 are in phase.

my thoughts now are, I can amplify voltage by resonant transformation, but it reduces current.

but then I can amplify current, by using the impulses, which results in a magnified voltage and current (in L3).

Also,
the impulses should be able to change the dielectric properties between and surrounding the coils. making the waves themselves amplify.

Tesla spoke of damped an undamped waves:
hit a bell submerged in mercury. it will be damped. only with very fast successive hits it will keep ringing (one impulse per cycle).

hit a bell in a vacuum and it will be undamped, only needing 1 hit per half our to continue to ring with the same amplitude.

So he talks about the medium, and in a patent he was clear about the impulses changing the dielectric properties of the air, making it conductive.

evostars

retuned the seat to TEM
« Reply #272, on November 20th, 2021, 02:35 AM »Last edited on November 20th, 2021, 02:38 AM
I retuned the ascention seat to TEM 32.59 kc/s
impulse on negative maximum.

dc offset together with sine is now not sufficient. part of the impulse is below zero.

while tuning a saw the L2 sine rise after the impulse, but making the foto while sitting in the chair its gone.
when I stand up its still gone....
starnge. But I did have to retune when I sat down.

yellow is L2 voltage

edit I remember I tuned at lower power, then I saw the increase of amplitude right after the impulse

 20211120_113201.jpg - 1971.06 kB, 4032x2268, viewed 3 times.


evostars

amplified after impulse
« Reply #273, on November 20th, 2021, 03:11 AM »
in addition to previous post,
the attached photo is what i saw, and I can't reproduce it.

the amplitude of the L2 primary voltage, right after the impulse was amplified.

I don't understand why I can't replicate it. I played with voltage and frequency.

this amplification is what I need!

 20211120_120832_kindlephoto-49842340.jpg - 856.6 kB, 4026x2268, viewed 3 times.


evostars

Re: Radiant coil capacitor
« Reply #274, on November 20th, 2021, 04:06 AM »Last edited on November 20th, 2021, 04:16 AM
after calculating EM radiation from my L3 secondary coil, following Tesla's formula of square root of C divided by L, I came down to the capacity of L needing to be 1nF for 0,15 radiation factor.
Altought that formula doesn't make a lot of sense, and tesla didnt use the units we used (he used cm)

Then I made the series capacity of L2 primary, 4nF and tuned.

Some times, I saw L3 voltage (orange) being amplified, while L2 voltage (yellow) was diminished.

it appeared, the L3 sine wave was on a sub octave. so instead of 6 waves, it only had 3 waves (same total period).

scr25 shows L2 having one cycle while L3 has 3 cycles. (I believe this was with a larger capacity on L2)
142kc/s. L2 is out of phase with the L3 at the time of the impulse, so this is amplified. but still at TEM

scr26 is at 108 kc/s
now the L2 yellow and L3 both have 4 cycles, of which the middel is deminished in L2, and then grows again,
While the L3 voltage (orange) is amplified during the impulse, and drastically grows in amplitude in the middel, at the point where L2 is deminished in amplitude.
But looking at the current of L3 (green) the current is demished after the impulse, which explains the lower amplitude of the sine after the impulse, which makes the middel look like being amplified...
So it is not...

This is because the impulse is now on the positive peak voltage maximum of L2. hereby the current is deminished in L3 instead of amplified, at TEM resonance (L2 L3 in phase)

 SCR25.PNG - 43.13 kB, 1280x824, viewed 5 times.

 SCR26.PNG - 43.63 kB, 1280x824, viewed 6 times.

 power1.jpg - 1090.55 kB, 2421x1362, viewed 3 times.

 power2.jpg - 1084.45 kB, 2427x1365, viewed 4 times.