In a non-super conductor, you must have some voltage to have a current correct?
The voltage is instantaneous, which means the current necessary for alignment is instantaneous. Those Aether particles will flip as soon as the voltage is applied. They won't push out of the conductor, but they will be aligned. So the voltage now pushes them out and concentrates the magnetic field on the rotor.
So far so good? If not, just think pulse--everything happens that you need in a pulse.
What did I explain to you about resistance the other night? Specifically the resistance encountered in an inductor? Rotating discs remember. When those things come out of alignment and begin to buck the binding, current flows. So how do we fix that?
First we have to recognize a different form of current. One type (the kind we are interested in) is purely an alignment of Aether particles. The second (the type we all think of when the word current is used) is more like electron flow or something associated with heat. This is a current that begins when perfect alignment starts to slip or deviate.
Solution to your conundrum:
Drop the voltage before real current starts to flow. Remember, for a very short instance in time an inductor is actually an insulator (as far as current is concerned). For voltage, it's just the opposite--in a short instance it is a very good conductor. The larger the inductor the more pronounced this will seem.
Don't charge up the coil Russ. There is no need to do this. Just bump it very briefly, let off (relaxation & reguaging time), then hit it again. When the rotor comes around and needs to be pushed in the opposite direction, do the same thing with reverse polarity. You can always grab the back EMF and re-use this energy too. There won't be much of it there because you're not going to slam the coil with current anyway (like in that video you posted above). So don't get all twisted up in the back EMF or counter EMF. It's not a huge deal here. It's just something you can use to make things more efficient if you want to; certainly not compulsory.
A Newman motor probably shouldn't even be called a motor at all. It doesn't work like a motor we are all familiar with. Joe's device works on totally different principals. His setup is the gold standard for what a true pulse motor should look & work like.
You got to get into Newman's mind Russ. This stuff was simple to him; if it's not simple to you, you're not thinking right.
Roger that.
Thanks Matt, your right, if its not easy, were not thinking right... ( step back, reevaluate)
studding more of what Joe teaches i came up with this:
some of this is directly from the book, some slightly view from my prospective.
Chapter 3:
A spinning gyroscope will move at right angles to the force acting upon it. Hence as the gyro particles encounter the particles composing the conductor wire, they move “up, or down” the conductor. At right angles to the direction that they first encounter the conductor.
It’s the spin, not the direction of the path down the flux line that do the interaction.
So each atom row expands to a flux line… width and height and length of the row of atoms create the flux lines. theses are REAL lines in space...
My thoughts:
This is why you can make a bigger magnetic field with more current in a smaller coil, but if you were to look at the flux lines you would see there is less. there just more spread out. However in more copper with the same current you can have more interactions more flux lines, this makes a bigger field with the same input. it really is about the mass or flux lines. ( like my expandable pipe in a coil… more “ surface area” of interactions, gyro particles )
chapter 4.
The magnetic field is not generated by the current. Copper is already magnetic, relative to the speed of the alignment of the atom. As well as the action reaction effect of the energy released ( gyro particles)
Current in is the same as current out, but when shut off, and shorted, there is still current flowing in the coil. Where did that current come from?
So there is an “extra” “gallon” of current in the coil that is relisted in the coil. (magnetic field)
As the field expands, then collapses, the particles try to return to where they came from ( like in sonnet’s electron spring idea.) The mechanical action of the gyro particles strike other atoms as they go back in, at some degree of right angle and moving at right angles to that force.
Production efficiency and conversion efficiency.
my thoughts:
In a small coil, there is insignificant current flow to generate the desired effect. When switched off and shorted out. (inertia)
A much larger coil of the same resistance will have a lot more inertia
Also note that the inductance is greater when shorted. And if the coil is energized then shorted the current will flow for a long time in a massive coil.
theses below are subject to change, I'm trying to calculate some stuff.
Desired Result (Flow of kinetic energy or inertia.) = inductance * Turns/lbs. More Inductance the greater resistance to change, the more the mass the more inertia it has. The more turns it has …( need to add here. i think the turns are already included in the inductance. so it might just be : Desired Result = inductance * lbs ( flux line interactions) )
There is no such thing as “stored potential” in a magnetic field. Its kinetic! ( gyro particles spinning and moving at the speed of light)
Flow of kinetic energy.... all the time. Even in a capacitor... ITS ALL KINETIC! there is no such thing as "potential energy"...
Magnets... on the same pole end has particles in 2 directions... This is why we get an AC wave on the output of a conventional coil. "cancellation effect" See diagram 19-A(chapter 8 )
attached explains why the current is held for a long time. the magnet plays a big roll in this. also note the poles of the magnet are headed to the ends of the coil... ( see figure 20-C in chapter 8 ) as this happens the magnet is on its side, each side has the same effect. when the poles of the magnet are adjacent with the coil there is a " canceling effect" (See diagram 19-B and 19B1 (chapter 8 ) )
so the edges of the magnet are trying to alight with the coil's winding. this ADDS to the current flowing in the coil... there for when you turn off the current you get an even higher current "BEMF" or transient spike... again its a huge amount of inertia.
more to add later... if we STOP thinking for our self's UNTIL we master what Newman teachings THEN bring back our thinking for ours self... we will have this mastered in no time... and yes, it should be "easy" at that point to advance it...
more to do...
~Russ