Ok -well i must say that this (like Russ said)went all wrong.
First i find it very interesting that CC just so happens to turn up on this very post -for the very first time on this forum,right after Bob dose???
CC-you should look at the system a bit closer befor giveing your expert opion on how something some one else has built-works.
Yes,magnetic fields will react to any metal-if strong enough.
First wrong asumption-the electromagnetic field is what is lifting the ali pistion.
In this case no-you are wrong.
The ali pistion is between the center and bottom of the electro magnet-so any force would have been downward,not up.
Second-the electro magnet is on befor the high amp pulse is sent to the cylender,and the pistion dose not move prior to the high amp pulse being sent to the cylender.This high amp pulse is delivered through two apposing electrode's,and no linear magnetic fields produced by that pulse.
Then to get your knickers in a twist because he wouldnt carry out your test requests is nothing more than childish.
What you have succeeded in doing is getting rid of a very inportant part of this reserch ,and a valuble member of this forum.
Did you CC heed to your own advice and build a replication to proove your theroy?.If so,post the vidio so we can all see your experiments
On IAEC we value everyone's input,and we do not try in any way to discredit any one's work-especially when we cant proove it to be wrong.
This is something maybe Russ and other members should concider implimenting into the ruels of this forum
I do appologise to all for my strong post,but some times things just shouldnt take a direction like this did.
The coincidence is Russ's video. I found it while trying to find information at the plasmerg kit. I had no idea Bob was on here and I have never had any contact with his brother. I assume he found this forum the same way and the timing is not so strange. But if you want to be paranoid be my guest.
I am aware of some of the configuration of the cylinder. The piston is below the centre of the coil. But like you I am unaware of all the details of the configuration. There is apparently a massive chunk of iron directly beneath the piston. That may well effect the shape of the magnetic field generated, The cylinder walls also appear to be aluminium, without more detailed information I could not even guess as to how this would effect the resultant field, it may well concentrate it to the base of the cylinder where the iron is and directly below the piston. But I am only guessing just like you. My guess though is a large field is created and as the piston can't go down it goes up in an attempt to reach ground state.
You don't know that the high current pulse is not going through the coil. You just assume that based on information you may have seen. but you don't know that that's the way it actually works.
Anyway I did not discredit the work of Bob I only asked him if he had tested it to see if the coil was acting like a solenoid. in fact if you read my post I said its "just a theory".
I do find it incredibly odd that Bob had no idea that aluminium reacts strongly with a magnetic field. That is how some maglev trains work. It is an extraordinarily large gap in his knowledge, don't you think?
As for building it. If I could I might try. perhaps you can point me to plans of how to build it. I am not talking about plasmergs 'popper' now, I am talking about the demo one we saw in the Tesla video. I think Bob is quite correct the plasmerg popper is more about discrediting him than proving any true science. I may be wrong though, so I wait on Russ's build.
Did Bob leave because of me? perhaps, but perhaps not. If he took his ball and bat because someone questioned him then what does that say about him? Without even considering other options he called me a liar, abused me, accused me of being a stooge for his brother and then ran away. That says more about him than me. It doesn't go astray on me that while defending Bobs rights you chose to ignore mine.
But I *am* curious, nobody has attempted to answer my question. Where is the energy to drive the system coming from. If we are to believe the conservation of energy laws then it must come from somewhere. I have not heard of these laws being bent by anyone other than crackpots. So I assume they still hold here.
With the assumption that the energy must be derived from somewhere, can someone try to answer that question?
Censoring those that don't say the things you like is of course another option.
Very excited for you to get the popper project started.
I’ve seen some people doubting whether this thing is real and if it can produce power. Lets look at what the energy source is and how it functions.
1: Noble Gases and 2: RF wave energy i.e.: electricity and 3: Heat.
With these three things can we make a piston in a cylinder move?
I believe everyone would answer yes! to that question. The Real issue is how efficiently can it be done and also how much power can we produce.
Plasma has already been proven as an energy source. Heat a no brainier!
RF wave energy? Used to create the plasma! Electricity used to create the RF Wave! Sparks????? Does an Electrical Sparking Increase the energy of a soweto plasma? Ionization happens in different ways! So the answer is yes!
So! What do we see happing? I see some one using RF wave energy to bring the gas up to a higher level of excitement than using a electrical spark to cause a plasma burst with reactive elements to enhance that burst and then letting the whole process collapse.
There is no doubt in my mind that this process is real and not nuclear. Plasma is a function of electromagnetic force/Radio Frequency. Turn on your Neon Sign.
Is the Satallite plasma engine a Neuclear Reaction.
Take a look: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bba_1264267430
The VASIMR (VAriable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket) works by using radio waves to ionize a propellant into a plasma and then a magnetic field to accelerate the plasma out of the back of the rocket engine to generate thrust.//
So! What’s the Difference? The Rocket Engine expels the gas. The PPAP engine does not! The Rocket Engine completely converts all the gas to plasma and then accelerates even further. The PPAP Engine does not. The Rocket engine gets HOT!
The PPAP Engine does not! Why! Isn’t there something wrong here! NO!!!
The PPAP Engine does have a thermal component! This Component is both positive and negative. So the net thermal left over is from the Coil heating!
Last But not least. This is exactly how Stanley Myers Electrical generator works.
Plasma is not an energy source its an energy sink. in other words it absorbs energy and the result is light and heat, when it cools from the plasma state it may also release some energy.
"plasma burst with the reactive elements" Are you saying the reactive elements are consumed? converted to energy. If the Papp engine works as described then I don't think there is enough reactive elements in the chamber to power it for long. Or are you talking about something different?
I thought about the self canceling heat and cold with a net result of zero, But I could not come up with a configuration that would work. perhaps you could explain the configuration you had in mind