Notes on columns & methodology
Peak voltages and energies are typical industry ranges; I used midpoints where practical.
VIC numbers are derived from your posted bobbin sheet (Vs ≈ 356 V, Q ≈ 144 → ideal V_peak ≈ 51 kV) and our earlier energy calc using primary inductance and currents you supplied (Ip ≈ 0.27 A → ~2 mJ; Ip_max ≈ 2.2 A → ~150 mJ). Real operating values will be lower because of losses, coupling, gap load, and MOSFET drive limitations.
Percent voltage compares typical open-circuit peaks directly to the 30 kV baseline. Real loaded gap voltages are usually lower.
Voltage score mapping: linear scale 0–10 mapped to 0–60 kV approximate. (30 kV baseline → 5/10). This is a comparative visualization, not a measured metric.
Goal fit score measures how well each system fits your specific VIC / nano-bubble water fuel goals: resonant voltage control, adjustable amplitude, safe waveform shaping, and ability to drive chokes & tuned secondaries. That scoring rewards tunability and resonance capability.
Interpretation — what this table tells a builder
VIC stands out for peak open-circuit voltage and tunability. If your goal is to create resonant HV pulses and explore waveform shaping (for dissociation / nano-bubble interactions), VIC is the most flexible and highest-voltage option. That’s why it scores high for the goals you described.
Energy is king for usable sparks. High open-circuit voltage alone doesn’t guarantee a strong spark — the stored energy (0.5·L·I²) and transfer efficiency determine how much energy the spark receives. Conventional coils and some high-energy hybrids routinely deliver comparable energy (tens to hundreds of mJ) without the complexity of resonant tuning.
CDI is great for fast, high-voltage strikes but low energy. CDI’s very fast rise time is excellent for igniting lean mixtures or ionization but, because the pulse is short, CDI can have lower delivered energy than an inductive coil unless specially designed.
COP gives great per-cylinder control with moderate voltage & energy. It’s the closest mainstream match for precise timing and per-cyl control — useful if you want ECU-grade timing without a complex resonant stage.
VIC integration costs complexity & safety. The VIC is powerful but requires:
Proper MOSFET gate drivers, snubbers, and current sensing,
Careful timing (drive the primary to energize the tank before gap conduction),
HV isolation & insulation, and
Bench tuning (sweep frequency/duty to maximize energy transfer without core saturation).
Quick actionable recommendations for the builder (based on comparison)
If your goal is maximum tunable HV for resonant water dissociation, proceed with VIC but prioritize primary current capacity (higher Ip raises stored energy dramatically), add robust gate drivers and snubbers, and design for core cooling and safety.
If your goal is robust, repeatable spark energy for ignition-like events with simpler integration, a high-energy CDI or a hybrid (inductive + CDI) may be easier to implement and tune.
For precise timing and ECU integration, use COP or dedicated coils with the Teensy/DropBear driving them — then use a separate VIC module for experiments that don’t require millisecond-level ignition timing.
For isolation of multiple outputs, avoid cheap HV diodes unless they’re rated for kV pulses; prefer separate secondary taps or dedicated per-plug secondaries.