You did a frequency sweep of the coil & found a peak?
The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
You did a frequency sweep of the coil & found a peak?
Anything in the positive phase is inductive. ( inductive reactance) and anything the negative is capacitance. (capasitive inductive reactance)
~Russ
nav
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1627, on May 29th, 2018, 01:53 PM »Last edited on May 29th, 2018, 02:02 PM
Interesting thread and debate about magnetic fields and what they actually are. I always refer to the magnetic field as a trapped 'force' which cannot escape in any particular linear direction unless coerced into doing so. Take permanent magnets for example, what do we have? In the case of Neodymium rare earth magnets we have a none linear powerful force, in the case of a 60mm x 10mm x 5mm Neo of good quality can hold 33Ibs of mass suspended from an iron surface indefinitely. Lets think about that for a second, 33lbs of force would rip a mans arm off after half an hour yet this small object the size of your finger can defy gravity indefinitely? If it held 33lbs of force for 20 years then the calculations would be approaching nuclear yield capability but what do we do with magnets - we play with them and stick em on fridges!
Now, Ed Leedskalin taught us that you can create a magnetic field with a coil and core, wired a particular way which will emulate a permanent magnet perfectly and he also said that the lines of force involved were constantly circulating the core on his keeper. If we spray iron filings around a bar magnet we can see lines of force which surround the magnet and are joined in an oval shape around the bar. Are these lines of force the same lines Ed talks about in his keeper? I think so.
All of this tells us that the magnetic field created in a transformer is the same magnetic field which surrounds a permanent magnet, therefore using a primary instead of a permanent magnet seems pretty stupid because instead of having to prime the core with flux of our own making from a power supply, all we ever needed to do was let nature take it's course and let the seemingly never ending supply of energy in a magnet do it's thing. If we use our brains and learn to divert the flux away from the core in a magnet driven transformer then the game is won.
But getting back to magnetism and what it is. Some of you may not know this but research is going on with a particular type of Quartz. They energize the quartz with voltage and a insane particle emerges called the Ganesh particle. This particle builds an Einstein Rosenberg bridge into living cells and repairs them no matter what is wrong with them but get this: they have also found that it produces algae spores during tests in sterilized conditions in a vacuum. They now believe that it was this particle that started life going in the Universe. The particle has no mass, neither does the Einstein Rosenberg bridge it builds into living cells but it consists entirely of a electromagnetic field which completely vanishes when the voltage is switched off.
This explains magnetic fields much easier, they are bridges built by electric and atomic charges to carry information from one place to another and they expand past the mass boundary for the simple reason of penetration of exterior masses. In a magnet, there are bridges extending past the boundary of the magnet in order to exchange information, both gather information and release information. The Universe has a brilliant way of keeping in contact with itself, that is what magnetism is my friends - the Universe trading information from one side to the other.
Now, Ed Leedskalin taught us that you can create a magnetic field with a coil and core, wired a particular way which will emulate a permanent magnet perfectly and he also said that the lines of force involved were constantly circulating the core on his keeper. If we spray iron filings around a bar magnet we can see lines of force which surround the magnet and are joined in an oval shape around the bar. Are these lines of force the same lines Ed talks about in his keeper? I think so.
All of this tells us that the magnetic field created in a transformer is the same magnetic field which surrounds a permanent magnet, therefore using a primary instead of a permanent magnet seems pretty stupid because instead of having to prime the core with flux of our own making from a power supply, all we ever needed to do was let nature take it's course and let the seemingly never ending supply of energy in a magnet do it's thing. If we use our brains and learn to divert the flux away from the core in a magnet driven transformer then the game is won.
But getting back to magnetism and what it is. Some of you may not know this but research is going on with a particular type of Quartz. They energize the quartz with voltage and a insane particle emerges called the Ganesh particle. This particle builds an Einstein Rosenberg bridge into living cells and repairs them no matter what is wrong with them but get this: they have also found that it produces algae spores during tests in sterilized conditions in a vacuum. They now believe that it was this particle that started life going in the Universe. The particle has no mass, neither does the Einstein Rosenberg bridge it builds into living cells but it consists entirely of a electromagnetic field which completely vanishes when the voltage is switched off.
This explains magnetic fields much easier, they are bridges built by electric and atomic charges to carry information from one place to another and they expand past the mass boundary for the simple reason of penetration of exterior masses. In a magnet, there are bridges extending past the boundary of the magnet in order to exchange information, both gather information and release information. The Universe has a brilliant way of keeping in contact with itself, that is what magnetism is my friends - the Universe trading information from one side to the other.
~Russ
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1628, on May 29th, 2018, 02:39 PM »Last edited on May 29th, 2018, 02:41 PM
Interesting thread and debate about magnetic fields and what they actually are. I always refer to the magnetic field as a trapped 'force' which cannot escape in any particular linear direction unless coerced into doing so. Take permanent magnets for example, what do we have? In the case of Neodymium rare earth magnets we have a none linear powerful force, in the case of a 60mm x 10mm x 5mm Neo of good quality can hold 33Ibs of mass suspended from an iron surface indefinitely. Lets think about that for a second, 33lbs of force would rip a mans arm off after half an hour yet this small object the size of your finger can defy gravity indefinitely? If it held 33lbs of force for 20 years then the calculations would be approaching nuclear yield capability but what do we do with magnets - we play with them and stick em on fridges!
Now, Ed Leedskalin taught us that you can create a magnetic field with a coil and core, wired a particular way which will emulate a permanent magnet perfectly and he also said that the lines of force involved were constantly circulating the core on his keeper. If we spray iron filings around a bar magnet we can see lines of force which surround the magnet and are joined in an oval shape around the bar. Are these lines of force the same lines Ed talks about in his keeper? I think so.
All of this tells us that the magnetic field created in a transformer is the same magnetic field which surrounds a permanent magnet, therefore using a primary instead of a permanent magnet seems pretty stupid because instead of having to prime the core with flux of our own making from a power supply, all we ever needed to do was let nature take it's course and let the seemingly never ending supply of energy in a magnet do it's thing. If we use our brains and learn to divert the flux away from the core in a magnet driven transformer then the game is won.
But getting back to magnetism and what it is. Some of you may not know this but research is going on with a particular type of Quartz. They energize the quartz with voltage and a insane particle emerges called the Ganesh particle. This particle builds an Einstein Rosenberg bridge into living cells and repairs them no matter what is wrong with them but get this: they have also found that it produces algae spores during tests in sterilized conditions in a vacuum. They now believe that it was this particle that started life going in the Universe. The particle has no mass, neither does the Einstein Rosenberg bridge it builds into living cells but it consists entirely of a electromagnetic field which completely vanishes when the voltage is switched off.
This explains magnetic fields much easier, they are bridges built by electric and atomic charges to carry information from one place to another and they expand past the mass boundary for the simple reason of penetration of exterior masses. In a magnet, there are bridges extending past the boundary of the magnet in order to exchange information, both gather information and release information. The Universe has a brilliant way of keeping in contact with itself, that is what magnetism is my friends - the Universe trading information from one side to the other.
the fact that a PM can do what it can do also tells me that it can be a source of energy in a system. for sure...
" If we use our brains and learn to divert the flux away from the core in a magnet driven transformer then the game is won"
I'm quite sure that's the "what" Newman was doing. he saw this differently, But did achieve his goal. we can convert thses things and use them to our advantage.
and not necessarily " flux away from the core" but rather let it influence the system in a positive way.
for Newman he needed to apply a source of "motivation" to get the result he needed. and i can see that being the case in most systems. a feed back loop of sorts...
welcome back :)
Hope you had a good break from the forums. I know we all need that some times :). We got to sit and think about things for our self's for a while!
~Russ
Cycle
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1629, on May 29th, 2018, 10:01 PM »Last edited on May 30th, 2018, 12:05 AM by Cycle
Some of you may not know this but research is going on with a particular type of Quartz. They energize the quartz with voltage and a insane particle emerges called the Ganesh particle. This particle builds an Einstein Rosenberg bridge into living cells and repairs them no matter what is wrong with them but get this: they have also found that it produces algae spores during tests in sterilized conditions in a vacuum. They now believe that it was this particle that started life going in the Universe. The particle has no mass, neither does the Einstein Rosenberg bridge it builds into living cells but it consists entirely of a electromagnetic field which completely vanishes when the voltage is switched off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BrE1Kr2V0g
It appears Dan Crain (aka Dan Crane, aka Dan Burisch, aka Dan Catselas), the supposed 'discoverer' of the "Ganesh particle" is a fake (as is the "Ganesh particle"), claiming to be an Area 51 doctor so he can get fame and the money associated with it. He claims to have gotten his doctorate degree from Stony Brook University (NY), but they have no record of him ever attending the school, let alone graduating, let alone getting his doctorate or doing any post-doc. During the time he was supposedly getting his doctorate in NY, he was working as a parole officer in Las Vegas (where he met his wife, who'd been convicted on drug charges). He claims to have worked with Bob Lazar, who says he never met Crain nor worked with him. Crain's own resume from 1991 shows Crain's later claims to be lies. In his 2002 bankruptcy filing, his wife listed herself as a casino supervisor, and Crain listed himself as a "homemaker". This isn't the first time Crain has tried to get a personality-scam going... in the 1980s, he attempted to claim he was working on a biological computer project... when he was really a casino security guard... a job he got fired from. Not even his mother, Dodie Crain, believes him anymore.
Even that resume is 'fluffed'... John Quincy Adams Institute of Research, Technology and Life Sciences doesn't exist... and even if it did exist, I'm fairly certain they wouldn't award a honoris causa degree (usually awarded to recognize a lifetime of achievement in a specific field) in Cellular Biology to someone whose highest academic achievement appears to be a seminary school, and whose highest career achievement appears to be casino security guard and parole officer.
In addition, an MA in Theology is a minimum three-year degree requiring 40 academic credits (on top of all the other course load... grammar, speech, foreign language / mathematics, algebra, geometry, calculus, statistics, computer science / American history, western civilization, social and political history, psychology, sociology, economics, anthropology, archaeology, political science / physics, geology, chemistry, biology, physiology, physiological psychology, anatomy, embryology, general science, ecology, health science / world literature, drama, literary criticism, art, art history, intellectual and cultural history, history of science, music, history of music)... Dan Crain is claiming in his resume above that he loaded all those course credits into a single year... remotely. While he was in Las Vegas, St. Patrick's Seminary is in Menlo Park, CA. They don't offer distance learning. The "cr" in the resume above denotes that he took the tests and passed ("tested out"), allowing him to forego the classroom time for some coursework (students are required to complete at least 50% of the required coursework)... this requires Academic Dean approval, so it should be easy to contact the seminary to out Crain's lie on this. I'm betting he couldn't quote more than a handful of Bible verses.
http://www.theoutpostforum.com/tof/showthread.php?144-Dan-burish-%96-fraud-%96-liar-%96-hoaxer-stolen-valor
Rense.com was gullible enough to believe Crain's story, and added to it, claiming that Caltech was investigating the "Ganesh Particle"... except it was a guy named Ganesh, an actual PhD, doing research on fluid flow dynamics of particles suspended in fluid.
Do you really think this supposed "Ganesh particle" would evade detection by the world's finest scientists with the most advanced lab equipment, only to be found by Dan "The Chinless Goof" Crain with no scientific educational background and no lab equipment?
Further, it's not an "Einstein-Rosenberg bridge", it's an Einstein-Rosen bridge, a folding of spacetime upon itself as a consequence of a black hole... specifically a black hole with charge and spin. So if such a black hole manifested within the cells of your body, it wouldn't "repair them no matter what is wrong with them", it would rip them apart due to the high charge density of the Reissner-Nordström hole. Even further, such a small black hole would evaporate within microseconds. Even further, such an Einstein-Rosen bridge for such a small black hole would be too unstable to even form... it takes a massive black hole to even form an Einstein-Rosen bridge (hypothetically... the equations of Special Relativity say it can happen, but none have ever been observed... so such a momentous discovery as an actual Einstein-Rosen bridge would have every legitimate scientist in the field trying to replicate the results... that didn't happen because it's a scam... a scam so unbelievable that it boggles the imagination that anyone could have believed it in the first place). Dan Crain attempted to get a $30,000 pre-payment from a filmmaker to make a documentary about this "discovery"... that's the money trail. The filmmaker immediately recognized it as a scam, and only later realized that the guy attempting the scam was Dan Crain under yet another alias.
Let's do try to keep the conversation confined to reality, yes?
Hummm... well its allways good to see the truth.
~Russ
~Russ
I'm sure I read somewhere that Caltech has acknowledged the existence of the Ganesh particle?
Oh well, was an interesting concept.
Oh well, was an interesting concept.
nav
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1632, on May 30th, 2018, 09:31 AM »Last edited on May 30th, 2018, 09:33 AM
Cycle, just once in a while it helps to read words from your own brain instead of being the forum's serial cut and paste[r] of Wiki and other sites. I've noticed that you do that quite often to either discredit an idea or bolster a disagreement. So although I agree that the site must keep with reality, I also acknowledge that mainstream science is sometimes an obstacle (but not always) in what we try to achieve on forums like this so it doesn't help to cut and paste huge chunks of wiki info in your rhetoric.
Another thing, using theoretical physics to discredit any thesis is akin to asking Peter Pan if he ever met Alice in wonderland. Theoretical is purely theoretical so be careful where you go with that.
Another thing, using theoretical physics to discredit any thesis is akin to asking Peter Pan if he ever met Alice in wonderland. Theoretical is purely theoretical so be careful where you go with that.
hi Nave, Nice to see you here, yeah i can see that being the right direction.
the fact that a PM can do what it can do also tells me that it can be a source of energy in a system. for sure...
" If we use our brains and learn to divert the flux away from the core in a magnet driven transformer then the game is won"
I'm quite sure that's the "what" Newman was doing. he saw this differently, But did achieve his goal. we can convert thses things and use them to our advantage.
and not necessarily " flux away from the core" but rather let it influence the system in a positive way.
for Newman he needed to apply a source of "motivation" to get the result he needed. and i can see that being the case in most systems. a feed back loop of sorts...
welcome back :)
Hope you had a good break from the forums. I know we all need that some times :). We got to sit and think about things for our self's for a while!
~Russ
My wave was like this, the diode should have chopped out the lower 180 degrees and filled in the gaps on the top 180 degrees causing a dc bias but it never did.
Cycle, just once in a while it helps to read words from your own brain instead of being the forum's serial cut and paste[r] of Wiki and other sites. I've noticed that you do that quite often to either discredit an idea or bolster a disagreement. So although I agree that the site must keep with reality, I also acknowledge that mainstream science is sometimes an obstacle (but not always) in what we try to achieve on forums like this so it doesn't help to cut and paste huge chunks of wiki info in your rhetoric.
Another thing, using theoretical physics to discredit any thesis is akin to asking Peter Pan if he ever met Alice in wonderland. Theoretical is purely theoretical so be careful where you go with that.
You do the same... where do you suppose you got the story about Dan Crain and the wholly-fabricated "Ganesh particle"... did it just appear to you in a dream? No, you got it from the internet.
The difference between you and me is that I vet any claims before I agree with them. So you're being hypocritical.
Cycle
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1637, on May 30th, 2018, 08:59 PM »Last edited on May 30th, 2018, 09:27 PM by Cycle
Hi Russ, good to be back and have a chat. I've dismantled my Meyer research completely, I lost both my mum and dad in a short space of time which didn't help matters but I couldn't overcome an obstacle too. The obstacle was a strange one, I managed to send over 30kv into my cell at 200mA and I had perfect resonance between the cell and the chokes on the scope but no gas and it totally baffled me. I then realised that the resonance was actually an AC signal and produced a sign wave rather than the top half of a sign wave. So the top half of the signal was step charging like on Stan's schematics but the lower half of the signal was also step charging the opposite polarity and cancelling it out. I could not and still do not understand how it bypassed my diode to do this, the diode should have chopped the lower half of the signal off and allowed a DC bias on the cell but it didn't. I tried four different types of fast switching diodes but I still got an AC sign wave at the cell, I even placed another diode between the positive choke and the cell to chop the sign wave in two but it bypassed that too and still produced a self cancelling sign wave. 30kv AC wave form step charging and unstep charging a cell simultaneously. So close and fell at the last hurdle, couldn't figure it out so that was that.
Or you simply may be exceeding the PIV or VRRM of the diode... in which case try a string of diodes in series.
Or your frequency could be exceeding the Trr of the diode, in which case you need a faster diode. Try a lower frequency... if the downstream AC signal vanishes, that's the problem.
A last but not very likely possibility is if you've got your VIC wound wrong and the second voltage pulse off the VIC is reversed in polarity. In this case, your diode is likely working fine.
The diodes were as specified in Stan's schematics, I did try diodes in series and an whole bunch in parallel to divide the voltage to make sure I didn't exceed the breakdown voltage but to no avail. The low amps high voltage scenario was there, so was the resonance between the chokes and the cell but the dc bias failed to materialize. I even took the cell away and got the chokes resonant with a massive capacitor and I showed this in a video I made, I also made a video of the system powering a fluorescent tube with only one wire attached which indicated to me that I had stray RF somewhere and if you have RF then there is a possibility that the resonance between the chokes and the cell may be bypassing the diodes by radiating on the system wires, that is my strongest suspicion btw.
nav
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1639, on May 31st, 2018, 01:56 PM »Last edited on May 31st, 2018, 01:59 PM
Technically speaking, some of Stan's designs are akin to an AM transmission terminated into a wave guide and it is no secret that Stan used the term resonant cavity which he borrowed from Microwave resonators such as radar. Ronnie talks about this across his threads. However, some things don't add up: firstly microwave resonators have a very short wavelength which allows RF and magnetic fields to bounce around wave guides of reasonable size i.e a couple of feet in length and 12 inches wide. The higher you go up in frequency then the smaller wave guide is required. According to Stan, he was using frequencies up to 20Khz and the wavelength of such a signal is massive, 1000's of feet long. There is no way such a signal could be bounced around a set of tubes which are 14 inches long, it's impossible. So either Stan was lying and using microwave frequencies or his wave guide/resonant cavity theory was flawed. It is interesting though that water gets a bit exited when you stick it in a microwave oven and fire 2.2 - 2.4 gigs at it, tends to get exited and warmish, is this a coincidence? I think not, I think Stan was using Gigahertz not Kilohertz. Another interesting fact about frequencies in the very high gigs, certain high frequencies if aimed through a wave guide at concrete have a very powerful effect on the moisture content of the concrete, apparently it super-heats the trapped water molecules so violently that it creates super-heated steam at very high pressure and the concrete explodes violently. Weird stuff.
~Russ
Russ, shouldn't that be:
"JWN 19 / TSFA 22: Understanding Capacitance In a Bifilar Coil. Measuring Xc, Xl, Z, Phase Shift."
JWN 18 was "Testing a different coil".
"JWN 19 / TSFA 22: Understanding Capacitance In a Bifilar Coil. Measuring Xc, Xl, Z, Phase Shift."
JWN 18 was "Testing a different coil".
Thanks cycle, yes indeed, and i fixed it.
~Russ
~Russ
namirha
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1645, on June 8th, 2018, 02:50 AM »Last edited on June 8th, 2018, 04:26 AM
There is any number of equations used to describe electric current. But there is one simple equation that
is seldom to be found in any Academic textbook or Peer-reviewed journal article. Yet what I’ve named "The
Forbidden Equation", i = qc, is nothing more or less than the defining equation of electric current, with i the
electric current, q the net line charge per unit length, and c the speed of light. It is apparent why this equation is
buried so deeply as to be unheard of- it destroys the idea of electric current, and all that descends from that idea,
by its very definition. There have been a few recent sightings of The Forbidden Equation, all curiously enough
in papers addressing The Catt Question.
For each rotation through 360°, long wavelength, low frequency radiation would therefore describe a wider (greater radius) and thus longer (slower angular acceleration) spiral path than short-wave, high frequency radiation.
In view of this the absolute speed of light as it travels forwards along a given axial path over this same distance is NOT CONSTANT, but as stated above is the varying product of the reciprocities of spiral radius r x angular acceleration rw2.
page 24
Living Energies
http://www.bearcy.no/9/6viktor.pdf
page 60
In this context we could usefully reexamine the Hasenohrl-Einstein equation (E= mc2) in connection with other energy determining equations. While their general premises apply to mechanical systems, there is some doubt as to their relevance to living systems. As presently interpreted E = mc2 requires that the amount or energy in the Universe to be finite and assumes the speed of light to be constant. Here, however, we are reminded of Walter Schauberger's contention that the absolute speed of light is not constant (p.24), but dependent on the frequencyrelated radius of its spiral path; the smaller the radius of rotation (frequency of periodicity), the greater the velocity and intrinsic energy of the radiation (light) and vice versa. Such a nonconstancy in the speed of light - as a factor in quantifying energy or mass - would seemingly negate the doctrine of universally finite energy and the conservation of energy law.
...
But when intrinsically the same energy equation is applied to technical energetic processes and purposes, the amount of useful energy is apparently halved. From textbooks we learn that energy is indestructible, but merely changes form, this reduction being attributable to the encounter with a resistance of some kind (deceleration) or through the conversion of energy into heat, or both. In consideration of what has been stated above, and, Walter Schauberger's reinterpretation of C2, perhaps the real reason for this loss is the exploitation of wasteful axialradial, centrifugal motion. In contrast, radialaxial dynamics operate according to the law of the anti-conservation of energy mentioned in chapter 1, wherein friction - and therefore heat - constantly reduces and velocity increases automatically, because the type of motion is in conformity with natural energetic (spiritual) law and not the mundane, physical laws of mechanics.
Can you explicit what you call a 'bifilar coil' ?
I know what is the Tesla bifilar -pancake - coil , but I wonder for yours: is that two strands gathered in one ?
I know what is the Tesla bifilar -pancake - coil , but I wonder for yours: is that two strands gathered in one ?
Hi piero, did you see the video here:
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=3128.msg49712#msg49712
But for further details, a bifilar coil is 2 wires in parallel wraped on the same coil.
And there could be even more in parallel still considerd "bifilar" or Xfilar.
Now for me the connection is inportant.
You can connect alot of thses wires in different configurations as well.
Basically the goal is to create more capatance in the coil be having wires conected so that there potential difference is high next to each other.
~Russ
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=3128.msg49712#msg49712
But for further details, a bifilar coil is 2 wires in parallel wraped on the same coil.
And there could be even more in parallel still considerd "bifilar" or Xfilar.
Now for me the connection is inportant.
You can connect alot of thses wires in different configurations as well.
Basically the goal is to create more capatance in the coil be having wires conected so that there potential difference is high next to each other.
~Russ
Matt Watts
Parametric Reactance
« Reply #1648, on June 9th, 2018, 01:34 AM »Last edited on June 9th, 2018, 02:58 AM
Never stop learning...
Piero
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1649, on June 9th, 2018, 01:56 AM »Last edited on June 10th, 2018, 01:39 PM
Hi piero, did you see the video here:
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=3128.msg49712#msg49712
But for further details, a bifilar coil is 2 wires in parallel wraped on the same coil.
Basically the goal is to create more capatance in the coil be having wires conected so that there potential difference is high next to each other.