https://youtu.be/S3BbB1t1NoA

At 9:45 of the video, the description of the LENR "trigger”. STOPING the LENR reaction releases LENR energy from the EMF event horizon. An active LENR reaction will not "actualize" the energy that the reaction is producing. We will see transmuted elements but the energy produced by that process will not be actualized.

At 11:34 in the video, the role of magnetic fields in LENR. A strong magnetic field dampens the reaction since such a field will destroy the superconductive conditions that the LENR reaction thrives on. It might not kill the LENR reaction but the magnetic field might wound it.

Also the application of optical energy from a laser will produce more polaritons and therefore increase the strength of the LENR reaction.

The polariton is a plasmonic based quasiparticle that loves to socialize. They are the quintessential party animal. If any polaritons are produced inside a LENR reactor, they will automatically find each other and begin an entangled get together.

This predisposition to produce a global condensate over the entire extent of the reactors surface structure is where all the EMF power comes from. This concentration of EMF power is known as super-radiance.

super-radiance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superradiance

Quote

In quantum optics, superradiance is a phenomenon that occurs when a group of N emitters, such as excited atoms, interact with a common light field. If the wavelength of the light is much greater than the separation of the emitters, then the emitters interact with the light in a collective and coherent fashion. This causes the group to emit light as a high intensity pulse (with rate ∝ N2). This is a surprising result, drastically different from the expected exponential decay (with rate ∝ N) of a group of independent atoms (see spontaneous emission). Superradiance has since been demonstrated in a wide variety of physical and chemical systems, such as quantum dot arrays and J-aggregates. The effect has recently been used to produce a superradiant laser.

If we can pump EMF into a sub-straight such as a Mizuno micro mesh that is optimized to form plasmons and their bosonic progeny: polaritons, that sub-straight will sooner or later give rise to an EMF event horizon as untold billions of polaritons join the Bose condensate. A global polariton condensate will develop on the surface of the mesh that will generate a LENR active superradiant EMF event horizon.

In my opinion, the distinctions between HHO, Brown's gas, and Ohmasa gas is the percent concetration of LENR active agent per unit volume that is contained in the gas. The production of Brown's gas is marked by the application of complex wave forms in the voltages that produce the gas in electrolysis. This voltage produces the LENR active agent in the electrolyte.

Ohmasa gas does not use these complex wave forms in the voltage that produces the gas. It just simply uses raw cavitation to produce the active LENR agent.

The way that these various gases perform is a function of the concentration of the LENR active agent that the particular gas supports per init volume of gas.

As this percent concentration of the LENR active agent increases, the nature of the way the gas performs may evolved into an even higher state of reactivity.

For example, if both the the application of a complex wave forms in the voltages that produce the gas in electrolysis and a independent application of cavitation are concurrently used, the gas that is produced may show more bizarre and reactive behaviors distinct from both brown's gas and Ohmasa gas.

This is why I would like to see if the application of intense cavitation that is generated by a high powered cavitation device or even many such devices as used in the ECCO LENR reactor's fuel preparation process might produce an exceptionally reactive LENR based gas.

If the issue in behavior of the Ohmasa gas is a result of the increased concentration of the LENR active agent in the gas, then if the rate of gas produced by electrolysis is reduced by reducing the applied current, then a reduced amount of gas per volume of LENR active agent would result. This method of agent concentration by reduced gas production might also result in an increased concentration of the LENR active agent per volume of gas produced.

One of the formats that energy production in the LENR reaction can assume is shock wave generation. The Papp engine produced a huge amount of energy inside the combustion chambers of its paired cylinders but no heat. The first Papp engine was based on the production of a fuel cycle based on water. Only later in the mid 80's did Papp come up with a new reaction based on the explosion of noble gases. By the way, this method of LENR energy generation does not require hydrogen to operate.

The same heatless expansion through shock wave generation might be true for the combustion of all LENR reaction based gases: Ohmasa, brown's gas, etc. in the cylinder of a car engine. If you would be kind enough to ask your contacts familiar with LENR gas fueled cars if any appreciable heat output is produced, I would be interested to know.

How the details of the LENR shock wave energy production format occurs is still unknown.

Quote from Axil on July 16th, 2019, 03:50 PM

The same heatless expansion through shock wave generation might be true for the combustion of all LENR reaction based gases: Ohmasa, brown's gas, etc. in the cylinder of a car engine. If you would be kind enough to ask your contacts familiar with LENR gas fueled cars if any appreciable heat output is produced, I would be interested to know.

How the details of the LENR shock wave energy production format occurs is still unknown.

It has been my understanding, through research on this subject years ago, that HHO produced with multiple and different resonant frequencies (i.e. Boyce, Meyer, and others), produces voluminous extra heat that needs to be dealt with by either recombining the burnt fuel gasses with the incoming fuel / air charge, or water mist injection or else mixing with another fuel.  I am not 100% sure whether it is the heat or flame front speeds that are being adjusted - perhaps reducing the flame-front speed does reduce the heat as well.

The Russian autothermia reports also suggest that atmospheric air treated with a magnetic field and / or a high voltage field or arc discharge causes a burnable fuel (likely dissociation and recombination of n2) with high heat that also needs cold water mist injection.   

I do know that HHO as a boost fuel, in combination with gasoline or diesel, does indeed need to have the heat issues addressed.  I can't remember what the results were for mixing with propane or natural gas.

One other possibly related report is of the water mist spark implosion, and the HHO implosion / pressure differences without much heat.  Cannot remember who actually did those tests, but there are a few, i believe, who claim to have.

In my opinion, the distinctions between HHO, Brown's gas, and Ohmasa gas is the percent concetration of LENR active agent per unit volume that is contained in the gas. All these gases are basically the same: they  are all LENR gases. The production of Brown's gas is marked by the application of complex wave forms in the voltages that produce the gas in electrolysis. This voltage produces the LENR active agent in the electrolyte.

Ohmasa gas does not use these complex wave forms in the voltage that produces the gas. It just simply uses raw cavitation to produce the active LENR agent. Ohmasa gas can be compressed into a liquid and used as a fuel for the internal combustion engine. Bob Greenyer recently rode in this car fueled with Ohmasa gas.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVwmr7WNtNA


The way that these various gases perform is a function of the concentration of the LENR active agent that the particular gas supports per init volume of gas.



As this percent concentration of the LENR active agent increases, the nature of the way the gas performs may evolved into an even higher state of reactivity.

For example, if both the the application of a complex wave forms in the voltages that produce the gas in electrolysis and a independent application of cavitation are concurrently used, the gas that is produced may show more bizarre and reactive behaviors distinct from both brown's gas and Ohmasa gas.

This is why I would like to see if the application of intense cavitation that is generated by a high powered cavitation device or even many such devices as used in the ECCO LENR reactor's fuel preparation process might produce an exceptionally reactive LENR based gas.

A high powered cavitation device is pictured below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHI7EkyAMpw

Just place some electrolizing electrodes under that cavitation bubble steam and we may have a way of producing more powerful Ohmasa gas by other means.

This piece of equipment is expensive but two 400 watt cavitation heads at $140 a pop might do the same job.

If the issue in behavior of the Ohmasa gas is a result of the increased concentration of the LENR active agent in the gas, then if the rate of gas produced by electrolysis is reduced by reducing the applied current, then a reduced amount of gas per volume of LENR active agent would result. This method of agent concentration by reduced gas production might also result in an increased concentration of the LENR active agent per volume of gas produced.

I do now remember some experiments using an ultrasonic transducer from a humidifier as part of the water fog explosion and vaporized fuel experiments.  Part of the experiments dealt with producing a fuel vapor with different characteristics (different fuels from gasoline to water).  I remember that the issue with this seemed to be to maintain the position of the transducer or rather the liquid level consistently so that the surface of the liquid vs transducer remained in the sweet spot.  I recall efforts to float the transducer, or float valve the liquid to maintain that sweet spot.

I don't know what happened to this line of investigation (other than my own transducer developed a hole in it which altered the angle of sound and made it useless). I did not purchase another to continue the experiments.

Quote

Ohmasa gas does not use these complex wave forms in the voltage that produces the gas. It just simply uses raw cavitation to produce the active LENR agent. Ohmasa gas can be compressed into a liquid and used as a fuel for the internal combustion engine. Bob Greenyer recently rode in this car fueled with Ohmasa gas.

First, there are mechanical, audible and ultrasonic harmonics associated with Ohmasa gas generation.  These harmonics could be functioning in a similar way to the complex voltage wave forms of Boyce, Meyer, etc.  For example, in your video you posted above of Lawrence Forsley, he mentions that while loading the cell, shutting off the power briefly and then restarting it could be a trigger by  applying a double density wave-front of Deuterium.  This could also be the case with the wave-forms in voltage or mechanical / ultrasound, plasma pulses, thermal pulses, and EMF etc. pushing the Deuterium or other actors closer together in a semi-coherent fashion.

Second, Ohmasa gas vehicle was using 50% Ohmasa gas and 50% propane.  I don't think it has been run on 100% but I could be mistaken.  I do know Bob Boyce ran his racing boats on 100% HHO (or Hydroxy as he terms it) on demand, and I believe Stan Meyer ran his dune buggy on 100% HHO in an on demand system as well.  In Bob's boats, he had ample cold water to cool the engine (from the lake or river), so there was no heat problem that his setup could not cope with.  One would have to read through Stan's information, and watch the videos again to see if there was a mention of any extra heat or special modifications made for 100% HHO gas operation. I think Fast Freddy ran his truck on 100% HHO, but I don't have any other info about him or his setup.  There have been several who have just idled their vehicles on 100% HHO but I doubt that it counts for what you are asking.

The vortex heat exchanger folks (Geet or Pantone tech.) routinely run their systems with heat generation in the vortex chamber hot enough to blue stainless steel and certainly hot enough to run the vortexing heat exchanger (usually black iron pipe) red and in some cases yellow hot.  I do not know if the vortexing heat exchanger action can be considered a LENR fuel or not, but I include it in case the main operating principle uses a modality that is similar to some LENR systems.

In the preparation of Ohmasa gas, the production process uses about 50 grams of heavy water per 5 litters of water. Heavy water is expensive so an inexpensive way to increase the heavy water percentage in the water used for electrolysis might be productive.

Heavy water freezes at 38.84°F. To increase the percentage of heavy water in your electrolyte, set you’re your refrigerator to some temperature under 32F. The frozen portion of the water will be enriched in heavy water.

https://youtu.be/S72N0bdaEJk

At 00:20 into the video about the preparation of Ohmasa gas, the recipe sheet shows that 50 grams of heavy water is added to 5 letters of water to enrich its heavy water content.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inItVAOSNIs

It is important to note that transmutation is occurring during the preparation of Ohmasa gas.


Features of Ohmasa Gas --

Ignition and burning is stable and quiet
Hydrogen atoms in the flame and the presence of OH radicals.
The raw gas is molecular hydrogen, atomic hydrogen in addition to oxygen, such as the presence of oxygen and deuterium.
Is safe to compress the gas mixture.
100-200 and the pressure to secure "mixed gas" state.
Even in long-term storage, "composition and energy" shows essentially no change.
Plenty of water (70 percent) even with the oil emulsion containing a possible burn completely.
Vaporizes metal tungsten in about one second.
To demonstrate the high-energy "conversion element" in the possibility of a lot of attention is the creation of new industry expectations

http://www.jmcchina.org/html/2019/1/20190101.htm

The Detection of K-Ca Transmutation in the Mixture of K and Hydride Chemicals

Replication of biologic transmutation using a chemical reaction.

In this experiment, the productivity of the transmutation was a function of the ambient temperature of the solution. The experiment that was run at 75C produced the most transmutation. Note that there was no report of a heating effect or other energy release that accompanied the transmutation.

The thing that makes biological transmutation work for organisms is the fact that LENR does not produce any energy or particle radiation to harm the organism. This fact is totally in opposition to the entire LENR meme and that makes biological transmutation  an idea that cannot be accepted by those who are interested in LENR due to the decades old assumptions and traditions handed down to us through word of mouth by the cold fusion old guard. This tradition flies in the face of experimental results and the benign, gentle, and inherently safe nature of the LENR reaction.

LENR has two separate channels of activity, energy production and transmutation. Energy production in LENR has nothing to do with transmutation. This concept is incomprehensible to LENR followers.  LENR shields the transmutation process from influencing the world of our reality. The only thing that LENR produces is a stabilized product of the transmutation process.

In LENR, energy production comes with some rare exceptions from the extraction of vacuum energy. But this energy is not realized until the LENR reaction is terminated. So organisms can turn energy production off if the organism keeps the LENR reaction active. Energy and harmful radiation from the LENR reaction is not realized when the reaction is active.

The polariton condensate produces x-waves which are a form of superluminal  light.

Quote

https://www.nature.com/articles/lsa2017119

Superluminal X-waves in a polariton quantum fluid

The  polariton condensate also forms a supersolid which means that the polaritons fall into a hexagon lattice.

Bob Greenyer has shown us a dark gray blob that has a hexagon lattice that we can see through its surface. This lattice is a sure marker to identify that that the blob was a polariton condensate.

Quote

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017IJMPC..2850043E

Dynamics of supersolid crystals in microcavity polariton condensates

Abstract

The possible existence of quantum crystals phase of polariton condensate in two-dimensional microcavity polariton was studied by using mean-field method for bosons at zero temperature. In this study, we observe the supersolid crystallized (hexagonal, square) and a quantized winding number of the phase in a regime of strong- field interaction in rotating exciton-polariton condensates. First, the ground state of the condensate was found; and the solution was further extended for dynamics state to reach the equilibrium steady-state as well as their density profile and energy diagrams. The supersolid crystal is the result of the considerable deviation induced by the interaction of polaritons of both ground and dynamic states of a dressed dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate. Here, the researchers demonstrated the formation of a hexagonal lattice in the nonlinear regime at high polariton-density where polariton-polariton interactions dominate the behavior of the system. It was identified that stability regimes for ground state increases as the polariton-polariton interaction strength increases. The phase diagram for the stable vortex state will be useful for conducting experimental and theoretical studies on rotating dipolar quantum gases and many other exotic systems.

This blob was sitting still. So I deduce that the polariton condensate is a particle that has some part of its internal structure that is Superluminal but the particle itself can behave like a normal sub light speed particle.



Bob has superimposed a section of strange radiation track where the track corresponds to a boundary of a hexagonal lattice cell which most likely has etched the pattern of the track as the blob rolled along.

https://coldfusionnow.org/cold-fusion-reactor-heats-room-in-sapporo/

Mizuno reactor replication.

Quote

Modifications to the cold fusion energy reactor designed by Tadahiko Mizuno have dramatically increased excess heat production. Thermal power output of the cell is now able to exceed the air-flow calorimeter’s heat removal capacity of 1 kilowatt.

Slobodan Stankovic presented his novel work to determine the temperature of HHO gas at ICCF-20 in Sendai

https://youtu.be/fQV_9n3x9NE

https://youtu.be/3fsUrBlVjjg

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Slobodan_Stankovic/publication/281971041_Measurements_of_temperature_and_electron_density_of_oxyhydrogen_HHO_flame/links/560016c508ae07629e5283f0/Measurements-of-temperature-and-electron-density-of-oxyhydrogen-HHO-flame.pdf



Browns Gas: What Exactly is It?

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:F3llUrNrBN8J:https://www.scribd.com/document/24189045/Browns-Gas-What-Exactly-is-It+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

The thing that makes biological transmutation work for organisms is the fact that LENR does not produce any energy or particle radiation to harm the organism when the LENR reaction is active. This fact is totally in opposition to the entire LENR meme and that makes biological transmutation  an idea that cannot be accepted by those who are interested in LENR due to the decades old assumptions and traditions handed down to us through word of mouth by the cold fusion old guard. This nuclear energy based tradition flies in the face of experimental results and the benign, gentle, and inherently safe nature of the LENR reaction.

LENR has two separate channels of activity, energy production and transmutation. Energy production in LENR has nothing to do with transmutation. This concept is incomprehensible to LENR followers.  LENR shields the transmutation process from influencing the world of our reality. The only thing that LENR produces is a stabilized product of the transmutation process.

In LENR, energy production comes with some rare exceptions from the extraction of vacuum energy. But this energy is not realized until the LENR reaction is terminated. So organisms can turn energy production off if the organism keeps the LENR reaction active. Energy and harmful radiation from the LENR reaction is not realized when the reaction is active.

As a rule, transmuted matter and any associated residual stored energy if any is released from the LENR reaction when the reaction terminates.

When the LENR reaction terminates, the transmuted elements are realized throughout the colony of bacteria or cell in a higher organism. This is the results of super-absorption of matter and energy where all the cells in the colony share equally in both the transmuted matter and the associated residual energy released by the termination of the LENR reaction. Using the property of global entanglement, these transmuted elements can now be shared equally throughout  the colony

https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms5705

Superabsorption of light via quantum engineering

Quote

https://physics.aps.org/articles/v12/88

Focus: Light Seems to Pull Electrons Backward


Light hitting a metal surface at an angle sends the electrons moving in the direction opposite to the light, a result that puzzles theorists.

The interaction of light with electrons will produce polaritons. Polaritons have negative mass. The light gives electrons negative mass so they move in the negative direction from the force imparted on them by the light.

But when the light interacts with air which is mostly nitrogen, polaritons are not formed and the light imposes a force in which the electrons move in the direction positive to the force imparted by the light.

How negative mass reacts to an applied force:



There is a lessen here to be learned by LENR engineering in general and more specifically for the Mizuno replicators. Air is a LENR poison. Polaritons on a metal surface will not form when exposed to nitrogen.

Freedom from surface contamination on a LENR active metal surface must be perfect for the LENR reaction to occur. Any poison on that LENR surface will destroy the plasmonic reaction that brings forth polaritons.

There is another lesson to be drawn here.

Rossi loads his reactor with fuel. That fuel has polaritons based EVOs pre-formed on the surfaces of the fuel particles.

This is the difference between a LENR reaction in with EVOs form in parallel with the LENR as it begins and a reaction when the EVOs are produced and seeded before the reaction begins.

Rossi can pre-load fuel into his reactor in the presence of air before reactor initiation with no ill effects to the LENR reaction, whereas Mizuno must completely purge his reactor of air before reaction startup.

Deneum a LENR based development company in Europe who os in the process of replicating the Mizuno R20 experiment following instructions and protocols provided in the recent Mizuno/Rothwell paper.

We can see from this video of their reactor build that they are being very thorough in trying to follow with exactness the steps spelled out in the Mizuno paper, even purchasing the same Japanese detergent brand that Mizuno used.

They say there will be more videos to come.

The next video(s) will feature the main experiment, no matter the positive result (excess heat) is achieved or not.

Deneum is starting their validation run today. The speed in which their validation run was setup shows that they  are devoting full time to the effort. Interesting weeks ahead.

https://youtu.be/TWZ-uXQTF_s

The Mizuno replication is not working...did they do something wrong?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=51&v=OKRt3fa4lfU

A new paper has been posted on the LENR-CANR website by Tadihiko Mizuno and Jed Rothwell, titled: “Supplemental Information on Increased ExcessHeat from Palladium Deposited on Nickel”, available here:

https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTsupplement.pdf

It is meant to be a supplement to their earlier paper, “Increased Excess Heat from Palladium Deposited on Nickel” published here:

https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTincreasede.pdf

The document gives some safety warnings about the hazards of working with nickel, and the need for taking proper safety precautions if replications are attempted. It also includes the Q&A with Mizuno first published on June 25, 2019.

There is also this comment about tap water:

“Tap Water may Play a Role Some people suspect the tap water in Sapporo may make a difference. They are investigating this. There is a detailed description of this water in Japanese which you can Google translate. It is here:

https://www.city.sapporo.jp/suido/overview/suiPoou/result/documents/suiPoosukekkah31-04.pdf

There are more instructions about cleaning the nickel mesh, and some instructions that have been sent to persons who have received mesh prepared by Mizuno himself. There is a temperature distribution study which shows temperatures recorded on the surface of a reactor.

A post from MFMP as follows:

On May 21st 2005 at the MIT Cold Fusion conference, Ken Shoulders presented this

https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Fopen%3Fid%3D1XlUPzdGjZX2eHHYTrFVbtOv9m5Mp4WXu%3AatMc_rM_yBCym9MvcGU09vtCHRU&cuid=2168707

I wish we had access to what he said alongside the slides, perhaps someone recorded it? He talks about Adamenko's radiation remediation tests, something of high personal value to me at the moment (Adamenko did 100 experiments by neutron activation of Co and Ag followed by controlled discharge producing radiation remediation immediately and repeatedly, VERY detailed description in Adamenko's book).

In this paper, shoulders states that EXCESS HEAT will be DESTRUCTIVE, however, electrical production can be achieved without destruction of device. In my understanding, based on observation driven insight, I agree.

He also said that Hutchison effect, Sono Fusion, Cold Fusion etc all show signs of EVOs - I agree, I am amazed to have, last Friday, seen so much evidence of EVOs on LION1 and LION2 tube furnace quartz sheath - and these were 'outside' the reactor, not affected chemically by copper in any way, clearly showing that these structures are progressively destroying the reactor, with some held in place, it would appear, by the electric and magnetic fields of the heater coil. This latter observation is the key to controlling this to make it useful, in the case of Shoulders, he used a penning trap.

https://youtu.be/GPWf0JKoipQ

https://youtu.be/sNHb0_9EmfM

https://youtu.be/p-Zo4h2I6NI



Look at the high resolution images downloadable from the video descriptions.



https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oTmM4v49ccH06WI_PBvV4xIa4lqsoVOP/view



-------------------------------------------

My take about what is going on in these videos as follows (The Dense Higgs Field LENR theory):

An electron is comprised of a set of quantum properties. These properties direct the behavior of the electron. Unlike free electrons in a vacuum, these quantum properties can be isolated from other quantum properties when the electron is part of a solid.

The coming thing in condensed matter physics and quantum engineering is the ability in general to select these quantum properties of both fermions (electrons) and/or bosons (photons) that are useful and discard the others.

It is now possible to build a material that hosts electron based quasiparticles that mix and match the quantum properties selected from one or more of its fundamental particle quantum properties that are useful and to ignore or restrict the other less advantageous ones. The selected quantum properties can be strengthened and protected while other properties can be ignored.

For example, condensed matter Scientists can now see their way in creating Majorana particles from electrons and photons because of their potential to store quantum information in a special computation space where quantum information is protected from the environment noise. These quasiparticles have no mass or charge and can travel at the speed of light.

What LION has done without knowing how he did it is create another quasiparticle that is composed of a pair of electron properties called isospin and hypercharge and concentrated these quantum properties into a condensate which greatly amplifies the strength of these quantum properties.

Isospin gives the electron its magnetic nature and hypercharge gives the electron its ability to make electrons spin in the right and left direction. Hypercharge also gives the electron the property of mass and its ability to interact with the weak force. It is the Higgs field property.

The EVO is comprised of two counter rotating magnetic currents of isospin and hypercharge. Let’s call the combination of isospin and hypercharge the spinon quasiparticle.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinon

The EVO does not have charge or other electron quantum properties. These properties reside in other places in a solid but the EVO can move around unaffected and unconfined by its other electron quantum properties. The EVO can extract and concentrate without limit the spinon property of the electron. The EVO can start out small but grow to just about any size as it accumulates more spinons. The spinon gives the EVO the ability to activate the weak force, to produce and broadcast magnetically greatly increased mass in fermions (quarks) that makeup protons and neutrons. This is how Holmlid can breakup protons and neutrons turn them into mesons.

Yes, LION has produced ultra-dense deuterium which will form the superconductor core of the EVO.

Electrons come it two varieties right handed electrons and left handed electrons. These electron properties are defined and produced by hypercharge. Hypercharge can change the way electrons spin. This is what gives fermions mass. When a fermion changes its spin direction, it absorbs energy and this result in their increased mass. The more Hypercharge that the fermion is exposed to, the more massive that it gets because of all the spin flipping that it is doing. When a proton is exposed to a dense hypercharge field (dense Higgs field) it will blow apart and decay into very heavy quarks. These quarks will stay deconfined until the dense Higgs field is removed. But when the dense Higgs field is removed, the deconfined quarks will get back to normal and reform new protons, neutrons and mesons which lead to the formation of new elements as in transmutation.

When the density of spinons is extreme, it forms a supersolid. The spinons arrange themselves in a lattice that takes the form of a geometric shape.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersolid

A supersolid is a spatially ordered material with superfluid properties. Superfluidity is a special quantum state of matter in which a substance flows with zero viscosity.

This is why Bob sees various geometric shapes in the scars that were produced by the EVOs. The counter rotating spinon currents produce right and left handed rotating scars in the quartz as the projecting magnetic beams disrupt matter using their dense counter rotating magnetically born Higgs fields. These beams have various geometric shaped boundaries but rotate internal to that boundary. The spinons also form and move as a superfluid.

What might have happened is that an EVO got embedded in the wire and projected its two counter rotating Higgs beams outward and circled around downward beyond the wire to the quartz surface were it was terminated when it encountered the surface of the quartz.

To end, the EVO can be a monopole when it forms and projects just a single straight on Higgs beam. The dipole scars can be matched though equal diameters sizes of the scars that these paired dipole beams produce.

 

https://youtu.be/3h3Gk4vatS8

On taking a look at part of the 10 Yen coin exposed to Ohmasa Gas in Japan, it appears that minute EVOs / Condensed plasmoids may have taken on the role of Copper Oxide mining to yield sulphur containing balls.

One of the most elusive steps in creating a LENR reactor is mastering the production of LENR fuel. Ohmasa Gas might well be a prolific carryer of the LENR active agent also known as the EVO. Ohmasa Gas is simple to make using a combination of cavitation and electrolysis to carry the EVOs in the gas. Load some Ohmasa Gas in a boron nitride tube and run some high frequency RF through the gas and there is a good chance that you will have produced a LENR reactor.

What the Holmlid reaction shows is the naked transmutation process. This naked transmutation process is not hidden from our reality by superposition caused by the coherence of the LENR causative agent. The laser pulse does not form a coherent system therefore the destruction of matter is not hidden from our reality.

In transmutation caused by the LENR reaction, muons are produced, but they are hidden by quantum mechanical superposition of the active agent. All that we see is the cold ash that remains after the transmutation process has terminated, the muons are not realized or observed in our reality.

matter annihilation energy occurs in the LENR reaction but it is hidden from our view. It happens but it is invisible. We cannot feel its results. We cannot see or fell the mesons and muons that fly off into wherever and/or whenever. They are invisible to us and have no impact in our world.

In the case of the Holmid reaction and the resulting proton decay, all the steps that occur in transmutation are realized in our reality as all the steps that occur are visible for our inspection.

Such is a concrete example and a primer of how quantum mechanics works.

But why does the laser pulse cause the reaction? Why does the laser pulse when it falls onto the surface of the Ultra Dense Hydrogen make protons fall apart?

The onset of the laser is the setting point that starts the reaction of proton decay. When the laser light hits the surface of the UDH, the decay of matter happens almost instantaneously. BUT HOW???

Holmlid's paper got bounced recently from publication by peer review because the Holmlid reaction is violating the Conservation of baryon number.

Baryon number
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon_number

Quote

The hypothetical concepts of grand unified theory (GUT) models and supersymmetry allows for the changing of a baryon into leptons and antiquarks (see B − L), thus violating the conservation of both baryon and lepton numbers. Proton decay would be an example of such a process taking place, but has never been observed.

Protons cannot decay into mesons because that would violate the Conservation of baryon number and the conservation of charge.

Quarks cannot just vanish, three quarks cannot transform into two quarks. But if quarks do, then WHY? I want to know WHY?

Holmlid's reaction is based on the production of the Higgs field on the surface of the ultra dense hydrogen when the laser hits that surface, The Higgs field is a tachyonic field but  what exactly are tachyonic fields?

Domino Valdano, PhD Theoretical Physics tells us as follows:

Quote

In Einstein's theory of special relativity, the relationship between the energy, momentum, and mass of a particle is E2=(pc)^2+(mc2)^2

It was realized early on that if you plug in a negative value for m2 into this equation, you get a combination of momentum and energy that implies the particle must always travel faster than light.  That is, v=pc2/E>c

While the equations are consistent, it was never clear whether such a particle, which would have to have imaginary mass, could make sense or exist in the real world.

In light of quantum field theory, now particles are thought of as excitations of a quantum field near the minimum of its potential energy curve.  And there are now a couple different definitions of mass.  One of the definitions of mass (sometimes called the "bare mass") is the square root of the quadratic coefficient of a quantum field in its potential energy.  In many cases, this mass can be imaginary, and so it is sometimes called a "tachyonic mass".  However, in any known physical cases where this happens (the most famous case being the Higgs boson), there is a change of coordinates one can do such that in the new coordinates, the mass is real and the physical particle travels at less than the speed of light.  The "physical mass" of a particle is the square root of the quadratic coefficient of a field at the minimum of it's potential energy curve, which is by definition always real.

If the mass-squared for some field like the Higgs is negative, what that means is that you're looking at a maximum (unstable point) of the potential energy curve rather than the minimum.  Excitations near the maximum are not actually particles.  If there is a field which has only a maximum and no minimum, then it is truly a tachyonic field (since there is no coordinate transformation you can do to make the mass real).  This signifies that there is something wrong with the theory because there is no ground state energy for the field--and hence it cannot exist in the real world.  Some people like to say that a tachyonic field represents an "instability of the vacuum".  I would go a step further and say that it represents a field which has no vacuum (ground state).

In summary, tachyons do show up in theoretical physics sometimes, but because physical particles must have a real (not an imaginary) physical mass, there are no particles in the real world which can travel faster than light.

A tachyonic field is a field that produces and instability in the vacuum. The Higgs field is the the primary component of the vacuum and it is like a large pole that is finely balanced on the sharp point of  a pin. A tachyonic field produces an instability of the vacuum like a force that disturbs the finely balanced pole that when perturbed  will cause that pole to fall to a minimum energy state.

Quote

In his lecture on string theory and m-theory Lenny Susskind says that tachyons don't really move faster than the speed of light, and only "crackpots" will tell you that. Instead it has to do with that the vacuum is unstable, and that this is the source of the tachyons. If you want to watch the whole thing you can see it here:

He starts to talk about the tachyonic field somewhere about 46:00

https://youtu.be/gCyImLu0HSI?t=2766

Click on the YouTube link to position to 46:00 into the Lenny Susskind lecture.




In summary, what Holmlid has done is create a mechanism that creates a tachyonic field (a Higgs field) that produces an instability is the vacuum that causes matter to become unstable. This mechanism is the fundamental basis behind the LENR transmutation process.

2019 Progress report from the SAFIRE project. It looks like SAFIRE will be getting into the LENR reactor business.

https://youtu.be/DTaXfbvGf8E

Keith Fredericks

http://restframe.com/mm/authors/keith-fredericks/

has presented his research on what he calls superluminal particles which are magnetic monopoles at ICCS22. I found the theory that could underpins Keith's finding in a cosmology course from MIT.

It involves the formation of a topological defect in the Higgs field. This defect forms when a new Higgs field is created and the Higgs field combines with the new Higgs field. This defect in the Higgs field forms a magnetic monopole that is huge and powerful. A particle forms that has a mass of 10^20 protons or about a microgram. This energy level produces a Higgs field defect that meets the dense Higgs field level of 10^18GeV.

According to cosmology theory, monopoles from Higgs field cooling appeared about 2 hours after the big bang. We know that this monopoles can form in the present day to support LENR transmutation.

First, the particle is a Higgs field condensate and is tachyonic. The Higgs field is a tachyonic field. This means that the monopole is not superluminal but represents a disturbance in the Higgs field.

The lecture is informative from the start and is well worth the time to view it in total. It explains how the Higgs field fits into both the standard model and the standard cosmological model. It shows the math, and then it explains the way dissimilar Higgs field interact.

For your convenience, I placed the video pointer of the lecture at 52:58 to show the Higgs field spacifics.

This area of cosmology is well developed and can be accessed for further study by googling "topological defect in the higgs field"

Transmutation in LENR is caused by the "higgs abyss" (for further study google). The Higgs mechanism distorts the function of quarks due to their mass redefinition.

In my opinion, Keith's presentation is the most significant presentation of this conference and reveals the true nature of the NAE and the science that supports it.

What is interesting about Keith Fredericks findings is that these monopoles form spontaneously from the environment as well as those being produced in LENR experiments. Keith Fredericks calls these particles cosmic background. He shows them as the agent that produce tracks (strange radiation) where matter loss occurs. 

https://youtu.be/seBwiL9InII?t=3178

In the pursuit of the development of LENR theory and the process of connecting its many dots, one needs to be a jack of all trades but in my case,  master of none. However, LENR dot connecting has recently lead me to the suspicion that the LENR reaction is seated firmly in the nature and behavior of the vacuum. Over the years, the dots have lead us to examine  particle physics, quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, black hole theory, nanoplasmonics, solid state physics, nanooptics, nuclear physics, material science, among other fields of study. Now the nature and behavior of the vacuum leads to an interest in cosmology, for in cosmology, its practitioners recognize how the vacuum is the structure upon which the universe is built.

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201907.0181/v1/download

Keith Fredericks shows experimentally that "strange radiation" is a monopole by analyzing the elliptical tracks that this particle excavates on surfaces. The particle makes matter disappear without a trace as it proceeds along it track as a form of transmutation. It is my contention that strange radiation is a topological defects in the Higgs field as defined above in the last post.

There is a new principle in development in cosmology called the “Multiple Point Principle” (MPP) that postulate the existence of topological Higgs field defects that produces the dense Higgs field (10^18 GeV...approximately 0.02 milligrams...the Planck mass). This defect will be enclosed in a micro black hole called an electromagnetic "Hedgehog"

https://www.groundai.com/project/degenerate-vacua-of-the-universe-and-what-comes-beyond-the-standard-model/2

Quote

Abstract

We present a new cosmological model of the Universe based on the two discoveries: 1. cosmological constant is very small, and 2. Nature shows a new law in physics called “Multiple Point Principle” (MPP). The MPP predicts the two degenerate vacua of the Universe with VEV
v1≈246 Gev and v2∼10^18 GeV, which provide masses of the Higgs boson and top-quark. A new cosmological model assumes the formation of two universal bubbles. The Universe at first stage of its existing is a bubble with a de-Sitter spacetime inside, having black-holes-hedgehogs as topological defects of the vacuum. Such a bubble has a “false vacuum” with VEV v2, which decays very quickly. Cooling Universe has a new phase transition, transforming the “false” vacuum to the “true” (Electroweak) vacuum. Hedgehogs confined, and the universal bubble is transformed into the bubble having spacetime with FLRW-metric and the vacuum with new topological defects of U(1)(el−mag) group: magnetic vortices and Sidharth’s pointlike defects. The problem of stability/metastability of the EW-vacuum is investigated. Noncommutativity of the vacua spacetime manifold is discussed. The prediction of a new physics is given by the future observations at LHC of the triplet SU(2) Higgs bosons (at energies E∼10 TeV), and/or of the new bound states 6t+6¯t formed by top-antitop quarks (at E∼1 TeV). The problem “What comes beyond the Standard Model” is discussed at the end of this paper.

The nature of the defects that form depends on the symmetries of the Higgs field itself. For example, the Higgs field may have a choice of two possible states to fall into. In this case, when regions that have taken opposite choices run up against each other, the boundary is marked by a structure called a domain wall, in which the Higgs field is obliged to pass through zero, creating a localized region where the vacuum state is one of unbroken symmetry .The domain wall is a microscopically narrow region trapping what physicists call a false vacuum, as distinct from the true vacuum on either side. The false vacuum ought not to exist, but does so because the geometry of the Higgs field does not allow it to disperse.The polariton condensate as a condensate of hyper-change causes the Higgs field to form this false vacuum state as a perturbation.

Why did Ken Shoulders name the EVO an exotic vacuum object...because that is exactly what it is.

The LHC found that the Higgs field (aka vacuum) is set on the finest of points. 

Calculations show that if the mass of the Higgs boson were just a few times heavier and everything else stayed the same, protons could no longer assemble into atoms, and there would be no complex structures—no stars or living beings. So, what if our universe really is as accidentally fine-tuned as a pencil balanced on its tip, singled out as our cosmic address from an inconceivably vast array of bubble universes inside an eternally frothing “multiverse” sea simply because life requires such an outrageous accident to exist?

The Higgs field is set exactly on its tipping point, just like if water was set at its triple point







If the strength of the Higgs field is increased or decreased by the slightest amount then there would be a change of state that would occur in the vacuum. For example, if water is moved off its triple point in the slightest way, it would begin to transform into a vapor, or a liquid, or ice.

In like manner to what happens in a change in state of water, If the strength of the vacuum changes in the slightest, then atoms would not exist, neither would electrons or protons; all matter would resolve down to pure energy.

There are processes that exist in nature in electromagnetic and particle interactions and in chemistry that create a tightly confined bubble of the Higgs field whose strength is different from that finely tuned value that keeps our universe from falling apart. This is what an EVO is, a rouge perturbative bubble of the vacuum.

The EVO can begin its existence as an nanoscopic object, but its effect on matter is still potent. As it grows in size into the microscopic, its vacuum state may change, but its effect on matter remains the same, when the EVO reaches a macroscopic size, its effects on matter remain constant throughout its lifecycle. What matters is that the vacuum state confined inside the EVO is different than the value of the vacuum throughout the rest of the universe.

Whatever matter that this bubble of the vacuum contacts will dissociate and dissolve into energy. When the true Higgs field is restored, then matter will assemble into its usual state of protons, electrons, and atoms just like this formation of matter happened soon after the big bang occured when the Higgs field weakened and assumed its current strength.

This is how and why transmutation occurs in LENR...matter to energy and then back to matter.

Inside that EVO with its own vacuum state, there exists another universe where life and matter cannot survive. Does space-time even exist inside the EVO? Where does matter go when it comes in contact with the EVO? Can energy leak out of the EVO? Who will run the experiments to answer these questions?