here i will post information that makes logical scene...

Also the difference where linear and nonlinear systems.

In the attached photos is an article that I find one of the most logical things I have seen in a long time.

The key concepts i see are that:

A. Power and energy... Need to be very well understood. ( defined)

"Energy is measured in joules as a finite quantity with no respect to time

Power is measured in joules per second with respect to time"

B. More Than 1HP of work can be done with 745.69W when the system is set up to use its full potential.

C. the ENERGY will eventually die out in the system. ( unless we include some kind of other means for ambient energy to enter the system, such as what Newman could have been doing with his extreme voltages)

D. Power conversion from electrical to heat is not 100% we are missing up to 50% of the ENERGY to POWER conversion in electrical to heat.

E. This is not Frequency Resonance (for me this seems to be the standard LC resonance we think about a specific frequency) but instead this is ENERGY resonance. ( again for me this seems to be something like instead of using the 1/4 wave resonance, we will use ALL the Harmonics as well... in this way we are using ALL ENERGY resonance. )

F. Energy can be moved around and do work (power) with only losses from resistance and the like.

G. The difference where in where linear and nonlinear systems do not compute the same when we define Energy and Power correctly.

H. The fact that Maxwell's equations do not include the fluid dynamic properties of inertia for the electrical system? ( not 100% sure about this but i believe it to be true)

I. EMF and CounterEMF will cancel out each other,(CEMF, this is not the same as Back EMF) and in doing so, real POWER can be delivered to the load while the Supply will not see this load due to the cancellation. ( reactive power, or better yet REACTIVE WATTS) ( one must changing the frame of reference between the supply and the load. In this case in a Nonlinear time variance scenario ) ( delay line motor)

J. Newtons third law dose not apply in all systems. ( In this case electrical system.) such as "Current X the rate of change of inductance = Negative resistance." ( This one needs more study, but i have heard quite a few high level people say this, in the attached article they speak about this. here is some more info. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93de_Haas_effect )

H. The diffrence between EMF and Voltage. There not one in the same . (EMF is the force that pushes current. Voltage develops from the charge that cant get through the impedance. No impedance then no voltage...?)

So using the magnetic feild of a shorted coil to drive the other coil magnetically.

( I'm sure i have more i forgot... )

http://www.gestaltreality.com/energy-synthesis/jim-murray-dynaflux-serps/

https://youtu.be/xNeLgqrXJiw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK3JOlY0V8Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhaAxQjyeC0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-chHnLyHVF8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5LsrMPS_KM

just to name a few...

Related to E:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyODF8FWs_8

https://www.murata.com/products/emc/emifil/knowhow/basic/chapter02-p3

((3) Waveform of duty 50% has strong odd harmonics)

think about reflecting waves and harmonics and how one could use all those waves to AMPLIFY energy with in a system.

ok, well more to think about.

However i can see how moving energy around in a system like Newman's could result in a similar principal to what Murray is describing.

Newman was a nonlinear system... and the things he was doing resemble the same thoughts and principles. but getting there was different.

~Russ

Also the difference where linear and nonlinear systems.

In the attached photos is an article that I find one of the most logical things I have seen in a long time.

The key concepts i see are that:

A. Power and energy... Need to be very well understood. ( defined)

"Energy is measured in joules as a finite quantity with no respect to time

Power is measured in joules per second with respect to time"

B. More Than 1HP of work can be done with 745.69W when the system is set up to use its full potential.

C. the ENERGY will eventually die out in the system. ( unless we include some kind of other means for ambient energy to enter the system, such as what Newman could have been doing with his extreme voltages)

D. Power conversion from electrical to heat is not 100% we are missing up to 50% of the ENERGY to POWER conversion in electrical to heat.

E. This is not Frequency Resonance (for me this seems to be the standard LC resonance we think about a specific frequency) but instead this is ENERGY resonance. ( again for me this seems to be something like instead of using the 1/4 wave resonance, we will use ALL the Harmonics as well... in this way we are using ALL ENERGY resonance. )

F. Energy can be moved around and do work (power) with only losses from resistance and the like.

G. The difference where in where linear and nonlinear systems do not compute the same when we define Energy and Power correctly.

H. The fact that Maxwell's equations do not include the fluid dynamic properties of inertia for the electrical system? ( not 100% sure about this but i believe it to be true)

I. EMF and CounterEMF will cancel out each other,(CEMF, this is not the same as Back EMF) and in doing so, real POWER can be delivered to the load while the Supply will not see this load due to the cancellation. ( reactive power, or better yet REACTIVE WATTS) ( one must changing the frame of reference between the supply and the load. In this case in a Nonlinear time variance scenario ) ( delay line motor)

J. Newtons third law dose not apply in all systems. ( In this case electrical system.) such as "Current X the rate of change of inductance = Negative resistance." ( This one needs more study, but i have heard quite a few high level people say this, in the attached article they speak about this. here is some more info. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93de_Haas_effect )

H. The diffrence between EMF and Voltage. There not one in the same . (EMF is the force that pushes current. Voltage develops from the charge that cant get through the impedance. No impedance then no voltage...?)

So using the magnetic feild of a shorted coil to drive the other coil magnetically.

( I'm sure i have more i forgot... )

http://www.gestaltreality.com/energy-synthesis/jim-murray-dynaflux-serps/

https://youtu.be/xNeLgqrXJiw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK3JOlY0V8Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhaAxQjyeC0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-chHnLyHVF8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5LsrMPS_KM

just to name a few...

Related to E:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyODF8FWs_8

https://www.murata.com/products/emc/emifil/knowhow/basic/chapter02-p3

((3) Waveform of duty 50% has strong odd harmonics)

think about reflecting waves and harmonics and how one could use all those waves to AMPLIFY energy with in a system.

ok, well more to think about.

However i can see how moving energy around in a system like Newman's could result in a similar principal to what Murray is describing.

Newman was a nonlinear system... and the things he was doing resemble the same thoughts and principles. but getting there was different.

~Russ