WFC in action

Mechanic

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #75, on December 4th, 2013, 03:11 AM »
Hi Lynx,
Did you get and watch the video...??


freethisone!!!,

What a great honor to have you vissit my treat!!!!

Sorry! I did not understand much of what you said.....should I start a new tread to explain what Stanley did and exactly how to do it??

Thanks.....Blessings


Mechanic

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #77, on December 4th, 2013, 07:01 AM »
Thanks for the great replies.......

Here is a link to where all the information will be sorted and where we will start to set out the WFC in its most basic form: http://open-source-energy.org/?tid=1575

Thanks, Blessings.......

Mechanic

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #78, on December 5th, 2013, 03:29 AM »Last edited on December 5th, 2013, 12:20 PM by Lynx
Can someone please confirm this drawing on a occiloscope: [attachment=4771]

Thanks

Mechanic

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #79, on December 5th, 2013, 05:06 AM »
Lynx,
I'm talking from my blackberry 8520....when trying to up load a photo to my attachments it uploads and shows "space used" for attachments but when I go to "manage attachments" the photo is not there....I do not get a "save" option after I add the attachment...?? What am I missing??

Lynx

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #80, on December 5th, 2013, 06:18 AM »
Quote from Mechanic on December 5th, 2013, 05:06 AM
Lynx,
I'm talking from my blackberry 8520....when trying to up load a photo to my attachments it uploads and shows "space used" for attachments but when I go to "manage attachments" the photo is not there....I do not get a "save" option after I add the attachment...?? What am I missing??
If you upload the image to your "standard" image hosting site and PM me the link to it I'll do the rest for you

Mechanic

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #81, on December 5th, 2013, 07:57 AM »Last edited on December 5th, 2013, 08:29 AM by Mechanic
Quote from Lynx on December 5th, 2013, 06:18 AM
Quote from Mechanic on December 5th, 2013, 05:06 AM
Lynx,
I'm talking from my blackberry 8520....when trying to up load a photo to my attachments it uploads and shows "space used" for attachments but when I go to "manage attachments" the photo is not there....I do not get a "save" option after I add the attachment...?? What am I missing??
If you upload the image to your "standard" image hosting site and PM me the link to it I'll do the rest for you
what is "standar image hosting site" ????

The upload file section on the RWG forum says page not found......I've been struggling the whole day to get this info out in the open for discussion but something seems to be blocking me.....we have to unite to get this "kiss" method to the people......we need to be freed from the one world order and their dark master......

Lynx

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #82, on December 5th, 2013, 08:54 AM »
Quote from Mechanic on December 5th, 2013, 07:57 AM
what is "standar image hosting site" ????

The upload file section on the RWG forum says page not found......I've been struggling the whole day to get this info out in the open for discussion but something seems to be blocking me.....we have to unite to get this "kiss" method to the people......we need to be freed from the one world order and their dark master......
You've got a PM

Lynx

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #83, on December 5th, 2013, 12:22 PM »
Quote from Lynx on December 5th, 2013, 08:54 AM
Quote from Mechanic on December 5th, 2013, 07:57 AM
what is "standar image hosting site" ????

The upload file section on the RWG forum says page not found......I've been struggling the whole day to get this info out in the open for discussion but something seems to be blocking me.....we have to unite to get this "kiss" method to the people......we need to be freed from the one world order and their dark master......
You've got a PM
I've updated your post to include the image you sent me, http://open-source-energy.org/?tid=321&pid=21037#pid21037

Mechanic

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #84, on December 6th, 2013, 07:44 AM »Last edited on December 6th, 2013, 07:48 AM by Mechanic
Thanks Lynx,

What do you think of the photo....does it make sense??

http://open-source-energy.org/forum/attachment.php?aid=4774

Can anybody do a test on a oscilloscope to confirm the picture?? (Its on page 4 of this tread if the link does not work)

Thanks and be Blessed for in a short time we shall have great adventures....

Lynx

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #85, on December 6th, 2013, 12:58 PM »
Quote from Mechanic on December 6th, 2013, 07:44 AM
Thanks Lynx,

What do you think of the photo....does it make sense??

http://open-source-energy.org/forum/attachment.php?aid=4774

Can anybody do a test on a oscilloscope to confirm the picture?? (Its on page 4 of this tread if the link does not work)

Thanks and be Blessed for in a short time we shall have great adventures....
I take it you're out to replicate Meyer's "rotary pulse generator"?
It would make things easier if you could provide a schematic showing the circuit from the alternator/armature to the cell, or if you could point to that very schematic you're out to replicate/create.







Thanks.


Mechanic

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #87, on December 6th, 2013, 02:56 PM »
Ok Lynx, first of all, the armature is the primary winds of the alternator and rotates in the middle of the alternator....then connects through a magnetic field to the stater which is the outer part of the alternator standing still...now as shown in the attachment, which is the drawing I drew by hand that you posted above in the link, I am still without the charging chokes and, at this stage, I'm only in stage of replicating the correct waveform, which is necessary to correctly "stress" the water molecule by unipolar waveform...(look at the drawing again, correct mark shows the unipolar wave).

To further explain the technology that is bestowed onto me, you first have to understand: through a simple prayer you will
"receive this understanding" as Stanley said....

The chokes only restricts amp flow to a certain degree and then by tuning in to the dielectric (78.54) and attenuate(slowing) the voltage amplitude to the frequency pulse, then only will the voltage rise and the amperes drop to a minimum need...

You're chokes is only important to a minimum which is it must match each other and have a equal frequency....I also suspect that the voltage applied to each individual choke won't be a factor as long as the frequency is uniform and unipolar pulses is applied to each choke.... The "K.I.S.S" (keep it simple stupid) method is what is making it so difficult to replicate.....I understand exactly what Stanley did.......but due to language barrier and limited resources in a black empowered country where white people is suppressed ..... I can not seem to make you understand how easy it is......

Lynx

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #88, on December 6th, 2013, 03:42 PM »
Ok, thanks.
Well if you check page 5 in the PDF I attached previously (http://open-source-energy.org/?tid=321&pid=21078#pid21078 ) you'll see how the full wave bridge rectifier is attached to the stator windings and the rectified DC pulses can then in turn all be connected to one and the same cell as opposed to 6 cells attached in parallel in groups of 2 as described in the PDF.
The rotor windings are then fed by your pulsing circuit and as the (alternator) rotor turns the output frequency from the stator is varied linear to the rotor speed, thus varying the stator full wave rectified unipolar pulse frequency feeding the cell(s) and the more current the cell takes the more effect is needed to keep the alternator rotating at the same speed, so you know when you've hit the sweet spot when the current to the motor driving the alternator rotor starts dropping, which in turn of course indicates a drop in amps to the cell.

Mechanic

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #89, on December 6th, 2013, 03:50 PM »
Furthermore Stanley used 2 separate waveforms.
In the GP(gas processor), WFC he used the unipolar waveform marked with the right mark in the hand drawn picture in the link....

The water heating system used the waveform marked with a X in the drawing and did exactly what "our" present cell replication is doing except for the current consumption.....it functions in almost the same way for both methods except by wave form that differs.

Please watch the discussed video and look at his hand as he imitate the oscillation of the water molecule in the explanation of the water heater technology and gives the waveform used there away, and then also again at the explanation of the fractioning of the water molecule on the video.....
This can also be seen in almost all of the drawings where the positive and negative voltages on the exciter plates is shown at an on position at exactly the same time and that is what "unipolar" means.

I hope I got through to all of my friends in this minor explanation of this technology.... If only I had a oscilloscope to measure my setup......
I know what I want and what need to be done but can't measure my builds so that we all can proceed......

Thanks.....

Matt Watts

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #90, on December 6th, 2013, 08:14 PM »Last edited on December 6th, 2013, 08:18 PM by Matt Watts
Quote from Mechanic on December 6th, 2013, 03:50 PM
If only I had a oscilloscope to measure my setup......
I know what I want and what need to be done but can't measure my builds so that we all can proceed......

Thanks.....
Very good observation Mechanic.

Say, can anyone pop for a scope similar to:
http://www.amazon.com/NEEWER-Digital-Storage-Oscilloscope-Bandwidth/dp/B00CMPOTVM/ref=pd_sim_sbs_indust_1


To help Mechanic out a bit.

Surely someone has one of these tucked away in a box someplace not being used.

Mechanic

RE: WFC in action
« Reply #91, on January 4th, 2014, 04:48 AM »
Has anyone gotten hold of the 10XA3 WFC schematic yet?? Pls share!!!! There seems to still be allot of missing documentation......

Thanks.