PROJECT ICARUS

Matt Watts

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #25, on May 20th, 2013, 06:11 AM »
Quote from geenee on May 20th, 2013, 06:03 AM
real KISS is Daniel Dingel but he didn't tell secret and secret died with him.last version of Meyer use low LPM because plasma spark plug injector and water expansion.
Which I still think may work, but first I need the engine to run well enough on HHO alone to begin slowly injecting the water mist and find the best combination.

Right now with just HHO a simple spark works just the same as a plasma spark--no difference, no additional power.  So I'm basically stuck until I can either make more HHO or get the HHO I'm making now to be more energetic.

Ray Don

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #26, on May 20th, 2013, 07:19 AM »
Quote from Dog-One on May 20th, 2013, 06:11 AM
Quote from geenee on May 20th, 2013, 06:03 AM
real KISS is Daniel Dingel but he didn't tell secret and secret died with him.last version of Meyer use low LPM because plasma spark plug injector and water expansion.
Which I still think may work, but first I need the engine to run well enough on HHO alone to begin slowly injecting the water mist and find the best combination.

Right now with just HHO a simple spark works just the same as a plasma spark--no difference, no additional power.  So I'm basically stuck until I can either make more HHO or get the HHO I'm making now to be more energetic.
some times we just need to do the work and the research
/watch?v=DYvPI8FGzY4
then research and work some more


Matt Watts

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #27, on May 20th, 2013, 08:15 AM »
Thank you for the refresher course--saw things this time I didn't notice before.  Even noticed Stan's use of ATTARCTION.  Thought that was a spelling error and noticed he did it more than once.  Maybe had something to do with his personal life.

Need to think a little more about that Gas Resonant Cavity apparatus.  I see what appears to be Tesla pancake coils top and bottom--did not notice that before at all.  In that chamber you will collect a massive amount of radiant energy; how it all transfers to the gas molecules I'm not sure of.  What I do know is therein lies the key to souping up the fuel.

pwrpro

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #28, on May 20th, 2013, 11:11 AM »
I'm seeing a lot of confusion around Stans work here...

Stan was using basic electrical attraction/repelling forces to make water into a fuel. Nothing magic going on here.

By the laws of physics charges behave in a specific way. Unlike attract and like repel.

The water molecule is polar and has thus a more positively charged side and a more negatively charged side, and if you expose it to an electric field the two sides off it will be attracted in opposite directions and pull the water molecule apart. This is The Electrical Polarization Process.

the same basically goes for the gas processor, you are ripping electrons off and thereby ionizes the gas molecule. Then the gas can be used for The Hydrogen Fracturing Process.

We need to read up on Stans work and stop having crazy theories about were the energy is coming from, coatings, magic resonance frequency's and other stuff. Stans work can be explained by common science and that was what he was trying to do!

Don't take this the wrong way, I'm just trying to show you that the explanation for Stans work lies in his patents and publications.

Ray Don

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #29, on May 20th, 2013, 11:19 AM »
Quote from pwrpro on May 20th, 2013, 11:11 AM
I'm seeing a lot of confusion around Stans work here...

Stan was using basic electrical attraction/repelling forces to make water into a fuel. Nothing magic going on here.

By the laws of physics charges behave in a specific way. Unlike attract and like repel.

The water molecule is polar and has thus a more positively charged side and a more negatively charged side, and if you expose it to an electric field the two sides off it will be attracted in opposite directions and pull the water molecule apart. This is The Electrical Polarization Process.

the same basically goes for the gas processor, you are ripping electrons off and thereby ionizes the gas molecule. Then the gas can be used for The Hydrogen Fracturing Process.

We need to read up on Stans work and stop having crazy theories about were the energy is coming from, coatings, magic resonance frequency's and other stuff. Stans work can be explained by common science and that was what he was trying to do!

Don't take this the wrong way, I'm just trying to show you that the explanation for Stans work lies in his patents and publications.
i thought i posted this?
my mistake.
/watch?v=DYvPI8FGzY4



pwrpro

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #32, on May 20th, 2013, 11:27 AM »Last edited on May 20th, 2013, 11:30 AM by pwrpro
Quote from Ray Don on May 20th, 2013, 11:19 AM
Quote from pwrpro on May 20th, 2013, 11:11 AM
I'm seeing a lot of confusion around Stans work here...

Stan was using basic electrical attraction/repelling forces to make water into a fuel. Nothing magic going on here.

By the laws of physics charges behave in a specific way. Unlike attract and like repel.

The water molecule is polar and has thus a more positively charged side and a more negatively charged side, and if you expose it to an electric field the two sides off it will be attracted in opposite directions and pull the water molecule apart. This is The Electrical Polarization Process.

the same basically goes for the gas processor, you are ripping electrons off and thereby ionizes the gas molecule. Then the gas can be used for The Hydrogen Fracturing Process.

We need to read up on Stans work and stop having crazy theories about were the energy is coming from, coatings, magic resonance frequency's and other stuff. Stans work can be explained by common science and that was what he was trying to do!

Don't take this the wrong way, I'm just trying to show you that the explanation for Stans work lies in his patents and publications.
i thought i posted this?
my mistake.
/watch?v=DYvPI8FGzY4
don't see lots of explanation there, or am I missing it. mayby i will make a video of the entire tech brief


pwrpro

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #34, on May 20th, 2013, 11:37 AM »Last edited on May 20th, 2013, 11:42 AM by pwrpro
Quote from Ray Don on May 20th, 2013, 11:32 AM
LOL
thats a good song

the electron extraction is needed. its not magic or useless.
leave it out and just keep wishing you could run an engine
the purpose of the post was not to explain entirely how to make an engine run off water, tried to show that the basic of the processes use electrical attraction forces. the electron extraction is of course required to make the gas processor work. You are doing good work max

Ray Don

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #35, on May 20th, 2013, 11:41 AM »
Quote from pwrpro on May 20th, 2013, 11:37 AM
Quote from Ray Don on May 20th, 2013, 11:32 AM
LOL
thats a good song

the electron extraction is needed. its not magic or useless.
leave it out and just keep wishing you could run an engine
the purpose of the post was not to explain entirely how to make an engine run off water, tried to show that the basic of the processes use electrical attraction forces. the electron extraction is of course required to make the gas processor work.
ok
i do like the guy with the fro tho

B+ and B- is clearly electric field.


pwrpro

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #36, on May 20th, 2013, 11:44 AM »
Quote from Ray Don on May 20th, 2013, 11:41 AM
Quote from pwrpro on May 20th, 2013, 11:37 AM
Quote from Ray Don on May 20th, 2013, 11:32 AM
LOL
thats a good song

the electron extraction is needed. its not magic or useless.
leave it out and just keep wishing you could run an engine
the purpose of the post was not to explain entirely how to make an engine run off water, tried to show that the basic of the processes use electrical attraction forces. the electron extraction is of course required to make the gas processor work.
ok
i do like the guy with the fro tho

B+ and B- is clearly electric field.
me too, its my new favorite song now

Matt Watts

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #37, on May 20th, 2013, 11:50 AM »
So now that I got everyone lightened up a bit, what do you think is the best way to test this contraption?  Think maybe just monitoring the heat coming out of a torch tip?  Tweak voltage and frequencies until you spot something, then zoom in?

Ray Don

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #38, on May 20th, 2013, 11:58 AM »
Quote from Dog-One on May 20th, 2013, 11:50 AM
So now that I got everyone lightened up a bit, what do you think is the best way to test this contraption?  Think maybe just monitoring the heat coming out of a torch tip?  Tweak voltage and frequencies until you spot something, then zoom in?
/watch?v=h6JG-yE8UTw
this is the song of life
LOL

i got a engine going together. its got all this stuff going on it. i will tune it to run on just hho, then with the gas processor. see what happens if the tuning changes, then we know something happened

firepinto

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #39, on May 20th, 2013, 01:33 PM »
I still think the electron extraction circuit can be tested on a normal car running on gasoline. A mileage improvement should show up if it is working.  The hydrocarbons still form in to water in the exaust.  The theory should still apply.
Come to think about it, has there ever been any shots of Stans daily driver car in videos?  I dare to bet he used that as a test bed for many things.

Nate

GoldBl4d3

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #40, on May 20th, 2013, 01:37 PM »Last edited on May 20th, 2013, 01:46 PM by GoldBl4d3
Quote from pwrpro on May 20th, 2013, 11:11 AM
I'm seeing a lot of confusion around Stans work here...

Stan was using basic electrical attraction/repelling forces to make water into a fuel. Nothing magic going on here.

By the laws of physics charges behave in a specific way. Unlike attract and like repel.

The water molecule is polar and has thus a more positively charged side and a more negatively charged side, and if you expose it to an electric field the two sides off it will be attracted in opposite directions and pull the water molecule apart. This is The Electrical Polarization Process.

the same basically goes for the gas processor, you are ripping electrons off and thereby ionizes the gas molecule. Then the gas can be used for The Hydrogen Fracturing Process.

We need to read up on Stans work and stop having crazy theories about were the energy is coming from, coatings, magic resonance frequency's and other stuff. Stans work can be explained by common science and that was what he was trying to do!

Don't take this the wrong way, I'm just trying to show you that the explanation for Stans work lies in his patents and publications.
Probably the most ignorant thing I have heard all day. Crazy theories, coatings, magic resonance frequency's...... if you dont understand how things actually work, please done try to come in here and say sh*t like that.

Resonance.... Materials.... Ionization.... Aperture of the 3rd dimension....

Learn about these things before you try to tell us how this is all a bunch of crazy blah. Get yourself familiar to harmonics, and the interactions of atoms and their states as well as basic quantum mechanics.

We know how the polarization process works, its been known for decades. The point of stans usage of harmonics is to break the bonds of water and hydrogen much more efficient.

Sure we can make a dry cell and hook up a massive 60v @ 40amps and get a solid 15LPM. But thats exactly the problem.

Stan had to use more than electrolysis from a - and + plate. You have to tap in to the resonance of water to get a high output.

Tesla figured this all out a long time ago, when he vibrated the hotel he was in and got close to the resonant signatures and the hotel started to shake.


Lol.... Magic Resonance Frequencies....... Learn how your cell phone works.
Quote from firepinto on May 20th, 2013, 01:33 PM
I still think the electron extraction circuit can be tested on a normal car running on gasoline. A mileage improvement should show up if it is working.  The hydrocarbons still form in to water in the exaust.  The theory should still apply.
Come to think about it, has there ever been any shots of Stans daily driver car in videos?  I dare to bet he used that as a test bed for many things.

Nate
Yes uh well actually we should be able to see a difference in output energy, not much, but measurable.

We need a compression test cylinder or somethign to test the output energy on the explosion.

Part of me making a gas processor was to do exactly that, hook it to my jeeps intake. I have to do more research though on the effects of the carbon atoms may have in this role. So we will have to see how it goes.
Quote from pwrpro on May 20th, 2013, 11:11 AM
I'm seeing a lot of confusion around Stans work here...

Stan was using basic electrical attraction/repelling forces to make water into a fuel. Nothing magic going on here.

By the laws of physics charges behave in a specific way. Unlike attract and like repel.

The water molecule is polar and has thus a more positively charged side and a more negatively charged side, and if you expose it to an electric field the two sides off it will be attracted in opposite directions and pull the water molecule apart. This is The Electrical Polarization Process.

the same basically goes for the gas processor, you are ripping electrons off and thereby ionizes the gas molecule. Then the gas can be used for The Hydrogen Fracturing Process.

We need to read up on Stans work and stop having crazy theories about were the energy is coming from, coatings, magic resonance frequency's and other stuff. Stans work can be explained by common science and that was what he was trying to do!

Don't take this the wrong way, I'm just trying to show you that the explanation for Stans work lies in his patents and publications.
I dont know why my posts arent showing up...

Okay so yea this is the dumbest thing Ive heard all day.

You need to learn about resonance and harmonics and quantum mechanics before you come in here and post about how none of that matters.

Dont take it the wrong way, but you dont understand any of it other than 2 plates one being positive and the other being negative.

Ray Don

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #41, on May 20th, 2013, 01:57 PM »Last edited on May 20th, 2013, 02:07 PM by Ray Don
back then gasoline was 85 cents a gallon. no gas boosters where needed. jobs were easy to find and gas was cheap.

there are people who say just a ozone gen will save you gas.

i think firepinto is a name that should try that.
or print me out a tube for my leds. i will put it in my truck. i get a steady 20mpg going to work every day. it has a carberator
Quote from GoldBl4d3 on May 20th, 2013, 01:37 PM
Quote from pwrpro on May 20th, 2013, 11:11 AM
I'm seeing a lot of confusion around Stans work here...

Stan was using basic electrical attraction/repelling forces to make water into a fuel. Nothing magic going on here.

By the laws of physics charges behave in a specific way. Unlike attract and like repel.

The water molecule is polar and has thus a more positively charged side and a more negatively charged side, and if you expose it to an electric field the two sides off it will be attracted in opposite directions and pull the water molecule apart. This is The Electrical Polarization Process.

the same basically goes for the gas processor, you are ripping electrons off and thereby ionizes the gas molecule. Then the gas can be used for The Hydrogen Fracturing Process.

We need to read up on Stans work and stop having crazy theories about were the energy is coming from, coatings, magic resonance frequency's and other stuff. Stans work can be explained by common science and that was what he was trying to do!

Don't take this the wrong way, I'm just trying to show you that the explanation for Stans work lies in his patents and publications.
Probably the most ignorant thing I have heard all day. Crazy theories, coatings, magic resonance frequency's...... if you dont understand how things actually work, please done try to come in here and say sh*t like that.

Resonance.... Materials.... Ionization.... Aperture of the 3rd dimension....

Learn about these things before you try to tell us how this is all a bunch of crazy blah. Get yourself familiar to harmonics, and the interactions of atoms and their states as well as basic quantum mechanics.

We know how the polarization process works, its been known for decades. The point of stans usage of harmonics is to break the bonds of water and hydrogen much more efficient.

Sure we can make a dry cell and hook up a massive 60v @ 40amps and get a solid 15LPM. But thats exactly the problem.

Stan had to use more than electrolysis from a - and + plate. You have to tap in to the resonance of water to get a high output.

Tesla figured this all out a long time ago, when he vibrated the hotel he was in and got close to the resonant signatures and the hotel started to shake.


Lol.... Magic Resonance Frequencies....... Learn how your cell phone works.
Quote from firepinto on May 20th, 2013, 01:33 PM
I still think the electron extraction circuit can be tested on a normal car running on gasoline. A mileage improvement should show up if it is working.  The hydrocarbons still form in to water in the exaust.  The theory should still apply.
Come to think about it, has there ever been any shots of Stans daily driver car in videos?  I dare to bet he used that as a test bed for many things.

Nate
Yes uh well actually we should be able to see a difference in output energy, not much, but measurable.

We need a compression test cylinder or somethign to test the output energy on the explosion.

Part of me making a gas processor was to do exactly that, hook it to my jeeps intake. I have to do more research though on the effects of the carbon atoms may have in this role. So we will have to see how it goes.
Quote from pwrpro on May 20th, 2013, 11:11 AM
I'm seeing a lot of confusion around Stans work here...

Stan was using basic electrical attraction/repelling forces to make water into a fuel. Nothing magic going on here.

By the laws of physics charges behave in a specific way. Unlike attract and like repel.

The water molecule is polar and has thus a more positively charged side and a more negatively charged side, and if you expose it to an electric field the two sides off it will be attracted in opposite directions and pull the water molecule apart. This is The Electrical Polarization Process.

the same basically goes for the gas processor, you are ripping electrons off and thereby ionizes the gas molecule. Then the gas can be used for The Hydrogen Fracturing Process.

We need to read up on Stans work and stop having crazy theories about were the energy is coming from, coatings, magic resonance frequency's and other stuff. Stans work can be explained by common science and that was what he was trying to do!

Don't take this the wrong way, I'm just trying to show you that the explanation for Stans work lies in his patents and publications.
I dont know why my posts arent showing up...

Okay so yea this is the dumbest thing Ive heard all day.

You need to learn about resonance and harmonics and quantum mechanics before you come in here and post about how none of that matters.

Dont take it the wrong way, but you dont understand any of it other than 2 plates one being positive and the other being negative.
your right, thats the dumbest thing i read all day too.
LOL
resonance of water is into the ghz.
let me know when your bell rings that fast:P

simply to break a molicule apart with its resonant frequency.......you just turn up you frequency gen to say........idk....20ghz. for a base freq, then 21 ghz and 19 ghz then that baby will just come unglued.
problem is...........YOU CANT
LOL
thats not what stan did. and he did not ring his tubes like a bell either .
physics man..........its awesome
a child can ring a bell....then again.....so can a school teacher....and the icecream man.
show me a bell making HHO

Matt Watts

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #42, on May 20th, 2013, 02:52 PM »Last edited on May 20th, 2013, 03:03 PM by Matt Watts
Quote from Ray Don on May 20th, 2013, 11:58 AM
i got a engine going together. its got all this stuff going on it. i will tune it to run on just hho, then with the gas processor. see what happens if the tuning changes, then we know something happened
Right on man.  Keep us posted.  I have my setup here I'd sure like to get it working too--get the evil-eye from my wife everytime she looks at it.  Need to get this thing humming.

gpssonar

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #43, on May 20th, 2013, 02:54 PM »
All this is to crazy for me. Im going back to making a small hydrogen bomb. LOL

Matt Watts

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #44, on May 20th, 2013, 03:19 PM »
Quote from gpssonar on May 20th, 2013, 02:54 PM
All this is to crazy for me. Im going back to making a small hydrogen bomb. LOL
Did you get your materials from the FBI?  I understand there aren't enough terrorists around to justify their own existence, so they will help fund new recruits.  I had a link to their sign-up page around here somewhere...

pwrpro

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #45, on May 20th, 2013, 03:49 PM »Last edited on May 20th, 2013, 04:06 PM by pwrpro
Come on guys, was not trying to be rude or the expert here, nor to be ignorant.I'm sorry. Lets move on.

gpssonar

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #46, on May 20th, 2013, 04:41 PM »Last edited on May 20th, 2013, 05:01 PM by gpssonar
Ok, on the serious side of things, Stan covered about any way that hydrogen and oxygen could be used in all his patents. From low level hydrogen on demand to high level rocket use. Now think about it, how can you make enough hydrogen and oxygen to power a rocket engine from a wall outlet or car battery or an alternator, simple answer you can't. So don't that tell you that you have to raise the energy level of the hydrogen and oxygen. Forget about the Vic, take the hydrogen and oxygen that you can make anyway you can, and raise the energy level as needed to run what you desire to run. Depending on your use, you may only need to strip the electrons from the hydrogen. Other uses you may have to strip electrons from the oxygen. If your gouing to make a rocket im sure you will have to strip both. Stan shows several ways in his patents to strip either. And it all depends on what you intend to use it for.

firepinto

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #47, on May 20th, 2013, 06:12 PM »
Quote from Ray Don on May 20th, 2013, 01:57 PM
back then gasoline was 85 cents a gallon. no gas boosters where needed. jobs were easy to find and gas was cheap.

there are people who say just a ozone gen will save you gas.

i think firepinto is a name that should try that.
or print me out a tube for my leds. i will put it in my truck. i get a steady 20mpg going to work every day. it has a carberator
I do plan on building 1 or 2 for my 1.6L VW diesel, plus print an intake manifold to replace the air filter box.  I think I'll need more CFM than Stan's version since diesel has no throttle body, so I may just use two.  How many liters is your truck?  I can work with ya on a print that will work for it.  :)

I'm not sure how cramped for under hood space the truck is, but I plan on making a big cowl induction type hood, and a strut tower brace under that to mount the gas guns.  The greasecar kit already took up all my spare space.:P


Nate

Matt Watts

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #48, on May 20th, 2013, 06:52 PM »
Quote from gpssonar on May 20th, 2013, 04:41 PM
... Stan shows several ways in his patents to strip either. And it all depends on what you intend to use it for.
Yes, I'm looking at them now.  I would like the smallest, simplest proof of concept model I can make.  Even with that, I'm still a little concerned about power usage.  LEDs shouldn't hog more than a couple of amps and a 70kV grid should be pretty simple and low power too.  Have to be darn sure I won't get any arcing though.  Going to use Tesla coils for step-up and keep the gas contained within the magnetic field of the coils.  I think I have a piece of stainless tube somewhere around here as well as a piece of stainless rod for the center electrode.  Seems like I will have to insulate one side or the other unless I use a much lower voltage.  I'll need to polish both electrodes and drill them for the LEDs.  I heard references to 660nm LEDs being used, but I wonder if I shouldn't try a variety of wavelengths.

Anyway, I think of something besides duct tape and bailing wire.

GoldBl4d3

RE: PROJECT ICARUS
« Reply #49, on May 20th, 2013, 07:09 PM »Last edited on May 20th, 2013, 08:30 PM by GoldBl4d3
Quote from Ray Don on May 20th, 2013, 01:57 PM
back then gasoline was 85 cents a gallon. no gas boosters where needed. jobs were easy to find and gas was cheap.

there are people who say just a ozone gen will save you gas.

i think firepinto is a name that should try that.
or print me out a tube for my leds. i will put it in my truck. i get a steady 20mpg going to work every day. it has a carberator
Quote from GoldBl4d3 on May 20th, 2013, 01:37 PM
Quote from pwrpro on May 20th, 2013, 11:11 AM
I'm seeing a lot of confusion around Stans work here...

Stan was using basic electrical attraction/repelling forces to make water into a fuel. Nothing magic going on here.

By the laws of physics charges behave in a specific way. Unlike attract and like repel.

The water molecule is polar and has thus a more positively charged side and a more negatively charged side, and if you expose it to an electric field the two sides off it will be attracted in opposite directions and pull the water molecule apart. This is The Electrical Polarization Process.

the same basically goes for the gas processor, you are ripping electrons off and thereby ionizes the gas molecule. Then the gas can be used for The Hydrogen Fracturing Process.

We need to read up on Stans work and stop having crazy theories about were the energy is coming from, coatings, magic resonance frequency's and other stuff. Stans work can be explained by common science and that was what he was trying to do!

Don't take this the wrong way, I'm just trying to show you that the explanation for Stans work lies in his patents and publications.
Probably the most ignorant thing I have heard all day. Crazy theories, coatings, magic resonance frequency's...... if you dont understand how things actually work, please done try to come in here and say sh*t like that.

Resonance.... Materials.... Ionization.... Aperture of the 3rd dimension....

Learn about these things before you try to tell us how this is all a bunch of crazy blah. Get yourself familiar to harmonics, and the interactions of atoms and their states as well as basic quantum mechanics.

We know how the polarization process works, its been known for decades. The point of stans usage of harmonics is to break the bonds of water and hydrogen much more efficient.

Sure we can make a dry cell and hook up a massive 60v @ 40amps and get a solid 15LPM. But thats exactly the problem.

Stan had to use more than electrolysis from a - and + plate. You have to tap in to the resonance of water to get a high output.

Tesla figured this all out a long time ago, when he vibrated the hotel he was in and got close to the resonant signatures and the hotel started to shake.


Lol.... Magic Resonance Frequencies....... Learn how your cell phone works.
Quote from firepinto on May 20th, 2013, 01:33 PM
I still think the electron extraction circuit can be tested on a normal car running on gasoline. A mileage improvement should show up if it is working.  The hydrocarbons still form in to water in the exaust.  The theory should still apply.
Come to think about it, has there ever been any shots of Stans daily driver car in videos?  I dare to bet he used that as a test bed for many things.

Nate
Yes uh well actually we should be able to see a difference in output energy, not much, but measurable.

We need a compression test cylinder or somethign to test the output energy on the explosion.

Part of me making a gas processor was to do exactly that, hook it to my jeeps intake. I have to do more research though on the effects of the carbon atoms may have in this role. So we will have to see how it goes.
Quote from pwrpro on May 20th, 2013, 11:11 AM
I'm seeing a lot of confusion around Stans work here...

Stan was using basic electrical attraction/repelling forces to make water into a fuel. Nothing magic going on here.

By the laws of physics charges behave in a specific way. Unlike attract and like repel.

The water molecule is polar and has thus a more positively charged side and a more negatively charged side, and if you expose it to an electric field the two sides off it will be attracted in opposite directions and pull the water molecule apart. This is The Electrical Polarization Process.

the same basically goes for the gas processor, you are ripping electrons off and thereby ionizes the gas molecule. Then the gas can be used for The Hydrogen Fracturing Process.

We need to read up on Stans work and stop having crazy theories about were the energy is coming from, coatings, magic resonance frequency's and other stuff. Stans work can be explained by common science and that was what he was trying to do!

Don't take this the wrong way, I'm just trying to show you that the explanation for Stans work lies in his patents and publications.
I dont know why my posts arent showing up...

Okay so yea this is the dumbest thing Ive heard all day.

You need to learn about resonance and harmonics and quantum mechanics before you come in here and post about how none of that matters.

Dont take it the wrong way, but you dont understand any of it other than 2 plates one being positive and the other being negative.
your right, thats the dumbest thing i read all day too.
LOL
resonance of water is into the ghz.
let me know when your bell rings that fast:P

simply to break a molicule apart with its resonant frequency.......you just turn up you frequency gen to say........idk....20ghz. for a base freq, then 21 ghz and 19 ghz then that baby will just come unglued.
problem is...........YOU CANT
LOL
thats not what stan did. and he did not ring his tubes like a bell either .
physics man..........its awesome
a child can ring a bell....then again.....so can a school teacher....and the icecream man.
show me a bell making HHO
Sure the frequency of water is in the ghz, but that doesnt mean frequency is useless here. I never specifically said anything about turning the cell rods in to a bell.

Obviously were not tuning in to the frequency of the water itself. But we can invoke a specific resonance frequency to aid in the process breaking a bond. Maybe the angular moment of the electrons has soemthing to do with it. Im not 100% sure what the frequency is going to be doing. But I can tell you that we are not ringing bells.

Im not trying to fight so I apologize for any of my behavior. But I take offense to it when someone wants to tell me everything I know and research is a magical theory.