A really great video series. Can't wait for more.
Here is a Tetryonics add-on concerning these fields.
Primer fields and Tetryonic theory:
A number of points jump out regarding the intersection of Tetryonic & Primer field theories: The Primer field model of interactions, and their bowls in particular, only model the M-fields of the interactions taking place – a common problem with most experimentalists. If you look at their toroidal shaped fields and realize they are only models of M-fields you’ll notice that they match the equilateral m-fields of Tetryonics but fail to model the e-field energy that they are applying to them in order to achieve their results. That said they still remain an accurate model of the processes, albeit only half the picture.
1. Primer is experimentally based – Tetryonics is theory based.
2. Both can aid and expand on the work of each other and in fact this should be encouraged if possible.
3. There is a case of strong agreement between Tetryonic theory and the Primer field experimental results that we have seen in his videos, and that is what excited us.
4. We congratulated him in using EM discharges as this is where Tetryonic theory shows where our future advances lie in energy generation and resource creation.
5. Obviously his focus has been on practical results while Tetryonics has focused on developing and refining a theory that shows great promise in expanding on his work to date.
6. Tetryonic theory can greatly expand his understanding of the plasma physics of the discharges that he is working with presently, in turn enabling the rapid development of new experimental designs.
7. In fact, Tetryonic theory has many discharge designs that can be readily provided to further his experimental work on discharge plasmas etc. Leading inevitably to the GEM pinch designs that will be commencing work on in the coming months.
8. CAD modelling of equilateral E&M fields shows that the electrode designs he has found effective [and was utilising in the videos] are fully reflective of Tetryonic M field geometries, leaving scope to expand on his current theoretical modelling and suppositions through the inclusion of Tetryonic field theory.
9. Obviously there is scope to develop the E-field components of the fields as this is where Tesla found much application. This is where real physical forces can be easily created and real horsepower can be transmitted over great distances near-instantaneously, as Tesla noted...
10. It is only current science’s fixation on electrical oscillations & transverse waves that creates our current impediment to many new technologies that can be rapidly developed and made available to all.
11. We couldn’t agree more with his statement that practical outcomes are a necessary step – but equally, so is a solid understanding of the physics involved from a theoretical stand point.
12. From a mutual understanding of eachother’s work an even greater understanding could be developed. From our point of view, presently, there is much in common.
Sadly, Dave LaPoint is not interested in understanding Tetryoincs at this point. Like so many other researchers, he is too wrapped up in his own set of ideas and has his own set of goals he's trying to accomplish. No doubt he is a busy researcher with little time to consider others perspectives. Perhaps he will change his mind sometime down the line when he comes up for air, or comes across a stumbling block of sorts.
Some development of a theoretical understanding of the results and its application to current sciences was attempted in his videos but found only limited success as key pieces of theory were missing the equilateral geometries of Planck energies and the theoretical advances made possible by Tetryonic theory’s geometric approach to electrical energies and physics in general.
The original Tetryonics thread.
http://open-source-energy.org/?fid=45Richard