Deserves theorizing & discussion

FaradayEZ

Deserves theorizing & discussion
« on November 19th, 2012, 02:58 AM »

Hi deep thinkers,

In the thread "new inventions and stuff" i placed a link to something that i think needs more deliberations of the forum members here.

I'm seeing it but can't explain it..so a perfect entrance for theorizing and trying to get to the kernel off the kern.

The Travis effect, it upside downs everything i thought to be reality.

http://youtu.be/0JUj42h6j7Y   (and more there around.)

What are your thoughts?


Lynx

RE: Deserves theorizing & discussion
« Reply #1, on November 20th, 2012, 03:58 AM »Last edited on November 20th, 2012, 03:59 AM by Lynx
I'm sorry EZ, I really don't see what the big deal is here.
Force equals pressure times area, so the pressure 30 cm down times the "small" area surrounding
the cylindrical block inside the cup equals the pressure at top times the "large" area on top of the block
plus the gravitational force of the weight minus the deplacement weight measured in water that the
volume of the weight itself makes.
That's how I see it anyway.

FaradayEZ

RE: Deserves theorizing & discussion
« Reply #2, on November 20th, 2012, 06:20 AM »
Quote from Lynx on November 20th, 2012, 03:58 AM
I'm sorry EZ, I really don't see what the big deal is here.
Force equals pressure times area, so the pressure 30 cm down times the "small" area surrounding
the cylindrical block inside the cup equals the pressure at top times the "large" area on top of the block
plus the gravitational force of the weight minus the deplacement weight measured in water that the
volume of the weight itself makes.
That's how I see it anyway.
Its strange to my gutt feeling for one, and it seems that there should be a device possible that makes use of the difference in volume and produced pressure.


FaradayEZ

RE: Deserves theorizing & discussion
« Reply #3, on November 21st, 2012, 12:07 PM »
(although it is all within the known theories..)

Imagine..bucket A full of air. Bucket B 1/10 air.

On the surface of the water, bucket A need 2 kilos of weight to stay just under.
Bucket B so needs 200 grams for the same.

A flows to the bottom and has a well deserved rest.

B flows down, misses the concrete pillar and sits beside A with 200 grams on top.

Fine..now a swirl lifts B and places it on top of a stone.. as long as the stone doesn't reach the 1/10 air in bucket B, nothing new happens.

Fine..another swirl (i like them) and B floats over the concrete pillar in its shape.

Still nothing new happens..the concrete will just reach the air but not touch it i guess.

Only thing is when we want the bucket B to go the last centimeters towards the bottom, we now need to apply more weight to it.

Eventually as much as on bucket A.

The concrete pushes against the air, if the air could not go sideways, it has to compress and maybe even more weight then on A is needed for the last centimeters.

The concrete replaces and acts like air, forcewaylike in which water could not. Because it is still in contact with the rest of the water and can escape out the bucket.

But how in the heck use these properties to gain energy out off?

Hmmm..