Stanley Meyer WFC

firepinto

RE: Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #2, on May 14th, 2011, 04:28 PM »
Quote from Rwg42985 on May 14th, 2011, 11:05 AM
Quote from admin on May 14th, 2011, 02:28 AM
CLOSEUPS OF SOME STAN MEYERS CIRCUITS


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icGiVO-x55s
This is leget, and also there will be some things here I will be posting that you will not want to miss! Please subscripe to this thred! Good things ere comming!!!

Tony is doing some good things allready!!!

~Russ
This is amazing!  Is this also from the Meyers estate?  I love card cages!!

Nate

Lynx

RE: Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #3, on September 24th, 2012, 01:10 PM »
He reaches "resonance" and then he ups the frequency without losing resonance at the same time?
I don't think so.
Also why didn't he show how an HHO cell performed at "resonance" then?
Surely that would have been the most interesting part.

Jeff Nading

RE: Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #4, on September 24th, 2012, 08:00 PM »
Quote from Lynx on September 24th, 2012, 01:10 PM
He reaches "resonance" and then he ups the frequency without losing resonance at the same time?
I don't think so.
Also why didn't he show how an HHO cell performed at "resonance" then?
Surely that would have been the most interesting part.
If your talking about valyonpz1, he posted this once before in six different threads, now he's done the same thing 16 times on different threads, he was warned about this the first time.

Lynx

RE: Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #5, on September 25th, 2012, 12:13 AM »
Quote from Jeff Nading on September 24th, 2012, 08:00 PM
Quote from Lynx on September 24th, 2012, 01:10 PM
He reaches "resonance" and then he ups the frequency without losing resonance at the same time?
I don't think so.
Also why didn't he show how an HHO cell performed at "resonance" then?
Surely that would have been the most interesting part.
If your talking about valyonpz1, he posted this once before in six different threads, now he's done the same thing 16 times on different threads, he was warned about this the first time.
WTH for :huh:
Some kind of "alternative energy forum" spamming..........
Does it happen a lot or is it only this forum?
Perhaps TPTB has seen that we're actually on to something and now tries to
see to it to spam the board to the ground? :D

symanuk

RE: Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #6, on September 25th, 2012, 12:30 AM »
More likely he is trying to make all roads that lead to meyers discussions have a link to that video as some kind of "proof".  But he has gone about it in a very annoying way and received a ban for his efforts.  He has also managed to really ruin the "View Today's Posts" button for me as it is just a long list of his name!

Lynx

RE: Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #7, on September 25th, 2012, 05:30 AM »
Quote from symanuk on September 25th, 2012, 12:30 AM
More likely he is trying to make all roads that lead to meyers discussions have a link to that video as some kind of "proof".
I recall having seen such a "perfect" sinusoidal waveform on my analog oscilloscope
when I measure the voltage on the HHO cell although I fed the circuit with a square
wave pulse train to start with, I didn't pay it much attention to be honest.
At the end of the day my cell hasn't performed any differently regardless of waveform,
frequency, voltage etc.
The really interesting thing here would have been to see a cell in action under
these "perfect" conditions, including changes in gas production, voltage, current etc.