The Great Popper of Giza?

firepinto

The Great Popper of Giza?
« on October 17th, 2012, 07:44 PM »
I was watching this video about pyramids on YouTube:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI1UHyMNY3s&feature=related

They were talking about the construction of the Great Pyramid in Giza.  The large stones we see now are made of high magnesium limestone, and the outer casing was a low magnesium lime stone.  Basically an insulated conductive pyramid.  The chambers and passageways are made of granite, which is a little radioactive.

The video talked about how the granite might of pre-ionized gasses.  Also how the dept. of antiquity "restored" the kings chamber to remove blackened soot.  Starting to sound familiar?  

Sounds to me like what happened to the inside of Russ' popper chamber when he ran it with pure hydrogen. Could it be that water was separated into Hydrogen and oxygen, with only hydrogen being allowed to rise into the kings chamber?  There are also huge cracks that they couldn't explain.  This could be from the stress of the popping action, or maybe when oxygen accidentally got into the kings chamber causing an explosion.  

The other aspect of the pyramid is the sound resonance of its design.  Maybe the popping noise could of supplied the correct sound waves that the design needs.

Anyway I though it was very interesting and it proves how a little experimenting can give you valuable knowledge.  

Nate

Jeff Nading

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #1, on October 17th, 2012, 07:55 PM »
Quote from firepinto on October 17th, 2012, 07:44 PM
I was watching this video about pyramids on YouTube:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI1UHyMNY3s&feature=related

They were talking about the construction of the Great Pyramid in Giza.  The large stones we see now are made of high magnesium limestone, and the outer casing was a low magnesium lime stone.  Basically an insulated conductive pyramid.  The chambers and passageways are made of granite, which is a little radioactive.

The video talked about how the granite might of pre-ionized gasses.  Also how the dept. of antiquity "restored" the kings chamber to remove blackened soot.  Starting to sound familiar?  

Sounds to me like what happened to the inside of Russ' popper chamber when he ran it with pure hydrogen. Could it be that water was separated into Hydrogen and oxygen, with only hydrogen being allowed to rise into the kings chamber?  There are also huge cracks that they couldn't explain.  This could be from the stress of the popping action, or maybe when oxygen accidentally got into the kings chamber causing an explosion.  

The other aspect of the pyramid is the sound resonance of its design.  Maybe the popping noise could of supplied the correct sound waves that the design needs.

Anyway I though it was very interesting and it proves how a little experimenting can give you valuable knowledge.  

Nate
Cool Nate, I'll have to watch that video:cool::D:P.

firepinto

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #2, on October 17th, 2012, 07:57 PM »
Quote from Jeff Nading on October 17th, 2012, 07:55 PM
Quote from firepinto on October 17th, 2012, 07:44 PM
I was watching this video about pyramids on YouTube:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI1UHyMNY3s&feature=related

They were talking about the construction of the Great Pyramid in Giza.  The large stones we see now are made of high magnesium limestone, and the outer casing was a low magnesium lime stone.  Basically an insulated conductive pyramid.  The chambers and passageways are made of granite, which is a little radioactive.

The video talked about how the granite might of pre-ionized gasses.  Also how the dept. of antiquity "restored" the kings chamber to remove blackened soot.  Starting to sound familiar?  

Sounds to me like what happened to the inside of Russ' popper chamber when he ran it with pure hydrogen. Could it be that water was separated into Hydrogen and oxygen, with only hydrogen being allowed to rise into the kings chamber?  There are also huge cracks that they couldn't explain.  This could be from the stress of the popping action, or maybe when oxygen accidentally got into the kings chamber causing an explosion.  

The other aspect of the pyramid is the sound resonance of its design.  Maybe the popping noise could of supplied the correct sound waves that the design needs.

Anyway I though it was very interesting and it proves how a little experimenting can give you valuable knowledge.  

Nate
Cool Nate, I'll have to watch that video:cool::D:P.
I think its a 3 part series, that is part 2.  I'm still watching part 3. :)

Jeff Nading

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #3, on October 17th, 2012, 07:58 PM »
Quote from firepinto on October 17th, 2012, 07:57 PM
Quote from Jeff Nading on October 17th, 2012, 07:55 PM
Quote from firepinto on October 17th, 2012, 07:44 PM
I was watching this video about pyramids on YouTube:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI1UHyMNY3s&feature=related

They were talking about the construction of the Great Pyramid in Giza.  The large stones we see now are made of high magnesium limestone, and the outer casing was a low magnesium lime stone.  Basically an insulated conductive pyramid.  The chambers and passageways are made of granite, which is a little radioactive.

The video talked about how the granite might of pre-ionized gasses.  Also how the dept. of antiquity "restored" the kings chamber to remove blackened soot.  Starting to sound familiar?  

Sounds to me like what happened to the inside of Russ' popper chamber when he ran it with pure hydrogen. Could it be that water was separated into Hydrogen and oxygen, with only hydrogen being allowed to rise into the kings chamber?  There are also huge cracks that they couldn't explain.  This could be from the stress of the popping action, or maybe when oxygen accidentally got into the kings chamber causing an explosion.  

The other aspect of the pyramid is the sound resonance of its design.  Maybe the popping noise could of supplied the correct sound waves that the design needs.

Anyway I though it was very interesting and it proves how a little experimenting can give you valuable knowledge.  

Nate
Cool Nate, I'll have to watch that video:cool::D:P.
I think its a 3 part series, that is part 2.  I'm still watching part 3. :)
Can you link them all? Thanks.:D

symanuk

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #4, on October 18th, 2012, 04:59 AM »Last edited on October 18th, 2012, 06:11 AM by symanuk
I actually quite like the theory that the pyramids were built on Aquifers as negative ion towers.  The materials they are made of and the shape of them would focus the beam upwards into the sky and that in turn would help for clouds to form and - in effect - help control the weather.  Very important in terms of the location of Egypt and supporting their crops.

I read somewhere else that Tesla's wardenclyffe tower was designed with a similar purpose in mind (the effect being linked with transmission of power) - who knows if that was a leap too far, but the negative ion tower purpose for the pyramids makes a lot of sense to me.

EDIT: Found this - http://rob-s.hubpages.com/hub/The-True-Purpose-of-the-Pyramids-of-Giza which summarises some of the stuff I was referring to above

KevinW_EnhancedLiving

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #5, on October 18th, 2012, 08:30 AM »Last edited on October 18th, 2012, 04:35 PM by KevinW_EnhancedLiving
Quote from firepinto on October 17th, 2012, 07:44 PM
I was watching this video about pyramids on YouTube:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI1UHyMNY3s&feature=related

They were talking about the construction of the Great Pyramid in Giza.  The large stones we see now are made of high magnesium limestone, and the outer casing was a low magnesium lime stone.  Basically an insulated conductive pyramid.  The chambers and passageways are made of granite, which is a little radioactive.

The video talked about how the granite might of pre-ionized gasses.  Also how the dept. of antiquity "restored" the kings chamber to remove blackened soot.  Starting to sound familiar?  

Sounds to me like what happened to the inside of Russ' popper chamber when he ran it with pure hydrogen. Could it be that water was separated into Hydrogen and oxygen, with only hydrogen being allowed to rise into the kings chamber?  There are also huge cracks that they couldn't explain.  This could be from the stress of the popping action, or maybe when oxygen accidentally got into the kings chamber causing an explosion.  

The other aspect of the pyramid is the sound resonance of its design.  Maybe the popping noise could of supplied the correct sound waves that the design needs.

Anyway I though it was very interesting and it proves how a little experimenting can give you valuable knowledge.  

Nate
This looks amazing. Thank you

Should i start with part 1? Wait... Yes i am

Kevin

firepinto

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #6, on October 18th, 2012, 06:43 PM »
Apparently there are 5 parts.  The first 2 I think are the best.  

Part 1: The Band of Peace

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAFZ1g4_QCQ&feature=relmfu

Part 2: High Level Technology

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI1UHyMNY3s&feature=relmfu

Part 3: Sacred Cosmology

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi7cFKLNIqU&feature=relmfu

Part 4: The Empowered Human

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TV1X5ic_jAE&feature=relmfu

Part 5: A New Chronology

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-si5786olY&feature=relmfu

firepinto

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #7, on October 18th, 2012, 08:13 PM »
Quote from symanuk on October 18th, 2012, 04:59 AM
I actually quite like the theory that the pyramids were built on Aquifers as negative ion towers.  The materials they are made of and the shape of them would focus the beam upwards into the sky and that in turn would help for clouds to form and - in effect - help control the weather.  Very important in terms of the location of Egypt and supporting their crops.

I read somewhere else that Tesla's wardenclyffe tower was designed with a similar purpose in mind (the effect being linked with transmission of power) - who knows if that was a leap too far, but the negative ion tower purpose for the pyramids makes a lot of sense to me.

EDIT: Found this - http://rob-s.hubpages.com/hub/The-True-Purpose-of-the-Pyramids-of-Giza which summarises some of the stuff I was referring to above
Nice link, I think the Ark of the Covenant played a role also.  I think it is related to the cap bank and spark gap in Russ' popper.  
 The movement of the water in the aquifers would also generate electricity.  If the pyramid was perfectly sealed, the popping action would pump the water in and out of the aquifers, generating even more power.  Not sure where the hydrogen would be made or how, but if not much hydrogen is consumed in the popping process it might not take a lot of production.  

FaradayEZ

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #8, on October 23rd, 2012, 10:29 PM »Last edited on October 24th, 2012, 01:57 AM by FaradayEZ
Quote from firepinto on October 18th, 2012, 08:13 PM
Quote from symanuk on October 18th, 2012, 04:59 AM
I actually quite like the theory that the pyramids were built on Aquifers as negative ion towers.  The materials they are made of and the shape of them would focus the beam upwards into the sky and that in turn would help for clouds to form and - in effect - help control the weather.  Very important in terms of the location of Egypt and supporting their crops.

I read somewhere else that Tesla's wardenclyffe tower was designed with a similar purpose in mind (the effect being linked with transmission of power) - who knows if that was a leap too far, but the negative ion tower purpose for the pyramids makes a lot of sense to me.

EDIT: Found this - http://rob-s.hubpages.com/hub/The-True-Purpose-of-the-Pyramids-of-Giza which summarises some of the stuff I was referring to above
Nice link, I think the Ark of the Covenant played a role also.  I think it is related to the cap bank and spark gap in Russ' popper.  
 The movement of the water in the aquifers would also generate electricity.  If the pyramid was perfectly sealed, the popping action would pump the water in and out of the aquifers, generating even more power.  Not sure where the hydrogen would be made or how, but if not much hydrogen is consumed in the popping process it might not take a lot of production.
Why not link it to the oracle of Delphi? The water and electricity and HHO plus other unknown elements where breathed in by the priests in the pyramid chamber.
And then the POP was the popping in their heads of new idea's and revelations?

OMG I'm getting too old for this...









KevinW_EnhancedLiving

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #9, on October 30th, 2012, 11:56 AM »
http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/details?mid=982ca0336bf3476b614edc3c9b2489f4

"The pyramids are built over aquifers inside limestone layers. Unique layers of rock transmit electricity upward known as physioelectricity. The gold capstone facilitated a conductive path for the transfer of negative ions to the ionosphere. This way, a useable current was generated. An identical form of this technology was built into the Wardenclyffe Tower by Nicola Tesla."

symanuk

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #10, on October 30th, 2012, 01:24 PM »
Simple free energy, working in harmony with nature. Those Anunhaki knew what they were up to. Build it then forget about it. Very low maintenance and literally standing thousands of years later, albeit half the materials have since been plundered. Nice diagram Kev

Jeff Nading

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #11, on October 30th, 2012, 04:42 PM »
Quote from KevinW-dirtwill on October 30th, 2012, 11:56 AM
http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/details?mid=982ca0336bf3476b614edc3c9b2489f4

"The pyramids are built over aquifers inside limestone layers. Unique layers of rock transmit electricity upward known as physioelectricity. The gold capstone facilitated a conductive path for the transfer of negative ions to the ionosphere. This way, a useable current was generated. An identical form of this technology was built into the Wardenclyffe Tower by Nicola Tesla."
You know Kevin, I had the very same thought about the Wardencllyffe Tower that Tesla was building, cool stuff. :cool::D:P

symanuk

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #12, on October 31st, 2012, 04:36 AM »
I saw today that they have been experimenting with Ion towers in the deserts of Dubai, with the end result that it rained and mystified locals. They were not using the technology linked here: http://www.australianrain.com.au/technology/howitworks.html but something similar (Dubai ones looked like some of the stuff in the Tesla patents).  Amazing to me that no-one sees the same engineering solution to the same problem being the pyramids.

Jeff Nading

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #13, on October 31st, 2012, 06:45 AM »
Quote from symanuk on October 31st, 2012, 04:36 AM
I saw today that they have been experimenting with Ion towers in the deserts of Dubai, with the end result that it rained and mystified locals. They were not using the technology linked here: http://www.australianrain.com.au/technology/howitworks.html but something similar (Dubai ones looked like some of the stuff in the Tesla patents).  Amazing to me that no-one sees the same engineering solution to the same problem being the pyramids.
Very cool find symanuk, do you have a link to the Dubai tower information?:D

FaradayEZ

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #14, on October 31st, 2012, 03:12 PM »

At their site they say its still inconclusive:

For this reason the simple comparison of average rainfall across target (“affected”) and control (“unaffected”) areas employed to date in cloud-seeding analysis has been inconclusive. As a result, the conclusions of reviewers of cloud seeding trials has been that trials across many years will be necessary to isolate any particular variability in association with cloud-seeding. This is extremely difficult and expensive.

http://www.australianrain.com.au/technology/statisticalmethodology.html



~Russ

RE: The Great Popper of Giza?
« Reply #15, on October 31st, 2012, 09:39 PM »
Quote from symanuk on October 31st, 2012, 04:36 AM
I saw today that they have been experimenting with Ion towers in the deserts of Dubai, with the end result that it rained and mystified locals. They were not using the technology linked here: http://www.australianrain.com.au/technology/howitworks.html but something similar (Dubai ones looked like some of the stuff in the Tesla patents).  Amazing to me that no-one sees the same engineering solution to the same problem being the pyramids.
this is all good until some one starts playing with the knobs and creates a mega storm! lol just saying... many people have experienced this... Bob Boyce to name one...

hence why he wont release his HEX B controller... ~Russ