Leedskalnin and Meyers

symanuk

Leedskalnin and Meyers
« on September 24th, 2012, 02:39 AM »
Does anyone know if Meyers referred to Leedskalnin in any of his videos or sources?

I remember seeing on some of Stan's patent drawings the word UniPolar with regard to magnetic current.  Leedskalnin's work and his mystery of Coral Castle would have been featured on TV etc around the time of Stan's work (as a look at the mystery he left behind).

If you look on: http://www.leedskalnin.com/ and scan down the page a little bit to the PMH (Perpetual Motion Holder) which Russ has successfully replicated here previously - the bit that caught my attention is the references to it as unipolar (which gives a theoretical tie back in my mind) and the fact that if you look at the PMH and turn it on its side then you effectively have what looks a lot like the Voltage Intensifier Circuit (VIC) core and windings.  On the page it says that putting in DC to one of the PMH coils will result in NATURAL AC at the other coil and that this is different to man made AC.

Long story short, has anyone tried hooking up a PMH to the Water Fuel Cell (WFC) to see if it has any benefits with regard to producing resonance?  It could be that we are looking at the VICs purely from a transformer point of view when in fact they are a current conditioning / concentrating device...

One to throw out there and get some thoughts on.

Cheers,

Sy

Matt Watts

RE: Leedskalnin and Meyers
« Reply #1, on September 24th, 2012, 06:05 PM »
Quote from Edward Leedskalnin
Millions of people all over the world are being fooled by the non-existing electrons. Here is how the electrons came into existence...
That's some heavy stuff right there.   Throw away everything you think you know about electrons, electricity, electronics and start fresh with the concept of unipolar magnets flying every which way.  Does tend to make your head hurt.

I will say this though, much of what he says does make sense and would explain the strange effects noted when working bifilar coils.

symanuk

RE: Leedskalnin and Meyers
« Reply #2, on September 25th, 2012, 12:01 AM »Last edited on September 25th, 2012, 12:03 AM by symanuk
I found it interesting to read the referenced academic papers at the bottom too, seems that a lot of "old science" was trying to come to grips with the same phenomena but described it in different ways.  The "sonoluminescent ether" that everyone believed must be there was modelled mathematically in a very similar way to how you would model leedskalnin's work from the looks of it.

The fact that the PMH works lends some credence to his thinking - even if the latest Sterling Allan PESN news video from the tour guides at Coral Castle debunk levitation etc.  Leedskalnin never wrote about magnetic levitation in his pamphlets, only electricity.  Everything else was driven from speculation after he died about how he achieved it.  He said he knew the techniques of the ancient Egyptians as would any magician drawn to the dramatic.  To then postulate that he means the ancient Egyptians knew how to levitate rock is a wild and speculative leap on the behalf of those interpreting what he has said.  The ancient Egyptians needed to know how to quarry and transport rock efficiently and I think he was merely referring to understanding the mechanics of how they achieved this.  Everything else is your typical Internet conspiracy rumour mill.  Anyway I digress in my OPINION on these matters...

The man was very switched on to the theories of his time regarding electricity and I think that watching some replications of this stuff you start to get to where lidmotor and theoldscientist and everyone else on youtube playing with electricity gets to.  An understanding of our lack of understanding.

For those of you that have Water Fuel Cells and want to do some testing, I think we would be most interested in seeing how you get on with testing some old theories of electricity on the devices.  I do think that you need to tune the inner and outer stainless steel tubes to be as musically in resonance with each other as possible (there are plenty of old experiments with tuned resonance in other applications) as nature works in harmonic waves and we want to encourage that as much as possible.

Another 2 pence worth,

Sy

Matt Watts

RE: Leedskalnin and Meyers
« Reply #3, on September 25th, 2012, 07:40 PM »
An experiment I need to try is this one below and a modified version as well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SO3dXCsyBC4

My thought is playing with a two wire version where North goes one way in one wire and the opposite way in the other wire.  Trying to imagine what will happen...

My guess is the magnets will stick there in between the two wires since there are opposite and equal forces.  Got to try this one because I think it will shed some light on what might be going on inside a bifilar coil/transformer.

The whole Leedskalnin magnet view of electricity has taught me more about magnets and electricity than I ever learned in school because I can now see the mechanics of operation in my head, something I could never do with electrons.

freethisone

RE: Leedskalnin and Meyers
« Reply #4, on January 2nd, 2013, 11:02 PM »
Ed lee called this, magna-tisity.

working in identical manner of electricity. causing a current. 2 forces twisting in.

My experiments with ion generator also tell me 2 clearly different charges exist. in modern science the positron is the electron counter.

even simpler still. negative static, attracts  the positive static, or ion particles . i have shew this in one ov my experiment. the air is positivly over charged. we need the negative counter part to cause dynamic motion between the particles.

I am convinced it is as Tesla described.

Kinetic, and is static itself. Tesla had said if static was not kinetic our hope would be in vain. more or less. he is certain it is. if he said so i can not disagree.

also the use of the light uv helps conduction. simply add intense uv light in a water cell between the plates. others say infra red is causing another type of action due to sunlight.

even better a flash tube should be used. same as laser. plasma wow. same as a silly little spark. thats why a gap is needed in circuitry, even if you think no,
 i should not have a gap here.

important to try anyway. gap cause flow, flow is current. ground is nothing but draining, a drain plug.  pulling in positive energy. dropping it to the floor.

Bearden states preserve the dipole, I say yes it causes a  vacuum state.

am i made my self clear? ERRRR its late.

Matt Watts

RE: Leedskalnin and Meyers
« Reply #5, on January 2nd, 2013, 11:13 PM »
Quote from freethisone on January 2nd, 2013, 11:02 PM
Ed lee called this, magna-tisity.

working in identical manner of electricity. causing a current. 2 forces twisting in.

My experiments with ion generator also tell me 2 clearly different charges exist. in modern science the positron is the electron counter.

even simpler still. negative static, attracts  the positive static, or ion particles . i have shew this in one ov my experiment. the air is positivly over charged. we need the negative counter part to cause dynamic motion between the particles.

I am convinced it is as Tesla described.

Kinetic, and is static itself. Tesla had said if static was not kinetic our hope would be in vain. more or less. he is certain it is. if he said so i can not disagree.

also the use of the light uv helps conduction. simply add intense uv light in a water cell between the plates. others say infra red is causing another type of action due to sunlight.

even better a flash tube should be used. same as laser. plasma wow. same as a silly little spark. thats why a gap is needed in circuitry, even if you think no,
 i should not have a gap here.

important to try anyway. gap cause flow, flow is current. ground is nothing but draining, a drain plug.  pulling in positive energy. dropping it to the floor.

Bearden states preserve the dipole, I say yes it causes a  vacuum state.

am i made my self clear? ERRRR its late.
Yes it is late and I'm not sure what to make of it all.  I do know that if we could look at old problems with a new understanding, those problems would be solved rather quickly.  Hard to teach and old dog a new trick, but I'm in the game for the long run.  2013, here we go...

symanuk

RE: Leedskalnin and Meyers
« Reply #6, on January 2nd, 2013, 11:50 PM »
MrAngusWangus and UFOPolitics on their YouTube channels are doing some interesting things with Leedskalnin and Asymetric windings that could be very enlightening. I recommend keeping an eye on those guys for some new ways of looking at electrical systems

FaradayEZ

RE: Leedskalnin and Meyers
« Reply #7, on January 3rd, 2013, 06:44 AM »
Quote from Dog-One on September 24th, 2012, 06:05 PM
Quote from Edward Leedskalnin
Millions of people all over the world are being fooled by the non-existing electrons. Here is how the electrons came into existence...
That's some heavy stuff right there.   Throw away everything you think you know about electrons, electricity, electronics and start fresh with the concept of unipolar magnets flying every which way.  Does tend to make your head hurt.

I will say this though, much of what he says does make sense and would explain the strange effects noted when working bifilar coils.
It also reeks a lot like Keshe explains stuff with all being fields of magnets and gravity, not a particle way of explaining.