Stanley Meyers buggy

bibi

Stanley Meyers buggy
« on September 2nd, 2012, 03:08 AM »
Hi all!
First of all, I'd like to say hallo. So Hello there ;) Yes I know. There is another topic for new members to introduce themselves, but I'm interested mostly in RWGresearch.com research and Russ and all of You work.

My name is Bartek. Since I remember I was interested in electronics and in every free time I just make something new in my little workshop.By now I have made a  lots of stuff including Tesla coils, transformers. What I was really proud of is Plasma speaker. Still a lot of people in Poland don't believe that there is no need to have speakers to produce sound. :)

But that's not what I was about to write.
For about a year I have been making various HHO cell based of traditional electrolysis, couse I always wondering to build water powered car.
Then I found Daniel Dingel's page, where he claims he has 100% water powered Toyota. Having downloaded all possible to download data from different sites that wasn't enough information for me. I didn't know what  "levitator" is and other stuff he made there.

In suggested videos I found Stanley Meyer’s interview, then “It runs on water” and others.  By fortune I watched Russ video, where was a link to his site, and this forum.  I read some topics, and saw “Photographic Evidence of Stanley Meyers work”. For me that is enough evidence that Stans work was for real, cause who would spend so many time and cash (probably) on something that doesn’t work.
I want to make replica of his buggy, so I watched that films several times, and I’m not quite sure if I understand all of that he did there. I noticed that he was using 1.6 VW boxer engine from VW Beetle. That is well known engine here in Europe  And I have some questions about that. What he did with carburetor? And the whole Air Intake.

Maybe I don’t understand what he did, but I thought that hydrogen is mixed with Ambient Air which is proceeded in Gas Processor, and with NON-Combustible gases from exhaust. This mixture is injected through 4 injectors into combustion chamber, and that is all what he need to power buggy engine. This mixture is controlled by GMS for best performance (AIR Gate and EXH Gate). Another question is How he build pressure in the injector line? Couse what he did is something like CommonRail injector system?
And about VIC. Why he made 10 separated “VICs” for every resonant cavity, when in WFC we can see all cavities are connected in series, and one isn’t connected at all?

Maybe answers are obvious, but please answer me :) that will help me to understand how this buggy ran. If there was some mistakes please let me know, cause I have been learning English for only 4 years

Big respect for Russ and all of you guys for so much research u did.

Amsy

RE: Stanley Meyers buggy
« Reply #1, on September 2nd, 2012, 10:31 AM »Last edited on September 2nd, 2012, 11:11 PM by Amsy
Hi Bartek,

there are a lot of theorys about stan meyer car. it seems everyone has his/her own. And this is my theory. :)

After the recorded photo documentary, a lot of things changed IMHO. Because with the photos it was possible to see many details.

If we look closer to the memos and patents, the "core invention" was the "Hydrogen Fracturing Process". Do you have read the memo of Meyer "Birth of a new technology?"
It looks like this "Hydrogen Fracturing Process" is the "basic" technique on which the engine of the VW buggy was running. But also the ionized air intake and the use of the exhaust gases mixed in the inlet of the engine.

To fracture hydrogen the basic idea is, first to split water to its molecules H2 and O2 on demand. However this was done "economical", it will produce the basic gas for further processing. Also this will prevent the storage of H2 gas at high pressures in a vessel or tank like in LPG cars and therefor it is much safer. The second stage is to ionize this produced gases, this was made with the Gas Resonant Cavity/Hydrogen Gas Gun. Later in the car, it was a gas resonant cavity direct mounted on the engine block feeded with HHO by a WFC. This is necessary because, when fracturing  H2 to H-H it will recombine immediately to H2. This was made with high voltage and UV Leds.

The point of "igniting" the fracturing process seems to be like in a diesel engine on the top end of the piston.

The latest version of the car, didn´t need a WFC. All the process steps were made in one "ignition tube cell/gas resonant cavity". So the last version of this gas resonant cavity was mounted on enginge block instead of the spark plug. This cavity was feeded direct with water out of the red water tank and a water pump.
The cavity made all the steps described above. So it splits H2O to H2 and O2 and ionized this gas. So a voltage controller like the VIC was necessary to split H2O and to ionize the gas.

i hope this can help you a little bit. Maybe you will find this "theory" in the memos and patents.

It is not obvious why the WFC tubes were connected in series... IMHO, this was because the spliiting of the water to HHO was not realy a OU machine or "better" than normal electrolyses. You also maybe will see this in the foto docu, that the WFC was feeded by a normal step up transformer, look at the cutted wires (red and black). You will find the controller for the WFC (it was not a VIC).

Just look here in this forum, there are a lot of discussions about that. :)