H2O 2000

km30773

H2O 2000
« on August 17th, 2012, 08:46 AM »
Hi , I am new here and very interested in free energy i hope i am able to pick up a thing or 2 with the help of you guys.

Here is my Question.

i came across a product call " H2O 2000 " in U-Tube, and it is able to produce HHO gas on demand, it is a gas welding and cut machine which is already in the market.

See attached link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkaiXNFAY0M

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Hp475l6pqA&feature=relmfu

1) Does anyone have this machine?
2) How does this machine produce HHO Gas on demand?
3) Can the Technology be use to produce fuel for engine?

If we are able to get information of how this machine work, we might be able to save a lot of time doing research to develop the technology. It may give new light to many projects we are working on.

Hope Someone will share some light to this technology, thank you.

Jeff Nading

RE: H2O 2000
« Reply #1, on August 17th, 2012, 01:53 PM »
Quote from km30773 on August 17th, 2012, 08:46 AM
Hi , I am new here and very interested in free energy i hope i am able to pick up a thing or 2 with the help of you guys.

Here is my Question.

i came across a product call " H2O 2000 " in U-Tube, and it is able to produce HHO gas on demand, it is a gas welding and cut machine which is already in the market.

See attached link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkaiXNFAY0M

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Hp475l6pqA&feature=relmfu

1) Does anyone have this machine?
2) How does this machine produce HHO Gas on demand?
3) Can the Technology be use to produce fuel for engine?

If we are able to get information of how this machine work, we might be able to save a lot of time doing research to develop the technology. It may give new light to many projects we are working on.

Hope Someone will share some light to this technology, thank you.
Well, you really have to understand what is being done here, the bottom line is, no storage of hho, not even one ounce. So that means there is much more tech involved, that's what all the hub-bub is about, how this was done. It's relatively easy to produce hho for a torch, can be done with a car battery. But producing hho in the cylinder of an engine that's something different all together.:D

km30773

RE: H2O 2000
« Reply #2, on August 17th, 2012, 06:49 PM »
Jeff thank you for your reply

i do understand that it is not the same producing HHO for engine and for torch, what i mean was the technology that they used. Are they using pulse like Stan Meyer or other new technology. Maybe we can learn something from it.

Jeff Nading

RE: H2O 2000
« Reply #3, on August 17th, 2012, 06:52 PM »
Quote from km30773 on August 17th, 2012, 06:49 PM
Jeff thank you for your reply

i do understand that it is not the same producing HHO for engine and for torch, what i mean was the technology that they used. Are they using pulse like Stan Meyer or other new technology. Maybe we can learn something from it.
Oh, Ok, It's pretty much what we already know, I have a one cell fuel cell I built , that can be used as a torch, so it's really nothing new.:D

km30773

RE: H2O 2000
« Reply #4, on August 17th, 2012, 10:43 PM »
Jeff

It sounds to me that it is not difficult to produce HHO torch with technology we already have.

Just wondering how come HHO torch is not widely used and replacing the old technology (like CD replacing Tape and DVD replacing VCD). Correct me if i am wrong, that there is not many HHO torch available in the market right?

Pls enlighten me if i missed something.

~Russ

RE: H2O 2000
« Reply #5, on August 17th, 2012, 10:53 PM »
Quote from km30773 on August 17th, 2012, 10:43 PM
Jeff

It sounds to me that it is not difficult to produce HHO torch with technology we already have.

Just wondering how come HHO torch is not widely used and replacing the old technology (like CD replacing Tape and DVD replacing VCD). Correct me if i am wrong, that there is not many HHO torch available in the market right?

Pls enlighten me if i missed something.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis

brought force Electrolysis, this is what we are trying do not do...

basically... it consumes a lot of power...

~Russ

Jeff Nading

RE: H2O 2000
« Reply #6, on August 18th, 2012, 05:29 AM »
There are a few companies using and just starting to use the hho torch system, but all the "hipe" about it leave people in fear of it. HHO can be very dangerous if not handled correctly, I would have to say though, handled correctly, even though more explosive, it's no more dangerous than using an acetylene torch, hardly any money involved in operating it, no bottles to store, takes up less room in the shop, burns at a higher temperature. So there are many advantages to an HHO torch over acetylene torches.:D

Forum Administrator

RE: H2O 2000
« Reply #7, on August 18th, 2012, 09:50 AM »
Quote from km30773 on August 17th, 2012, 10:43 PM
Jeff

It sounds to me that it is not difficult to produce HHO torch with technology we already have.

Just wondering how come HHO torch is not widely used and replacing the old technology (like CD replacing Tape and DVD replacing VCD). Correct me if i am wrong, that there is not many HHO torch available in the market right?

Pls enlighten me if i missed something.
Just to clarify what Russ has already stated, the difference is that this torch takes A LOT of power (yes it works, but to work in a vehicle it would take more power than the average household consumes) this is known as brute force, as there is no finesse in separating the Hydrogen and Oxygen.  Basically it's the Brock Lesnar of HHO production.

The goal everyone here would be happy to see attained and open sourced would be a way to finesse the H20 apart, using very little power, as Stanley Meyer had claimed and videotaped before his sudden untimely death.  Basically using the brute force method, it takes more energy to split the HHO than can be produced from burning it.

To run a car on HHO it would need to take very little power to produce large enough amounts of hho to produce power for the car, and enough to spin a generator (alternator) to produce more HHO as well, so that the only fuel input is water :)

Stick around read up, you've hundreds of hours of video to watch and forums to read so that these guys don't sound like they are speaking a different language :)  

HOWEVER you have found the perfect place to do so :).  I recommend subscribing to the RSS and following it when you can :)

WELCOME!

M

km30773

RE: H2O 2000
« Reply #8, on August 18th, 2012, 03:36 PM »
Thank you Guys

I will follow your lead to the new discovery and make history

Hopefully i can help and learn on the way along.


Matt Watts

RE: H2O 2000
« Reply #10, on October 19th, 2012, 04:50 PM »
I don't know guys, it would seem that if you listen closely to everything this guy says, you can do the rest without much effort:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3ySaTPu9HY

He mentions DC with an AC component on top of it.  So run the DC through one side of a transformer to the cell and dump your AC signal on the other side.  Adjust the amplitude and frequency while your cell is doing normal electrolysis and watch for a huge spike in production as you dial in the AC.  I would think one of those seven cell Punch units with a little NaOH would work perfectly to prove this out once and for all.  If this doesn't work, you can always go back to the orignal way Bob discovered it--short out one of the diodes in an alternator and hook the alternator to a variable speed motor until you hit the spike in gas production.

FaradayEZ

RE: H2O 2000
« Reply #11, on October 19th, 2012, 05:12 PM »Last edited on October 19th, 2012, 05:15 PM by FaradayEZ
Quote from Dog-One on October 19th, 2012, 04:50 PM
I don't know guys, it would seem that if you listen closely to everything this guy says, you can do the rest without much effort:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3ySaTPu9HY

He mentions DC with an AC component on top of it.  So run the DC through one side of a transformer to the cell and dump your AC signal on the other side.  Adjust the amplitude and frequency while your cell is doing normal electrolysis and watch for a huge spike in production as you dial in the AC.  I would think one of those seven cell Punch units with a little NaOH would work perfectly to prove this out once and for all.  If this doesn't work, you can always go back to the orignal way Bob discovered it--short out one of the diodes in an alternator and hook the alternator to a variable speed motor until you hit the spike in gas production.
These guys had no luck yet with it....





Quote from km30773 on August 17th, 2012, 10:43 PM
Jeff

It sounds to me that it is not difficult to produce HHO torch with technology we already have.

Just wondering how come HHO torch is not widely used and replacing the old technology (like CD replacing Tape and DVD replacing VCD). Correct me if i am wrong, that there is not many HHO torch available in the market right?

Pls enlighten me if i missed something.
HHO torch is terrible for welding iron. The oxigen in it makes it impossible.