https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r95OI0rD7Dk  Maybe I missed this somewhere but what is the downside here?

Quote from Blazer on August 13th, 2012, 09:50 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r95OI0rD7Dk  Maybe I missed this somewhere but what is the downside here?

the only thing your missing is that we are still driving on gas and we all still relay on money... lol

here is there site:

http://www.electricauto.com/

~Russ

PS. we still need energy to charge the car... and fuel cell tech is not all that it is cracked up to be...

Well we really need free energy, I personally would not want batteries, I would have to replace for $6000.00 when they wear out. Electric cars! -------- Ok, but free energy to run them.

I still think Tesla had it with the wireless power transmission.  Even if the tower didn't produce free energy at first.  It would always be an option down the road.  It's a shame that the tower was never completed.  An on board free energy device would still be the ultimate.  No reliance on anyone, pure independence.   Hopefully some day!

Also one should do some research on who "Apollo" really is, and decide if you really want to buy a product with one his names on it.:P

Quote from DarcieGale on September 6th, 2012, 08:19 PM

I would have to replace for $6000.00 when they wear out. Electric cars! -------- Ok, but free energy to run them.

Those old battery's can be refurbished with alum, see lidmotors YT channel, ask him about John he does car battery's.:D

Quote from firepinto on August 16th, 2012, 07:18 PM

I still think Tesla had it with the wireless power transmission.  Even if the tower didn't produce free energy at first.  It would always be an option down the road.  It's a shame that the tower was never completed.  An on board free energy device would still be the ultimate.  No reliance on anyone, pure independence.   Hopefully some day!

Also one should do some research on who "Apollo" really is, and decide if you really want to buy a product with one his names on it.:P

Tesla had a hard time convincing Westinghouse about the advantages with his
wireless power transmission system, as he (Westinghouse) basically said
"Well, what's keeping the ones NOT subscribing to the system from tapping in
to it and basically just drain the power from it, without paying a cent?"
Hence, as Westinghouse was Tesla's financier, the tower wasn't finished.
I don't think Tesla had "free energy" as a goal per se, his vision was to provide
power to basically any vehicle anywhere wirelessly, thus bringing power to all
the World's corners, without the need for costly national grids, etc etc :cool:

Quote from Lynx on September 7th, 2012, 01:27 PM

Quote from firepinto on August 16th, 2012, 07:18 PM

I still think Tesla had it with the wireless power transmission.  Even if the tower didn't produce free energy at first.  It would always be an option down the road.  It's a shame that the tower was never completed.  An on board free energy device would still be the ultimate.  No reliance on anyone, pure independence.   Hopefully some day!

Also one should do some research on who "Apollo" really is, and decide if you really want to buy a product with one his names on it.:P

Tesla had a hard time convincing Westinghouse about the advantages with his
wireless power transmission system, as he (Westinghouse) basically said
"Well, what's keeping the ones NOT subscribing to the system from tapping in
to it and basically just drain the power from it, without paying a cent?"
Hence, as Westinghouse was Tesla's financier, the tower wasn't finished.
I don't think Tesla had "free energy" as a goal per se, his vision was to provide
power to basically any vehicle anywhere wirelessly, thus bringing power to all
the World's corners, without the need for costly national grids, etc etc :cool:

Just a small point, actually it was JP Morgan that pulled the funding from Tesla, Westinghouse bought some of Tesla's patents.

Quote from Jeff Nading on September 7th, 2012, 05:13 PM

Quote from Lynx on September 7th, 2012, 01:27 PM

Quote from firepinto on August 16th, 2012, 07:18 PM

I still think Tesla had it with the wireless power transmission.  Even if the tower didn't produce free energy at first.  It would always be an option down the road.  It's a shame that the tower was never completed.  An on board free energy device would still be the ultimate.  No reliance on anyone, pure independence.   Hopefully some day!

Also one should do some research on who "Apollo" really is, and decide if you really want to buy a product with one his names on it.:P

Tesla had a hard time convincing Westinghouse about the advantages with his
wireless power transmission system, as he (Westinghouse) basically said
"Well, what's keeping the ones NOT subscribing to the system from tapping in
to it and basically just drain the power from it, without paying a cent?"
Hence, as Westinghouse was Tesla's financier, the tower wasn't finished.
I don't think Tesla had "free energy" as a goal per se, his vision was to provide
power to basically any vehicle anywhere wirelessly, thus bringing power to all
the World's corners, without the need for costly national grids, etc etc :cool:

Just a small point, actually it was JP Morgan that pulled the funding from Tesla, Westinghouse bought some of Tesla's patents.

Okidok, my bad, thanks.