Resonance

camaswizard

Resonance
« on May 24th, 2012, 02:06 PM »
Just my thoughts on the subject. Please excuse my terminology but this is the best way I can describe it.. All things above absolute zero vibrate due to electron motion. Energy. When 2 or more "items" in our universe are in "vibrational harmony" they resonate. This has an affect on the corporeal (all states of matter) and ethereal (magnetic, energy) local area. Maybe the whole universe, but I can't say for sure. What I can say is that Stanley Meyer, Dave Lawton, Ravi and Russ built resonance machines that remind me of serious car stereos. No joke. The principles are the same. Its where I believe my idea for a conical plate came from. Music is pumped thru an amplifier and sent to the speaker as pulses. Old and new music was and is recorded this way. Whether analog(records) magnetic (cassettes) or digital (mp3).. Look at the speaker it RESONATES with the electric pulse that is turned into sound waves... energy. More than just sound energy we can hear. Look at a "pimped out" car with an extensive stereo system. The automatic transmission wears out faster. Not due to neglect. More vibrations which make the transmission work harder. I know trust me I know lol. The whole car "loosens up" due to repeated stress.   A subwoofer is an AIR CAPACITOR! Resonant cavity cell is a WATER CAPACITOR. I can't help but to see similarities in the 2. Any thoughts or criticism an this would be helpful.  

Robert Twiss

RE: Resonance
« Reply #1, on May 24th, 2012, 02:17 PM »
Very interesting thought.

Sirgoose

RE: Resonance
« Reply #2, on May 25th, 2012, 09:41 PM »
Quote from camaswizard on May 24th, 2012, 02:06 PM
Just my thoughts on the subject. Please excuse my terminology but this is the best way I can describe it.. All things above absolute zero vibrate due to electron motion. Energy. When 2 or more "items" in our universe are in "vibrational harmony" they resonate. This has an affect on the corporeal (all states of matter) and ethereal (magnetic, energy) local area. Maybe the whole universe, but I can't say for sure. What I can say is that Stanley Meyer, Dave Lawton, Ravi and Russ built resonance machines that remind me of serious car stereos. No joke. The principles are the same. Its where I believe my idea for a conical plate came from. Music is pumped thru an amplifier and sent to the speaker as pulses. Old and new music was and is recorded this way. Whether analog(records) magnetic (cassettes) or digital (mp3).. Look at the speaker it RESONATES with the electric pulse that is turned into sound waves... energy. More than just sound energy we can hear. Look at a "pimped out" car with an extensive stereo system. The automatic transmission wears out faster. Not due to neglect. More vibrations which make the transmission work harder. I know trust me I know lol. The whole car "loosens up" due to repeated stress.   A subwoofer is an AIR CAPACITOR! Resonant cavity cell is a WATER CAPACITOR. I can't help but to see similarities in the 2. Any thoughts or criticism an this would be helpful.
Everything does resonate but there is only specific frequency were material is in a resonant condition.The Inductive and Capacitive reactance must equal. This being said inductive reactance is inversely proportionally to capacitive reactance. Reactance is measured in Ohms. Hope is helps

Buratino

RE: Resonance
« Reply #3, on October 28th, 2012, 04:10 PM »
I think Meyer invented resonance, that people would be looking for another way. In water there is no resonance, water quantum system, the molecule cannot be rocked. But it can be reversed. Only it is necessary to know exactly how much exert a force field.

FaradayEZ

RE: Resonance
« Reply #4, on October 31st, 2012, 03:26 PM »
Quote from camaswizard on May 24th, 2012, 02:06 PM
Just my thoughts on the subject. Please excuse my terminology but this is the best way I can describe it.. All things above absolute zero vibrate due to electron motion. Energy. When 2 or more "items" in our universe are in "vibrational harmony" they resonate. This has an affect on the corporeal (all states of matter) and ethereal (magnetic, energy) local area. Maybe the whole universe, but I can't say for sure. What I can say is that Stanley Meyer, Dave Lawton, Ravi and Russ built resonance machines that remind me of serious car stereos. No joke. The principles are the same. Its where I believe my idea for a conical plate came from. Music is pumped thru an amplifier and sent to the speaker as pulses. Old and new music was and is recorded this way. Whether analog(records) magnetic (cassettes) or digital (mp3).. Look at the speaker it RESONATES with the electric pulse that is turned into sound waves... energy. More than just sound energy we can hear. Look at a "pimped out" car with an extensive stereo system. The automatic transmission wears out faster. Not due to neglect. More vibrations which make the transmission work harder. I know trust me I know lol. The whole car "loosens up" due to repeated stress.   A subwoofer is an AIR CAPACITOR! Resonant cavity cell is a WATER CAPACITOR. I can't help but to see similarities in the 2. Any thoughts or criticism an this would be helpful.
I think you are totally right. But what to do with it? Make HHO? Then find the frequency of the H-O binding and also use the ownfrequency of the cell. Let the second be sounding as an harmonic to the first, by dividing the 2 frequencies and then adjust the length of the cell towards the first whole number.

And maybe also use the frequency of the ingoing current to achieve the resonance point faster.

In this way you would use the least amount of energy for the most HHO gain, i think.





Matt Watts

RE: Resonance
« Reply #5, on October 31st, 2012, 09:09 PM »
Quote from FaradayEZ on October 31st, 2012, 03:26 PM
I think you are totally right. But what to do with it? Make HHO? Then find the frequency of the H-O binding and also use the ownfrequency of the cell. Let the second be sounding as an harmonic to the first, by dividing the 2 frequencies and then adjust the length of the cell towards the first whole number.

And maybe also use the frequency of the ingoing current to achieve the resonance point faster.

In this way you would use the least amount of energy for the most HHO gain, i think.
There was a guy by the name of Royal Raymond Rife that did a bunch of experimenting with resonant frequencies; even went so far to build at the time a state of the art microscope to look at bacteria and see what frequencies impact different types of bacteria.  Much of his work and instruments found their way down the memory hole but the concept still lives on.  What would be nice is to be able to see a magnified water molecule well enough to do the same thing with it.  If we could see what we are doing instead of guessing, within a week someone could hit the resonant frequency/pattern that works to split water.  Then we all could replicate it and it would work every time.  It's frustrating to know the answer is right there, if there were only a good way to get from here to there.

~Russ

RE: Resonance
« Reply #6, on October 31st, 2012, 09:28 PM »
Quote from Dog-One on October 31st, 2012, 09:09 PM
Quote from FaradayEZ on October 31st, 2012, 03:26 PM
I think you are totally right. But what to do with it? Make HHO? Then find the frequency of the H-O binding and also use the ownfrequency of the cell. Let the second be sounding as an harmonic to the first, by dividing the 2 frequencies and then adjust the length of the cell towards the first whole number.

And maybe also use the frequency of the ingoing current to achieve the resonance point faster.

In this way you would use the least amount of energy for the most HHO gain, i think.
There was a guy by the name of Royal Raymond Rife that did a bunch of experimenting with resonant frequencies; even went so far to build at the time a state of the art microscope to look at bacteria and see what frequencies impact different types of bacteria.  Much of his work and instruments found their way down the memory hole but the concept still lives on.  What would be nice is to be able to see a magnified water molecule well enough to do the same thing with it.  If we could see what we are doing instead of guessing, within a week someone could hit the resonant frequency/pattern that works to split water.  Then we all could replicate it and it would work every time.  It's frustrating to know the answer is right there, if there were only a good way to get from here to there.
yep! :) ~Russ

FaradayEZ

RE: Resonance
« Reply #7, on November 1st, 2012, 04:49 AM »
Quote from Dog-One on October 31st, 2012, 09:09 PM
Quote from FaradayEZ on October 31st, 2012, 03:26 PM
I think you are totally right. But what to do with it? Make HHO? Then find the frequency of the H-O binding and also use the ownfrequency of the cell. Let the second be sounding as an harmonic to the first, by dividing the 2 frequencies and then adjust the length of the cell towards the first whole number.

And maybe also use the frequency of the ingoing current to achieve the resonance point faster.

In this way you would use the least amount of energy for the most HHO gain, i think.
There was a guy by the name of Royal Raymond Rife that did a bunch of experimenting with resonant frequencies; even went so far to build at the time a state of the art microscope to look at bacteria and see what frequencies impact different types of bacteria.  Much of his work and instruments found their way down the memory hole but the concept still lives on.  What would be nice is to be able to see a magnified water molecule well enough to do the same thing with it.  If we could see what we are doing instead of guessing, within a week someone could hit the resonant frequency/pattern that works to split water.  Then we all could replicate it and it would work every time.  It's frustrating to know the answer is right there, if there were only a good way to get from here to there.
Yes, the influence of frequencies on tissue, also to create cancer in rabbits is known here and there.
But i don't think we have to find out those frequencies with a practical setup. There are already people who have calculated some of this, or know how to do that. They know the mass of the atom, the mass and speed of the electrons etc. We just have to find some of those professors and email them?








Buratino

RE: Resonance
« Reply #8, on November 1st, 2012, 12:08 PM »Last edited on November 1st, 2012, 12:10 PM by Buratino
Help scheme generator resonance


FaradayEZ

RE: Resonance
« Reply #10, on November 2nd, 2012, 09:53 AM »
Quote from Buratino on October 28th, 2012, 04:10 PM
I think Meyer invented resonance, that people would be looking for another way. In water there is no resonance, water quantum system, the molecule cannot be rocked. But it can be reversed. Only it is necessary to know exactly how much exert a force field.
Resonance is as old as the world..don't know who first put it in writing. Also in water there is resonance possible. In several ways..the whole system..bucket whatever and the individual molecuuls and between atom and electrons etc. Ergo resonance can occur between all the individual components and between borders and group of ind. components, acting as a whole.