Sounds like something Meyers did, but without trying to market it.
this is done by vibrating the water whilst electorlyzing it at the same time the releases hydrogen stay trapped in greater concentration with in the water mixture.
this show that even, if you put detergent it won't bubble as the vibration break the water tension and h2 release from electrolizer is obsorbed into water kinda of saturating it, Stanely said a unformly homogenised mix. or simething very similar
so he fractured it meter mix and the I am sure found he could vibrate buuble out mean it was a mix fuel
see here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUPE0Z9V82E
I believe that caviation during electolyzation is capturing h in the water
to saturate it to equal gasoline
research it
This video is fairly old. Im unsure why he never went to market or even released how he made it. But its all been shelved from what i can tell. I have seen other videos of steve since he made that bike and in the background of one of the videos you can see that same bike just sitting there and he has moved on to other stuff. Not sure what the go is but something is fishy somewhere. (Sorry, i cant remember what the other videos were i saw)
Well i found the video ofter much searching my utube history. Seems this video is old as well, not sure if it predates the bike or not. But if you look at 1:45, you will see the bike in the background. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfhacTEcZhE
Edit: and if your wondering how i spotted that bike in the background, its because im a biker lmao.
Zaneaussie, yes from memory that was on http://peswiki.com from memory.
I wasnt aware of the ecotube.
Yes thats my bike, its American made Victory Jackpot.
Very nice! Would be cool to have that baby run for free!Quote from AHL on August 16th, 2013, 04:35 AM I wasnt aware of the ecotube.
Yes thats my bike, its American made Victory Jackpot.
Haha. in this case id rather gasoline lol.Quote from zaneaussie on August 16th, 2013, 04:38 AM Very nice! Would be cool to have that baby run for free!Quote from AHL on August 16th, 2013, 04:35 AM I wasnt aware of the ecotube.
Yes thats my bike, its American made Victory Jackpot.
Im in Syd, where u at?
Cavitation as Daniel said. I also suspect the Bob Boyce electrolyzer following the same principal. Cavitation is a side-effect of vibration within the fuel cell. You get the correct resonant stimulation within the fuel cell and cavitation adds energy to the process.
Some interesting discoveries about cavitation. It is suspected when the tiny bubbles reform back to water while undergoing cavitation, there is actually a microscopic nuclear fusion reaction taking place. I think it's termed the LeClair Effect and appears to be repeatable. This effect explains why even the toughest of materials are effected by cavitation--microscopic nuclear bombs would do that to anything.
http://www.pureenergyblog.com/2013/08/14/1664/8502365_keelynet-summarizes-leclairs-3-4x-overunity-cavitation-report/
Supposedly, Mark LeClair will be at the GlobalBEM conference. I'll plan on attending that session and get the gritty details if I can.
So what you are saying is that Steve put the water through some type of cavitation proceedure which somehow altered the water enough to be used as is and without electrolysis to run a motor vehicle?
I like your way of thinking hereQuote from zaneaussie on August 24th, 2013, 07:49 AM So what you are saying is that Steve put the water through some type of cavitation proceedure which somehow altered the water enough to be used as is and without electrolysis to run a motor vehicle?
Sure, until proven otherwise I'd say that building a cell that which uses cavitation for splitting water into H2 and O2 should be perfectly possible to do.
No electrolysis, no electric fracturing, just vibrations/cavity/sound waves/vibrating mechanical energy/whatever you would like to call it.
Nice.
That's good thinking ouside the box, keep it up
Sure, I'd buy that.
Until it's officially out here, complete with documents and all, I'd say that what mr Pond has to offer full well could be applied the way you suggest D1 and proved to be working just fine, the way we all hope it would.
AAMOF, at cavitation, when vacuum is produced, that itself would lead to lower conductivity between the plates/tubes, which in turn would mean a rise of voltage and a decrease of current.
Makes perfect sense to me.
And shazamm! What you are talking about is also described by Dale Pond: Sympathetic Vibratory Physics. He gets into the dirty details on his site and explains the difference between resonance and vibration. It's subtle, but understandable based on WHERE the oscillation is coming from.
So for grins, lets suppose you have an electrolysis cell, normal brute force type. Connected to that cell you have a pulsing source that you can adjust until it hits some frequency within the plates of the cell that cause the plates to rapidly squeeze and expand much faster than the water can move into and out of those cavities. Now add a little vacuum to the cell so the water is more likely to cavitate. Hmmm, maybe we get some gas production that is beyond what we can explain by brute force, because just maybe the cavitation of the water between the plates is assisting the process. Seem like a reasonable explanation on Stanley Meyer Day...?
...
So for grins, lets suppose you have an electrolysis cell, normal brute force type. Connected to that cell you have a pulsing source that you can adjust until it hits some frequency within the plates of the cell that cause the plates to rapidly squeeze and expand much faster than the water can move into and out of those cavities. Now add a little vacuum to the cell so the water is more likely to cavitate. Hmmm, maybe we get some gas production that is beyond what we can explain by brute force, because just maybe the cavitation of the water between the plates is assisting the process. Seem like a reasonable explanation on Stanley Meyer Day...?