Xxx
FOGDOG7
Stan Deyo v2 lifter
« on October 13th, 2021, 08:29 PM »Last edited on October 28th, 2021, 07:27 AM
Stan Deyo v2 lifter
FOGDOG7
Re: Stan Deyo v2 lifter
« Reply #1, on October 13th, 2021, 08:43 PM »Last edited on October 28th, 2021, 07:27 AM
Xxx
FOGDOG7
Re: Stan Deyo v2 lifter
« Reply #2, on October 14th, 2021, 06:15 PM »Last edited on October 28th, 2021, 07:28 AM
Xxx
FOGDOG7
Re: Stan Deyo v2 lifter
« Reply #3, on October 16th, 2021, 10:56 AM »Last edited on October 28th, 2021, 07:28 AM
Xxx
FOGDOG7
Re: Stan Deyo v2 lifter
« Reply #4, on October 18th, 2021, 04:24 PM »Last edited on October 28th, 2021, 07:28 AM
Xxx
FOGDOG7
Re: Stan Deyo v2 lifter
« Reply #5, on October 18th, 2021, 04:32 PM »Last edited on October 28th, 2021, 07:29 AM
Xxx
FOGDOG7
Re: Stan Deyo v2 lifter
« Reply #6, on October 19th, 2021, 08:16 PM »Last edited on October 28th, 2021, 07:29 AM
Xxx
FOGDOG7
Re: Stan Deyo v2 lifter
« Reply #7, on October 19th, 2021, 08:27 PM »Last edited on October 28th, 2021, 07:29 AM
Xxx
how do you calculate the lifting force have you used a dc bias ? with positive bottom negative top
like others do ?
like others do ?
FOGDOG7
Re: Stan Deyo v2 lifter
« Reply #9, on October 20th, 2021, 08:18 PM »Last edited on October 28th, 2021, 07:29 AM
Xxx.
does a switching
charge go in motion ?
charge go in motion ?
FOGDOG7
Re: Stan Deyo v2 lifter
« Reply #11, on October 22nd, 2021, 02:03 PM »Last edited on October 22nd, 2021, 02:08 PM
Look up the definition of heterodyning. It is a fairly simple circuit design that forces a continued fractal. Well 0 point energy is basically the same thing, But it takes advantage of the energy return to keep itself running.
If you use a pump Z wave to move positive ion charge in one direction there will be a pump Z wave of negative ion charge in the opposite direction. All you need are a few things to keep them from finding each other again. Consider the torus. Now add pump Z waves on it so that they orbit around and through that center upon the surface. Now once you add carried waves on top of that, And even have a 3rd system in there that would allow those carried waves to forever multiply themselves as a continued fractal, Then you finally understand how you can split the heavy Z positive boson Bosson away from energy moving in the opposite direction. Concentrate those particles enough and they become as heavy as gold.
Tom Bearden described the nonlinear medium which is necessary to fold pump Z waves into a higher frequency. Heterodyning also uses a non linear medium.
Dave Puchta who does hydrogen for power on Yt uses heterodyening , he says, to make deuterium.
He does not think 0 point is the same thing but he doesn't understand the physics of it. All you need is a medium for any fractal to multiply itself into further divisions.
If you use a pump Z wave to move positive ion charge in one direction there will be a pump Z wave of negative ion charge in the opposite direction. All you need are a few things to keep them from finding each other again. Consider the torus. Now add pump Z waves on it so that they orbit around and through that center upon the surface. Now once you add carried waves on top of that, And even have a 3rd system in there that would allow those carried waves to forever multiply themselves as a continued fractal, Then you finally understand how you can split the heavy Z positive boson Bosson away from energy moving in the opposite direction. Concentrate those particles enough and they become as heavy as gold.
Tom Bearden described the nonlinear medium which is necessary to fold pump Z waves into a higher frequency. Heterodyning also uses a non linear medium.
Dave Puchta who does hydrogen for power on Yt uses heterodyening , he says, to make deuterium.
He does not think 0 point is the same thing but he doesn't understand the physics of it. All you need is a medium for any fractal to multiply itself into further divisions.
do you have the drive circuit for heterodyning
Ah yes well I'm getting bad vibes from people here so knowing there are fake profiles, foreign spies, and religious extremists, I see no point in sacrificing my hard work to some douches who want world domination. I cannot make this information public. I don't even know you. Probably some chinese guy using some doctor's photo. What is that about. A stethoscope? Looks like you have a stethoscope hanging around your neck. What the heck. You're in Thailand. Even more sketchy!!!
I came here to find tech help for an electronic circuit problem but received no expertise there. I don't know why Russ even keeps this lame site up.
Anyway, it took me a few days, but I managed to figure it out. Just replaced coils with parallel caps that echo rf from the apex of compression in the bell shape, while acting as 4 zero points there. Simple.
Anyway, it took me a few days, but I managed to figure it out. Just replaced coils with parallel caps that echo rf from the apex of compression in the bell shape, while acting as 4 zero points there. Simple.
You can look up a heterodyning patent on google I bet.
I've been working on modifying the design now to work with what I've been learning. My biggest problem was I didn't know a capacitor's output depends mostly on it's surface areas of the two sides. I'd always thought it was 2 round plates facing one another inside those cylindrical tubes!
If I'd just known this little fact, it could have save me on the massive changes I'm having to do right now on the design. The birthday cake array of 144 coils is merely a way to split charge, compress force to an apex, and do so ever so efficiently. What it does not do however is hold charge long enough to effect the needed 3 phase waveform among other parts in the circuit loop.
Now this is where engineering theory gets very very interesting. Too bad I had to figure this out on my own. It's looking a lot better now, yet there's a chance I would still benefit from the help of an e.t. who knows their way around circuits.
The coils of the array do not hold much capacitance by simply resisting one-another, since they are currently wired in series. The change now is wiring them in series with 2 more capacitors, each one, matching the other cap, and the cap amplitude(?) calculated by metal volume will equal that of the wires in the 144 coils. This means, in series, spark gap, cap, 16 coil pairs on L3, cap, 24 coil pairs L2, cap, 32 coil pairs L1, spark gap.
This puts the circuit into a forced 3 phase dynamo relationship. The L2 and L3 interface caps would mount as near as possible to ferrous material of the disc at the base of the bell shape in order to pick up charge resonating in and out of the vortex modulated by both spark gap and the controlling flatwire caps in the top box in parallel. L2 and L3 would be on the bottom of this bell shape, and L3 is on it's own ferrous ground which gaps away from the main part of the bell along with spark gap on the same ballscrew system.
I'll post a diagram of this if I feel the need. So far, nobody here seems to have interest in this project and has any electronic experience.
I've been working on modifying the design now to work with what I've been learning. My biggest problem was I didn't know a capacitor's output depends mostly on it's surface areas of the two sides. I'd always thought it was 2 round plates facing one another inside those cylindrical tubes!
If I'd just known this little fact, it could have save me on the massive changes I'm having to do right now on the design. The birthday cake array of 144 coils is merely a way to split charge, compress force to an apex, and do so ever so efficiently. What it does not do however is hold charge long enough to effect the needed 3 phase waveform among other parts in the circuit loop.
Now this is where engineering theory gets very very interesting. Too bad I had to figure this out on my own. It's looking a lot better now, yet there's a chance I would still benefit from the help of an e.t. who knows their way around circuits.
The coils of the array do not hold much capacitance by simply resisting one-another, since they are currently wired in series. The change now is wiring them in series with 2 more capacitors, each one, matching the other cap, and the cap amplitude(?) calculated by metal volume will equal that of the wires in the 144 coils. This means, in series, spark gap, cap, 16 coil pairs on L3, cap, 24 coil pairs L2, cap, 32 coil pairs L1, spark gap.
This puts the circuit into a forced 3 phase dynamo relationship. The L2 and L3 interface caps would mount as near as possible to ferrous material of the disc at the base of the bell shape in order to pick up charge resonating in and out of the vortex modulated by both spark gap and the controlling flatwire caps in the top box in parallel. L2 and L3 would be on the bottom of this bell shape, and L3 is on it's own ferrous ground which gaps away from the main part of the bell along with spark gap on the same ballscrew system.
I'll post a diagram of this if I feel the need. So far, nobody here seems to have interest in this project and has any electronic experience.
securesupplies
Re: Stan Deyo v2 lifter
« Reply #16, on October 30th, 2021, 10:29 AM »Last edited on October 31st, 2021, 01:42 AM
linear and parallel to earths surface
than you get ability to surf the fields.
I suggest those Following to Look at Position 44 .55
If your concerned about who i am or who others are use the links
in my signature post or others posts
to do some reading.
https://youtu.be/R6RGwdlgDUM
than you get ability to surf the fields.
I suggest those Following to Look at Position 44 .55
If your concerned about who i am or who others are use the links
in my signature post or others posts
to do some reading.
https://youtu.be/R6RGwdlgDUM
For those Struggling to comprehend what open source and co operation means
I suggest Watch Russ's Explanation here of what forum is for.
https://youtu.be/zUswMSqRTLI