(topic misspelling intentional...)

The more I get into this the more I think the purpose of my education was to teach me how to clone 100y old Poo and pay my taxes...

I think why electronics and EM radiation seem so difficult to grasp, is that the causes are hidden or unknown. Is this deliberate or not is another topic, but if you are told how the effects are and you have no clue of the cause, then you are pretty much fracked. You can read a recipe and bake a cake, but you have no clue how to make bread with the same stuff.

So I have a couple of questions/ideas that I have pondered upon and I hope you could correct me or confirm my thoughts. I will replace Ether with "quantum foam" so people do not foam. Now after writing the questions it seems there were more than I expected, but I feel I cannot proceed with any experiments, if the actual "causes" are eluding me

1. Electricity is manifested when quantum foam is stressed into movement (change) by a moving magnetic field and there is a conductor in the area of this movement. Doesn't need to be a coil. Can be hot gas even ie. a conductor

2. Electricity going through a coil starts slow and then blows out from the end. Like water in a bucket at the end of a string that is spun in a circle. When you cut the power that string is cut and the bucket flies outwards. You see this when a diode and a cap is after the coil. You get battery voltage + what ever was in the bucket in the cap. More than battery voltage anyway. That "blowing" or stretching in the coil now snaps back, because it was stretched further than where the coil was. The quantum foam that is the invisible spring being stretched here snaps back and cause the backEMF. This is larger than battery voltage and this is what strings do.

3. Positive and negative voltages depend on the agreed 0-level that is called ground. You can arbitrarely decide where this ground is. If your ground is at the positive end of 2x 9V batteries in series, then between the batteries is -9V and at the negative and you got -18V. More common example would be ground in the middle for 9V, 0V and -9V or just 18V and 0V when ground is at the negative end.

4. Now lets say you are standing in the actual circuit and looking along the wire. Positive voltage (to you) means positive pressure towards where you are looking at and charges move that way. If you are measuring negative voltage that means negative pressure (suction) and that means charges coming at you.

5. In an AC circuit there is no positive or negative terminal and you can swap your power plug which ever way you wasn't in the wall socket. When you are looking along the wire you see charges going and coming at you 50 times a second. The light bulb does not care which way the charges are going.

6. In the previous item the amount of electricity you are "using" is the what ever the bulb can turn to light and heat. Like two of your friends on your left and right side both pulling on a rope that goes around your wrist. They each pull 60 times a second and you get a nice rope burn on your wrist. The rope experiences a slight wear and tear from your wrist, but in Finland you pay rent for the whole rope in kW per hour. This is measured from either terminal. In Canada with the new smart meters they started to measure from both ends, so they now charge double.

7. I now put a diode between myself and my positive friend so that positive charge (rope) can come from my positive friend towards my wrist. This is now called a half-bridge and it is supposed to cut negative half waves off, but that negative half wave is rope coming towards my positive friend?!? Isn't that diode supposed to pass negative voltage from that direction towards my positive friend? What was cut off by the diode and what are the measuring points to achieve this? If I reverse the diode does my wrist get anything from my positive friend and does my negative friends rope now pass my wrist and somehow go against the reversed diode?!?

8. I just read that capacitor has one charge and on which plate this charge is located depends on the voltage applied. What happens if I connect a cap to positive 9V DC and leave the other leg disconnected? What happens if I do this with 9V AC?

10. What happens to charges if I connect both legs to 9V DC battery? Cap now has 9V, but what supplied the actual charges?

11. What happens in I use 9V AC? Both plates are continuously being charged with positive and negative charges? Where do the charges come from?

12. My cap now has 9V potential difference between the legs and that is charge depending on farads. Do I have positive charge on positive plate and none on the negative plate or do I have positive charge on positive plate and negative charge on negative plate?

13. If I ground the negative leg, the ground will change the plate potential to zero. I see no other way than the ground supplying the plate with positive charges. Do I now have a cap with both plates charged with positive charge?

wow this is a great hot chocolate,  although it does have sugar... ;-D

hmm i think my issue is about self decpetion kind of too.  was thinking about this thismorning,  - when i started too move beyond hho, and start playing with electronics free energy, like bedini etc. ,  i was out of practice, not having done much electronics since i was like 14.

anyways after a few years playing with the prevaining toys on ou.com and energeticforum.com .  i wasnt having any solid success.  - free energy from battery chemistry is not what i was looking for,  and i wanted something i could do reliabley - and consistently, with any components,. and batterys, new or old, conditioned or not.

anyways for the last few years my sights have been on simile designs that were going too work.  - and its clear too see, and test. - like pendulus and linear motors etc..   i spent 20 mins on the phont with thein heinz, and was only able too determine that my efforts with his motor was wasted, because that just isnt viable either, as advertized initially.,  -however i understand how later verious of that, and the transformers CAN actaully work.  -   

its really cool too feel higher up the ladder in this game now, -- can look at my pyramid of blocks that makeup my experience,  - and i can also see some blocks above me that have already been placed by others.  - im really looking forward too tackle some of these,  - but i still have alot invested in my current projects,  and they are still viable., so i will contunue with them

but one thing is annoying me,   the possibility that some of these motionless transformer designs are so good, and simple, and light, and cheap.

that it really would be better too drop what im doing.

live and learn right,  this is a highclass problem,  dont      cry.

Quote from patrick1 on February 11th, 2019, 06:44 AM

wow this is a great hot chocolate,  although it does have sugar... ;-D

hmm i think my issue is about self decpetion kind of too.  was thinking about this thismorning,  - when i started too move beyond hho, and start playing with electronics free energy, like bedini etc. ,  i was out of practice, not having done much electronics since i was like 14.

anyways after a few years playing with the prevaining toys on ou.com and energeticforum.com .  i wasnt having any solid success.  - free energy from battery chemistry is not what i was looking for,  and i wanted something i could do reliabley - and consistently, with any components,. and batterys, new or old, conditioned or not.

anyways for the last few years my sights have been on simile designs that were going too work.  - and its clear too see, and test. - like pendulus and linear motors etc..   i spent 20 mins on the phont with thein heinz, and was only able too determine that my efforts with his motor was wasted, because that just isnt viable either, as advertized initially.,  -however i understand how later verious of that, and the transformers CAN actaully work.  -   

its really cool too feel higher up the ladder in this game now, -- can look at my pyramid of blocks that makeup my experience,  - and i can also see some blocks above me that have already been placed by others.  - im really looking forward too tackle some of these,  - but i still have alot invested in my current projects,  and they are still viable., so i will contunue with them

but one thing is annoying me,   the possibility that some of these motionless transformer designs are so good, and simple, and light, and cheap.

that it really would be better too drop what im doing.

live and learn right,  this is a highclass problem,  dont      cry.

The reason why I don't want to try any pendulums or or mechanical devices is that I feel they are always hindered by friction. Air or otherwise. I felt that there can be a electronic analog for every mechanical device, so at least air friction is taken out of the equation.

I have never really thought that they could actually work so well, that you can make them work first and then proceed to electronic analogs if needed. Also just came to mind that inertia might be more easily abused with a mechanical device than with an electronic one. Good luck on the contest! Nice shot of your boner in the start of the video ;)

I realized I need some clarity on those questions before I can design any device or understand other people's devices

my boner is the humility of fail, lots of lots of fail, and lots and lots of fight ;-D

Well some of the questions I might remove. It seems I have built Tesla's hairpin. Did not recognize it first, because mine is different. Explains some of the weirdness at least