Worth a read and some time to reflect:
https://www.thoughtco.com/the-lowest-animal-by-mark-twain-1690158
In times long past they used to speak of the horror vacui — fear of the void. They meant something quite objective. They meant that space itself always wants to be filled with something. An empty space cannot really be created; Nature has a kind of horror of the void. This belief in the horror vacui first had to disappear from humanity; it had to be possible to create a space in which the air is rarefied, — a space approximately empty. Only then could one proceed with the practical construction of steam-engines. The air had to be eliminated from certain spaces.
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=3134.msg46940#msg46940
You're still attempting to look at the system from the vantage point of only the coil... it's the interaction of the coil and the permanent magnet, which I've already discussed in a prior post.
The extra energy is pulled from the quantum vacuum because you're stealing momentum from the orbiting electrons in the permanent magnet. They have nowhere else to get the energy to return to their normal orbital radius, since the energy being transferred to the coil is being taken away and put into a cap. The coil is merely the means of transferring the energy from the orbiting electrons to macroscopic rotation of the permanent magnet itself.
1) Steal orbital momentum from the permanent magnet's electrons via the coil
2) Convert electron orbital momentum to electrical energy
3) Store electrical energy in a cap
4) Magnet extracts energy from quantum vacuum to regain normal electron orbital radius
5) Pulse the cap voltage back through the coil
6) Push on the permanent magnet to sustain its rate of rotation
Newman thought the extra energy was coming from the conversion of matter in the coil into energy... it's not. It's coming from the orbiting electrons in the permanent magnet regaining their normal orbital radius by extracting energy from the quantum vacuum (the quantum vacuum being what sustains electrons in their orbits in the first place, as Boyer and NASA demonstrate in the peer-reviewed studies previously posted).
So he was almost correct in stating that more copper means more power output... had he dug into quantum mechanics a bit, he'd have realized that more copper implies a greater magnetic interaction between the coil and the permanent magnet (ie: lowering the permanent magnet's electron orbital radius more), and a larger machine implies a larger permanent magnet, thus more orbiting electrons extracting more energy from the quantum vacuum after they've had their orbital momentum stolen by the coil.
The arc discharge is a non-issue, a dead end. It does nothing to contribute to the power output of the machine, and in fact represents an energy loss. The machine should run better without it. I believe in later iterations of his motor, Newman took steps to minimize the arcing.
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=3128.msg48532#msg48532
Reply #1359 > 369
