Discernment -- Judge David Wynn Miller

Matt Watts

Re: Discernment -- Judge David Wynn Miller
« Reply #3, on February 3rd, 2017, 08:02 AM »
I asked Clint Richardson about this guy, here's his response:
Quote from clint
Greetings Matt... I have indeed heard of David and tried to view his research with an open mind. With that, I will tell you this...

First, after the spiritual awakening process I have been through for so many years, I have come to recognize what is the difference between what is self-evident Truth and what is not. When I read any language, whether it is represented by numbers, letters, symbols, hiro- or other glyphs, I understand that nothing self-evident may come from these words, let alone property interpretation of the intent of their author. Because all societies have been built upon cultural memes, historical fallacy, and religious lies, and because the entirety of all language structures are merely agreed upon terms of art that describe both nature (reality) and all artifice, I am left with one absolute end: Never trust anyone that worships symbol (including language) over Reality. Likeness is not sameness. And all authority comes from words, specifically names (property) and nothing else. And so when i see such ardent examination and respect of grammar and syntax I see someone lost in the trees never seeing the forest. Likewise, I might say the same about one who worships sacred geometry, who believes those numbers are more than symbols, and who has more faith in those numbers that the Reality, the substance that those numbers show to be the mere empty form. Societies of the secret love their sacred mathematics, from the Zodiac to the Roman calendar. In Truth, there are not days, months, or years, no dates, no names, and no persons. And this is very hard for people to remember and even contemplate. We do not see the code that makes up the legal matrix, the debtor's hell. We see what the computer language and code (words) represent to our senses, yet no substance exists behind that lie, that representation. In the Matrix movie this is an obvious conclusion. Wake up and Reality sets in, and no words or programming may change it.

Secondly, it is this worship of language structure and syntax that bothers me. While there is certainly something to what he is saying, to me he is not describing the self-evident Nature of Life and Nature, he is merely describing the code of the matrix, the building blocks of the matrix. I will not say he is wrong or right, only that since I woke up to Reality and to what is Truth (i.e., Nature, Reality, self-Existence without words) I am no longer fascinated by such pointless endeavors. I seek the meaning of Life and my place within Nature, not the structure of fiction. More importantly, I understand now that there is nothing I can do to change what he is teaching, for it is not mine to change. Those words and their jurisdictions are the artistic property of those who have incorporated themselves into what we call the government and societies, brotherhoods and associations. Just as I may not alter my own True Nature nor the Laws of Nature without dyer consequence, neither may I alter or force change to that impossible collection of verbiage, for it is not mine to change. It is, however, my choice to either follow their words or quit claiming them as my own while operating in their persona (status/mask). So, I am not sure that I can answer your question in the way that you want, that he is good or bad or whatever "word" you are looking for. What I can say is that if you get lost in such a game trying to figure out the correct version of a lie, then you will miss Living and never find Truth. My only sage wisdom here is to tell you that the Truth is never that which is made of man's words and inventions. The Truth is property of no man. If one spends his life, as I was doing for many years, trying to figure out the code that makes the Matrix run while I am still inside that simulation of word-magic, then I will only ever find exactly what I am looking for, which is the structure of a great and terrible lie and my own delusion of it.

I will not tell you to turn to "God," for that is just another artful word of man that has no definite meaning and that is misused at every turn. I will tell you that I wrote my book(s) in order to fully lead one to the Truth I speak of, which in the Bible is transcribed as all of self-Existence, as that which is self-evident (without name or property), which when considered as the whole of Life and Nature and the infinite substance of all Existence in the unending universe, is the definition of the VERB "Jehovah." To become one with Nature, with self-evident Truth, and to follow the Law of Nature without respect of all this artifice and the artificial authority of man's languages, this is to become one with God, or one with the Oneness of Being. This is what it means to follow the Law of Nature, to live without artifice and respect of words over the Reality they represent. Do not mistake this as religion (corporations/nouns), only as the intent of the author of the word Jehovah and how it is used in the scriptures. However, one must follow the Law religiously (verb). Like words, religion has nothing to do with the message and Law of the Bible. Religion keeps us away from the Truth of the Bible. The Truth is not immediately recognizable in the words of the Bible, but those words leads one to have the greatest super-power possible, to never be fooled by mans designs and words again.

While I obviously believe it is necessary to learn the language to the extent that you may recognize the trickery of its nature, I caution any further enchantment with it for it is so easy to lose oneself in its mystery. All magic is of words (symbols). And so unfortunately we must know evil and be vigilant against it to escape its clutches, its contracts, and its illusionary power. But we must not let it take us out of our very own Nature, our connection to Source, which some call as God.

Hope that helps in some way...


-Clint-

Matt Watts

Re: Discernment -- Judge David Wynn Miller
« Reply #5, on February 3rd, 2017, 11:37 AM »
Nature has no compassion for creatures that wish to control it and understandably so.

If nature is the supreme elder of all, I would imagine it to be in the best interest of all living creatures to respect our elder, accept our elder and work with it both physically and intellectually.  Compassion is given to those creatures who do this and don't attempt to fight the desires of nature.  In other words, go with the flow.  Not the flow of mankind, but that of nature.

And what are the desires of nature?

That's the 64,000 dollar question isn't it.