I'm unsure how to separate virtual photons by their helicity (massless particles have the same helicity and chirality, so we don't need to worry about particle chirality), or even if it can be done... but theoretically, if it could be done, it may be one avenue to separating out the two magnetic flux directions on each pole face, as means of forcing magnets to do useful work. So I'll archive this gedankenschnipsel and do more research.

cycle,
Please look over my current work site papers:

http://www.quantumgravityresearch.org/publications

seem like this might interest you.

~Russ

Quote from ~Russ on February 3rd, 2017, 01:21 PM

cycle,
Please look over my current work site papers:

http://www.quantumgravityresearch.org/publications

seem like this might interest you.

~Russ

Hi, Russ. That's pretty interesting, the 8-d charge-space. I'll have to look into it. Each vertex represents the underlying structure (the elementary particles) of the universe, the rays of the tetrahedron would be the "pathways" via which the elementary particles can be formed or can interact... the only questions I'd have, I guess, are:

1) What do the faces of the tetrahedron represent? Some sort of boundary condition which limits elementary particle interaction?

2) Why are some of those vertices at each end of the tetrahedral rays "locked" in our 4-d (x,y,z,time) existence, in other words, why isn't the universe constantly rearranging the vertices, making our reality liquid, constantly changing? Or is it constantly changing, but macroscopically "smeared out"?

3) How do we know that the tetrahedron is an equilateral triangle? Wouldn't each ray length (ie: each pathway of interaction) be dependent upon the cross-section of each interaction, the probability that each interaction would take place?