Free energy from bucking coils

Alan

Free energy from bucking coils
« on January 20th, 2015, 11:49 AM »
Chris Sykes from hyiq.org investigated for many years transformer type overunity systems, and focussed mainly on Floyd Sweet and his vacuum triode amplifier. Recently Chris made a breakthrough discovery: the use of bucking coils to eliminate Lenz's law; input power remains the same independent of output load.

He decided to release his findings
Please read this to understand : http://hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidelines%20to%20Bucking%20Coils.pdf

It's a very simple experiment. For more info, see hyiq.org

I wish I could try it out.

nav

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #1, on January 20th, 2015, 12:50 PM »
Quote from Alan on January 20th, 2015, 11:49 AM
Chris Sykes from hyiq.org investigated for many years transformer type overunity systems, and focussed mainly on Floyd Sweet and his vacuum triode amplifier. Recently Chris made a breakthrough discovery: the use of bucking coils to eliminate Lenz's law; input power remains the same independent of output load.

He decided to release his findings
Please read this to understand : http://hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidelines%20to%20Bucking%20Coils.pdf

It's a very simple experiment. For more info, see hyiq.org

I wish I could try it out.
I did that on here last year. I did an whole series of tests and posts about bucking coils and how they cancel len's law. I'm glad you've posted this because people don't seem to pay attention to it.
The tests i'm doing now with bifilar coils are the same and are the key to Stan Meyer's work. Unless you have the ability to cancel current in the VIC it will not work.
Once you have the current on hold you can play with self resonance.

Alan

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #2, on January 20th, 2015, 01:25 PM »
Can you please  link to your experiments?  I'm very interested in reading about them.

The resonant charging chokes seem to be wired in bucking configuration.

nav

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #3, on January 20th, 2015, 01:34 PM »
Quote from Alan on January 20th, 2015, 01:25 PM
Can you link to your experiments, I'm very interested in reading them.

The resonant charging chokes seem to be wired in bucking configuration.
My experiments are all on this forum but here is a vid where a trapped a magnetic field inside one bucking coil and created a magnet with one poll.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4T2jyC6N0_g#
But the amp restricting test and best test is here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qT-t6LpYbEc#ws

Matt Watts

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #5, on January 20th, 2015, 02:46 PM »
Difficult if you don't natively speak the language, but Ruslan clearly uses a bucking coil in his device shown here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyP5IcVzLHk#

From what I can determine using the close captioning translation into English, this bucking coil is the secret in him getting his Kapanadze type device to work.

Alan

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #6, on January 21st, 2015, 02:56 AM »
Do the Russians ever share documentation or schematics? All I see in hundreds of videos are colored coils.

The bucking coil in the first post must be used in a transformer configuration, the bucking coils being the secondary; they do allow current which isn't felt by the primary, thus infinite current must be able in theory.

Matt Watts

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #7, on January 30th, 2015, 04:29 PM »Last edited on January 30th, 2015, 04:31 PM
Here is an LC compensated bucking coil configuration that is worthy of some investigation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYjREkw1v-A#ws

The two brown axial components are 0.001uF 600 volt caps.  The signal input is nothing more than a straightforward DC pulse generator with variable duty cycle.  Core material is Ferrite.

Take special note of how the primary is wound in a figure eight pattern--very interesting magnetic effects associated with this design.

~Russ

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #8, on February 19th, 2015, 09:03 AM »
i attached the linked PDF.

Matt Watts


Webmug


Matt Watts

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #11, on March 4th, 2017, 03:52 AM »
Quote from Webmug on March 4th, 2017, 02:29 AM
To bad he has a ban on overunity forum, invite him on rwgresearch...  :-)
Before he was banned, I sent him a PM with my Skype contact hoping he would link up.  Nothing as yet.

I recommend trying some of the experiments he suggests.  There is definitely something there we need to wrap our heads around.  Some of Eric Dollard's "Lines of Force" documents help to explain the phenomena.  I'd like to think if we keep trying, one of us will hit on a small self-runner that can be replicated and better understood.  The Akula and Ruslan devices are good examples.

Webmug

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #12, on March 4th, 2017, 09:04 AM »Last edited on March 6th, 2017, 02:03 AM
This is interesting. Stan wrote the VIC is a frequency doubler and a "voltage intensifier" aka "charge separator" and using the "magnetic field" to restricts the current. The WFC is between the coils where the charge is separated. This only "works" when there is a load on the output coils. (WFC as a form of resistance).

 "charge separator"
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=2858.msg42555#msg42555
Quote from EMJunkie link=http://overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/msg433950/#msg433950
Why are we configuring Two Output Coils so that each Magnetic Field is Opposing each other?

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!
Quote from SkyWatcher123 link=http://overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/msg434009/#msg434009
The bucking causes a ping pong action, that alternatingly induces more output in each coil and possibly increases frequency as well.
Spot On! Any Conductor that see's a Changing Magnetic Field in Time will experience a Magnetic Force, Lorentz's Force.

It increases Charge Separation!!!

Floyd Sweet said:
“If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-Field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E.”

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!
Quote
What happens if we bring two coils together, one has an input of say 10V 10ma?

The Secondary Coil, in it is Induced and EMF, (Charge Separation), via Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field of the Primary! This Magnetic Field (Result of Charge Flowing) is in the Opposite Direction to the Primary! So in the Picture (Attached) we see Net Zero Magnetic Field. The Vector from each Magnetic Field, Sums to Zero! This is Lenz's Law! A Magnetic Field that Opposes the Primary! Only if Loaded and Current is Flowing!

Now, in a Secondary, which would normally be carrying Current anyway, if we bring another Coil in (Tertiary Coil), we see again a Tertiary Field, Lenz Law, Induced EMF in our Tertiary Coil! Because of the Magnetic Field in the Secondary, which in turn opposes the Primary. Our Tertiary Coil actually Adds to the Primary Coils Field.

IMPORTANT: The Electric Fields of each Coil must Add (Like Floyd Sweet said) - So simply putting a bunch of coils together may not work as one may expect! It has to be configured correctly to work!

"If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E. It is a simple matter using the equations √ue and 1/√ue for a team wave to get rid of H and C and so convert the first equation into the well known equation for energy density in the so-called electrostatic field"

Its a little complicated to get ones head around at the start. Keep thinking, it will come!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!
The VIC is using the magnetic field to "restrict the current". There is little current flowing, but it's the number of turns that also increase the magnetic field?
Quote
Remember, this Technology is related to the Magnetic side of the whole spectrum (Lenz's Law component).

If Current is not Flowing and as a result the Magnetic Fields are not aloud to build, then this does not work!

It is easy to "Choke" off the effect. Tight Coupling "Chokes" off the effect! You have to let it Live! Its a Pump, Charge Carrier Pump!

It is a Living Beast, this sound's silly, but feel it working and you WILL succeed!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!
~webmug

Matt Watts

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #13, on March 4th, 2017, 12:34 PM »Last edited on March 4th, 2017, 12:42 PM
Quote from Webmug on March 4th, 2017, 09:04 AM
The VIC is using the magnetic field to "restrict the current". There is little current flowing, but it's the number of turns that also increase the magnetic field?
If you study Eric Dollard's papers, he explicitly details two fundamental components of electricity:  dielectric fields and magnetic fields.  This stuff is straight from Mr. Tesla.  Dielectric fields emanate from conductor to conductor--a beginning and an end.  Magnetic fields are closed loops.  Magnetic fields are associated with current and dielectric fields are associated with voltage.  Electromagnetic (T.E.M. or Hertzian) waves are slowed to the speed of light due to the magnetic component.  Longitudinal Magneto Dielectric (L.M.D.) waves have no magnetic component and as such are Pi/2 faster (minimum), since they do not have the rotational component T.E.M. waves do.  Electricity as we know it is strictly found in T.E.M. waves.  The Tesla coil is a means to go from these T.E.M. waves to L.M.D. waves.  But there are a few tricks many overlook.

One such trick is the bucking coil filter; another is the spherical ball.  Both of these devices filter the magnetic component of the T.E.M. wave, leaving mostly a pure L.M.D. wave.  Now why would anyone want to do that...?

The reason, from everything I can gather is that L.M.D. waves are the purest form of electricity as found in nature.  They contain no magnetic component which means there is no current within them.  Yes, they can induce current, but there is a simplicity a lot of people fail to recognize.  Start with Ohm's Law,  V = I R.  With a L.M.D. wave there is no "I" and since there is no "I', any value of "R" is insignificant.  You simply have potential or better stated, a dielectric field.  Some would argue with no current, you cannot have any power.  I think Mr. Tesla himself dismissed this line of reasoning.  Voltage can do work and Stan Meyer agrees.

So what happens if you expose water to a purely dielectric field, created by a L.M.D. wave?

Do you suppose Stan's VIC is actually a filter?  That it holds back the magnetic field in a closed loop and allows the dielectric field to proceed on to the WFC?  I happen to think this is a really good question and wish I new someone of true authority that could answer it.  Unfortunately, all the real gurus I know are stuck in the T.E.M. world and refuse to accept Maxwell's original Quaternion equations as fact.

Other devices that I have worked on also REQUIRE L.M.D. waves to function.  These device are designed to mix L.M.D. waves with T.E.M. waves at the correct ratios and phase angles to produce a more powerful T.E.M. wave at the output.  If what Eric Dollard and others have deciphered from Mr. Tesla is correct, the fundamental principal behind all these so-called Free Energy devices is quite simple.  And if Eric is wrong?  Well, it's not likely any of these devices could work, but since I'm pretty confident at least one of them does, I'll stick to this methodology for a while longer.

Webmug

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #14, on March 4th, 2017, 01:16 PM »Last edited on March 4th, 2017, 01:49 PM
Quote from Matt Watts on March 4th, 2017, 12:34 PM
The reason, from everything I can gather is that L.M.D. waves are the purest form of electricity as found in nature.  They contain no magnetic component which means there is no current within them.  Yes, they can induce current, but there is a simplicity a lot of people fail to recognize.  Start with Ohm's Law,  V = I R.  With a L.M.D. wave there is no "I" and since there is no "I', any value of "R" is insignificant.  You simply have potential or better stated, a dielectric field.  Some would argue with no current, you cannot have any power.  I think Mr. Tesla himself dismissed this line of reasoning.  Voltage can do work and Stan Meyer agrees.

So what happens if you expose water to a purely dielectric field, created by a L.M.D. wave?

Do you suppose Stan's VIC is actually a filter?  That it holds back the magnetic field in a closed loop and allows the dielectric field to proceed on to the WFC?  I happen to think this is a really good question and wish I new someone of true authority that could answer it.  Unfortunately, all the real gurus I know are stuck in the T.E.M. world and refuse to accept Maxwell's original Quaternion equations as fact.

Other devices that I have worked on also REQUIRE L.M.D. waves to function.  These device are designed to mix L.M.D. waves with T.E.M. waves at the correct ratios and phase angles to produce a more powerful T.E.M. wave at the output.  If what Eric Dollard and others have deciphered from Mr. Tesla is correct, the fundamental principal behind all these so-called Free Energy devices is quite simple.  And if Eric is wrong?  Well, it's not likely any of these devices could work, but since I'm pretty confident at least one of them does, I'll stick to this methodology for a while longer.
@Matt,


This is exacly the idea I also have, that the VIC is a filter. Increasing the voltage intensity and excite (exciter array) the dielectic (water) using charge separation (voltage).


Using the magnetic field to cancel and end up with almost no current flowing.

This gives Stan Meyers statement "tune in to the dielectric properties of water" a different meaning dont you think?

Btw Meyers coils are using lose coupling also...


~webmug

Matt Watts

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #15, on March 4th, 2017, 03:53 PM »
Quote from Webmug on March 4th, 2017, 01:16 PM
This is exacly the idea I also have, that the VIC is a filter. Increasing the voltage intensity and excite (exciter array) the dielectic (water) using charge separation (voltage).
A magnetic filter, yes.  The VIC strips the T.E.M. wave of its magnetic component, leaving only the dielectric component to find an endpoint within the water.

Certainly you've heard the term "cold electricity" ?  It's called that because amperage is almost always associated with heat.  And we know a properly functioning Meyer device does not get hot, it would be impossible for it to do so.
Quote from Webmug on March 4th, 2017, 01:16 PM
Using the magnetic field to cancel and end up with almost no current flowing.
Again, stripping the magnetic component; violating Ohm's Law and probably other Laws as well.  Don't even attempt to calculate the power factor, it would have to be done some other way.
Quote from Webmug on March 4th, 2017, 01:16 PM
This gives Stan Meyers statement "tune in to the dielectric properties of water" a different meaning dont you think?
Sure does.  The dielectric field is doing all the work.  Forces do work.  Dollard and others talk about what "really" happens in a capacitor.  It's not electrons piling up on one of the plates; making holes on the other.  It's dielectric lines of force that form between the plates and these lines of force can have density.  They can continue to increase in numbers until they finally destroy the insulating layer between the plates.  We're told electrons destroy capacitors.  I'm not convinced.  I think electrons do what they are told and the master is the fields that control them.  Electron Bounce Phenomena ?   A phenomena because the fields at work are left cloaked in the shadows.
Quote from Webmug on March 4th, 2017, 01:16 PM
Btw Meyers coils are using lose coupling also...
Which is another reason (beyond the obvious bucking coil arrangement) Chris Sykes included Stan Meyer in his list of inventors of similar technology.  The "k" factor and the turns ratio for all these devices are quite similar.  Air core coils are also prevalent.

I'm telling you guys, if you can get any one of the devices Chris has listed to work, you will be able to get all of them to work.  The principal is a foundation for them all.  Tesla, Maxwell, Steinmetz, Dollard, these guys are either correct or they are not.  What do we have to lose at this point in following their lead.


Webmug

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #16, on March 8th, 2017, 07:20 AM »
Quote from Matt Watts on March 4th, 2017, 12:34 PM
The reason, from everything I can gather is that L.M.D. waves are the purest form of electricity as found in nature.  They contain no magnetic component which means there is no current within them.  Yes, they can induce current, but there is a simplicity a lot of people fail to recognize.  Start with Ohm's Law,  V = I R.  With a L.M.D. wave there is no "I" and since there is no "I', any value of "R" is insignificant.  You simply have potential or better stated, a dielectric field.  Some would argue with no current, you cannot have any power.  I think Mr. Tesla himself dismissed this line of reasoning.  Voltage can do work and Stan Meyer agrees.

So what happens if you expose water to a purely dielectric field, created by a L.M.D. wave?
Answer
Quote
Furthermore, external electrical force (66/67) can alter the electromagnetic properties of a atom since electromagnetic force is dependent on the movement of charged particles in a electrostatic field. voltage Intensifier circuit (190) of figure (3-23), now, allows voltage to dissociates water molecule (85) by overcoming electrostatic bonding force (qq') between unlike atoms (76n7) while restricting amp flow, as illustrated in (160) of Figure (3-26).
~webmug

nav

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #17, on March 8th, 2017, 02:55 PM »
Ed Leedskalnin with his perpetual motion holder: He trapped the magnetic field in the core indefinitely by pitching one coil against another. Imagine Stan's VIC with just bare individual coils not joined together, under no load and the primary, you hit the primary with one pulse and what happens? Nothing, the primary field collapses and all three secondary coils magnetic fields dissipate. You measure the voltage on all three secondaries and it is nothing.
Now imagine Ed's perpetual motion holder with three coils instead of two, you pitch all three coils against each other and pulse them, the magnet closes and the dipole is never collapsed trapping the current inside. Somewhere on Ed's PMH there is voltage sat there, its a fact and its static voltage distributed between windings. What do we know about static voltage? We know you can extend the voltage field to the outside if we match the condition which is holding the voltage in the windings, that condition is dielectric coatings of the windings, if you match that condition then it will extend the voltage field to outside without collapsing the dipole. As soon as you collapse the dipole you've lost the battle. Look no further than Ed's PMH, he's left us a great gift and we don't know it. Once Ed's magnet is formed and the dipole is trapped, it becomes Stan's VIC.

Radomir

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #18, on March 9th, 2017, 01:42 PM »Last edited on March 9th, 2017, 01:46 PM
Hello all at this thread.

Keep in mind these simple facts:
Divergence of Vectro Magnetic Potential uniformly moving particle (for example an electron) is different from zero. It mean Scalar Magnetic Field H*= -div A is real and has BIPOLAR nature. It further mean spatial derivation of Vector magnetic potential is a Scalar Magnetic Field with 2 sign components Hs* = +H* + -H*. If electron or similar negative charged particle/s run through negative zone of -H* field it will accelerate, while in positive zone of +H* decelerate. Trick is to find proper geometry configuration either of two. The most important is to know that Hs* field change kinetic energy of particle/s regardless of the direction of particle/s movement, while ordinary →vector H field H = rot A change kinetic energy of interacting particle/s only in case of central vector interaction/s.

Also it is important to understand that -div A and rot A doent make sense as "force field/s"- because the sense "force field" is real and legitimate only for electrical field E. Both could make dimensionality of force (vectorail value), only in relation to a moving charged particle/s by means of e·(v/c)· Because as you know, electrical field E is a fixed force acting at single test charge. At this way had been started electrodynamic from electrostatic

Regards
Radomir (gladness of the world)

Webmug

Re: Free energy from bucking coils
« Reply #19, on March 10th, 2017, 06:45 AM »Last edited on March 18th, 2017, 08:09 AM
Are there similarities with the The Unidirectional Transformer (UDT) and the VIC?

The VIC has a split secondary (chokes) and a "UDT feedback winding" the VIC secondary all in series connected?

The "UDT feedback winding" secondary is placed on the same core leg were the primary is, just as the VIC has.

Both secondaries (chokes) have the same number of turns.

Low µ of the VIC core. (flat core)

Magnetizing the core results in an AC sine voltage being induced in the secondary (VIC chokes). (resonance)

When a current is drawn from the output, the two secondary windings each generate a magnetomotive force (MMF) directed against the MMF of the primary. The MMF of each secondary winding "sees" a series-parallel magnetic circuit through the transformer core.

The reluctances of the magnetic circuits is the same on a core without a gap, but what happens when the secondary has more turns than the "UDT feedback winding" placed on the same core leg where the primary is?

Now consider the "feedback winding." It is connected in series with the secondary and is wound over the primary winding on the centre leg of the core. When the core is magnetized, an induced voltage will appear across the feedback winding which will subtract from the voltage across the secondary. The purpose of the feedback winding is to cancel the remaining secondary flux passing through the centre leg of the core. It effectively isolates the currents in the primary and the secondary at the cost of a reduced output voltage. The feedback winding generates a magnetic flux equal and opposite to the residual magnetic flux from the secondary when an output current is drawn.

The magnetic flux from the two secondary (chokes) windings cancels.

http://www.hyiq.org/Research/Details?Name=A%20Free-Energy%20Device

My thoughts...
Quote
by Paul Raymond Jensen
 
I have built a transformer which supplies more power to its load than is drawn from its primary source. I named this device The Unidirectional Transformer (UDT), because the magnetic reaction of the load current does not affect the magnetic action of the primary circuit. The UDT is composed of a parallel LC resonant primary, a split secondary, a gapped magnetic core, and a "feedback winding." Virtually the only input power needed is that used to magnetize the core. The magnetic core I used came from a small 60 Hz commercial power transformer made of interleaved silicon steel E and I laminations. I took the core apart, separated the Es and the Is, and made one stacked E core and one stacked I core from the laminations. Then I filed down the centre leg of the E core about 15 mils (0.381mm) to gap the combined E-I transformer core. The resulting m of the core at 60 Hz was about 100.

The primary winding is wound on the centre leg of the core. The two secondary windings are wound on the two outer legs of the core and are series connected. Both secondary windings have the same number of turns. The "feedback winding" is wound over the primary on the centre leg and is connected in series with the secondary. The free-energy action of the UDT follows directly from the laws of magnetic circuits. Consider what happens when an AC sine voltage is applied to the UDT primary. A magnetizing current flows, which can become rather high because of the low m of the core. Fortunately, gapping the core results in a fairly constant m through the entire AC cycle, up to a peak H of about 720 A-T/M.

This results in a constant primary inductance, which permits parallel LC resonation. Resonating the primary reduces the magnetizing power to that necessary to match I2* R losses in the primary and the hysteresis losses in the core. Magnetizing the core results in an AC sine voltage being induced across the secondary. The magnetic coupling between the primary and the secondary is very high, but the core area within each secondary winding is only one-half that of the primary. This means that the volts/turn of the secondary will be only one-half that of the primary. For the secondary voltage to equal the primary voltage, the secondary must have two times the number of turns in the primary.

The primary also induces a voltage across the feedback coil, but the purpose and characteristics of the feedback coil will be explained later. When a current is drawn from the output, the two secondary windings each generate a magnetomotive force (MMF) directed against the MMF of the primary. The MMF of each secondary winding "sees" a series-parallel magnetic circuit through the transformer core. One magnetic circuit, "seen" by each secondary winding, is through the centre leg of the core. The other magnetic circuit "seen" by each secondary winding is through the two outer legs of the core. The resulting magnetic flux generated by the MMFs of the two secondary windings is dependent upon the reluctances of each of the magnetic circuits.

Because the centre leg is gapped, it has a higher reluctance than do the outer legs. This means that less magnetic flux from the secondary will pass through the centre leg than will pass through the outer legs.

In my transformer, the reluctances of the magnetic circuits through the centre leg were three times higher than the reluctances of the magnetic circuits through both outer legs. This was difficult to achieve and required hours of filing, polishing and fitting of the E and I cores. The alternative was to increase the gap, which was not acceptable in my particular design because I was driving the transformer at 60 Hz and could not afford any additional loss of m in the core.

Since the reluctances of the "centre leg circuits" were three times higher than the reluctances of the "outer leg circuits," one-quarter of the secondary flux passed through the centre leg, while three-quarters of the secondary flux passed through both outer legs. The magnetic flux from the two secondary windings cancels in the "outer leg circuits," leaving only one-quarter of the total flux generated by the output current to react back upon the primary. This resulted in a current gain in the secondary, relative to the primary. Lenz's law was bypassed, and free-energy resulted. An alternate explanation for the current gain in the UDT is to consider each secondary winding as acting as the primary winding for the other secondary winding when an output current is drawn because the two secondary windings generate geometrically opposing fields.

Now consider the "feedback winding." It is connected in series with the secondary and is wound over the primary winding on the centre leg of the core. When the core is magnetized, an induced voltage will appear across the feedback winding which will subtract from the voltage across the secondary. The purpose of the feedback winding is to cancel the remaining secondary flux passing through the centre leg of the core. It effectively isolates the currents in the primary and the secondary at the cost of a reduced output voltage. The feedback winding generates a magnetic flux equal and opposite to the residual magnetic flux from the secondary when an output current is drawn.

Given the above example, where three-quarters of the secondary flux self-cancels in the "outer leg circuits," the feedback coil will only have to oppose one-quarter of the total secondary flux. Since the feedback winding has two times the core area of the secondary windings and carries the full output current, it need have only one-quarter the number of turns of each secondary winding. However, this will reduce the output voltage by 25 percent. Therefore, to achieve the originally desired output voltage, the total number of secondary turns must be increased by the factor 4/3; the feedback coil must then have one-quarter of the number of turns of each secondary winding in this new secondary circuit.

Given the condition in which the feedback coil perfectly cancels all the residual secondary flux through the centre leg of the core, the power drawn from the output will be nearly independent of the primary input power. The primary input will be the magnetizing power and nothing more. The output power will have a negligible phase angle (due to the leakage inductance) if the m of the core (as seen by the primary) is at least 100. In practice, it is best if the feedback winding is short a turn or two, thereby preventing series inductance in the output at the cost of a small increase in the primary input power. A parallel resonant primary circuit allows for great input power reduction while ensuring voltage stability and linear operation under varying output loads.

The UDT can be used without a resonant primary circuit for the amplification of any time-varying signal. The main flaws of the UDT are the (normally) low primary m and the very long secondary wire required to ensure isolation of the input from the output. A single or double stack of E-I laminations seems to provide the optimum core geometry, all factors considered. At high frequencies it becomes practical to use ferrite cores with "centre leg circuit" reluctances less than their "outer leg circuit" reluctances because the volts/turn of each winding can be made very high. Conventional transformer design techniques should be used once the basic UDT topology has been determined.

I have invented and developed the UDT on my own, without benefit of any knowledge of other free-energy devices, if they exist, which utilize the basic principles of UDT operation. Please feel free to use this information as you desire. However, I hope that no one will attempt to patent and control this type of transformer. The time on Planet Earth is 15 minutes before midnight; there is no time left to waste.

Free-energy technology is not meant to be controlled by vain and greedy parasites who wish to use a gift from God to exploit their fellow man. Free-energy technology represents a spiritual transition of the human race. Free-energy is not meant to be owned, period!
 
UDT EQUATIONS
Number of Turns = N
a = V(output)/V(primary)
V(Primary)/N(Primary) = V(feedback)/N(feedback) = V(secondary)/N(secondary)/2
N(feedback) = [N(secondary)/2] [(R of outer circuit)/(R of outer circuit)+(R of centre circuit)]
a[N(Primary)] = [N(secondary)/2)-N(feedback)]
R = Reluctance = Y/mA
~webmug