OP
Mogir Jason Rofick
Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« on April 12th, 2014, 11:33 PM »Last edited on April 28th, 2014, 03:16 AM by Matt Watts
Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
Matt Watts
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #1, on April 13th, 2014, 06:17 AM »Last edited on April 13th, 2014, 06:30 AM
Resonance in resonance. I've seen where Akula mentioned this with his device and I think it is applicable to the QEG as well.
There is a particular frequency you use to toggle the core inductance from high to low. Once established, you will get back another oscillation that is a cyclic change in amplitude. This later oscillation we get for free, so we use it as an exciter. Then all we need to do is extract output power from a separate winding coupled in parallel.
So in the case of the QEG, the rotating armature simply toggles the inductance of the core. This armature is precisely driven by a motor to setup the first resonance frequency. Next, the high voltage windings resonant with a coupled set of high voltage capacitors. Here we want a high-Q tank circuit, probably with a calibrated spark gap to shunt when the voltage exceeds some level to avoid arcing the windings. Lastly, we pull output power from the low turn count, high amperage windings to power our load, plus the motor drive.
To me, if this is accurate, it seems so simple I cannot imagine why we all haven't done this before.
What I'm most curious about is the symmetry of the armature. What I suspect is this symmetry eliminates the torque one would expect to see on the drive motor as the output load is increased.
There is a particular frequency you use to toggle the core inductance from high to low. Once established, you will get back another oscillation that is a cyclic change in amplitude. This later oscillation we get for free, so we use it as an exciter. Then all we need to do is extract output power from a separate winding coupled in parallel.
So in the case of the QEG, the rotating armature simply toggles the inductance of the core. This armature is precisely driven by a motor to setup the first resonance frequency. Next, the high voltage windings resonant with a coupled set of high voltage capacitors. Here we want a high-Q tank circuit, probably with a calibrated spark gap to shunt when the voltage exceeds some level to avoid arcing the windings. Lastly, we pull output power from the low turn count, high amperage windings to power our load, plus the motor drive.
To me, if this is accurate, it seems so simple I cannot imagine why we all haven't done this before.
What I'm most curious about is the symmetry of the armature. What I suspect is this symmetry eliminates the torque one would expect to see on the drive motor as the output load is increased.
Matt Watts
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #2, on April 13th, 2014, 12:09 PM »Last edited on April 13th, 2014, 01:29 PM
And this is how it works. Been right in front of our nose for over 100 years.
Don't try to find the patent for the generator on the left--it's gone. Do thank Mr. Tesla for throwing us a bone by leaving a picture of it on this patent.
Don't try to find the patent for the generator on the left--it's gone. Do thank Mr. Tesla for throwing us a bone by leaving a picture of it on this patent.
Matt Watts
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #3, on April 17th, 2014, 05:42 PM »Last edited on April 17th, 2014, 05:44 PM
If the magnetic field has an oscillating resonance then it should be easy to manipulate it (resonate it) by bringing a piece of steel into close proximity with the field each time it flips. Steel will pull on either polarity of a magnetic field!
With the proper material and geometry, do you suppose an enhancement mode inductor could be made? One where the ringing amplifies itself?
Give you a hint: Take a look at the Steven Mark TPU.
found this was recently released. Any viability to this?
http://hopegirl2012.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/qeg-user-manual-3-25-14.pdf
http://hopegirl2012.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/qeg-user-manual-3-25-14.pdf
Matt Watts
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #5, on April 30th, 2014, 06:29 AM »
Jose has it working well enough to burn out his light bulbs. Guess that's a start.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8x0Zpb67Uw4#
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8x0Zpb67Uw4#
freethisone
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #6, on April 30th, 2014, 09:00 AM »
what do you mean there is no patent for it?
Is it a tesla motor?
why the big secret if it ground breaking?
https://www.google.com/patents/US555190?dq=555190&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3h1hU5K5IKnu2wXRgYHoBQ&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAA
Is it a tesla motor?
why the big secret if it ground breaking?
https://www.google.com/patents/US555190?dq=555190&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3h1hU5K5IKnu2wXRgYHoBQ&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAA
Matt Watts
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #7, on April 30th, 2014, 09:33 AM »
what do you mean there is no patent for it?
Is it a tesla motor?
why the big secret if it ground breaking?
My take on this Mr. Tesla knew his original patent for the generator would be squashed, so being the smart guy he was, gave us a hint to it in his motor patent. Now if we are sharp enough to figure out what all is contained in that image, we might possibly be able to replicate it. Now I do not know if Mr. Tesla's generator is better than the QEG design, but I would say the QEG is certainly based on it.
freethisone
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #8, on April 30th, 2014, 10:33 AM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLiZDQxywqE#ws
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLK1VG8h2Wc#ws
its interesting, i guess if a gap is included before the caps, it may also work with a tesla hairpin also.
Matt Watts
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #9, on April 30th, 2014, 10:59 AM »
More to it than that. If you tap the core with an insulated object, no voltage spikes will come out of the core windings.
I'm not positive, but I suspect in order for the QEG to work, you must create the conditions for NMR--same principle for the Akula device.
I'm not positive, but I suspect in order for the QEG to work, you must create the conditions for NMR--same principle for the Akula device.
freethisone
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #10, on April 30th, 2014, 01:55 PM »
so now this could lead back to tousands of year old technology. liberty bell, corral castle. etc..
the shape of a bell, or a ringing of a bell to make voltage.. he he. take a bell wrap a coil, ring the bell.. cheers.
ding dong...
the shape of a bell, or a ringing of a bell to make voltage.. he he. take a bell wrap a coil, ring the bell.. cheers.
ding dong...
freethisone
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #11, on October 6th, 2015, 05:32 PM »
As you see you people who claim to what to do better never even try?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLK1VG8h2Wc
i gues just look for the new thread based on the same thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLK1VG8h2Wc
i gues just look for the new thread based on the same thing.
here is free energy if you can find it
freethisone
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #13, on October 7th, 2015, 02:20 PM »
As you see you people who claim to what to do better never even try?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLK1VG8h2Wc
freethisone
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #14, on October 7th, 2015, 06:23 PM »
Matt Watts
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #15, on October 7th, 2015, 06:27 PM »
here is free energy if you can find it
The scary thing about your image is that cyborg Ris Machine face. Any way to make that a bit more human looking?
the whole plant should be at the base of a mountain and Pipes should be leaning against the mountain due to the simplicity good insulation on the return pipe +heat exchanger at a high altitude will create a vacuum+lower barometric pressure at high altitudes -- these are just a technological aspects.but what's interesting This is just an example which clearly shows Clear as day with a lightweight math the free energy that comes from somewhere you might think that comes from gravity or the sun but I do not think so actually this is Nuclear Science I took the model of nuclear fusion. what they want to achieve is cancellation of repulsive force and by sticking certain substances receive the excess energy for sustainability of whole process so I applied canceling process to gravity and as you can see I do not need any fuel , do not need to destroy or fusion of any mass and such a power plant would be much cheaper from any fusion reactor. it seems to me that infinite energy is in us
freethisone
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #17, on October 8th, 2015, 06:08 AM »
Fig. 2.--Mechanical analogy of electrical oscillator.
I have likened a condenser to a reservoir R into which by means of a pump p an incompressible fluid as water W is supplied through a feed pipe p, as illustrated in the second diagram, Fig. 2, the fluid representing electricity, the pump the generator and the feed pipe the connecting wire. The reservoir has a movable bottom, held up by a spring S, and opens the ports oo when the fluid in the vessel has reached a certain height and the pressure has become sufficient to overcome the elastic force of the spring. To complete the model, adjustable weights w, a screw s for allowing the tension of the spring, and a valve v for regulating the flow of the fluid are provided. With the giving away of the bottom, the fluid in the reservoir acquires velocity and consequently momentum, which results, in an increased pressure against the bottom causing the latter to open wider, and more of the fluid rushes out than the feed pipe can supply, whereupon the spring reasserts itself, closing again the ports, and the same process is repeated in more or less rapid succession. This opening and closing of the bottom may be likened to the making and breaking of the conducting path, the frictional resistance in this mechanical system to the ohmic resistance and, obviously, the inertia of the moving masses to the self-induction of the electric circuit. Now it is evident that, in order to keep in action the mechanism without the employment of auxiliary means, the average rate of supply through the pipe must be inferior to the average rate of discharge through the bottom; for, if it be otherwise, the ports will simply remain open and no vibration will take place. The more nearly the average rate of supply equals the average rate of discharge, the quicker will the bottom open and close; and it is furthermore clear from a consideration of simple mechanical principles that, if the fluid be supplied so fast through the feed pipe that the bottom vibrates as it would of its own accord, then the amplitude of the vibration will be the largest, the pressure against the bottom the strongest, and the greatest amount of fluid will be passed through the ports. All these considerations hold good for the electric circuit, and in experiments with high frequency machines, in which these effects were purposely magnified with the view of rendering their observation more easy, I have found that that condition is fulfilled when the capacity, self *induction, and frequency of vibration bear a certain relation, which observation I have since utilized in the adjustment of inductive circuits. You will note that this condition governing the rate of supply and discharge, most important in practice, especially when no positively acting mechanical means are employed for effecting the rupture of the dielectric, is a distinct one and should not be confounded with the condition determining the oscillatory character of the discharge investigated long ago by Lord Kelvin.
The next step in the evolution of the principle and its adaptation to practical uses was to associate with the system illustrated in Fig. 1 a self-induction coil L, as shown in diagram Fig. 3, which modified the action in many now well understood ways. In a simplified form of this arrangement the condenser, as a distinctive part of the system, was done away with, the necessary capacity being given to the coil itself, and for this purpose the turns of the latter were wound as illustrated in Fig. 4 so as to allow the storage of the proper and generally the largest possible amount of energy. Then I associated a secondary coil S with the primary circuit P, as shown in Fig. 5, this enabling the obtaining of any tension required. After this, the arrangement in diagram Fig. 6. was adopted as best suitable for the existing municipal circuits. Again, the self-explanatory diagram Fig. 7. typically illustrates a further improved disposition as used in some of these machines with two or more circuits. A modification of this plan with one continuous contact common to the two circuits, and independent interrupters for each of these, allows easy adjustment of the phase of the currents through the primary, which is of practical advantage in some uses of the apparatus. Finally, in diagram Fig. 8 is shown the exact arrangement of the parts and circuits of one of these small oscillators with a break similar to that usually employed in connection with induction coils. Although the majority of the preceding arrangements have been described by me before, I thought it necessary to dwell on them here in order to present clearly and comprehensively the subject.
A specific result of value in the operation of Roentgen bulbs is obtainable by the use of two circuits linked as shown in Fig. 7, or otherwise, or entirely independent with two separate primaries.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obFj9x1u4lA
we learn much more..
for one capacity, self induction, and frequency of supply and discharge..
adding an inductor modified the circuit..
Pay strict attention to tesla. . He is telling me in his own words my air charge accumulator can push the fluid through the wire at a higher pressure, at higher rates.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s254r-42sSQ as you see here the rate of discharge may be made continuous.
I have likened a condenser to a reservoir R into which by means of a pump p an incompressible fluid as water W is supplied through a feed pipe p, as illustrated in the second diagram, Fig. 2, the fluid representing electricity, the pump the generator and the feed pipe the connecting wire. The reservoir has a movable bottom, held up by a spring S, and opens the ports oo when the fluid in the vessel has reached a certain height and the pressure has become sufficient to overcome the elastic force of the spring. To complete the model, adjustable weights w, a screw s for allowing the tension of the spring, and a valve v for regulating the flow of the fluid are provided. With the giving away of the bottom, the fluid in the reservoir acquires velocity and consequently momentum, which results, in an increased pressure against the bottom causing the latter to open wider, and more of the fluid rushes out than the feed pipe can supply, whereupon the spring reasserts itself, closing again the ports, and the same process is repeated in more or less rapid succession. This opening and closing of the bottom may be likened to the making and breaking of the conducting path, the frictional resistance in this mechanical system to the ohmic resistance and, obviously, the inertia of the moving masses to the self-induction of the electric circuit. Now it is evident that, in order to keep in action the mechanism without the employment of auxiliary means, the average rate of supply through the pipe must be inferior to the average rate of discharge through the bottom; for, if it be otherwise, the ports will simply remain open and no vibration will take place. The more nearly the average rate of supply equals the average rate of discharge, the quicker will the bottom open and close; and it is furthermore clear from a consideration of simple mechanical principles that, if the fluid be supplied so fast through the feed pipe that the bottom vibrates as it would of its own accord, then the amplitude of the vibration will be the largest, the pressure against the bottom the strongest, and the greatest amount of fluid will be passed through the ports. All these considerations hold good for the electric circuit, and in experiments with high frequency machines, in which these effects were purposely magnified with the view of rendering their observation more easy, I have found that that condition is fulfilled when the capacity, self *induction, and frequency of vibration bear a certain relation, which observation I have since utilized in the adjustment of inductive circuits. You will note that this condition governing the rate of supply and discharge, most important in practice, especially when no positively acting mechanical means are employed for effecting the rupture of the dielectric, is a distinct one and should not be confounded with the condition determining the oscillatory character of the discharge investigated long ago by Lord Kelvin.
The next step in the evolution of the principle and its adaptation to practical uses was to associate with the system illustrated in Fig. 1 a self-induction coil L, as shown in diagram Fig. 3, which modified the action in many now well understood ways. In a simplified form of this arrangement the condenser, as a distinctive part of the system, was done away with, the necessary capacity being given to the coil itself, and for this purpose the turns of the latter were wound as illustrated in Fig. 4 so as to allow the storage of the proper and generally the largest possible amount of energy. Then I associated a secondary coil S with the primary circuit P, as shown in Fig. 5, this enabling the obtaining of any tension required. After this, the arrangement in diagram Fig. 6. was adopted as best suitable for the existing municipal circuits. Again, the self-explanatory diagram Fig. 7. typically illustrates a further improved disposition as used in some of these machines with two or more circuits. A modification of this plan with one continuous contact common to the two circuits, and independent interrupters for each of these, allows easy adjustment of the phase of the currents through the primary, which is of practical advantage in some uses of the apparatus. Finally, in diagram Fig. 8 is shown the exact arrangement of the parts and circuits of one of these small oscillators with a break similar to that usually employed in connection with induction coils. Although the majority of the preceding arrangements have been described by me before, I thought it necessary to dwell on them here in order to present clearly and comprehensively the subject.
A specific result of value in the operation of Roentgen bulbs is obtainable by the use of two circuits linked as shown in Fig. 7, or otherwise, or entirely independent with two separate primaries.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obFj9x1u4lA
we learn much more..
for one capacity, self induction, and frequency of supply and discharge..
adding an inductor modified the circuit..
Pay strict attention to tesla. . He is telling me in his own words my air charge accumulator can push the fluid through the wire at a higher pressure, at higher rates.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s254r-42sSQ as you see here the rate of discharge may be made continuous.
freethisone
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #18, on October 8th, 2015, 10:32 AM »
start here ..N. TESLA. I '
ME'ITHOD OF AND_APPARAVTUS FOR ELECTRICAL CONVERSION AND
I ' DISTRIBUTION.
' ‘No. 462,418. ' Patented. NOV. 3, 1891.
ME'ITHOD OF AND_APPARAVTUS FOR ELECTRICAL CONVERSION AND
I ' DISTRIBUTION.
' ‘No. 462,418. ' Patented. NOV. 3, 1891.
clean as the day it is possible to generate more power with less invested energie--The problem is to prove the concept with a simple example in addition to that Conventional capacitor with some charge He would discharged over time without being connected to the anything and we'll tell dielectric insulation is bad but that can be correct and incorrect at the same time but if the capacitor loses potential as I see it. not through insulation but through the external terminals that are in the air and air has less dielectric properties the internal insulation It would be logical to conclud that the capacitor is attracting free electrons from air or earth.from it can be said the loss is a loss-------------but if such a capacitor is coupled to a circuit we immediately have, not a balance in the number of electrons which directly means higher negative charge we all know from experience that the high voltage capacitors quickly leaks combined with the high number of oscillations will certainly raise an interesting amount of energy to prove this we need serious scientific laboratory.
Cycle
Re: Quantum Energy Generator (QEG)- Discussion
« Reply #20, on October 20th, 2015, 02:21 PM »Last edited on October 20th, 2015, 02:27 PM by Cycle
The video above where he strikes the transformer core and it generates electricity is a perfect example of magnetostriction, or its inverse, the Villari effect. All ferromagnetic materials experience magnetostriction (a lengthening of the material when in a magnetic field). It's the primary reason for transformer hum and inefficiency.
I'd surmise that if you want a truly quiet and efficient transformer, you'd have to use some paramagnetic core material with a high magnetic susceptibility.
If one could figure out the frequency at which their material magnetostricts and create a mechanical "joule ringer" at that frequency to set up a resonance, they likely could get quite a lot of power out. Not sure if it'd be overunity, though.
I discuss another use of magnetostriction here:
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=2550
I'd surmise that if you want a truly quiet and efficient transformer, you'd have to use some paramagnetic core material with a high magnetic susceptibility.
If one could figure out the frequency at which their material magnetostricts and create a mechanical "joule ringer" at that frequency to set up a resonance, they likely could get quite a lot of power out. Not sure if it'd be overunity, though.
I discuss another use of magnetostriction here:
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=2550