All these designs are based on Meyer/Heins/Flynn technology with a little bit of improvisation by myself. They are all based on a 10:1 step up transformer with a magnetite core for maximum efficiency, then a one to one transformer on a magnetite transformer core with an adjustable cell plate width.
Neodymium duty cycle cruncher
This works by enhancing forward voltage by creating a magnetic field in the forward flux direction and an opposition field to restrict the back EMF. Mutual inductance is destroyed but back EMF being restricted makes it more efficient. Bargain basement efficient VIC.
[attachment=4986]
Electromagnet duty cycle cruncher
Same design as above but with an isolated electromagnet that will allow you to control the core saturation more easily. Again mutual inductance is destroyed but will be an efficient proposition.
[attachment=4987]
Low reluctance duty cycle cruncher
Again a similar design to above but this time with the addition of a Thane Heins low reluctance path. The electromagnet restricts back EMF then that back EMF takes the least resistive path and recirculates EMF into the load.
Not a bad design and could be done with magnets too.
[attachment=4988]
Electromagnetic gatekeeper
This is more complex. This time the VIC gets to keep its mutual inductance and the pulse is gated. We steal the gate but not the 50% duty cycle of the pulse train. This is done by having an optocoupler/transformer configuration coupled to the gating pulse width modulator. When TX2 collapses at the gate stage into voltage the optocoupler switches on the opposing magnetic field and restricts the back EMF of the gate and sends it around the load again while leaving the 50% duty cycle untouched and efficient.
I like this one cause its my design.
[attachment=4989]
Low reluctance electromagnet gatekeeper.
As above but with a low reluctance path thrown in for good measure. Same again, magnetite low reluctance path.
You won't find these at Argos at £6.99 with a few nectar points thrown in gpssonar old cock. lol
[attachment=4990]
These are just a few ideas I thought I'd post.
Neodymium duty cycle cruncher
This works by enhancing forward voltage by creating a magnetic field in the forward flux direction and an opposition field to restrict the back EMF. Mutual inductance is destroyed but back EMF being restricted makes it more efficient. Bargain basement efficient VIC.
[attachment=4986]
Electromagnet duty cycle cruncher
Same design as above but with an isolated electromagnet that will allow you to control the core saturation more easily. Again mutual inductance is destroyed but will be an efficient proposition.
[attachment=4987]
Low reluctance duty cycle cruncher
Again a similar design to above but this time with the addition of a Thane Heins low reluctance path. The electromagnet restricts back EMF then that back EMF takes the least resistive path and recirculates EMF into the load.
Not a bad design and could be done with magnets too.
[attachment=4988]
Electromagnetic gatekeeper
This is more complex. This time the VIC gets to keep its mutual inductance and the pulse is gated. We steal the gate but not the 50% duty cycle of the pulse train. This is done by having an optocoupler/transformer configuration coupled to the gating pulse width modulator. When TX2 collapses at the gate stage into voltage the optocoupler switches on the opposing magnetic field and restricts the back EMF of the gate and sends it around the load again while leaving the 50% duty cycle untouched and efficient.
I like this one cause its my design.
[attachment=4989]
Low reluctance electromagnet gatekeeper.
As above but with a low reluctance path thrown in for good measure. Same again, magnetite low reluctance path.
You won't find these at Argos at £6.99 with a few nectar points thrown in gpssonar old cock. lol
[attachment=4990]
These are just a few ideas I thought I'd post.