A partial theory / work in progress based on the works of John Searl, Marko Rodin, and Dave la Point, M.T. Keshe and Eric Dollard.
This is still incomplete, however I thought it would be interesting to post and generate some discussion.
But first a little brain teaser:
Does 'absolute zero' exist? It is an assumption based on a trend line as observed by Kelvin whilst studying gases. Based on this 'trend line' let us compare the intriguing relationship between sound and light. Most people accept that the speed of light in a vacuum can not be exceed by any known physical phenomena. Most people also accept that sound has a speed of 0 through a vacuum. Now, we all accept that as the density of the medium through which light travels increases the speed of light decreases. Sound demonstrates the inverse. The more dense the material, the faster it's speed. So... what is the speed of sound in, say, a neutron star or black hole? If we simply follow the 'trend line' as we did with Kelvin's theory about absolute zero... well, you should all be following me here. I'm certainly not the first person to have considered this, I'm just not quite sure how it ties in.
Some Searl 'Math '
Law of the squares
Normal "Square"
= 34
1 2 3 4 = 10
5 6 7 8 = 26
9 10 11 12 = 42
13 14 15 16 = 58
= 28 = 32 = 36 = 40 = 34
For a level n square you add (n - 1) to all the numbers. Searl uses the squares diagonals (below) to pick the amounts of the 4 materials of the device. Note: Searl refers both to mass and volume!
You may notice that the diagonals in mod 9 = 7 for the above square... some might argue that for a large enough square things will trend to 25%, however we know from rodin's math and the resulting coil that we only need to use mod 9, or the smallest possible square. Rodin's math is based entirely on a 3x3 square i.e. 9 = mod 9. Searl in one of his early interviews comments "you can only make a 3x3 square".
Searl's "Space Square"
= 34
1 6 3 2 13 = 34
5 10 11 8 = 34
9 6 7 12 = 34
4 15 14 1 = 34
= 34 = 34 = 34 = 34 = 34
This square represents random motion, white noise, water, ambient heat. By creating a doubling pathway using careful choice, quantity and construction of materials with a specific ratio to each element's equivalent of 1 i.e. 1 atom, order is wrought from chaos.
Searl by "the law of the squares" shows ordered information gives different values for each row, column and diagonal in a, say, 4x4 array. If the numbers are randomly arranged all the rows, columns and diagonals sum to the same value
In the case of Rodin, they follow an ordered pathway of natural movement, because we are focusing our attention on 'ordered' matter rather than white noise / random motion. Rodin follows the natural oscillation of the EM field.
Rodin and Powell at least to some extent confirm Searl's work.
Rodin has a coherent pattern on the surface, which follows the wave function as it goes from 1 inverting through 0 and onto -1.
Searl draws from the 'random' sea of potential energy which is free space (air, thermal energy, localized em-phenomena / background radiation. etc) and then organizes that random information into coherent electrical current. Much like we see with gravity and the EM field creating stars and planets. Those of you who have researched Searl will recall that in the SEG the Dielectric field (Dollard / Steinmetz / others) is radial in nature.
We all have read about the dipole effect with electrostatic charges - opposites attract, and lone charges are seemingly abhored by nature as much as the proverbial vacuum. Searl's motor also has a magnetic field oriented about the axis. The resulting effect is that electrons move outward through positive "holes" which move inward. This is a key principle in understantind Searl, Rodin and the others I will reference throughout this article / theory.
Now the basic design of the SEG going from inside to out for both the rollers and rings is:
Collector
Gate / Dielectric
Accelerator / Magnetic material
Emitter
When the rollers rotate and orbit a ring a number of nested vortices emerge (1 ring, 10 rollers - minimum of 11 vortices, complete 3 ring 15kw - minimum of 45. ) which utilize the magnetic field and the 'polarisation' of the rollers / rings to generate the effect we see when we wave a magnet near a conventional coil. Due to the systems overall design once in motion the nested votrices continually draw energy from inside to out, what we have in effect is what we might consider an electron sieve which sieves the electrons from ambient air and localized fields, transfers that to the next nested vortice, which unable, to maintain the imbalance between it's solid-state and the influx of energy external, must throw off the 'collected' material into the next most outer element. Maybe the dyson vacuum borrowed it's design from the SEG - but purely in a mechanical sense.
====
Rodin states "the 7 is different" and as anything which is divided by 7 ends up generating the 124875 type pattern which is the natural doubling circuit in one direction, but when it inverts it becomes a halving circuit.
So if Rodin follows the wave function through zero using the 9. And Searl draws energy from the 7, which is the number of random motion which be seen if we look at:
1/7 = 1.24875142875... = doubling circuit, and inverts the EM field when superconductivity point is reached resulting in a halving circuit.
Magnetism:
+1 0 -1
[N] inversion
point
Electricity:
+1 0 -1
p+ n e-
Sound (drum):
+1 0 -1
compress (1-1) expand
(-1+1)
(Might have the above a little off: Dollard lecture [07 dielectricity] will post link later.)
By inverse I mean reciprocal. As one doubles (gravity compresses) the other halves (light, inverse square law) - assuming I don't have it back-to-front. I see gravity is a halving 'circuit' in the sense that it is 'shrinking' and compressing trying to reach zero-point, however due the laws of physics it can-not do this easily and in many cases results in light and or heat, which are both electromagnetic in nature in my opinion. I would posit that gravity generates the EM-field of the sun by accelerating the plasmagnetic soup of Matters and matters (using Keshe's terminology) and we already understand that accelerating electrons through a coil (vortex fashion) generates a magnetic field. At this point I feel I should say that 0 is a concept, it does not exist except as a 'place holder' in mathematics or imho as a 'potential' i.e. there is a space for something to occupy e.g. the random 'particles' which hop about in the vacuum flux.
Searl: Law of Squares: 34 : both 1/2 and 2x circuit i.e. both interactions (gravity and magnetism) result in a 'background' random radiation - white noise. Randomly inverting depending on the surrounding doubling / halving interactions of the G-EM fields. As energy attempts to escape (say a high-pressure system generated over the pacific ocean due to solar-thermal interactions between ocean-currents, the sea-surface and the humidity of the atmosphere) it is also being restrained by gravity and cold-air currents / interactions.
I consider gravity to have a cold nature, and light to have a hot nature perhaps only in the sense of direction heat is either absorbed or released in or out. The difference between the two is merely the direction of the flow of energy. Space is cold because gravity literally sucks the heat out of it. The heat we feel from the sun is not present in space unless there is something there to impede the flow of energy which might be considered ordered rather than chaotic due to it propagating outwards along magnetic field lines.
Yes I know this is far from easy to follow and quite out there, but I'm still working on tying it all together.
This is still incomplete, however I thought it would be interesting to post and generate some discussion.
But first a little brain teaser:
Does 'absolute zero' exist? It is an assumption based on a trend line as observed by Kelvin whilst studying gases. Based on this 'trend line' let us compare the intriguing relationship between sound and light. Most people accept that the speed of light in a vacuum can not be exceed by any known physical phenomena. Most people also accept that sound has a speed of 0 through a vacuum. Now, we all accept that as the density of the medium through which light travels increases the speed of light decreases. Sound demonstrates the inverse. The more dense the material, the faster it's speed. So... what is the speed of sound in, say, a neutron star or black hole? If we simply follow the 'trend line' as we did with Kelvin's theory about absolute zero... well, you should all be following me here. I'm certainly not the first person to have considered this, I'm just not quite sure how it ties in.
Some Searl 'Math '
Law of the squares
Normal "Square"
= 34
1 2 3 4 = 10
5 6 7 8 = 26
9 10 11 12 = 42
13 14 15 16 = 58
= 28 = 32 = 36 = 40 = 34
For a level n square you add (n - 1) to all the numbers. Searl uses the squares diagonals (below) to pick the amounts of the 4 materials of the device. Note: Searl refers both to mass and volume!
You may notice that the diagonals in mod 9 = 7 for the above square... some might argue that for a large enough square things will trend to 25%, however we know from rodin's math and the resulting coil that we only need to use mod 9, or the smallest possible square. Rodin's math is based entirely on a 3x3 square i.e. 9 = mod 9. Searl in one of his early interviews comments "you can only make a 3x3 square".
Searl's "Space Square"
= 34
1 6 3 2 13 = 34
5 10 11 8 = 34
9 6 7 12 = 34
4 15 14 1 = 34
= 34 = 34 = 34 = 34 = 34
This square represents random motion, white noise, water, ambient heat. By creating a doubling pathway using careful choice, quantity and construction of materials with a specific ratio to each element's equivalent of 1 i.e. 1 atom, order is wrought from chaos.
Searl by "the law of the squares" shows ordered information gives different values for each row, column and diagonal in a, say, 4x4 array. If the numbers are randomly arranged all the rows, columns and diagonals sum to the same value
In the case of Rodin, they follow an ordered pathway of natural movement, because we are focusing our attention on 'ordered' matter rather than white noise / random motion. Rodin follows the natural oscillation of the EM field.
Rodin and Powell at least to some extent confirm Searl's work.
Rodin has a coherent pattern on the surface, which follows the wave function as it goes from 1 inverting through 0 and onto -1.
Searl draws from the 'random' sea of potential energy which is free space (air, thermal energy, localized em-phenomena / background radiation. etc) and then organizes that random information into coherent electrical current. Much like we see with gravity and the EM field creating stars and planets. Those of you who have researched Searl will recall that in the SEG the Dielectric field (Dollard / Steinmetz / others) is radial in nature.
We all have read about the dipole effect with electrostatic charges - opposites attract, and lone charges are seemingly abhored by nature as much as the proverbial vacuum. Searl's motor also has a magnetic field oriented about the axis. The resulting effect is that electrons move outward through positive "holes" which move inward. This is a key principle in understantind Searl, Rodin and the others I will reference throughout this article / theory.
Now the basic design of the SEG going from inside to out for both the rollers and rings is:
Collector
Gate / Dielectric
Accelerator / Magnetic material
Emitter
When the rollers rotate and orbit a ring a number of nested vortices emerge (1 ring, 10 rollers - minimum of 11 vortices, complete 3 ring 15kw - minimum of 45. ) which utilize the magnetic field and the 'polarisation' of the rollers / rings to generate the effect we see when we wave a magnet near a conventional coil. Due to the systems overall design once in motion the nested votrices continually draw energy from inside to out, what we have in effect is what we might consider an electron sieve which sieves the electrons from ambient air and localized fields, transfers that to the next nested vortice, which unable, to maintain the imbalance between it's solid-state and the influx of energy external, must throw off the 'collected' material into the next most outer element. Maybe the dyson vacuum borrowed it's design from the SEG - but purely in a mechanical sense.
====
Rodin states "the 7 is different" and as anything which is divided by 7 ends up generating the 124875 type pattern which is the natural doubling circuit in one direction, but when it inverts it becomes a halving circuit.
So if Rodin follows the wave function through zero using the 9. And Searl draws energy from the 7, which is the number of random motion which be seen if we look at:
1/7 = 1.24875142875... = doubling circuit, and inverts the EM field when superconductivity point is reached resulting in a halving circuit.
Magnetism:
+1 0 -1
[N] inversion
point
Electricity:
+1 0 -1
p+ n e-
Sound (drum):
+1 0 -1
compress (1-1) expand
(-1+1)
(Might have the above a little off: Dollard lecture [07 dielectricity] will post link later.)
By inverse I mean reciprocal. As one doubles (gravity compresses) the other halves (light, inverse square law) - assuming I don't have it back-to-front. I see gravity is a halving 'circuit' in the sense that it is 'shrinking' and compressing trying to reach zero-point, however due the laws of physics it can-not do this easily and in many cases results in light and or heat, which are both electromagnetic in nature in my opinion. I would posit that gravity generates the EM-field of the sun by accelerating the plasmagnetic soup of Matters and matters (using Keshe's terminology) and we already understand that accelerating electrons through a coil (vortex fashion) generates a magnetic field. At this point I feel I should say that 0 is a concept, it does not exist except as a 'place holder' in mathematics or imho as a 'potential' i.e. there is a space for something to occupy e.g. the random 'particles' which hop about in the vacuum flux.
Searl: Law of Squares: 34 : both 1/2 and 2x circuit i.e. both interactions (gravity and magnetism) result in a 'background' random radiation - white noise. Randomly inverting depending on the surrounding doubling / halving interactions of the G-EM fields. As energy attempts to escape (say a high-pressure system generated over the pacific ocean due to solar-thermal interactions between ocean-currents, the sea-surface and the humidity of the atmosphere) it is also being restrained by gravity and cold-air currents / interactions.
I consider gravity to have a cold nature, and light to have a hot nature perhaps only in the sense of direction heat is either absorbed or released in or out. The difference between the two is merely the direction of the flow of energy. Space is cold because gravity literally sucks the heat out of it. The heat we feel from the sun is not present in space unless there is something there to impede the flow of energy which might be considered ordered rather than chaotic due to it propagating outwards along magnetic field lines.
Yes I know this is far from easy to follow and quite out there, but I'm still working on tying it all together.