On lasersaber video "EZ Spin Motor Update Plus V3 Preview"
/watch?v=WAPeC1JcZkI
Many good thing about this motor, which the best thing about it the 3d printed precision which is necessary to be efficient and other thing which is stated in the video. But I am focusing on what needs updating in my opinion. Obviously the weak power of 1-2 micro amps is not enough but what would make it go higher I am wondering. If some people do not understand then message back if you want a diagram.
1
It seems as if the core of the induction does not have an iron core to help it go faster, but then again the iron core is not making it slow down some might feel. Would a 1/2 diamagnetic/magnetic core in the coils help it? I say 1/2 so that the magnet does get attracted or repelled by it.
2
If the gap between the magnets and the inductor are closer together it could help the efficiently, which he has plenty of gap and should be as close as possible, preferably as that only a a piece of paper could pass only.
3
The negative discharge of the inductor on the magnet to be used back info the device, since that is wasting 1/2 of the energy that the pulse gives off and it can even cause drag, especially if it is not discharged exactly at the center of the magnet.
4
Obviously a more powerful magnet than the 42n would help boot it greatly since it would need less electromagnetism to turn it. Also I assume it would not hurt it but help it if the magnet was bigger than the diameter of the copper coil, or to have 3 square magnets one on top of each other vertically ([][][]) to help strengthen then magnetism, but that is a guess.
5
A magnet at the center of the disk pulling the needle up without touching it could help lighten it up so that it has even less friction. I tried that with a spinning top and it kept going over 4 times much longer without having to deal with its weight or balance. That would also test the balance of the disk to see if it is perfectly even.
6
To have it in a vacuum will also help with the air friction. It would also help cool the coils down to a few degree if if went much faster or if the wires were thinner.
7
The biggest thing I see is the wasted energy is the opposite side of the induction coil. The coil facing the magnets are used but the backside of the coil facing outward just go to waste it seems. I was thinking a C shape induction coil might help so that both sides are used. It positioned properly it would help with issue #3 when the pulse discharges.
8
To have a Crookes radiometer to be black and white, so that it gets a boot to turn when light hits it.
9
The device is not accelerating but remaining a constant which is odd. Since even when you spin a disk with your hand it goes faster every boost, unless this is not a pulse motor and it has a lot of waste?
Also Russ's has a pulse motor which was a nice design, but some issues here also applied to his device as well.
Well no 10 but I assume some might say to have a solar panel, but the guy used his crystal battery to help. Well what do some think? Well your can't make something better if you don't find the flaws to something despite the device is a step in the right direction in a way.
/watch?v=WAPeC1JcZkI
Many good thing about this motor, which the best thing about it the 3d printed precision which is necessary to be efficient and other thing which is stated in the video. But I am focusing on what needs updating in my opinion. Obviously the weak power of 1-2 micro amps is not enough but what would make it go higher I am wondering. If some people do not understand then message back if you want a diagram.
1
It seems as if the core of the induction does not have an iron core to help it go faster, but then again the iron core is not making it slow down some might feel. Would a 1/2 diamagnetic/magnetic core in the coils help it? I say 1/2 so that the magnet does get attracted or repelled by it.
2
If the gap between the magnets and the inductor are closer together it could help the efficiently, which he has plenty of gap and should be as close as possible, preferably as that only a a piece of paper could pass only.
3
The negative discharge of the inductor on the magnet to be used back info the device, since that is wasting 1/2 of the energy that the pulse gives off and it can even cause drag, especially if it is not discharged exactly at the center of the magnet.
4
Obviously a more powerful magnet than the 42n would help boot it greatly since it would need less electromagnetism to turn it. Also I assume it would not hurt it but help it if the magnet was bigger than the diameter of the copper coil, or to have 3 square magnets one on top of each other vertically ([][][]) to help strengthen then magnetism, but that is a guess.
5
A magnet at the center of the disk pulling the needle up without touching it could help lighten it up so that it has even less friction. I tried that with a spinning top and it kept going over 4 times much longer without having to deal with its weight or balance. That would also test the balance of the disk to see if it is perfectly even.
6
To have it in a vacuum will also help with the air friction. It would also help cool the coils down to a few degree if if went much faster or if the wires were thinner.
7
The biggest thing I see is the wasted energy is the opposite side of the induction coil. The coil facing the magnets are used but the backside of the coil facing outward just go to waste it seems. I was thinking a C shape induction coil might help so that both sides are used. It positioned properly it would help with issue #3 when the pulse discharges.
8
To have a Crookes radiometer to be black and white, so that it gets a boot to turn when light hits it.
9
The device is not accelerating but remaining a constant which is odd. Since even when you spin a disk with your hand it goes faster every boost, unless this is not a pulse motor and it has a lot of waste?
Also Russ's has a pulse motor which was a nice design, but some issues here also applied to his device as well.
Well no 10 but I assume some might say to have a solar panel, but the guy used his crystal battery to help. Well what do some think? Well your can't make something better if you don't find the flaws to something despite the device is a step in the right direction in a way.