What do you think? Has anyone else seen this devise?:huh:

Is this what we need to make a perpetual motion devise? because it is a mono pole?

/watch?v=XofdRjwuAu8

/watch?v=rOdTDkgEdAY

/watch?v=sdAKknwWPps


this devise here is important.. for me. heheh.. /watch?v=k06S-01HBqQ:heart::heart:

Quote from freethisone on October 30th, 2013, 10:27 AM

What do you think? Has anyone else seen this devise?:huh:

Is this what we need to make a perpetual motion devise? because it is a mono pole?

/watch?v=XofdRjwuAu8

/watch?v=rOdTDkgEdAY

/watch?v=sdAKknwWPps


this devise here is important.. for me. heheh.. /watch?v=k06S-01HBqQ:heart::heart:

I like this guy and his work... very cool to me... never seen anyone try something like that.

Quote from freethisone on October 30th, 2013, 10:27 AM

What do you think? Has anyone else seen this devise?:huh:

Is this what we need to make a perpetual motion devise? because it is a mono pole?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XofdRjwuAu8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOdTDkgEdAY
http:///watch?v=sdAKknwWPps

this devise here is important.. for me. heheh..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k06S-01HBqQ
:heart::heart:

So he is seriously claiming the lead/tin globs are monopole magnets?  Seems pretty way out there and far too easy to do to have not been discovered by now.  Probably worth the effort for someone to prove/disprove this, though I have a hard time believing it.

I have been doing a fair amount of reading from Joesph Newman and he says "gyroscopic particles" are responsible for both magnetism and charge.  This fits pretty closely to Tetryonics as well as Ed Leedskalnin's magnet currents.  And since we already know the Lord Kelvin experiment separates charge, it may well separate magnetic poles too.  Again, probably worth the time to replicate.  I sure hope it isn't a hoax--I've seen far more of that than I care to count.  I suppose someone could contact MrTeslonian and see if he can make a simple self-runner monopole magnetic motor from the glob of metal.  It's pretty easy as I recall, just a shorted coil suspended above the magnet with some sort of bearings, like so:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izvitxGgZiQ

as you see the movies have been removed..



gasIs Gallium magnetic?
Answer:
yes!
iron, nickel, and cobalt are also magnetic.

i ask this because i know gallium has a low melting point, or curry point.. cheers,

i know Mr T would not fake this. the compass needle does not lie. but it is a small amount of material, and needs to have a workable face,

he may be correct, but the magnetic flux on these mono poles may be very weak as far as flux. more material is needed, and perhaps if the coils are energized with a higher charge it could make a substantial magnetic field.

Quote from freethisone on October 31st, 2013, 03:26 AM

Is Gallium magnetic?
Answer:
yes!
iron, nickel, and cobalt are also magnetic.

i ask this because i know gallium has a low melting point, or curry point.. cheers,

i know Mr T would not fake this. the compass needle does not lie. but it is a small amount of material, and needs to have a workable face,

he may be correct, but the magnetic flux on these mono poles may be very weak as far as flux. more material is needed, and perhaps if the coils are energized with a higher charge it could make a substantial magnetic field.

High tin lead solder should be fine.  I can easily melt that in my casting furnace.  Bottom line, lead may work just fine by itself, since everything is magnetic--it's just the alignment of the gyroscopic particles that matter.


As far as the coils...  I don't think they are acting like coils at all since the two ends of them are shorted out.  I could be wrong.  Seems to me just a simple copper pipe would probably work just as well.  They only need to act as charge separators; probably the longer they are, the better the effect.  The more time the liquid metal is exposed within the tubes while it falls the better the gyroscopic particles align.


And for the where the metal comes to rest...  Simply two small foundry ladles would work nicely.


If one is able to replicate this and it's not a hoax, then making an all-magnet motor is practically child's play.

:angel::D:Di was thinking about one more aspect, that is the curry point or temperature of metals or alloys to become demagnetized.

what we need is the dense structure of high domains. we need a relatively low curry point so as it passes through the copper tubes as you propose. that i think is a great idea. it will have the most allingments of dipole, and dipole density..
 the tubes can be lengthened to aid in cooling the aloy as it passes through, to obtain a magnetization. either single or double pole.

afterthought perhaps a negative ionic charge.. dc or static, can be added to one coil. for fun and practice. in the neighborhood of 100 thousand kilo volts. :D galiummm hmm?

/watch?v=m_S_0o0y7qg&feature=youtube_gdata

:heart::heart:

my finger paint of my propsal.

Quote from freethisone on October 31st, 2013, 05:46 PM

:angel::D:Di was thinking about one more aspect, that is the curry point or temperature of metals or alloys to become demagnetized.

what we need is the dense structure of high domains. we need a relatively low curry point so as it passes through the copper tubes as you propose. that i think is a great idea. it will have the most allingments of dipole, and dipole density..
 the tubes can be lengthened to aid in cooling the aloy as it passes through, to obtain a magnetization. either single or double pole.

afterthought perhaps a negative ionic charge.. dc or static, can be added to one coil. for fun and practice. in the neighborhood of 100 thousand kilo volts. :D galiummm hmm?

/watch?v=m_S_0o0y7qg&feature=youtube_gdata

:heart::heart:

my finger paint of my propsal.

Very cool  freethisone, wonder if one could cause a continuous spark.:cool::D:P

Quote from Jeff Nading on October 31st, 2013, 08:06 PM

Quote from freethisone on October 31st, 2013, 05:46 PM

:angel::D:Di was thinking about one more aspect, that is the curry point or temperature of metals or alloys to become demagnetized.

what we need is the dense structure of high domains. we need a relatively low curry point so as it passes through the copper tubes as you propose. that i think is a great idea. it will have the most allingments of dipole, and dipole density..
 the tubes can be lengthened to aid in cooling the aloy as it passes through, to obtain a magnetization. either single or double pole.

afterthought perhaps a negative ionic charge.. dc or static, can be added to one coil. for fun and practice. in the neighborhood of 100 thousand kilo volts. :D galiummm hmm?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w60SIHwOztk

:heart::heart:

my finger paint of my propsal.

Very cool  freethisone, wonder if one could cause a continuous spark.:cool::D:P

thank you , lucky for you as i was still in a good mood i did an experiment. this is to show equal potentials areas of mass. inside of an electric field. my sound was off but i will describe how mass effects the charge. i just have time to publish this movie. another experiment with my ion generator demonstrating mass, and surface area causes a great charge density on sharp point then i had obtained in my previous efforts that as groundbreaking dipole moments, and also shewn great potential for future experiments.:heart::heart:.

important reading,:sleepy:


Tesla's Single Wire Circuit and Energy Shuttling

Tesla's "single wire" circuit adroitly shuttled the current back and forth between two accumulators, instead of using one accumulator and thereby continually destroying the source dipole.

Before one writes off Tesla as "modern" electrodynamicists are prone to do, one should first see Barrett's rigorous quaternion analysis (cited) of Tesla's patented circuits.  Barrett showed that, if one increases the topology of the algebra so one can see what Tesla was actually doing, those circuits are shuttling energy (potential) around at will.  In other words, Tesla could asymmetrically regauge the circuit and any part of it, as he desired.

Further, the very best of tensor and vector electrodynamics analysis will not even see it.  So the Old Master did indeed have a few tricks up his sleeve that modern electrodynamicists have not yet learned.  You know, like how to build an overunity power circuit.

(For further discussion - see Glossary reference on Resonance)

Barrett — one of the great electrodynamicists of our present day — went on to adapt Tesla's method and even file a patent using that improvement and adaptation.  We cite the patent in the references, and also Barrett's remarkable analysis.

There's certainly sufficient in Barrett's excellent paper to keep you busy, if you wish further really technical theory.

T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," int the pdf below..:cool:
see the patent motor provided pdf.


off subject  i am  relating the electric force. in my previous movie.
the surface area, and mass makes for a virtual sea of particle to draw from.:sleepy:

 in this case i could use 5 full rolls of aluminum sheet, connect, and draw from  miles of particles. on the same 7.5 kilovolts negative ion generator. The foil was about 5 square feet , also the addition of a heavy metal conductor.

when i touch my new self oscillating circuit i get a bigger shock then with a small aluminum plate.  I can now charge at a faster rate. get it?


/watch?v=NQvmJjiM124
/watch?v=qwF5n67yjx8:dodgy:


I get a bigger shock.

Quote from Jeff Nading on October 31st, 2013, 08:06 PM

Quote from freethisone on October 31st, 2013, 05:46 PM

:angel::D:Di was thinking about one more aspect, that is the curry point or temperature of metals or alloys to become demagnetized.

what we need is the dense structure of high domains. we need a relatively low curry point so as it passes through the copper tubes as you propose. that i think is a great idea. it will have the most allingments of dipole, and dipole density..
 the tubes can be lengthened to aid in cooling the aloy as it passes through, to obtain a magnetization. either single or double pole.

afterthought perhaps a negative ionic charge.. dc or static, can be added to one coil. for fun and practice. in the neighborhood of 100 thousand kilo volts. :D galiummm hmm?

/watch?v=m_S_0o0y7qg&feature=youtube_gdata

:heart::heart:

my finger paint of my propsal.

Very cool  freethisone, wonder if one could cause a continuous spark.:cool::D:P

carbon arc:heart:
in the lecture he explains there will occur continuous break down. about tenth of a mil meter. avalanche or electric discharge. if your caps are small enough you will have them instantly charged. the bigger the charge and faster the rate. the bigger the surface charge density is required, it simply its mass times radius. in this case a volume. or pill box of a surface. also refer to Henry Cavendish work on electricity.
together with mine. if i had made a much larger surface area and had attempted to touch it. i could get knocked right on my asss. at say 1000 square meters.

so here i am drawing from about a 20 inch by 30 inch aluminum plate. it had a high vibration, and if i had touched the conductor, a small shock. so i touch the round councutor, and i get a greater shock.

it was an exelent lecture, we refer to a carbon arc for a continual current. thank you Walter Lewin.

Quote from freethisone on November 1st, 2013, 05:23 PM

Quote from Jeff Nading on October 31st, 2013, 08:06 PM

Quote from freethisone on October 31st, 2013, 05:46 PM

:angel::D:Di was thinking about one more aspect, that is the curry point or temperature of metals or alloys to become demagnetized.

what we need is the dense structure of high domains. we need a relatively low curry point so as it passes through the copper tubes as you propose. that i think is a great idea. it will have the most allingments of dipole, and dipole density..
 the tubes can be lengthened to aid in cooling the aloy as it passes through, to obtain a magnetization. either single or double pole.

afterthought perhaps a negative ionic charge.. dc or static, can be added to one coil. for fun and practice. in the neighborhood of 100 thousand kilo volts. :D galiummm hmm?

/watch?v=m_S_0o0y7qg&feature=youtube_gdata

:heart::heart:

my finger paint of my propsal.

Very cool  freethisone, wonder if one could cause a continuous spark.:cool::D:P

carbon arc:heart:
in the lecture he explains there will occur continuous break down. about tenth of a mil meter. avalanche or electric discharge. if your caps are small enough you will have them instantly charged. the bigger the charge and faster the rate. the bigger the surface charge density is required, it simply its mass times radius. in this case a volume. or pill box of a surface. also refer to Henry Cavendish work on electricity.
together with mine. if i had made a much larger surface area and had attempted to touch it. i could get knocked right on my asss. at say 1000 square meters.

so here i am drawing from about a 20 inch by 30 inch aluminum plate. it had a high vibration, and if i had touched the conductor, a small shock. so i touch the round councutor, and i get a greater shock.

it was an exelent lecture, we refer to a carbon arc for a continual current. thank you Walter Lewin.

Steel manufacturers melt recycled steel or iron ore with carbon arc technology.

Quote from freethisone on November 1st, 2013, 12:50 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQvmJjiM124

This guy is a hoot Free.  Where are you getting this material?

Quote from Matt Watts on November 1st, 2013, 07:47 PM

Quote from freethisone on November 1st, 2013, 12:50 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQvmJjiM124

This guy is a hoot Free.  Where are you getting this material?

Think it's MIT.

Quote from Jeff Nading on November 1st, 2013, 07:55 PM

Think it's MIT.

Yeah I agree, but who is recording it?

This Prof is a scream to watch and you can learn a boatload from him too.

MIT web page, these are free lectures.

I should be adding this experiment to lifters also.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w60SIHwOztk
:angel:
What is neat about the surface charge is, I could have as much pressure to charge most any cap. still am not sure about the electrolytic types yet. it is a sail imagine your car covered in foil. charging your battery? because you would be able to charge as a cap bank instead. if i had 100 square feet, this could collect energy all day long. instantly depending on how you store charge..

what do you think Matt? cheers..:dodgy:

there was mention of a floating ground like Tesla had used? i want to find more information on that. its basically the earth ground me that causes the flow of charge through the conductor and through my feet. a floating ground most likely dissipates to the ground as a spark gap. keeping the dipole still intact. a partial ground. or the use of several like i had tried in other experiments.
so i could use some more information about a floating ground. and how to use them with a second collector.

Foe the carbon arc a, c battery contains a carbon rod. for use as my new spark gaps perhaps. or to pass a current.  we maybe able to  put a 1500 watt heater in between that, and cause it to work.

Tesla one wire no wire motor works on the principle of adding a capacitor in series with the inductor, the bigger the inductor the smaller need be the metal plate insulated and suspend on a string.
if i had made a 6 foot inductor like in this patent, and also used a very large surface area for my equi-potential. i could use motor discharge caps as my energy outlet, and use it for work.

lots of inventions possible.
As part of lifter technology this tells us why they operate. With   high potentials 50 kv to 3 million. we have lift off.
 i can try a large wing as a lifter, and use a fine wire. but it will be as Tesla had said cigar shaped  flat on top like a bomber. even as pyramid shaped. to fly it remotely in all directions.
my proposal make the Guinness book of world records for the largest lifer made. 50 square feet perhaps, made of Styrofoam and foil. why because we can.

ok so the inductor shown in the dated patent is the same as Ed lee had used, the same as kapange, the same as tesla. are you missing the idea of a no battery inductor acting as a battery in itself. in other words it can replace a battery.:-/:)

I took a picture.:)

so here is a modern day inductor built in pairs also. note he said in his drawing to add another coil there, and shuttle the flux around. he did it on a small scale compared to a larger inductor. both are claimed to get hot..:@:@:cool:/watch?v=r8asKJNYJIY&list=UUI11GlPaphbBnNwxAtlF-2Q

if he adds one more pair he will have 8 magnetic fields. like in the dated patent. what did we do?

/watch?v=EHyH_cEnvUI&list=UUI11GlPaphbBnNwxAtlF-2Q

over unity inductor? hmmmmm link /watch?v=2EHKxspB7d8&list=UUI11GlPaphbBnNwxAtlF-2Q

Quote from freethisone on November 2nd, 2013, 10:01 AM

ok so the inductor shown in the dated patent is the same as Ed lee had used, the same as kapange, the same as tesla. are you missing the idea of a no battery inductor acting as a battery in itself. in other words it can replace a battery.:-/:)

I took a picture.:)

/user/TheOldScientist?feature=watch
looks like the old man has just created a similar inductor?
:D

Mr T are you with us? use the force.

this is a great result.

Thanks.
30 volts. hook that puppy to a windmill...
can my ion generator at 7.5 kv produce the same effect but on a higher scale? Oh yea.. just do it.


/watch?v=k06S-01HBqQ:cool::D

Did Mr T reproduce these effect? pause at 2 min 15 sec for a test i had done with a coil of wire. ii say the longer the wire the better. i say a huge inductor here may have great results. test it for truth..

his step downs are a crude form, but convert directly to usable voltage. the motor caps would be of better use.  glass tubes here with coils having the better radius to deal with.
 its all about how you want to store this charge..:P praises.  fine.


/watch?v=SfSJGNnWh_Q

i can tell you the wim machine has a flaw of it own. ill bring up the schematics...

now i look at this set up, my coil of wire was at a 90 degree angle from the larger iron core. i can now go back and make a test.

as my new advance, i can wrap the coil around the larger primary. either in a helix fashion, or as many turns as i go.

ill draw a picture. Make a prediction. the circles of coil will flow directly in the path of lines of force. in circles at 90 degree angles proving that the eddy currents do travel in small circles, causing induction, even here on Earth. On a very large scale.  through my proposed coil experiment to advance the logic of theory, and use. as a spire of wires. on a b field, on the a field, and any other electric field that springs up.
:angel::angel:

i can use copper tubes instead. advance in any number of ways.

/watch?v=fn4A6VJodow&feature=c4-overview&list=UUjqKLeadAXoXEUEf3VK6Dww


can someone please verify this.. I think he could do a slight of hand trick here, such as magnet in his palm, or two magnets that are not  correctly depicted...

i dont like the fact he has many edits in his movie cheers..:huh:

Quote from Matt Watts on October 31st, 2013, 07:52 AM

High tin lead solder should be fine.  I can easily melt that in my casting furnace.  Bottom line, lead may work just fine by itself, since everything is magnetic--it's just the alignment of the gyroscopic particles that matter.


As far as the coils...  I don't think they are acting like coils at all since the two ends of them are shorted out.  I could be wrong.  Seems to me just a simple copper pipe would probably work just as well.  They only need to act as charge separators; probably the longer they are, the better the effect.  The more time the liquid metal is exposed within the tubes while it falls the better the gyroscopic particles align.


And for the where the metal comes to rest...  Simply two small foundry ladles would work nicely.


If one is able to replicate this and it's not a hoax, then making an all-magnet motor is practically child's play.

its been a wile since your proper of mono poles. but besides that MRT had shown us how to vapourize carbon. this is very important in the case of the light chamber. or is it a eletron grid?

Quote from freethisone on October 31st, 2013, 03:26 AM

as you see the movies have been removed..



gasIs Gallium magnetic?
Answer:
yes!
iron, nickel, and cobalt are also magnetic.

i ask this because i know gallium has a low melting point, or curry point.. cheers,

i know Mr T would not fake this. the compass needle does not lie. but it is a small amount of material, and needs to have a workable face,

he may be correct, but the magnetic flux on these mono poles may be very weak as far as flux. more material is needed, and perhaps if the coils are energized with a higher charge it could make a substantial magnetic field.

test

Quote from freethisone on October 31st, 2013, 03:26 AM

as you see the movies have been removed..



gasIs Gallium magnetic?
Answer:
yes!
iron, nickel, and cobalt are also magnetic.

i ask this because i know gallium has a low melting point, or curry point.. cheers,

i know Mr T would not fake this. the compass needle does not lie. but it is a small amount of material, and needs to have a workable face,

he may be correct, but the magnetic flux on these mono poles may be very weak as far as flux. more material is needed, and perhaps if the coils are energized with a higher charge it could make a substantial magnetic field.

test!