Thanks Muxar, appreciate it 
First Idle Buggy Information(Meyer)
Thanks Muxar, appreciate it
By the way,Hydrogen wasn´t feed to the inyector in this system, i made a mistake.
The inyector was feed by water,non combustible gases and ionized ambient air
Just to be clear, a non-combustible gas is a gas that will not burn (usually in oxygen) when ignited. It is wrong to say that a non-combustible gas is one that does not support combustion. Oxygen is an oxidiser, yes it supports combustion, but it is not a combustible gas.
Just to be clear, a non-combustible gas is a gas that will not burn (usually in oxygen) when ignited. It is wrong to say that a non-combustible gas is one that does not support combustion. Oxygen is an oxidiser, yes it supports combustion, but it is not a combustible gas.
just Stan's words,non-combustible gas=already burned gas,not oxygen cause oxygen will change to water.think like Stan Thought.Quote from Farrah Day on October 13th, 2013, 02:42 PM Just to be clear, a non-combustible gas is a gas that will not burn (usually in oxygen) when ignited. It is wrong to say that a non-combustible gas is one that does not support combustion. Oxygen is an oxidiser, yes it supports combustion, but it is not a combustible gas.
I was replacing an ABS unit in one car today and i realized that, this thing can be used perfectly as the "gas mixer", it has many electrovalves and even a motor with 2 pistons to build the pressure(the black thing)
The one in the picture has 2 entries and 4 holes for output(i guess they can be used in opposite direction=4 entries 2 outputs)
Is just an idea....but depending on the flow rate of the valves, and how well they seal,could be used for that task and not paying much for it
Byee
Farrah Day
RE: First Idle Buggy Information(Meyer)
« Reply #55, on October 14th, 2013, 09:50 AM »Last edited on October 14th, 2013, 09:54 AM by Farrah Day
just Stan's words,non-combustible gas=already burned gas,not oxygen cause oxygen will change to water.
think like Stan Thought.
Stan's motor was 1hp(746watts) at 1725 rpm with a pulley ratio of 2x1,dont know the name but i think its an A.O Smith motor
I also read somewhere that the oxigen content in the ambient air nowadays is lower then it used to be..something of 18%.
adys15
RE: First Idle Buggy Information(Meyer)
« Reply #57, on October 14th, 2013, 02:00 PM »Last edited on October 14th, 2013, 07:39 PM by Matt Watts
So not an original VW engine? But if i see Stan driving of i can't think that that is driving of on 2 HP? That can't be right, or were you talking about the power of his dynamo..alternator? Or of some extra electro motor?
I also read somewhere that the oxigen content in the ambient air nowadays is lower then it used to be..something of 18%.
cory991
RE: First Idle Buggy Information(Meyer)
« Reply #58, on December 21st, 2013, 09:30 PM »Last edited on December 21st, 2013, 09:39 PM by cory991
I might have a theroy about why the non combustible gas lowers the burn rate of the hydrogen. For those of you that dont watch Mythbusters they did a test with a sewer in which they pumped methane and lit it to see if the covers blew off. Only after they added debris to the enclosure did the covers fly off. Now im wondering if the non combustible gasses are providing the needed surface area to do the same thing. Kinda like having something to push against.
Let me know what you think.
Let me know what you think.
GoldBl4d3
RE: First Idle Buggy Information(Meyer)
« Reply #59, on December 22nd, 2013, 10:30 AM »Last edited on December 22nd, 2013, 10:56 AM by GoldBl4d3
I might have a theroy about why the non combustible gas lowers the burn rate of the hydrogen. For those of you that dont watch Mythbusters they did a test with a sewer in which they pumped methane and lit it to see if the covers blew off. Only after they added debris to the enclosure did the covers fly off. Now im wondering if the non combustible gasses are providing the needed surface area to do the same thing. Kinda like having something to push against.
Let me know what you think.
Non-combustible gases are gases that don't react to support the burning process. So the fuel (hydrogen) has less oxygen to react with, slowing how fast it burns overall.
Take a candle, light it, place a glass over it. You will see the flame slowly burn out. That's because its using the oxygen within the glass and the byproduct of combustion is filling the glass, since the byproduct isn't combustible or 'non-combustible' gases, the flame burns out.
How would that work then? :huh:Quote Hi to all again, by the way i forgot to say that i think he runs the car in gasoline first to have non combustible gases to run in his hydrogen mixture.
CU
In that scenario the moment you stopped using gasoline, you would no longer have your non-combustible exhaust gases... would you?
However, the good news is that recirculating exhaust gases is totally pointless. This 'exhaust gas recycling' is another common misconception. Common sense should tell you that you wouldn't need to recirculate exhaust gases as, rather strangely, the air around us - the very air that we breath is... get this, non-combustible.
The point of the tube from the exhaust is to capture the released non-combustible gases. Which are present and released when using electrolysis.
Okay, let's try this again. You are obviously convinced that you know what's coming out of the exhaust pipe, so tell me, exactly what are these 'already burned' gases coming out of the exhaust? And what has happened to the 21% of oxygen already in the ambient air?Quote from geenee on October 13th, 2013, 06:24 PM just Stan's words,non-combustible gas=already burned gas,not oxygen cause oxygen will change to water.Thanks, but I'd really rather not!Quote think like Stan Thought.
Hi guys!!
Here you have the transcription of the video in english transcripted by jim miller.
Here you have the transcription of the video in english transcripted by jim miller.
Thanks for sharing Muxar, appreciate it 