Tesla I hear was interested in the number 3 and even 6 and 9. I assume certain electromagnetic things needed to have an imbalance in way? Maybe people should think 3 dimensional and not in 2 dimension when it comes to energy or out of the box.
Nikola Tesla said that, "If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe." http://nerdbusiness.com/blog/3-6-9-time-management-strategy
Well maybe some might say it does not apply to electronics. But what if it did?
If you add 1 by 1 one get 1, if you get add or multiply 2 by 2 you get 4, but 3 is the first when you multiply it you get 9 which is 3 more than if you add it. Sure other numbers give bigger gain but bigger means more number and to reach a higher number in electrical current you need more power and so less is more.
Does multiplication have a place in electricity or electromagnetic? If you fold a price of paper in 2 you get 2 layers, if you fold that then you get 4, then again it would be 8, etc. Now do people know how many layers it would be if you fold it hypothetically 20 times? Most don't believe that number that its over a million layers.
Another is frequency which is heavily ignored by science and some private individuals are exploiting it to their personal advantages and wont make it public. To use small amounts of power to generate great force with the momentum of the previous impact seems to be multiplying to compound the previous power released with the current one to have potential and kinetic working together. Frequency is used like in outdated inefficient motors, but not in many other aspects. Compound energy is also not as obviously used.
I assume some know about Tesla's Oscillator that brought down a building. Even mythbusters tested it and felt that it was a myth. Mythbusters have been wrong a few times and seem to intentionally fail experiments by skewing the hindering the results. Bad enough they did a test ot help boost cars MPG with alternative energy "booter" and changed the experiment to say the booster can not work alone and it's a useless booster which they were leading the audience. Maybe they are right or wrong when they talked about Tesla's oscillator (earthquake machine) as a myth. But the thing they did not do which they messed up and did not understand in their early experiment is how it works. Shouldn't they have had a oscillator to adjust the frequency to .01 degrees? Should they have has a sensor to read the current frequency the object was taking and by detecting the object? shouldn't the frequency be adjusted depending on the vibration frequency? Since how can one use the same frequency and not adjust every vibration when a small vibration of a iron beam is completely different form a big vibration of a iron beam? It's just like a spiral drain how the center of the drain goes a shorter distance than the outer ring of the spiral.
Certain things maybe have to been shown as being just myth since some feel that if people know too much then it's bad. Maybe they are right, no one deserves anything and progress happens through ones desire for truth or pleasure than having truth or pleasure. So again why give an answer for what is true since as I said I am not here to give answers, and if you got one then laziness sets in. And people do not seem to appreciates what they have not earned, which is a different topic. I am not saying I have answers, I am just saying certain info seems to be diverted away from our concentration.
As the saying goes "Necessity is the mother of invention is an English proverb meaning that difficult or impossible scenarios prompt inventions aimed at reducing the difficulty" Maybe some peoples pain is their drive and their drive invents weather for good or bad.
Nikola Tesla said that, "If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe." http://nerdbusiness.com/blog/3-6-9-time-management-strategy
Well maybe some might say it does not apply to electronics. But what if it did?
If you add 1 by 1 one get 1, if you get add or multiply 2 by 2 you get 4, but 3 is the first when you multiply it you get 9 which is 3 more than if you add it. Sure other numbers give bigger gain but bigger means more number and to reach a higher number in electrical current you need more power and so less is more.
Does multiplication have a place in electricity or electromagnetic? If you fold a price of paper in 2 you get 2 layers, if you fold that then you get 4, then again it would be 8, etc. Now do people know how many layers it would be if you fold it hypothetically 20 times? Most don't believe that number that its over a million layers.
Another is frequency which is heavily ignored by science and some private individuals are exploiting it to their personal advantages and wont make it public. To use small amounts of power to generate great force with the momentum of the previous impact seems to be multiplying to compound the previous power released with the current one to have potential and kinetic working together. Frequency is used like in outdated inefficient motors, but not in many other aspects. Compound energy is also not as obviously used.
I assume some know about Tesla's Oscillator that brought down a building. Even mythbusters tested it and felt that it was a myth. Mythbusters have been wrong a few times and seem to intentionally fail experiments by skewing the hindering the results. Bad enough they did a test ot help boost cars MPG with alternative energy "booter" and changed the experiment to say the booster can not work alone and it's a useless booster which they were leading the audience. Maybe they are right or wrong when they talked about Tesla's oscillator (earthquake machine) as a myth. But the thing they did not do which they messed up and did not understand in their early experiment is how it works. Shouldn't they have had a oscillator to adjust the frequency to .01 degrees? Should they have has a sensor to read the current frequency the object was taking and by detecting the object? shouldn't the frequency be adjusted depending on the vibration frequency? Since how can one use the same frequency and not adjust every vibration when a small vibration of a iron beam is completely different form a big vibration of a iron beam? It's just like a spiral drain how the center of the drain goes a shorter distance than the outer ring of the spiral.
Certain things maybe have to been shown as being just myth since some feel that if people know too much then it's bad. Maybe they are right, no one deserves anything and progress happens through ones desire for truth or pleasure than having truth or pleasure. So again why give an answer for what is true since as I said I am not here to give answers, and if you got one then laziness sets in. And people do not seem to appreciates what they have not earned, which is a different topic. I am not saying I have answers, I am just saying certain info seems to be diverted away from our concentration.
As the saying goes "Necessity is the mother of invention is an English proverb meaning that difficult or impossible scenarios prompt inventions aimed at reducing the difficulty" Maybe some peoples pain is their drive and their drive invents weather for good or bad.