I've read all the books and all the patents and saw all the videos. I just cant figure out the last step to the process.

1. Obtain a high vacuum.

2. If necessary depending on the type of reactor add the proper gases (while still having a vacuum after)

3. Ionize the gas\vacuum (to separate the proton from the electron and according to Mr. Keshe we reach this level but haven't figured out how to enter the solar system this is not plasma)

4 Open up (dilute) the proton or electron to release the fundamental energies. (this is plasma)

Now step 4 is what I cant figure out.. according to physics there called quarks. and no one has been able to split them from each other.  But Mr. keshe says its simple...

Edit:
He did say that alpha, beta, and gamma radiation is the universes cutting mechanism.

If we go the hv route to ionize the vacuum how much does it take to create UV

0.99

Quote from zeropointnine9 on April 17th, 2013, 09:16 PM

I've read all the books and all the patents and saw all the videos. I just cant figure out the last step to the process.

1. Obtain a high vacuum.

2. If necessary depending on the type of reactor add the proper gases (while still having a vacuum after)

3. Ionize the gas\vacuum (to separate the proton from the electron and according to Mr. Keshe we reach this level but haven't figured out how to enter the solar system this is not plasma)

4 Open up (dilute) the proton or electron to release the fundamental energies. (this is plasma)

Now step 4 is what I cant figure out.. according to physics there called quarks. and no one has been able to split them from each other.  But Mr. keshe says its simple...

Edit:
He did say that alpha, beta, and gamma radiation is the universes cutting mechanism.

If we go the hv route to ionize the vacuum how much does it take to create UV

0.99

----------------------------

Hola Amigo, para obtener un vacio aceptable necesitamos una turbomolecular, los gases nobles como argón, xenón,cripton y otros son faciles de obtener buscando en el sitio adecuado, la ionización se puede hacer empleando alta tensión y alta frecuencia, el plasma se puede crear a partir de 300-500 voltios de corriente continua una vez iniciada la ionización, por eso no hay problema, yo creo que la geometria es esencial y tener claro si los datos de la patente son ciertos

Quote from Antigraviticsystems1 on April 18th, 2013, 12:47 PM

Hola Amigo, para obtener un vacio aceptable necesitamos una turbomolecular, los gases nobles como argón, xenón,cripton y otros son faciles de obtener buscando en el sitio adecuado, la ionización se puede hacer empleando alta tensión y alta frecuencia, el plasma se puede crear a partir de 300-500 voltios de corriente continua una vez iniciada la ionización, por eso no hay problema, yo creo que la geometria es esencial y tener claro si los datos de la patente son ciertos

Translated text ---
Hello Friend, to obtain acceptable need a turbomolecular vacuum, noble gases such as argon, xenon, krypton and others are easy to obtain looking at the right places, ionization can be done using high voltage and high frequency, the plasma can create from 300-500 volts DC once initiated ionization, so no problem, I think the geometry is essential and be clear if the patent data are true

Correct Antigrav! how ever according to Mr Keshe Ionized plasma as we call it is not the same as his 'plasma'.  And in fact he doesn't use it.  Which brings me to step 4. After we ionize the plasma how do "we take the layers off" and access the fundamental energies of the proton, neutron, or electron

Notes:
The light we see during ionization is the protons and electrons separating and combining and there outer shells interacting with each other.  it has no effect on the inside of the proton or electron which is what we need to affect

Ionization is only to separate the "packets"

Effectiveness of the process is affected by the materials the walls are made of (maybe we use argon as an insulator between the walls and the lighter gases inside)

Any motors inside wont work they ruin the process (keshe in his last talk to ludmil said it would never work with a motor in his reactor)

edit:
added a picture to help explain keshes analogy

http://youtu.be/H7RyN1AT-5g  





Por desgracia no se aprecia con nitidez como el plasma se enrosca sobre si mismo, en este caso las fuerzas de Lorentz son las responsables de que el plasma se retuerza sobre si mismo pues todo hilo conductor crea un campo magnético asociado y el plasma es muy buen conductor, el campo magnético creado corta perpendicularmente a las particulas cargadas y estas describen una trayectoria vortical, nótese como el plasma va estrechando y los movimientos son sinuosos como en los huracanes terrestres

Nice video! and thanks for your reply, yes it is very easy to create a rotating ionized gas.

My Youtube channel is zeropointnine9

This spark rotates (zvs driver)
Rotation

This spark does not rotate (blocking oscillator)
no rotation

Ok I reread some chapters in book 1.

My new step 4...

Step 4) Weaken/dilute the Coulomb Barrier of the neutron, proton, or electron to allow the quarks to move around. These now freed quarks are the plasma Mr. Keshe talks about!

How do we weaken/dilute the Coulomb Barrier?
What affects the Coulomb Barrier? Heat? Electrostatics?

Just thinking out loud
0.99

Hmm weather is controlled by high and low pressures among other things. Thunderstorms don't form if there is high pressure. But if theirs low pressure it rains.

In russ's popper video 22 he shows film built up on the interior of the glass wall while using pure helium. Is this film matter from the electrodes or maybe a conversion happening between the gasses and something else? Could it be this simple? Keshe did say his reactors needed to be cleaned out on the inside because of material build up.

0.99