Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction

Axil

Re: Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction
« Reply #276,  »
The Topological materials process is important to understand in terms of LENR. According to Dirac, the electron is made up of 4 spinors: Right handed electron, Left handed electron, Right handed positron, and Left handed positron.

A topological material can separate the electron up into seperate spinors. This separation can make an electron look and perform differently based on how these spinors are broken apart and put back together. In this way, the electron can be made to look like any number of very different particles. The electron can be made to look and perform like a Weyl particle, for example, which looks like a neutrino.

These spinors can be also separated into seperated quantum properties that carry what gives the right (south magnetic pole) and left handed (north magnetic pole) electron magnetism and mass.

Helicity basis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_spinor

Because these properties are bosons, these spinners like to join together and can form a condensate that carry what makes the electron have magnetism and mass and the condensation process amplifies these properties greatly.

The weak hypercharge property of the spinor is what gives electrons mass, and the isospin property of the spinor is what gives electrons magnetic polarity.

The Higgs field is a condensate of the weak hypercharge property. So a spinor condensate can form a Higgs field. Because of the isospin property, this spinor condensate is also a dipole magnet or a monopole magnet because it has either the north and/or south isospin property. If the spinor condensate has both north and south isospin properties, it is a dipole magnet.

The spinor condensate is what an EVO is.

The Higgs field gives the EVO the ability to transmute matter because it modifies the mass of quarks which is also a Fermion and is made of  spinors.

The single isospin property is what makes the EVO a monopole.

Here is some science that says what I have just said.

Pattern formation in non-equilibrium spinor polariton condensates
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/633/1/012039
Quote
Non-equilibrium polariton condensates entangle properties of lasers, atomic Bose- Einstein condensates (BEC) and semiconductor physics. They provide a great variety of physical phenomena while maintaining a simple theoretical description. Among those phenomena are nonlinear excitations such as solitons or spontaneous spin bifurcations. In this paper I first present a short overview on the theoretical basis of polaritons. Then starting from a scenario of excitation generation in equilibrium BEC I turn to corresponding phenomenona in polariton condensates such as dark soliton formation (black EVO). Later the spin sensitive phenomena such as nonequilibrium bright solitons (Bright EVO)and half-bright solitons in semiconductor microcavities are discussed. Theoretically all the considered scenarios are described by partial differential equations (PDEs) and coupled systems thereof. The system of PDEs defines a so called condensate wave function, which completely describes the experimental relevant aspects of the physical system in a certain parameter regime where condensation occurs. The developed theories enable us particularly to make a variety of statements about excitations such as solitons (dipole) and half-solitons (monopole) in spinor systems forming within a non-equilibrium condensate (needs pumping). It turns out that by those means we can elucidate in particular the experimental implementation of a coherent superposition (this is what makes transmutation NOT produce energy) analog in a spin sensitive setting forming a macroscopic QUBIT within the semiconductor microcavity at temperatures in the Kelvin range.
Re: Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction
« Reply #277,  »
Magnetic monopoles have always been taught by science to be impossible.

This is true BUT.... quasiparticle like the polariton are not fundamental particles, They are made up of parts of true fundamental particles. But what science does not know is that polariton condensates or EVOs can became independent particles like the proton. After birth, they can exist on their own terms and travel around for a indeterminate and maybe permanent timeframe.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_z8BGcmLq3U

Intro to Magnetic Monopoles

What is the significance of an EVO being a monopole? Why is an EVO a monopole?

1 - It is massive.
2 - It is a stand alone independent self sustaining particle with an indeterminate lifespan..
3 - It has been predicted to exist
4 - It must exist to complete the symmetry of  electromagnetic theory.
5 - Its tracks show up as being produced by a monopole.
6 - We have pictures of it that show the magnetic flux tube of a monopole.

Cosmology theory says that these EVO monopoles had to have formed 2 hours after the big bang as the Higgs field cooled to a lower energy state of today. There is a ton of theory about how all this happened.

Here is some of that theory
Quote
Degenerate Vacua of the Universe and What Comes Beyond the Standard Model
https://www.groundai.com/project/degenerate-vacua-of-the-universe-and-what-comes-beyond-the-standard-model/2
But what science does not know is that these EVOs can form today in a LENR reactor. They can also form naturally, but only Ken Shoulders and Keith Fredericks have seen the natural kind.
Re: Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction
« Reply #278,  »Last edited
It was only a matter of time before science discovered the basic process upon which LENR energy is generated. The few highly capable LENR reactors produce Extreme ultraviolet radiation (EUV or XUV)  as their primary output energy product.

https://physicsworld.com/a/electrons-passing-over-nanophotonic-materials-could-create-synchrotron-like-light/

Electrons passing over nanophotonic materials could create synchrotron-like light



Electron flyby: illustration of how encounters between relativistic electrons and vacuum fluctuations can generate X-rays. (Courtesy: Nicholas Rivera et al/Nature Physics)

The interaction between electrons and a rough metal surface produce high energy photons derived from the vacuum. These photons come from the vacuum as mediated by polariton condensation. This experiment could be a proof of principle for the generation of Hawking radiation from polariton condensation.

In Hawking radiation, the polariton condensate  produces low energy infrared photons as a "positive energy" product having a positive frequency, but high energy EUV photons as "negative energy" having a negative frequency.  As in this case, zero vacuum energy is balanced when negative vacuum energy is created to offset positive vacuum energy production.

The high energy EUV photons produced in high powered LENR reactors like Rossi's SK reactor, Mills SunCell, and the SAFIRE project could be generated as negative vacuum energy photons.
Re: Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction
« Reply #279,  »
At the Global Breakthrough Energy Movement conference, Bob Greenyer , a volunteer from the MFMP says that that he had a discussion with a man who knew Yull Brown, and had bought one of the very few Brown’s gas generators that came from a Mongolian factory. Bob says that the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project is going to be given access to this generator and test it and reverse engineer it so that the device can be made open source. Bob says he will soon make the manual available online.
Re: Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction
« Reply #280,  »Last edited
FYI: Breaking New from E-CatWorld

A new post from Andrea Rossi from his blog

It seems like Saturday, November 23rd, 2019 could be a very important day in the history of Andrea Rossi’s development of the E-Cat.

For the last few months he has been working towards a version of the E-Cat that not only can produce electricity directly, but also uses some of that electricity to provide the power it needs to sustain itself. Rossi calls this Permanent Self-Sustain mode.

I asked Rossi today if Saturday would be he decisive day in this round of R&D. He replied: “If positive, yes, if negative we will have to continue the experiment and understand where are the errors.”

If he can pull this off it would be an incredible feat. If Rossi’s  claims are true, he would have created an electricity generator that could run on miniscule amounts of fuel for months at a time, that would produce no greenhouse emissions and producing no ionizing radiation. It really does sound like something you would read about in a science fiction novel.

It will be interesting to see what he reports. A claim of success would be exciting for some people who have been following his work closely, but I think the response for most people will be, okay – now show us what you’ve got. Until he does that, posts on the Journal of Nuclear Physics won’t mean a lot.

Mats Lewan posted this here on ECW today:

“The essential consequence of the SSM version is that he will be able to do a demo pulling the plug and eliminating the input power altogether. That makes verification simple: Any amount of heat produced over a sufficiently long time proves energy production beyond chemical reactions. Done.
And as far as I understand, he’s ready to do such a test as soon as he achieves a stable sum version. No sigma stuff. Will try to assist him in this.”

I hope that if the SSM test is successful that he and Rossi can work together to put on a show for the world to see it in action.

But first things first, let’s wait to see what Andrea Rossi reports from the lab on Saturday.

More info forthcoming when available.

November 23, 2019 at 9:43 PM
Dear Readers of the JoNP:
We did it.
Obtained permanent self sustaining mode with production of strong excess of electricity, generating more excess of electricity than of heat.
It is a revolution.
We did not violate unity, we just discovered an energy that had not been exploited before.
I am very tired.
Independent parties tests will follow, eventually we will make a presentation.
I think we made something that will make a revolution.
My team colleagues are saying to me ” Andrea, stay calm, be humble”. They are right. Now I am tired, must reorganize the ideas. The work in these last 2 weeks has been very hard, but we did it. This morning, late, we got more electric energy that the electric energy necessary to make the Cat work. The increase is strong.
Too big to be true, but it is true.
If you are reading this message, means I am not dreaming: our Readers are independent parties that can convince me I am not sleeping and I am really writing this.
The merit is of my fantastic Team, without them this could not have been done.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Re: Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction
« Reply #281,  »
Bob Greenyer posts as follows:

MFMP intends to resurrect the last best version of Brown Gas generator, test and document it so that this invention does not get memory holed and become a 'forgotten invention'.

To get things going, here is the manual, in Chinese and English for the BN2000

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ESMWoTbjpELcHpJttIXpS4eYPQ_fBPAi/view

Note: All of the corrections in the manual above are by Yull Brown himself

Bob states: Yes device looks really advanced, I was told the Chinese gave Yull 10,000 employees and researchers to work on it and this is the product that emerged. When you see it, it is actually quite refined for something from 1994 - yes that is 1/4 century ago.

I hope that what will be embedded in it is a lot of learning in the control regime and choice of materials.

If it does the same apparent transmutations has Ohmasa Gas did to Tungsten, it will be a revolution. Given the apparent claims of heavy element stabilisation from 1992, I have a reasonable expectation that it might.
Re: Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction
« Reply #282,  »Last edited
The EVO is a quantum object that does not collapse on its own. It is metastable and self sustaining. The EVO may become big enough to see with the naked eye but it is a single particle called a tachyon,  and as such, it acts just like an electron quantum mechanically. When an EVO produces energy, that energy is spread out all over space and time. This is why transmutation does not produce energy and isotopes produced by LENR are always stable. A LENR system could be producing energy for months or years, but not show any of it in our real world. The EVO only realizes energy when it dies. Here is an explanation of why this is all true.

https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-effects-at-mega-scale-the-universe-may-have-quantum-properties/
Quote
Valerian Yurov was recently published in European Physical Journal. The scientists have released their calculations, according to which the Universe may have quantum properties.

Artyom Yurov explained:

“To begin with, let’s remember what quantum physics is. Perhaps this is the most amazing phenomenon known to people. When scientists started studying atoms for the first time, they noticed that everything works “upside down” in the microcosm. For example, according to quantum theory, an electron may present in several places simultaneously.

Try to imagine your cat simultaneously lying on the sofa and eating from its bowl that is in the other corner of the room. The cat is not either here or there, but in both places simultaneously. But the cat is there only BEFORE you look at it. The moment you start staring at it, it changes the position to EITHER the bowl OR the sofa. You may ask, of course, that if the cat acts so weird only when not observed by us, so how do we know that it actually acts this way? The answer is simple: math! If we are to try and gather statistical information about us looking at the cat (needed to estimate the number of cases when the cat was on the sofa and when — near the bowl), we won’t have any information. This proves to be impossible if we consider the cat being EITHER near the bowl OR on the sofa. Well, it doesn’t work like that with cats, but works fine for electrons.

When we observe this particle, it really appears in one place and we can record that, but when we do not observe it, it must be in several places at once. For example, this is what they mean in chemistry classes when they talk about electron clouds. No wonder poor children never understand this. They just memorize … ”


Decoherence Effect

Yes, the cat is not some electron, but why? Cats consist of elementary particles, like electrons, protons, and neutrons. All the particles act the same when measured on the quantum level. So why a cat can’t be in two places simultaneously?

And the other question is: what is so magical about our ability to “observe”? Because when we don’t “observe,” the object is being “smeared” all over the universe, but the moment we look at it — it is gathered in one place! Well, physicists don’t say “gathered,” they say “wave function collapsed,” but those smart words actually mean “gathered” in one place as a result of observation! How are we able to do that?

“Firstly, the answer to these complex questions appeared at the end of the last century, when such a phenomenon as decoherence was discovered. It turns out that indeed, any object is located in several places at once, in very many places. It seems to be spread throughout the universe. But if the object comes into interaction with the environment, even collides with one atom of a photon, he immediately “collapses.” So there are no mystical abilities to cause quantum collapse by observation — this is due to interaction with the environment, and we are simply part of this environment.

Secondly, there is no absolute collapse as such. The collapse happens in the following way: if before interacting with the environment the object was “smeared” over two places, (we use “two places” to simplify, in reality it might be smeared over hundreds of thousands of places) but in fact, the object presents 99.9999% (and many, many nines after) of the time in one place, and a small remaining part of time in the second. And we observe it as being in one and only place! Everything happens in no time and the bigger an object is, the faster the “collapse.” We cannot realize it or somehow register, as such devices simply do not exist. And they cannot be created.”
Re: Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction
« Reply #283,  »
Statement of Andrea Rossi: “We Did It, Obtained Permanent Self Sustaining Mode”
Posted on November 24, 2019

Here is a statement made on The Journal of Nuclear Physics by Andrea Rossi this evening:

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=464#comment-1417348
Quote
Andrea Rossi
November 23, 2019 at 9:43 PM
Dear Readers of the JoNP:
We did it.
Obtained permanent self sustaining mode with production of strong excess of electricity, generating more excess of electricity than of heat.
It is a revolution.
We did not violate unity, we just discovered an energy that had not been exploited before.
I am very tired.
Independent parties tests will follow, eventually we will make a presentation.
I think we made something that will make a revolution.
My team colleagues are saying to me ” Andrea, stay calm, be humble”. They are right. Now I am tired, must reorganize the ideas. The work in these last 2 weeks has been very hard, but we did it. This morning, late, we got more electric energy that the electric energy necessary to make the Cat work. The increase is strong.
Too big to be true, but it is true.
If you are reading this message, means I am not dreaming: our Readers are independent parties that can convince me I am not sleeping and I am really writing this.
The merit is of my fantastic Team, without them this could not have been done.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Re: Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction
« Reply #284,  »Last edited
Its my guess that the energy being generated by the new Rossi  LENR reaction (SKL) is coming from the center of the plasma because of the confinement of the EVOs along the central axis of the plasma by a quadruple magnetic bottle. The LENR reaction is catalyzed by the EVOs that produce a negatively  charged electron cloud at the center of the plasma ball. So the plasma must circulate from the center to the more positively charged outside edges of the plasma and back to the center again. An electron collection mechanism is resident somewhere just outside the plasma ball maybe on the outside edges  of the plasma where the circulation of the electrons are collected on the positively charged anode and then rectified.

In the original heat producing SKL. the reported heat could have been produced by the thermalization of plasma flow against an insulating outer containment shell( boron nitride tube) where the kinetic energy of the electrons were converted to heat, but in the electric version of the SKL those electrons are now being captured by a grid that acts like an anode on a vacuum tube. The plasma cannot be that hot if the metal anode can survive inside the plasma flow. The heat that falls on the anode can be adjusted by the inverse square law...making the tube bigger and moving the anode further away from the center of the plasma ball.

As a speculation, think of the electric version of the SKL as a big vacuum tube.

The electron flow comes from the center of the hot negatively charged plasma ball (emitter) but is captured by the metal anode that encloses the plasma ball. The customer could control the heat production by applying a voltage to a grid that lies between the anode and the center of the plasma ball.

Being far more massive than the electrons, the EVOs would be confined by the quadruple magnetic bottle more vigorously than  the lightweight electrons who would then make their way to the positively charged anode. The voltage of the power produced could also be controlled by the confinement strength of the quadruple magnetic bottle.

The cathode function would be carried out by the two nickel electrode that pump the plasma ball with RF. These two electrodes would be more positively charged than the plasma ball and would serve to return the electrons through a load circuit to the plasma while also producing the RF pumping signal.

Re: Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction
« Reply #285,  »Last edited
How is electron flow produced in the SKL reactor?

In the Dekalion system, the pico clusters (EVOs) were seen to explode in a Bosenova. The continually excited EVO must have a limit to the amount of energy that it can store before the EVO becomes unstable. When that limit of instability is reached, the EVO explodes.

This Bosenova produces ionization of matter in the vicinity of the explosion. It also may be possible that a large volume of electrons reform from the spinors that the EVO was made composed and are released back into the plasma ball.

Because of confinement in a quadrupole magnetic field, the EVOs are highly localized and as a result, the center of the plasma ball becomes highly charged with electrons. The electrodes that pump the plasma with RF also return electrons through the load back to the plasma. New EVOs form again inside the plasma and migrate once again to its center of the plasma to replace the super heavy and energy engorged EVOs that have exploded.

The outside of the plasma is more positively charged than the center of the plasma ball. Electrons will flow to the outside of the plasma ball.

From SAFIRE we know the charge in the plasma will separate and this separation must also be happening inside the SKL plasma. This charge separation is most likely the cause of current flow in the SKL reactor.

namirha

Re: Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction
« Reply #286,  »
Prof. Konstantin Meyl the New Tesla
https://vimeo.com/41021469

Nikola Tesla was the biggest scientific genius in the last century. Today this is Prof. Dr. Konstantin Meyl from Villingen, Black Forrest, Germany. He has not only organized a revival of Tesla but developed his research to mindboggling levels. He detected that every vortex has a counterpart, a so-called potential vortex, being able to form matter. He shows that electrons, protons, neutrinos etc. are double vortexes, without needing a postulate. By that he proofs, that there are two more types of waves besides the already well-known electromagnetic wave (Hertz 1888). Tesla (1899) detected the electric scalar wave and Meyl the magnetic scalar wave, giving access to free energy, huge over unity effects. The magnetic scalar wave, as an aspect of the neutrinos and therefore beeing quicker than light, is used in all biology, so Meyl can explain how the DNA is sending information and energy as an antenna using a DNA wave.
He describes what electro smog is and how we can avoid this. The cell phone industry, the TV/radio and computer industry and the car manufacturers could revolutionize their products by using scalar waves instead of electromagnetic waves, because they are more healthy, use less energy and have one dimension more to transport information.
And finally Meyl found the unified field theory, which a lot of scientists have searched for since long time. Even Einstein did not succeed. He trapped himself in the wrong information that nothing is quicker than light.
Re: Chiral polarization is the KEY to the LENR reaction
« Reply #287,  »
Prof. Konstantin Meyl the New Tesla
https://vimeo.com/41021469

Nikola Tesla was the biggest scientific genius in the last century. Today this is Prof. Dr. Konstantin Meyl from Villingen, Black Forrest, Germany. He has not only organized a revival of Tesla but developed his research to mindboggling levels. He detected that every vortex has a counterpart, a so-called potential vortex, being able to form matter. He shows that electrons, protons, neutrinos etc. are double vortexes, without needing a postulate. By that he proofs, that there are two more types of waves besides the already well-known electromagnetic wave (Hertz 1888). Tesla (1899) detected the electric scalar wave and Meyl the magnetic scalar wave, giving access to free energy, huge over unity effects. The magnetic scalar wave, as an aspect of the neutrinos and therefore beeing quicker than light, is used in all biology, so Meyl can explain how the DNA is sending information and energy as an antenna using a DNA wave.
He describes what electro smog is and how we can avoid this. The cell phone industry, the TV/radio and computer industry and the car manufacturers could revolutionize their products by using scalar waves instead of electromagnetic waves, because they are more healthy, use less energy and have one dimension more to transport information.
And finally Meyl found the unified field theory, which a lot of scientists have searched for since long time. Even Einstein did not succeed. He trapped himself in the wrong information that nothing is quicker than light.