Fukushima disaster

freethisone

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #75, on November 5th, 2014, 05:17 AM »

106 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:607   Lincoln, NE, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 106 Low 21 High 342
Average 96, Deviation 38.9
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-05 05:49:00 GMT+0000
Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #76, on November 5th, 2014, 06:05 PM »

17 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 1:EBB9C7EB   Benton, AR, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 17 Low 2 High 4307
Average 234, Deviation 769
Average over last 10 minutes: 19

First MRU - Ham radio and Internet.
Last updated: 2014-11-06 02:00:06 GMT+0000



HIGH was over 4000

Its pluming. we are being plumed by radiation .
Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #77, on November 5th, 2014, 07:03 PM »Last edited on November 6th, 2014, 01:27 AM
secret of magnetism relieved..

all Boyd bushmen movies are being removed from youtube.

©2012 GooglePropulsion system using the antigravity force of the vacuum and applications
WO 2010151161 A2
ABSTRACT
The present invention relates to a new form of aerial, terrestrial, underwater or space propulsion, achieved through the manipulation (or engineering) of the vacuum with the proper electromagnetic interactions. This vacuum manipulation will allow the use of a new form of propulsion, and has applications in energy production and on the change of the time decay of radioactive elements. Opposing magnetic or electric fields create a mass repelling force, while attracting magnetic or electric fields create a mass attracting force. In particular, this vacuum manipulation process can be used to propel a mass (6) that contains the field sources that perturb the vacuum. One possible application is the creation of a repulsion point (48) in space through the interference of two or more longitudinal electrodynamic wave beams (46), which cause a repulsion force on mass (6),
CLAIMS  (OCR text may contain errors)
pressure," International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 19 (3), pp. 453-464, 1998.
Magueijo, J., Faster than the speed of light, Perseus Publishing, 2003.
Maxwell, J. C, "On Physical Lines of Force, Part I: The theory of molecular vortices applied to magnetic phenomena," Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 21 No. 139, 161-175, March 1861.
Monstein, C, and Wesley, J. P., "Observation of scalar longitudinal electrodynamic waves," Europhysics Letters, 59 (4), pp. 514-520, 2002.
Reich, W. , The Oranur experiment, Orgone energy Press, 1951.
Lisbon, 22 June 2009
Claims
1. Device for vacuum manipulation (antigravity propulsion through the repulsion or attraction of a mass like planet Earth (7) or a general mass (6)), characterized by a geometric (or not geometric) arrangement of at least one pair (two magnets or any other number) of magnets (20) with the north pole or the south pole in opposition (disposed in the same parallel plane, or at a perpendicular plane, or at any desired angle or angles) ; or were the magnets are arranged symmetrically (circular, hexagonal or any other) or asymmetrically (semicircular, conic, pyramidal, or any other) ; or by the magnets being disposed in a way to oppose the magnetic vector potential component (with magnetic poles face to face, or side to side, or at any other angle) in order to stress the vacuum and create a gravitational repulsive force on nearby masses (if the mentioned magnets are disposed with the magnetic vector potentials in attraction, with their vectors in the same direction, then they would generate an attractive gravitational force instead) ; or by the possibility of using a grid of multiple repelling (or attracting) magnets (20) with (or without) coil or coils (14) wrapped around them (each magnet or the whole or partial assembly of magnets) ; or by one or more magnets being wrapped by one or more coils (14) .
2. The apparatus according to claim 1, further characterized by the use of a geometric (or not geometric) arrangement of several opposing pairs (two or more) of magnets (pairs 9-10, and 11-12, or any other number of magnets or pairs of magnets in opposition, which form geometric patterns or not) with the fields in opposition (the magnetic vector potentials are in opposition) , with one (or more) unopposed magnet (s) (13) (which do not have another magnet (s) facing them), but whose magnetic field (and vector potential) is also in opposition relative to the fields of the other magnets; were the opposing magnets (each or all magnets) are disposed in a plane or at any desired angle or angles (including a parallel and/or perpendicular angle, for example) relative to the unopposed magnet (s) (13) (and/or relative to other opposing magnets); or were the magnets are arranged symmetrically (circular, hexagonal or any other) or asymmetrically (semicircular, conic, pyramidal, or any other) , were the opposing magnetic vector potentials (the magnetic poles all point in the same direction, or can be partially focused/asymmetric) stress the vacuum and create a gravitational repulsive force on nearby masses (if the mentioned magnets are disposed with the magnetic vector potentials in attraction, then they would generate an attractive gravitational force instead) ; or by the possibility of using any number of opposing (or attracting) magnet (s) (or electromagnet (s) ) (20) or pairs of magnets (or any number of magnets or electromagnets) in the plane perpendicular (or at any other desired angle or angles) to the unopposed magnet (s) (13) (which can also be more than one magnet, also at equal or different angles to each other) ; or by the possibility of using (or not) at least one electromagnet constituted by a ferromagnetic core (20) (or any other conducting, or non-conducting, or semiconducting or any other) material core surrounded by coil (S) (14) .
3. The apparatus according to claims 1 and 2, further characterized by the possibility of using at least one magnet (20) (or the whole or partial assembly of magnets) that is wrapped by one or more metal conducting coil (14), or a fiber optic coil (14), or a radiofrequency cable coil (14), or a microwave cable coil (14), or a coil material (14) that can produce a (conducting) plasma inside, or any suitable conductor of electromagnetic energy, were the coil(s) can have any geometry (cylindrical, toroidal, etc.), or can have one or more conducting layers in any disposition.
4. The apparatus according to claims 1 to 3, further characterized by a power source of direct current, or by a power source of (symmetric or asymmetric) alternating or pulsed current and/or voltage, that operates at any frequency (high or low, including radiofrequency, microwave, ultraviolet or higher) , with or without any type of modulation (frequency or amplitude modulation, for example) ; or a power source according to Avramenko's patent (US6104107); or a power source that produces electric or magnetic (symmetric or asymmetric) rotating fields; or a power source that produces one or more frequencies; or by the connection of one or more power sources to the same coil(s); or a power source that changes continuously the frequency of the exciting wave (current or voltage) in a sequential, caotic or repetitive manner (chirped excitation) , linearly or non-linearly, with or without any type of modulation, or using or not white noise, pink noise, or any type of noise or caotic electromagnetic excitation, or by the use of a power source with a delicate control of the phase; or by the use of any number of these power sources in an isolated or conjugated way; or by the use of any other power source; or by the use of any of these power sources connected to one or more coil(s) (14).
5. Device for vacuum manipulation (antigravity propulsion through the repulsion of a mass like planet Earth (7) or a general mass (6)), characterized by the use of coil(s) (21) (with cylindrical, tubular, toroidal (open or closed) or any other shape; coil(s) (21) are metal coils or can have the same properties of coils (14)) excited from the center to the periphery (or inversely from the periphery to the center) , where said coil (21) has three connecting wires: one in the center and another in each extremity (the connection can be in the extremity itself or at a certain desired distance from it) ; or by the possibility that the center wire may also be displaced from the center to one of the extremities (not in the geometric center of the coil) .
6. The apparatus according to claim 5, further characterized by the possibility of coil (21) with no connecting wires at the extremities (or near them) of coil
(21) (only a center wire or displaced wire) ; or by coil
(21) with no connecting wire at the center of coil (21)
(only at both extremities, or near them) ; or by using more turns of coil on one of the sides of coil (21) (with or without connecting wires at the extremities) ; or by coil
(21) being composed of several layers (one or more layers) of conducting coil or coils connected to the same (or different) feeding connections; or by using coil (21) were the wires from the center to the periphery go in opposite directions (anti-parallel), like when we just connect a wire to the center of a normal coil; or by using coil (21) were the wires from the center to the periphery of the coil go in the same direction (parallel) (but the gravitational force generated by this last coil will be attractive) ; or by using coil (21) with the wires in any disposition.
7. The apparatus according to claims 5 and 6, further characterized by the possibility of coil (21) where the diameter of the coil is nonlinear, that is, it can have a bigger or lower diameter at the center and/or periphery; or by wrapping coil (21) (from the inside or outside) with one or more coil or coils that generate opposed currents to coil (21) in an active (direct excitation with a power source) or passive way (generation of opposed currents according to the Maxwell equations, including specially the Faraday law, Lenz law, and the Ampere-Maxwell law) , where these extra coil or coils may be disposed in more than one layer.
8. The apparatus according to claims 5 to 7, further characterized by the possibility of using (or not) at least one electromagnet constituted by a ferromagnetic (or any other conducting, or non-conducting, or semi-conducting or any other) material core, that may have any shape and be hollow or not, that is surrounded by coil(s) (21); or by the possibility of using (or not) at least one magnet (s) (20) (one or more) of any type (and disposed in any manner, have any shape and be hollow or not) , that is surrounded by coil(s) (21); or by using the aforementioned setups together with coil (21) as a small propulsion unit disposed around the periphery (or at any other desired position) of mass (6), and/or as a mass repelling system (including Earth (7) ) , were coil (21) can completely involve the outside of mass (6) (which can have tubular, cylindrical, spherical or any other shape) .
9. The apparatus according to claims 5 to 8, further characterized by a power source of (symmetric or asymmetric) alternating or pulsed current and/or voltage, that operates at any frequency (high or low, including radiofrequency, microwave, ultraviolet or higher) , with or without any type of modulation (frequency or amplitude modulation, for example) ; or a power source according to Avramenko's patent (US6104107) ; or a power source that produces electric or magnetic (symmetric or asymmetric) rotating fields; or a power source that produces one or more frequencies; or by the connection of one or more power sources to the same coil(s); or a power source that changes continuously the frequency of the exciting wave (current or voltage) in a sequential, caotic or repetitive manner
(chirped excitation), linearly or non-linearly, with or without any type of modulation, or using or not white noise, pink noise, or any type of noise or caotic electromagnetic excitation, or by the use of a power source with a delicate control of the phase; or by the use of any number of these power sources in an isolated or conjugated way; or by the use of any other power source; or by the use of any of these power sources connected to one or more coil(s) (21) and/or any other coil that is used.
10. Device for vacuum manipulation (antigravity propulsion through the repulsion of a mass like planet Earth (7) or a general mass (6)), characterized by the possibility of using apparatus according to claims 1 to 4; or by using the apparatus according to claims 5 to 9; or by the possibility of using, in any independent or conjugated way, any of the setups mentioned in this claim, mechanically attached to a mass (6) and disposed around its periphery (or at any other desired position, in the interior or exterior of mass (6)) in any number and/or disposition.
11. Device for vacuum manipulation (antigravity propulsion through the repulsion of a mass like planet Earth (7) or a general mass (6) ) , characterized by one magnet (20) (or several magnets side by side, at any angle to each other) with a coil or coils (14) wrapped (or not) around it, or instead by the apparatus according to claims 1 to 4 (and in particular claim 2), where the unopposed element (s) (and the rest of the opposing magnets) , faces (or is at any other angle) a flat (square, triangular, circular, parabolic, concave, conical, pyramidal, or of any othex shape or cross section) slab of diamagnetic or paramagnetic (or any other material) conducting element (22) , that may also be a non-conductor (dielectric) , or semi-conductor or be any other material, that may rotate or not, or that may be superconducting or not, or that may be charged (to any polarity or voltage) with a static (not changing) or dynamic (changing) charge, or that may be not charged, were element (22) will generate opposed (magnetic vector potentials from) induced currents, and opposing (changing) electric fields (and also magnetic fields) due to the induced changing currents, in response to any externally applied changing electromagnetic field (or fields) generated by the apparatus described; or by the possibility of using at least one magnet (20) wrapped by coil(s) (14) inside a tubular element (22) ; or by the possibility of using at least one magnet (20) wrapped by coil(s) (14), inside a tubular element (22) (whose extremities can be closed or not, and whose section can vary towards the extremities; were it can have a cylindrical, pyramidal, or any other section) , were we can have one or more successive layers of magnet (s) (20) with coil(s) (14), and/or element (s) (22), and/or coil(s) (14); or by the possibility of using more than one apparatus side by side, or face to face (or at any angle to each other) , in any number; or by the possibility of coil(s) (14) having the properties described in claim 3.
12. The apparatus according to claim 11, further characterized by the possibility of not using the magnetic unopposed element (s) (13) (from claim 2), and using any number of elements (20) (wrapped or not by coil(s) (14)) that are parallel, perpendicular or at any other angle to element (22) (and in its proximity) ; or by a power source of (symmetric or asymmetric) alternating or pulsed current and/or voltage, that operates at any frequency (high or low, including radiofrequency, microwave, ultraviolet or higher) , with or without any type of modulation (frequency or amplitude modulation, for example) ; or a power source according to Avramenko's patent (US6104107); or a power source that produces electric or magnetic (symmetric or asymmetric) rotating fields; or a power source that produces one or more frequencies; or by the connection of one or more power sources to the same coil(s); or a power source that changes continuously the frequency of the exciting wave (current or voltage) in a sequential, caotic or repetitive manner (chirped excitation) , linearly or non- linearly, with or without any type of modulation, or using or not white noise, pink noise, or any type of noise or caotic electromagnetic excitation, or by the use of a power source with a delicate control of the phase; or by the use of any number of these power sources in an isolated or conjugated way; or by the use of any other power source; or by the use of any of these power sources connected to one or more coil(s) (14) (that wrap or not magnets (20)).
13. Device for vacuum manipulation (antigravity propulsion through the repulsion of a mass like planet Earth (7) or a general mass (6)), characterized by a (toroidal, cylindrical, or any other shape) coil or coils (24) with (or without in its interior or exterior) a ferromagnetic (or any other conducting, or non-conducting, or semiconducting or any other) material core (23) , that may also be any type of magnet (s) (with any shape and cross section) , were the element (23) can have any shape (toroidal, cylindrical, conical, oval, spherical, for example) or section (it can be hollow or not) ; were elements (23) and (24) are facing (or are at other angles to) a flat (square, triangular, circular, concave, conical, pyramidal, or of any other shape or cross section) slab of diamagnetic or paramagnetic (or any other) conducting element (22) , that may also be a non-conductor (dielectric) , or semi-conductor or be any other material, that may rotate or not, or that may be superconducting or not, or that may be charged (to any polarity or voltage) with a static (not changing) or dynamic (changing) charge, or that may be not charged, were element (22) will generate opposed (magnetic vector potentials from) induced currents, and opposing (changing) electric fields (and also magnetic fields) due to the induced changing currents, in response to any externally applied changing electromagnetic field (or fields) generated by element (s) (23) excited by coil(s) (24) (or only coil (S) (24)).
14. The apparatus according to claim 13, further characterized by the possibility of replacing element (22) with another coil (24) (connected or not to a power source) which has (or not) in its interior (or exterior) an element (23), which can have different dimensions than the first coil (24) (constituting in this way an asymmetric arrangement) , were the two coils generate opposed (magnetic vector potentials from) induced currents, and also opposing
(changing) electric and magnetic fields.
15. The apparatus according to claims 13 and 14, further characterized by the possibility of element (22) being a (diamagnetic or paramagnetic material, or any other material) conductor in solid, liquid, gas, or plasma state, or any combination of these states (vapor, for example) , and contained by an appropriate chamber when needed.
16. The apparatus according to claims 13 to 15, further characterized by the possibility of using several elements or coils (22) and/or (24), with (or without, in its interior or exterior) an element (23) , disposed side by side, or in (any number of) concentric layers (of circular, toroidal or any other shape) ; or by also providing direct electrical excitation to (the usual passive) element (s) or coil(s) (22), in order to generate currents (and changing electric fields and magnetic fields) in opposition to coil or coils (24) .
17. The apparatus according to claims 13 to 16, further characterized by the possibility of using at least one coil or coils (22) and/or (24) that can be made by a metal conducting coil, or a fiber optic coil, or a radiofrequency cable coil, or a microwave cable coil, or a coil material that can produce a (conducting) plasma inside, or any suitable conductor of electromagnetic energy, were the coil(s) can have any geometry (cylindrical, toroidal, etc.), or can have one or more conducting layers in any disposition; or by a power source of (symmetric or asymmetric) alternating or pulsed current and/or voltage, that operates at any frequency (high or low, including radiofrequency, microwave, ultraviolet or higher) , with or without any type of modulation (frequency or amplitude modulation, for example) ; or a power source according to Avramenko's patent (US6104107); or a power source that produces electric or magnetic (symmetric or asymmetric) rotating fields; or a power source that produces one or more frequencies; or by the connection of one or more power sources to the same coil(s); or a power source that changes continuously the frequency of the exciting wave (current or voltage) in a sequential, caotic or repetitive manner
(chirped excitation) , linearly or non-linearly, with or without any type of modulation, or using or not white noise, pink noise, or any type of noise or caotic electromagnetic excitation, or by the use of a power source with a delicate control of the phase; or by the use of any number of these power sources in an isolated or conjugated way; or by the use of any other power source; or by the use of any of these power sources connected to one or more coil (S) (22) and/or (24) .
18. Device for vacuum manipulation (antigravity propulsion through the repulsion of a mass like planet Earth (7) or a general mass (6) ) , characterized by a flat (concave, cylindrical, conical, tubular, or any other shape) conducting elements or coils (wires, for example) (25) and (26) , that are side by side, face to face or at any angle to each other, with (or without) a ferromagnetic (or any other conducting, or non-conducting, or semi-conducting or any other) material (23) , that may also be any type of magnet (s) (with any shape and cross section), interposed between coils (25) and (26), were the element (23) can have any shape (toroidal, cylindrical, conical, oval, spherical, for example) or section (it can be hollow or not); where coil (25) is active and excited by a power source, and coil (26) is made of a diamagnetic or paramagnetic (or any) conducting element, that may also be a non-conductor (dielectric) , or semi-conductor or be any other material, that may rotate or not, or that may be superconducting or not, or that may be charged (to any polarity or voltage) with a static (not changing) or dynamic (changing) charge, or that may be not charged, were element (s) or coil(s) (26) will generate opposed induced currents according to the Maxwell equations (including specially the Faraday law, Lenz law, and the Ampere-Maxwell law) , in response to coil(s) (25); or by coil(s) or element (s) (26) being also active and excited by a power source in order to generate opposed (magnetic vector potentials from) currents (and changing electric and magnetic fields) to coil(s) or element (s) (25) .
19. The apparatus according to claim 18, further characterized by the possibility of using at least one coil or coils (25) and/or (26) that can be made by a metal conducting coil, or a fiber optic coil, or a radiσfrequency cable coil, or a microwave cable coil, or a coil material that can produce a (conducting) plasma inside, or any suitable conductor of electromagnetic energy, were the coil (s) can have any geometry (cylindrical, toroidal, etc. ) , or can have one or more conducting layers in any disposition; or by a power source of (symmetric or asymmetric) alternating or pulsed current and/or voltage, that operates at any frequency (high or low, including radiofrequency, microwave, ultraviolet or higher) , with or without any type of modulation (frequency or amplitude modulation, for example) ; or a power source according to Avramenko's patent (US61041Q7) ; or a power source that produces electric or magnetic (symmetric or asymmetric) rotating fields; or a power source that produces one or more frequencies; or by the connection of one or more power sources to the same σoil(s); or a power source that changes continuously the frequency of the exciting wave (current or voltage) in a sequential, caotic or repetitive manner (chirped excitation) , linearly or non-linearly, with or without any type of modulation, or using or not white noise, pink noise, or any type of noise or caotic electromagnetic excitation, or by the use of a power source with a delicate control of the phase; or by the use of any number of these power sources in an isolated or conjugated way; or by the use of any other power source; or by the use of any of these power sources connected to one or more element (s) or coil(s) (25) and/or element (s) or coil(s) (26) , or both.
20. Device for vacuum manipulation (antigravity propulsion through the repulsion of a mass like planet Earth (7) or a general mass [S)), characterized by a flat (square, triangular, circular, parabolic, concave, conical, pyramidal, or of any other shape or cross section) coil(s) (24) with (or without, in its interior or exterior) a ferromagnetic (or any other conducting, or non-conducting, or semi-conducting or any other) material core (23) , that may also be any type of magnet (s) (with any shape and cross section) , were the element (23) can have any shape (toroidal, cylindrical, conical, oval, spherical, for example) or section (it can be hollow or not) ; were elements (23) and (24) are facing (or are at other angles to) a flat (square, triangular, circular, concave, conical, pyramidal, or of any other shape or cross section) slab of diamagnetic or paramagnetic (or a,ny other) conducting element (or coil) (22) (connected or not to a power source) , that may also be a non-conductor (dielectric) , or semi-conductor or be any other material, that may rotate or not, or that may be superconducting or not, or that may be charged (to any polarity or voltage) with a static (not changing) or dynamic (changing) charge, or that may be not charged; were the element (22) can have any shape (toroidal, cylindrical, conical, oval, spherical, for example) or section (it can, be hollow or not); were element or coil (22) (when not connected to a power source) will generate opposed (magnetic vector potentials from) induced currents, and opposing (changing) electric fields (and also magnetic fields) due to the induced changing currents, in response to any externally applied changing electromagnetic field (or fields) generated by element (s) (23) excited by coil(s) (24) (or only coil(s) (24)); or were element or coil (22) (when connected to a power source) will generate opposed (magnetic vector potentials from) induced currents, and opposing (changing) electric fields (and also magnetic fields), in relation to the field (or fields) generated by element (s) (23) excited by coil(s) (24) (or only by coil(s) (24)).
21. The apparatus according to claim 20, further characterized by the possibility of using coil(s) (24) (or element (s) (23) surrounded by coil(s) (24) ), adjusted to the shape of any surface (parabolic, concave, conical or any other shape or section) belonging to element (s) or coil(s) (22).
22. The apparatus according to claims 20 and 21 further characterized by the possibility of using a circular coil or coils (24), and/or element (s) (23) surrounded by coil(s)
(24) (all of circular or other shape) , surrounding a circular (or other shape) slab or coil (or ring slab or coil, or elliptical slab or coil, or circular symmetric or asymmetric (with a segmented "triangular", or of any other shape, cut from the periphery (to a given radius or) to the center) slab or coil, or of any other shape) of element (s) or coil (s) (22) .
23. The apparatus according to claims 20 to 22, further characterized by the possibility of using coil(s) (24), or element (s) (23) surrounded by coil(s) (24), above or below element(s) or coil(s) (22); or by using several parallel (or at any other angle) planes of element (s) (22), and/or (23) , and/or (24) , that can be interposed (in different planes) or intermingled (in the same plane) in any succession.
24. The apparatus according to claims 20 to 23, further characterized by the possibility of using at least one coil or coils (22) and/or (24), and/or magnet (s) (or element (s) (23)) surrounded by coil(s) (24), that can be made by a metal conducting coil, or a fiber optic coil, or a radiofrequency cable coil, or a microwave cable coil, or a coil material that can produce a (conducting) plasma inside, or any suitable conductor of electromagnetic energy, were the coil(s) can have any geometry (cylindrical, toroidal, etc.)/ or can have one or more conducting layers in any disposition; or by a power source of (symmetric or asymmetric) alternating or pulsed current and/or voltage, that operates at any frequency (high or low, including radiofrequency, microwave, ultraviolet or higher), with or without any type of modulation (frequency or amplitude modulation, for example) ; or a power source according to Avramenko's patent (US6104107) ; or a power source that produces electric or magnetic (symmetric or asymmetric) rotating fields; or a power source that produces one or more frequencies; or by the connection of one or more power sources to the same coil(s); or a power source that changes continuously the frequency of the exciting wave (current or voltage) in a sequential, caotic or repetitive manner (chirped excitation) , linearly or non- linearlyr with or without any type of modulation, or using or not white noise, pink noise, or any type of noise or caotic electromagnetic excitation; or by the use of any number of these power sources in an isolated or conjugated way; or by the use of any other power source, or by the use of a power source with a delicate control of the phase; or by the use of any of these power sources connected to coil(s) (22) and/or (24), and/or magnet (s) (or element (s) (23)) surrounded by coil (s) (24).
25. Device for vacuum manipulation (antigravity propulsion through the repulsion of a mass like planet Earth (7) or a general mass (6)), characterized by a flat (square, triangular, circular, parabolic, concave, conical, pyramidal, or of any other shape or cross section) coil(s) (24) with (or without, in its interior or exterior) a ferromagnetic (or any other conducting, or non-conducting, or semi-conducting or any other) material core (23), that may also be any type of magnet (s) (with any shape and cross section) , were the element (23) can have any shape (tubular, toroidal, cylindrical, conical, oval, spherical, for example) or section (it can be hollow or not) ; were elements (23) and (24) surround (through the inside or outside) a conducting (diamagnetic or paramagnetic, or any other) element or coil (22) (that is connected or not to a power source) , and that may also be a non-conductor (dielectric) , or semi-conductor or be any other material, that may rotate or not, or that may be superconducting or not, or that may be charged (to any polarity or voltage) with a static (not changing) or dynamic (changing) charge, or that may be not charged; were the element (22) can have any shape (tubular, toroidal, cylindrical, conical, oval, spherical, ellipsoidal, flat, square, triangular, circular, parabolic, concave, pyramidal, for example; hollow or not) or any section (it can be hollow or not) ; were element or coil (22) (when not connected to a power source) will generate opposed (magnetic vector potentials from) induced currents, and opposing (changing) electric fields (and also magnetic fields) due to the induced changing currents, in response to any externally applied changing electromagnetic field (or fields) generated by coil(s) (24), or by element(s) (23) excited by coil(s) (24); or were element or coil (22) (when connected to a power source) will generate opposed (magnetic vector potentials from) induced currents, and opposing (changing) electric fields (and also magnetic fields) , in relation to the field (or fields) generated by coil(s) (24), or by element (s) (23) excited by coil(s) (24).
26. The apparatus according to claim 25, further characterized by the possibility of using (or not) at least one electromagnet with a ferromagnetic (or any other conducting, or non-conducting, or semi-conducting or any other) material core (23) , that may also be any type of magnet (s) (one or more, and with any shape and cross section) ; were element (23) can have any shape (cylindrical, conical, toroidal, oval, spherical or any other shape or section that may be hollow or not) , and can be inside (or outside) coil(s) or element (s) (24), which can also be inside (or outside) a tubular (cylindrical, conical, toroidal, oval, spherical or any other shape; hollow or not) element (s) (22); or by using (or not) one or more (several) parallel (or at any other angle) planes of elements (22), and/or (23), and/or (24) r interposed in succession at any order, or alternatively intermingled side by side in the same plane (s) or material (s).
27. The apparatus according to claims 25 and 26, further characterized by the possibility of substituting element (s) (22) by a coil, with the wires parallel (or at any other angle) to that of coil(s) (24); or by the possibility of involving or intermingling coil(s) (22) and coil(s) (24) in the same plane (or in successive parallel planes, or at any angle to each other) , which surrounds (or not) (from the outside or inside) element (23) , with the properties described above; or by the possibility of having openings (28) at desired points, which may constitute doors or windows (or any other opening (s) for any other purpose (s) )
(29) , made of transparent metal or any other material; or by the possibility of element (s) (22), and/or (23), and/or
(24) , being the whole external surface (which can be of any material) of the craft (or mass) or any smaller internal elements used to vector propulsion; or by the possibility of element (s) or coil(s) (22) and/or (24), being more than one coil (any number of coils parallel or perpendicular, or at any angle to one another), that can be divided (or not) into different or independent sections; or by the possibility that element (s) (24) have the same properties ascribed to element (s) (22).
28. The apparatus according to claims 25 to 27, further characterized by the possibility of using at least one coil or coils (22) and/or (24) that can be made by a metal conducting coil, or a fiber optic coil, or a radiofrequency cable coil, or a microwave cable coil, or a coil material that can produce a (conducting) plasma inside, or any suitable conductor of electromagnetic energy, were the coil(s) can have any geometry (cylindrical, toroidal, etc.), or can have one or more conducting layers in any disposition; or by a power source of (symmetric or asymmetric) alternating or pulsed current and/or voltage, that operates at any frequency (high or low, including radiofrequency, microwave, ultraviolet or higher) , with or without any type of modulation (frequency or amplitude modulation, for example) ; or a power source according to Avramenko's patent (US6104107); or a power source that produces electric or magnetic (symmetric or asymmetric) rotating fields; or a power source that produces one or more frequencies; or by the connection of one or more power sources to the same coil(s); or a power source that changes continuously the frequency of the exciting wave (current or voltage) in a sequential, caotic or repetitive manner
(chirped excitation) , linearly or non-linearly, with or without any type of modulation, or using or not white noise, pink noise, or any type of noise or caotic electromagnetic excitation, or by the use of a power source with a delicate control of the phase; or by the use of any number of these power sources in an isolated or conjugated way; or by the use of any other power source; or by the use of any of these power sources connected to coil(s) (22) and/or (24) .
29. Device for vacuum manipulation (antigravity propulsion through the repulsion of a mass like planet Earth (7) or a general mass (6)), characterized by a coil(s) (24) wi

Matt Watts

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #78, on November 6th, 2014, 01:55 AM »
Quote from freethisone on November 5th, 2014, 07:03 PM
secret of magnetism relieved..

all Boyd bushmen movies are being removed from youtube.
Yes, I'm not surprised.  Probably a National Security Letter has been issued in light of Boyd's last interview.

BTW, Free, if you want to keep a hard copy of an entire patent, see if you can print the thing to a PDF and just attach it to your post.  I'm afraid a single post cannot hold the whole thing, plus all the formatting gets destroyed when just displayed as text.

Gunther Rattay

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #79, on November 6th, 2014, 02:12 AM »
yes, free, it´s beneficial for transparence to put long text to an attatchment.

freethisone

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #80, on November 6th, 2014, 09:53 AM »Last edited on November 6th, 2014, 09:58 AM
rad con 5 alert   341 Sites NETC.com    RADCON 1 RadiationBackgroundLevel | RADCON-2-Rising   |  RADCON-3-Elevated |  RADCON-4-Concern/Watch  |  RADCON-5-ALERT


235 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:207   Syracuse, NY, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 235 Low 16 High 277
Average 64, Deviation 38.3
(CPM of Beta particles)


this is rad con 5>>>>>>>>>

226 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:111   Worcester, MA, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 226 Low 11 High 246
Average 55, Deviation 39.6
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-06 13:54:00 GMT+0000


226 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:111   Worcester, MA, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 226 Low 11 High 246
Average 55, Deviation 39.6
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-06 13:54:00 GMT+0000

the simpsons, springfield.. hmmm

go here do u see the big A rad con 5

http://www.netc.com/

as u see at rad con 5 we have cpm above 200..

but look at this, no alert given here. rad con 5 plus..

484 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:923   Bakersfield, CA, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 484 Low 12 High 542
Average 99, Deviation 89.7
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-06 09:37:00 GMT+0000
Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #81, on November 6th, 2014, 01:31 PM »Last edited on November 6th, 2014, 01:33 PM
180 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 1:009A20E4.3   Bristol, RI, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 180 Low 10 High 702
Average 28, Deviation 15.6
Average over last 10 minutes: 179

GMC-300E
41° 68' 59" N
71° 26' 17" W

rad con 5 plus

rad con 5 alert
226 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:111   Worcester, MA, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 226 Low 11 High 246
Average 56, Deviation 41.8
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-06 13:54:00 GMT+0000


235 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:207   Syracuse, NY, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 235 Low 16 High 277
Average 66, Deviation 42.4
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-06 13:59:00 GMT+0000


162 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:508   Toledo, OH, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 162 Low 7 High 258
Average 63, Deviation 46.1
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-06 14:32:00 GMT+0000



484 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:923   Bakersfield, CA, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 484 Low 12 High 542
Average 103, Deviation 96.6
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-06 09:37:00 GMT+0000

145 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:408   Montgomery, AL, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 145 Low 13 High 261
Average 68, Deviation 40.3
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-06 10:26:00 GMT+0000


143 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:706   Little Rock, AR, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 143 Low 17 High 400
Average 99, Deviation 49.1
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-05 20:33:00 GMT+0000


Now we have 2 big rad com 5 alrets. the others listed are rad con 5 plus, but no warning..
http://www.netc.com/  now we have 2 big A rad con 5..


Matt Watts


freethisone

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #83, on November 6th, 2014, 02:40 PM »
Quote from Matt Watts on November 6th, 2014, 02:15 PM
http://www.netc.com/   isn't matching with  http://www.radiationnetwork.com/

AT ALL !!!

What does that mean?

.
did u click the link?

what  it means is we are at, and have been at rad=con  5 as i have stated. for a long time..

the body cant take much more of this..

radiation plumes everywhere. meaning its not ebola...  as stated..

Matt Watts

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #84, on November 6th, 2014, 03:17 PM »
Quote from freethisone on November 6th, 2014, 02:40 PM
did u click the link?
Yes Free, I clicked the link.

I also looked at the data from both sites and they do not agree at all.  So we know for sure one of them is wrong, but we cannot rule out the possibility both of them are wrong.

The Radiation Network site has several monitors in my area and those data points match pretty close with my personal instrument.  But I can only speak for this particular location; I have no way to validate all the other locations.  For all we know those high reading NetC locations have their instruments sitting next to a smoke alarm with Americium in them.

freethisone

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #85, on November 6th, 2014, 04:03 PM »
Quote from Matt Watts on November 6th, 2014, 03:17 PM
Yes Free, I clicked the link.

I also looked at the data from both sites and they do not agree at all.  So we know for sure one of them is wrong, but we cannot rule out the possibility both of them are wrong.

The Radiation Network site has several monitors in my area and those data points match pretty close with my personal instrument.  But I can only speak for this particular location; I have no way to validate all the other locations.  For all we know those high reading NetC locations have their instruments sitting next to a smoke alarm with Americium in them.
i would suggest reading the blue writing as it goes by at top of linked page http://www.netc.com/

But Matt do you really want to downplay this when our lives depend on the correct data?

as i said i have made a detector that tells me for sure it is ionizing

 above my home, and im far far away from you..

also do u really want to play the game of what is correct and what is not?

these readings are the correct reading my friend...

Matt Watts

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #86, on November 6th, 2014, 07:08 PM »
Quote from freethisone on November 6th, 2014, 04:03 PM
But Matt do you really want to downplay this when our lives depend on the correct data?
Well no, but seeing how I have smoked ever since I was sixteen years old and just found out cigarettes have trace amounts of Polonium in them, I guess glowing black lungs is something I'm already used to.  Maybe that's why chemtrails don't seem to bother me as much as it does other folks.

No one ever told me life was going to be easy, but several told me to choose my vices early.

Anyway, back to winding and testing SFTs...

freethisone

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #87, on November 7th, 2014, 12:22 PM »
507 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:923   Bakersfield, CA, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 507 Low 12 High 542
Average 106, Deviation 103.8
(CPM of Beta particles)


445 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:920   Fresno, CA, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 445 Low 12 High 498
Average 124, Deviation 85.1
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-07 09:25:00 GMT+0000

112 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:607   Lincoln, NE, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 112 Low 21 High 342
Average 97, Deviation 37
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-07 14:01:00 GMT+0000


203 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:621   San Angelo, TX, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 203 Low 11 High 513
Average 119, Deviation 89.4
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-07 14:02:00 GMT+0000
Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #88, on November 7th, 2014, 08:04 PM »

529 CPM
NETC.COM   © 2014
Station ID 4:923   Bakersfield, CA, US
Click here for data charts
CPM: current 529 Low 12 High 542
Average 114, Deviation 118.1
(CPM of Beta particles)
Last updated: 2014-11-07 21:44:00 GMT+0000

Gunther Rattay


Matt Watts

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #90, on November 25th, 2014, 05:21 PM »
Quote from Gunther Rattay on November 25th, 2014, 02:34 PM
Tepco loses control about contaminated water.
Oh hell, just dump it all into the ocean.  It's going to end up there anyway.  Probably not much left to kill.

I think Gary Hendershot was right when he made the statement that northern japan should have been evacuated and a large thermonuclear device detonated to neutralize as much of that crap as possible.  But that was never in the plan.  It was supposed to be another gift that keeps on giving, compliments of your Powers That Be.

~Russ

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #91, on December 11th, 2014, 03:06 PM »
just wonderful
Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #92, on December 11th, 2014, 03:07 PM »
we at a point that there is nothing to fight for. its all ready on the down hill...

Oh Well. wont stop me from trying...

~Russ

Matt Watts


Gunther Rattay

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #94, on December 12th, 2014, 06:16 AM »Last edited on December 12th, 2014, 06:38 AM
Quote from Matt Watts on December 11th, 2014, 06:51 PM
And that is all we have left.  But it is also what we all started with too.
...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C6GZQ7UNaU#ws

to expand one´s mind is a good starter for the individual. that´s a way each of us can go independently from what global civilization is dealing with ...

the riders on the storm are we who watch and understand what´s going on ...






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTzh8uhnlqc#t=100



we can tell to the monkey but it won´t understand.


freethisone

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #95, on December 12th, 2014, 06:59 AM »
interesting storm.

ice age model predicts a storm coming. dec through feb at a time of angular momentum change and great quake.

this next great quake could happen that soon. keplers law predicts.

this storm is here.angular momentum change.

7.2 expected, and at least two powerful volcanic eruptions. 17 day out for test, 40 days out is more predictable. O:-)

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/natl/flash-avn.html

Gunther Rattay


Matt Watts

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #98, on February 8th, 2015, 06:01 AM »Last edited on February 8th, 2015, 06:03 AM
It comes down to the dire need for two technologies to be rapidly developed and implemented:
  • Free energy -- that can produce significant non-harmful output
  • Hutchinson-type or HHO devices that can render radionuclides harmless
If we do not accomplish this, Fukushima and future such Extinction Level Events will run their course and planet Earth will become a dead rock.

It really is that simple.  The time for talk is over.  We solve this problem or we perish.

I will also add, even if we are successful in this mission, a lot of damage has already been done that will still take decades to even begin repairing itself.

freethisone

Re: Fukushima disaster
« Reply #99, on March 9th, 2015, 03:36 AM »
Environment Pollution in USA on Saturday, 07 March, 2015 at 05:29 (05:29 AM) UTC.
Description
The latest cold snap has delivered a troubling surprise at PSEG Nuclear's Salem/Hope Creek reactor complex: Discovery of radioactive tritium in snow and ice outside a Hope Creek building at levels 500 times higher than federal water quality standards. At an estimated 10 million picocuries per liter in a confined area, it was the second-highest concentration reported in any tritium leak and pollution incident nationwide. Only a 15 million picocurie high at nearby Salem ranks higher, recorded during investigations of a leak and continuing, serious groundwater contamination problem that dates to 2002. The federal drinking water limit for tritium, an isotope of hydrogen, is 20,000 picocuries per liter. Although there was no clear origin or evidence the radioactive material had moved offsite, the unexplained finding was a "high reading" and cause for company and regulator concern, said David Lochbaum, a nuclear engineer and nuclear safety program director for the Union of Concerned Scientists. "Fortunately, the mystery will be solved, probably before anything can get offsite and cause harm," Lochbaum said. He added that in two other episodes in the past, airborne releases were found to have concentrated on rooftops before reaching the ground, although no evidence has been found to date pointing to a similar origin at Hope Creek. Federal regulators and the company provided details on discovery of the mildly radioactive material on the same day that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission made public plans for a special inspection at Salem Unit 1 triggered by an excessive number of emergency or unplanned shutdowns over the past several quarters. Investigators said the tritium at Hope Creek was detected below snow and ice hanging from a building during routine sampling on Thursday. Radiation monitors were showing normal conditions at the time, and tests of nearby vents the day before found normal tritium traces, according to the NRC.

"As such, there are no obvious potential unmonitored release paths that could account for the reading," said Neil Sheehan, spokesman for the NRC's regional office near Philadelphia. "No possible cause for the elevated tritium reading has yet been identified. Also, no increased tritium levels have been detected in a groundwater monitoring well located where the snow/ice sample was taken." Joe Delmar, spokesman for PSEG Nuclear, said workers conducting routine tritium sampling found the contamination. "Once identified, appropriate corrective actions were taken to mitigate the small impacted area including clearing ice from a five foot section of the paved surface located at the northeast corner of the building," Delmar said. "In addition, a containment device was added to capture any more dripping water." An investigation is under way, Delmar said. No groundwater threats have been identified, he added, and no connections have been found to a longstanding tritium release to groundwater at the nearby Salem Unit 1 area. A picocurie is a measure equal to one-trillionth of a curie. A curie is one standard measure of radiation intensity, and is roughly equal to that found with a gram of a particular type of radium. The hydrogen isotope called tritium is one of the lower-energy and shorter-lived radioactive materials; NRC reports say that humans usually excrete tritium within 10 days of exposure. Although the detection at Hope Creek was much higher, a dose from consuming water at 1,600 picocuries per liter, the NRC has reported, is 1,000 times lower than exposure to natural background radiation, and 12 times lower than the amount absorbed during a round-trip, cross-country flight. Before 2006, Lochbaum said, nuclear plant operators had no such monitoring for tritium - a fact that changed when the Braidwood reactor site near Joliet, Ill., contaminated groundwater used for drinking supplies in hundreds of homes. An estimated six million gallons of tritium-tainted water was found to have leaked from the plant in more than a dozen incidents with owner Exelon offering bottled water to some residents and in some cases buying homes affected by the spill. "Some of that leaked into people's drinking wells. It didn't kill anybody, but that was more luck than skill," Lochbaum said. "That's what really drove the industry to better monitoring." Then-Democratic Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, Lochbaum said, introduced legislation in response to the leaks that "industry didn't like," spurring plant owner agreements to adopt a new monitoring program.

PSEG has been wrestling with tritium leak and groundwater contamination at a nearby Salem reactor area for more than a decade. The company recently reported that the radioactive material had found its way into a deeper aquifer under the containment building despite earlier company denials that the material had worked its way so far down. In a twist, the company currently prevents tritium from spreading in groundwater by using a network of wells to hold back contaminated plumes, with the recovered, tritium-laced water simply pumped to the Delaware River for quick dilution. Delmar said separately that the company expected the NRC's finding and inspection requirement connected with the recent unplanned shutdowns. The Salem/Hope Creek reactor site on Artificial Island ranks as the nation's second-largest nuclear power center, with three plants on a 740-acre site capable of producing up to 3,485 megawatts. Delaware residents account for the majority - more than 45,000 people - living inside the operation's 10-mile emergency planning zone. The Delaware evacuation zone number is expected to rise to 68,000 by 2025. NRC officials are currently reviewing an application from PSEG for approval of a site for construction of one or more new reactors. Company officials have not chosen a technology or individual plant capacity for any new project - which would cost several billion dollars. A separate permit would be required for construction and operation.