http://open-source-energy.org/forum/ Fri, 24 May 2013 14:30:43 +0000 MyBB http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1196 Fri, 24 May 2013 09:45:05 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1196
He was using 18 starship coils and 9 n54 magnets mounted to a bicycle rim to create a BEMF generator. I believe that this circuit is a hybrid of John Bedini's BEMF circuit. He also posted other videos on this system that explains it further.

Im interested in it because in his videos he showed charging a 250 volt cap in i believe 4 seconds so i think there might be something here. I will also post the screenshot that i used to get the circuit this far. The second schematic is pretty much the same circuit except that at the frequency generator the bottom connection is set at the bottom pin in 2-2 vs at the left pin in 1-1. I would love to here from anyone that might be able to help finish the circuit.

Thanks

Note: The schematics program that I use is Diptrace. There is a freeware version but it is limited to i believe 300 pins.


  Multiburst Upload.zip (Size: 248.27 KB / Downloads: 3) ]]>
He was using 18 starship coils and 9 n54 magnets mounted to a bicycle rim to create a BEMF generator. I believe that this circuit is a hybrid of John Bedini's BEMF circuit. He also posted other videos on this system that explains it further.

Im interested in it because in his videos he showed charging a 250 volt cap in i believe 4 seconds so i think there might be something here. I will also post the screenshot that i used to get the circuit this far. The second schematic is pretty much the same circuit except that at the frequency generator the bottom connection is set at the bottom pin in 2-2 vs at the left pin in 1-1. I would love to here from anyone that might be able to help finish the circuit.

Thanks

Note: The schematics program that I use is Diptrace. There is a freeware version but it is limited to i believe 300 pins.


  Multiburst Upload.zip (Size: 248.27 KB / Downloads: 3) ]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1195 Fri, 24 May 2013 00:02:47 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1195 remember fuels cells have to have high purity hydrogen

http://youtu.be/vkgoNnKCA4s

website open source hydrogen car

http://www.riversimple.com/Content.aspx?...0d15de37a8

Daniel
http://www.securesupplies.biz
Sourcing & Distributing vital items]]> remember fuels cells have to have high purity hydrogen

http://youtu.be/vkgoNnKCA4s

website open source hydrogen car

http://www.riversimple.com/Content.aspx?...0d15de37a8

Daniel
http://www.securesupplies.biz
Sourcing & Distributing vital items]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1194 Thu, 23 May 2013 21:18:02 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1194
I am Starting this thread to list
Stanley Meyer forums so new comers can
learn faster and we increase the inbound information
by reading forums and sharing to others as well as fast as we can.

Please list all forums on Meyer tech Only.

Best Current Forums
Best Dead Forums still on web
Other forums


Kindest Regards

Daniel
http://www.securesupplies.bix
Sourcing & Distributing vital Items

---

http://www.rwgresearch.com

http://forums.mtbr.com/off-camber-off-to...51184.html

http://www.scienceagogo.com/forum/ubbthr...mber=47923

http://www.waterfuelcell.org/forum.htm]]>
I am Starting this thread to list
Stanley Meyer forums so new comers can
learn faster and we increase the inbound information
by reading forums and sharing to others as well as fast as we can.

Please list all forums on Meyer tech Only.

Best Current Forums
Best Dead Forums still on web
Other forums


Kindest Regards

Daniel
http://www.securesupplies.bix
Sourcing & Distributing vital Items

---

http://www.rwgresearch.com

http://forums.mtbr.com/off-camber-off-to...51184.html

http://www.scienceagogo.com/forum/ubbthr...mber=47923

http://www.waterfuelcell.org/forum.htm]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1193 Thu, 23 May 2013 16:49:24 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1193
An Australian inventor by the name of Edward Linacre, (http://www.gizmag.com/airdrop-wins-james...rd/20471/) earned the James Dyson award in 2011 for designing a low tech solution for extracting water from air. Australia's drought crippled farmers facing debt in the greedy clutches of monopolistic indentured servitude, and this invention emerged as a response to increasing farmer suicides. Essentially, a solar powered condenser extracts humidity in the air and powers a low pressure drip irrigation system to provide free water for crops. This has been shown to work in desert areas where humidity levels are incredibly low. Maxwell Whisson has described a wind powered version of this same concent. Google water from air, there are others. Sounds too good to be true? Think again. It gets even better.

Standalone, these inventions revolutionize the capabilities of home gardening and sustainable household agriculture, however, when coupled with gravity, the sky is literally the limit. Suppose a water tower is erected with several hundred solar condensers mounted atop, each working independently to fill the reservoir with condensed atmospheric humidity, and a turbine is installed midway to ground level to generate electricity as the reservoir empties to irrigate crops.

Unused water can be stored in a nearby solar still for purification and pumped with the electricity generated by the turbine for use in showering, cleaning, washing etc. When scaled up, this marriage of technologies represents a viable sustainable renewable source of water purification, energy, and agriculture, and if further refined, could be implemented on a small scale for individual families and communities too. Thank you Edward Linacre, Maxwell Whisson, and the many others in this field of incredibly simple yet unimaginably useful technology. Progress.]]>
An Australian inventor by the name of Edward Linacre, (http://www.gizmag.com/airdrop-wins-james...rd/20471/) earned the James Dyson award in 2011 for designing a low tech solution for extracting water from air. Australia's drought crippled farmers facing debt in the greedy clutches of monopolistic indentured servitude, and this invention emerged as a response to increasing farmer suicides. Essentially, a solar powered condenser extracts humidity in the air and powers a low pressure drip irrigation system to provide free water for crops. This has been shown to work in desert areas where humidity levels are incredibly low. Maxwell Whisson has described a wind powered version of this same concent. Google water from air, there are others. Sounds too good to be true? Think again. It gets even better.

Standalone, these inventions revolutionize the capabilities of home gardening and sustainable household agriculture, however, when coupled with gravity, the sky is literally the limit. Suppose a water tower is erected with several hundred solar condensers mounted atop, each working independently to fill the reservoir with condensed atmospheric humidity, and a turbine is installed midway to ground level to generate electricity as the reservoir empties to irrigate crops.

Unused water can be stored in a nearby solar still for purification and pumped with the electricity generated by the turbine for use in showering, cleaning, washing etc. When scaled up, this marriage of technologies represents a viable sustainable renewable source of water purification, energy, and agriculture, and if further refined, could be implemented on a small scale for individual families and communities too. Thank you Edward Linacre, Maxwell Whisson, and the many others in this field of incredibly simple yet unimaginably useful technology. Progress.]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1192 Wed, 22 May 2013 19:55:59 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1192
Five mouths hinder my progress and experimentation as discretionary resources dwindle in the shadow of economic disarray. Food for thought somehow fails to nourish. Recent promise of a promotion may expand my resources and rekindle the experimental momentum I once enjoyed. Time will tell. In the mean time I have primarily conducted research.

Lately I have become ensconced in theories of plasma cosmology and the electric universe, electromagnetism, solar phenomenon and possible correlation to terrestrial atmospheric and seismic activity, auroral anomalies, and human consciousness.

My favorite flavors of mental sustenance concern electromagnetic resonance, the composition, behavior, and geometry of magnetic flux fields, and practical uses for toroidal coils, and all things energy production. There is so much we have yet to discover about the forces of the universe.

Additionally, I am very interested in combination technology such as all-in-one solar-tidal-wind generators, on-board turbine-electrolysis for HHO fuel production, air-humidity condensation for irrigation of a sterling-motor heat-pump integration, and other similar positive-coefficient synergies, where multiple technologies are configured to produce abundant renewable energy at an efficiency greater than the sum of individual parts.

Also organic agriculture and square foot gardening, botany, living off the grid, all forms of sustainability for that matter, information suppression for profit protection, especially information concerning highly efficient energy production, corporate plutocracy, repression as a symptom of fear, post modern apathy and induced complacency, the in-quenchable thirst for free energy, hope, beauty, love, imagination, and life's intrinsic aspiration to succeed and survive against all odds.

These interests have inevitably lead me to this forum. I look forward to discussion and corroboration. I am pleased to be among the awakened. Progress.]]>
Five mouths hinder my progress and experimentation as discretionary resources dwindle in the shadow of economic disarray. Food for thought somehow fails to nourish. Recent promise of a promotion may expand my resources and rekindle the experimental momentum I once enjoyed. Time will tell. In the mean time I have primarily conducted research.

Lately I have become ensconced in theories of plasma cosmology and the electric universe, electromagnetism, solar phenomenon and possible correlation to terrestrial atmospheric and seismic activity, auroral anomalies, and human consciousness.

My favorite flavors of mental sustenance concern electromagnetic resonance, the composition, behavior, and geometry of magnetic flux fields, and practical uses for toroidal coils, and all things energy production. There is so much we have yet to discover about the forces of the universe.

Additionally, I am very interested in combination technology such as all-in-one solar-tidal-wind generators, on-board turbine-electrolysis for HHO fuel production, air-humidity condensation for irrigation of a sterling-motor heat-pump integration, and other similar positive-coefficient synergies, where multiple technologies are configured to produce abundant renewable energy at an efficiency greater than the sum of individual parts.

Also organic agriculture and square foot gardening, botany, living off the grid, all forms of sustainability for that matter, information suppression for profit protection, especially information concerning highly efficient energy production, corporate plutocracy, repression as a symptom of fear, post modern apathy and induced complacency, the in-quenchable thirst for free energy, hope, beauty, love, imagination, and life's intrinsic aspiration to succeed and survive against all odds.

These interests have inevitably lead me to this forum. I look forward to discussion and corroboration. I am pleased to be among the awakened. Progress.]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1191 Tue, 21 May 2013 04:18:40 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1191
Thanks]]>
Thanks]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1190 Tue, 21 May 2013 04:06:43 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1190
I drive a truck for a living and anything that i can do to offset my cost of operation im very interested in.

Just some food for thought. A typical semi truck gets around 5.5 to 6 MPG. On a good day with a good engine one might see 7 to 7.5 MPG. So any decrease in fuel usage could be game changing.

My interest in Alternative energies started during my sophmore year in high school when i got involved in a club dedicated to building and racing electric cars. The goal of the competition wasnt to race each-other but to see how far we could go in an hour on a set amount of energy. Since then my interest has expanded to HHO and BEMF research.

I hope to learn alot here and make many new friends along the way. ]]>
I drive a truck for a living and anything that i can do to offset my cost of operation im very interested in.

Just some food for thought. A typical semi truck gets around 5.5 to 6 MPG. On a good day with a good engine one might see 7 to 7.5 MPG. So any decrease in fuel usage could be game changing.

My interest in Alternative energies started during my sophmore year in high school when i got involved in a club dedicated to building and racing electric cars. The goal of the competition wasnt to race each-other but to see how far we could go in an hour on a set amount of energy. Since then my interest has expanded to HHO and BEMF research.

I hope to learn alot here and make many new friends along the way. ]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1189 Mon, 20 May 2013 17:55:39 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1189 http://ecat.com/news/3rd-party-report-sh...ssi-effect]]> http://ecat.com/news/3rd-party-report-sh...ssi-effect]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1188 Mon, 20 May 2013 17:08:06 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1188 Instructables.com
Due date: July 8, 2013

As it states:
This contest is open to any new Instructable that involves 3D printing or has a model that can be 3D printed. So for those of you with 3D printers, show us what you made where any piece or the whole thing was made with a 3D printer. For those with no printer, include a 3D file of something you wish you could 3D print.

Need some software to make a 3D file? Check out all the free 123D apps to get started!

The best entry will win a sweet new MakerBot® Replicator® 2 Desktop 3D Printer, for printing out lots of amazing parts for your upcoming project.

I figure some might want to know. You can click on the site to get more info and full rules. I am sure plenty have ideas but using the 3d design tool might not be as fun.]]> Instructables.com
Due date: July 8, 2013

As it states:
This contest is open to any new Instructable that involves 3D printing or has a model that can be 3D printed. So for those of you with 3D printers, show us what you made where any piece or the whole thing was made with a 3D printer. For those with no printer, include a 3D file of something you wish you could 3D print.

Need some software to make a 3D file? Check out all the free 123D apps to get started!

The best entry will win a sweet new MakerBot® Replicator® 2 Desktop 3D Printer, for printing out lots of amazing parts for your upcoming project.

I figure some might want to know. You can click on the site to get more info and full rules. I am sure plenty have ideas but using the 3d design tool might not be as fun.]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1187 Mon, 20 May 2013 15:16:59 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1187 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyItqZBFygo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZutTX9CLbAY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjeM2IBhtlc

Source for metal hydride.

Dear Jeff,

I am pleased to get your inquiry. This is Wendy from Whole Win(Beijing), a supplier of hydrogen storage tank, hydrogen storage alloys.

For your asked metal hydride, we have metal hydride hydrogen storage tank with different specs. See the below information:

Pls first let me know which one you need, then i could offer you cost to USA. Meanwhile, pls let me know more information about your company.

Tks and wait for your further reply.


Best Regards,
Wendy Wen
Whole Win (Beijing) Materials Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd.
Website: http://www.bjhaoyun.com
Tel : 86-10-62316766 62313836
Fax: 86-10-62319271
E-mail: wendy@bjhaoyun.com
Skype: wendy-wen1982
MSN: wendy@bjhaoyun.com

  Metal Hydride Specs.doc (Size: 48.5 KB / Downloads: 8) ]]> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyItqZBFygo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZutTX9CLbAY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjeM2IBhtlc

Source for metal hydride.

Dear Jeff,

I am pleased to get your inquiry. This is Wendy from Whole Win(Beijing), a supplier of hydrogen storage tank, hydrogen storage alloys.

For your asked metal hydride, we have metal hydride hydrogen storage tank with different specs. See the below information:

Pls first let me know which one you need, then i could offer you cost to USA. Meanwhile, pls let me know more information about your company.

Tks and wait for your further reply.


Best Regards,
Wendy Wen
Whole Win (Beijing) Materials Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd.
Website: http://www.bjhaoyun.com
Tel : 86-10-62316766 62313836
Fax: 86-10-62319271
E-mail: wendy@bjhaoyun.com
Skype: wendy-wen1982
MSN: wendy@bjhaoyun.com

  Metal Hydride Specs.doc (Size: 48.5 KB / Downloads: 8) ]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1185 Sun, 19 May 2013 19:58:11 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1185 http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesl...ransformer
http://www.alexpetty.com/index.php/2011/...o92-07861/

  Figure-1.-System-Overview.png (Size: 128.37 KB / Downloads: 22)

  meyer.jpg (Size: 70.92 KB / Downloads: 28)
Firstly, they are electrically very, very similar. Major differences are of course Meyer uses modern transformers and inductors where as Tesla uses early types but that may not be important.
Secondly, Meyers Vic has 2 inductors in series where as Tesla places them in parallel to the workload.
Lastly Tesla uses it to drive a different load than Meyer but again that may not be important.
THE MOST IMPORTANT OBSERVATION:
Unlike some of Meyers schematics of this design you will notice there has been a ground placed between TX2 and TX5, Tesla uses the same ground on both the transformer and the inductor. Electrically, its exactly the same in a modern schematic per se:-

  com.JPG (Size: 15.4 KB / Downloads: 21)
In some of Stan's patents he remarks how the VIC is 'isolated' from the rest of the schematic and I always wondered what he meant by this. Could it be that Stan is suggesting that we do what Tesla does in his schematic which is to use a rod hammered into the ground as a ground and not the ground used as the negative supply to the rest of his schematic and the PWM?
Tesla seems to think in these terms. Tesla's early version of a PWM which he marks as 'G' in his schematic is a simple rotary contact breaker which provides pulsed DC, he can also gate the pulse by time delaying the rotary contacts which he claims allows the current in the inductors to do work.
Very similar devices and both claiming to do the same thing. IS THE ISOLATED GROUND IMPORTANT?]]> http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesl...ransformer
http://www.alexpetty.com/index.php/2011/...o92-07861/

  Figure-1.-System-Overview.png (Size: 128.37 KB / Downloads: 22)

  meyer.jpg (Size: 70.92 KB / Downloads: 28)
Firstly, they are electrically very, very similar. Major differences are of course Meyer uses modern transformers and inductors where as Tesla uses early types but that may not be important.
Secondly, Meyers Vic has 2 inductors in series where as Tesla places them in parallel to the workload.
Lastly Tesla uses it to drive a different load than Meyer but again that may not be important.
THE MOST IMPORTANT OBSERVATION:
Unlike some of Meyers schematics of this design you will notice there has been a ground placed between TX2 and TX5, Tesla uses the same ground on both the transformer and the inductor. Electrically, its exactly the same in a modern schematic per se:-

  com.JPG (Size: 15.4 KB / Downloads: 21)
In some of Stan's patents he remarks how the VIC is 'isolated' from the rest of the schematic and I always wondered what he meant by this. Could it be that Stan is suggesting that we do what Tesla does in his schematic which is to use a rod hammered into the ground as a ground and not the ground used as the negative supply to the rest of his schematic and the PWM?
Tesla seems to think in these terms. Tesla's early version of a PWM which he marks as 'G' in his schematic is a simple rotary contact breaker which provides pulsed DC, he can also gate the pulse by time delaying the rotary contacts which he claims allows the current in the inductors to do work.
Very similar devices and both claiming to do the same thing. IS THE ISOLATED GROUND IMPORTANT?]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1184 Sat, 18 May 2013 20:32:12 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1184 (random picture found online as a rough example, the same can be said about a Bedini motor or some other motors )


I must be wrong on something since many would have seen it and done something, so when they don't then that means I don't get it... right?

You have the electromagnet which can push "North" (for example) the magnets in the center wheel from the side that is facing it. But shouldn't the electromagnet side that is facing away "South" (that can pull) from the device be used too?

For example wouldn't it be better if the pulling side "South" was used and attracting another wheel? Or have the electromagnet in a U Tube that goes back to the wheel? Or Maybe have the electromagnet be in a C shape which both the north and south side hit both sides of the same magnet on the wheel?

I see plenty of commercial motors just use one side of the electromagnet while the other side is not use to be wasted. Or does using both sides of the electromagnet weaken one side?

You notice how when you turn on a light it radiates all over and you have a reflector to focus the light at a point to make it stronger and more efficient in what you want to see. So wouldn't that principle in a way be kind of used in focusing or using all the electromagnet's magnetism all over to not have loss? Even a fire in zero gravity radiates and one can not cook as efficient if the fire is not concentrate if it radiates.

I can even go as far to say maybe the magnetism around the electromagnet is wasted which being inside a tube make the outside tube magnetic as well? To have a tube, the magnetized wire, then a tube again.

Thanks]]> (random picture found online as a rough example, the same can be said about a Bedini motor or some other motors )


I must be wrong on something since many would have seen it and done something, so when they don't then that means I don't get it... right?

You have the electromagnet which can push "North" (for example) the magnets in the center wheel from the side that is facing it. But shouldn't the electromagnet side that is facing away "South" (that can pull) from the device be used too?

For example wouldn't it be better if the pulling side "South" was used and attracting another wheel? Or have the electromagnet in a U Tube that goes back to the wheel? Or Maybe have the electromagnet be in a C shape which both the north and south side hit both sides of the same magnet on the wheel?

I see plenty of commercial motors just use one side of the electromagnet while the other side is not use to be wasted. Or does using both sides of the electromagnet weaken one side?

You notice how when you turn on a light it radiates all over and you have a reflector to focus the light at a point to make it stronger and more efficient in what you want to see. So wouldn't that principle in a way be kind of used in focusing or using all the electromagnet's magnetism all over to not have loss? Even a fire in zero gravity radiates and one can not cook as efficient if the fire is not concentrate if it radiates.

I can even go as far to say maybe the magnetism around the electromagnet is wasted which being inside a tube make the outside tube magnetic as well? To have a tube, the magnetized wire, then a tube again.

Thanks]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1183 Fri, 17 May 2013 16:29:22 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1183
Please see attached

Attached
for your knowledge and consideration.

suggest we start to draw up the housing similar to what stan did
but use stand original design.

mas did one which is closer to is for the air intake ionizer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=KZJRonwmFjw&feature=share&list=UUEGe7GasoADRNz6wfHM91sQ

Compare his video and pc together as I did the 2 different
1. air intake ionizer and

2.HHO gas processor not same 2 different things.

second may not be needed in fact if first is efficient..

Easier now we all have 3d printers to make housing for these.
lets draw them up now knowledge is here .

Attached

Dan
Secure Supplies

  Secure supplies -stans-gas-processor-and-exhaust-regulator-control---cover-off.jpg (Size: 388.14 KB / Downloads: 20)

  Secure Supplies Air Intake Ionizer.jpg (Size: 1.11 MB / Downloads: 21) ]]>
Please see attached

Attached
for your knowledge and consideration.

suggest we start to draw up the housing similar to what stan did
but use stand original design.

mas did one which is closer to is for the air intake ionizer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=KZJRonwmFjw&feature=share&list=UUEGe7GasoADRNz6wfHM91sQ

Compare his video and pc together as I did the 2 different
1. air intake ionizer and

2.HHO gas processor not same 2 different things.

second may not be needed in fact if first is efficient..

Easier now we all have 3d printers to make housing for these.
lets draw them up now knowledge is here .

Attached

Dan
Secure Supplies

  Secure supplies -stans-gas-processor-and-exhaust-regulator-control---cover-off.jpg (Size: 388.14 KB / Downloads: 20)

  Secure Supplies Air Intake Ionizer.jpg (Size: 1.11 MB / Downloads: 21) ]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1179 Thu, 16 May 2013 05:48:07 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1179 I could be wrong but so I am asking to understand. When you put water into a bucket with a hole in the end you get 100% efficiently for what water goes in water goes out. But when you deal with devices with coils its not eh case, so the problem is impossible and to give up? Meaning the coil should be looked at again since that the the main weak point it seems for some to take a second looks from time to time with the new discoveries.

When you see the small circles in the diagram and the arrows going one way while the other is rubbing on it the other way it seems like friction in the electromagnetic sense, which friction always reduces the power.

Now if you use other physics for rubber gears it won't it would be a lot of friction, if you use water it wont work as well as smoothly. Friction always is bad no matter if its air friction, physical friction, or electromagnetic friction. Maybe some might say its 1 step back and 2 steps forward. Now if some say it gets together with the bigger loop that still won't take away the fact that their is a small gap in between and if it just makes the big gap you might as well use a blat piece of metal that can cover the entire pipe.
Some can say my question is wrong so how does not produce some loss?

Some might feel the Muller coil is the way to help with the distance away form the core but it still has friction.


Even the tesla bifilar has a good idea to give a boost but still friction.


A good step in the direction might be the "star challis coil" but that seems better but has friction when you wind a lot of coil.

Weather right or wrong, I hope some people take a second thought if possible.
Thanks]]> I could be wrong but so I am asking to understand. When you put water into a bucket with a hole in the end you get 100% efficiently for what water goes in water goes out. But when you deal with devices with coils its not eh case, so the problem is impossible and to give up? Meaning the coil should be looked at again since that the the main weak point it seems for some to take a second looks from time to time with the new discoveries.

When you see the small circles in the diagram and the arrows going one way while the other is rubbing on it the other way it seems like friction in the electromagnetic sense, which friction always reduces the power.

Now if you use other physics for rubber gears it won't it would be a lot of friction, if you use water it wont work as well as smoothly. Friction always is bad no matter if its air friction, physical friction, or electromagnetic friction. Maybe some might say its 1 step back and 2 steps forward. Now if some say it gets together with the bigger loop that still won't take away the fact that their is a small gap in between and if it just makes the big gap you might as well use a blat piece of metal that can cover the entire pipe.
Some can say my question is wrong so how does not produce some loss?

Some might feel the Muller coil is the way to help with the distance away form the core but it still has friction.


Even the tesla bifilar has a good idea to give a boost but still friction.


A good step in the direction might be the "star challis coil" but that seems better but has friction when you wind a lot of coil.

Weather right or wrong, I hope some people take a second thought if possible.
Thanks]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1178 Thu, 16 May 2013 04:50:09 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1178 Russ Gries Gets Interviewed For RWGresearch.com) which he said some decent things and figured I sign up and ask some questions to get so I can understand or make people think about some things and give ideas. What I see is people kind of shooting in the dark gathering crumbs than stepping back and looking at the big picture which is hard to do. It would be like trying to understand the periodic table before the periodic table was made. Sometimes something simple can be under our noses and we can't see it.

I feel many are like Tesla that mean well but might not understand business. I hear about people how being just a middle man to get a 1% deal to sell oil they can make over a million a month depending on the quantity, so when people want to put companies like that away and stop 100 million dollars a month is looking for trouble or don't know how to present the info properly. Some people are smart in some things but not in everything, which is why so many seem to here try to pool their resources. I know others that have done some things that I can not say and wont step on others peoples feet and they prefer to keep their secrets to themselves for profit which is a shame.

The thing I say is that anything is possible and when people feel something is not then I feel people are limited and can't discover new things. If one cant figure it out then ask ask ask and think counter intuitive to think in an opposite way, or in a progressive patten.

If I help good if not sorry.]]> Russ Gries Gets Interviewed For RWGresearch.com) which he said some decent things and figured I sign up and ask some questions to get so I can understand or make people think about some things and give ideas. What I see is people kind of shooting in the dark gathering crumbs than stepping back and looking at the big picture which is hard to do. It would be like trying to understand the periodic table before the periodic table was made. Sometimes something simple can be under our noses and we can't see it.

I feel many are like Tesla that mean well but might not understand business. I hear about people how being just a middle man to get a 1% deal to sell oil they can make over a million a month depending on the quantity, so when people want to put companies like that away and stop 100 million dollars a month is looking for trouble or don't know how to present the info properly. Some people are smart in some things but not in everything, which is why so many seem to here try to pool their resources. I know others that have done some things that I can not say and wont step on others peoples feet and they prefer to keep their secrets to themselves for profit which is a shame.

The thing I say is that anything is possible and when people feel something is not then I feel people are limited and can't discover new things. If one cant figure it out then ask ask ask and think counter intuitive to think in an opposite way, or in a progressive patten.

If I help good if not sorry.]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1177 Wed, 15 May 2013 22:07:06 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1177
  100mmZmotor1_5.15.13.png (Size: 50.28 KB / Downloads: 1)
  100mm54x63Vertex_5.17.13.png (Size: 70.04 KB / Downloads: 1)
So this is my second attempt to gain more Z axis space on my Lulzbot. This is derived from Josef Prusa's i2 Z motor mount and my extra clearance vertex kit. I changed the foot vertex to a 63 degree angle and the top vertex to a 54 degree angle. The top horizontal rod spacing is increased to 100 mm, holes are also available for the original rod spacing. The extruder should be able to raise up between these rods for maximum Z travel, depending on your X carriage and X end configuration. I use a lifted X carriage on my Lulzbot which effectively lowers my X ends on my Z axis rods, giving me more travel at the top end.

Two zip files are attached

Nate

  100mmZmotor1_5.15.13.zip (Size: 95.06 KB / Downloads: 4)

  100mm54x63Vertex_5.17.13.zip (Size: 585.92 KB / Downloads: 1) ]]>
  100mmZmotor1_5.15.13.png (Size: 50.28 KB / Downloads: 1)
  100mm54x63Vertex_5.17.13.png (Size: 70.04 KB / Downloads: 1)
So this is my second attempt to gain more Z axis space on my Lulzbot. This is derived from Josef Prusa's i2 Z motor mount and my extra clearance vertex kit. I changed the foot vertex to a 63 degree angle and the top vertex to a 54 degree angle. The top horizontal rod spacing is increased to 100 mm, holes are also available for the original rod spacing. The extruder should be able to raise up between these rods for maximum Z travel, depending on your X carriage and X end configuration. I use a lifted X carriage on my Lulzbot which effectively lowers my X ends on my Z axis rods, giving me more travel at the top end.

Two zip files are attached

Nate

  100mmZmotor1_5.15.13.zip (Size: 95.06 KB / Downloads: 4)

  100mm54x63Vertex_5.17.13.zip (Size: 585.92 KB / Downloads: 1) ]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1175 Wed, 15 May 2013 05:51:10 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1175 I am Jack from NewYork.

Here is the idea of mine. I have planned to change my full home to renewable sources. My choices are Solar panels & home wind turbines. I will connect both the systems to generator. From there i planned to split the DC power directly to the appliances that run on DC. Remaining power to the storage battery for the future need.

So there is always an issue, while converting the DC to AC or AC to DC, power is getting wasted. Will the AC appliances (like power tools) accept DC power directly from battery without any inverters or Rectifiers?]]> I am Jack from NewYork.

Here is the idea of mine. I have planned to change my full home to renewable sources. My choices are Solar panels & home wind turbines. I will connect both the systems to generator. From there i planned to split the DC power directly to the appliances that run on DC. Remaining power to the storage battery for the future need.

So there is always an issue, while converting the DC to AC or AC to DC, power is getting wasted. Will the AC appliances (like power tools) accept DC power directly from battery without any inverters or Rectifiers?]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1173 Wed, 15 May 2013 05:27:39 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1173
A little about me, I am working on a culinary degree for me own enjoyment. I am a computer programmer in C# and C++ (mostly C#) for 8 years now.

I am very educated in electronic circuitry as well as quantum physics.

I have been scouting the forum and russ's videos for a while now and thought it's time to pitch in.

So well im excited to join you guys, your all very smart people and much like you all I believe in open sourcing for the better of our future and our childrens future.]]>
A little about me, I am working on a culinary degree for me own enjoyment. I am a computer programmer in C# and C++ (mostly C#) for 8 years now.

I am very educated in electronic circuitry as well as quantum physics.

I have been scouting the forum and russ's videos for a while now and thought it's time to pitch in.

So well im excited to join you guys, your all very smart people and much like you all I believe in open sourcing for the better of our future and our childrens future.]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1172 Wed, 15 May 2013 05:16:50 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1172
I understand how stan meyers gas processor works, Im just wondering has anyone been able to get it working.

Also, I need the 9XA board correct? I have started building it, but Im just wondering if this is what stan used, I do understand their are other ways of doing it.

Thanks.]]>
I understand how stan meyers gas processor works, Im just wondering has anyone been able to get it working.

Also, I need the 9XA board correct? I have started building it, but Im just wondering if this is what stan used, I do understand their are other ways of doing it.

Thanks.]]> http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1171 Mon, 13 May 2013 11:13:55 +0000 http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1171 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NrIXndSyT0
PROJECT ICARUS
MAX AND TEAM HAS FIGURED MEYERS" WORK ALL OUT
AND HE JUST GAVE IT AWAY THE OTHER DAY
MORE TO COME]]> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NrIXndSyT0
PROJECT ICARUS
MAX AND TEAM HAS FIGURED MEYERS" WORK ALL OUT
AND HE JUST GAVE IT AWAY THE OTHER DAY
MORE TO COME]]>