Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
interesting video based on Leedskalnin theories
05-28-2011, 12:50 AM
Post: #1
interesting video based on Leedskalnin theories
(05-24-2011 06:46 PM)firepinto Wrote:  I just watched this interesting video based on Leedskalnin theories. He describes how he thinks there is no electron and shows a helium gas lattice. The lattice is what struck me when you hear Stan talk about the same thing. He talks about how the "Magnetrons" can move through the lattice.

Perhaps Helium is a good EPG gas?





Nate

So I really like your theory. I have a few questions regarding your theory.

If you have two or lets say three nucleus in thier original state before combining 2 oxygen atoms and one hydrogen atom combining together to make H20 for example. Are these nucleus combined into one nucleus with two south pole and two north pole magnotrons circling the one "new" nucleus to keep it combined together as water?

Do the south poles and north poles of the individual oxygen atoms and the hydrogen nuclues north and south poles all combine together to make a larger magnetic field to hold all three nucleus "fuse" together to make just "one" nucleus atom? If so do the south poles from the individual nucleus atoms combine with the opisite poles of the other atoms? So the nucleus of the hydrogen atom two south poles combine with the two north poles of the nucleus of the oxygen atom and the two north poles of the hydrogen atom combine with the two south poles of the oxygen atom to be a larger more magnetic pole for both the south and north poles? And then when the two stronger north poles and south poles combine with the new nucleus of another oxygen atom north poles and south poles to combine with an even stronger magentic field to hold the new atom all together to form an H20 water molecule? So I guess I am asking do the poles combine to create a stronger magnetic north and south pole or stay seperate at all times and just increase the amount of magnetic energy in a seperate state and never combine?

or is the three nucleus over laying each (combined together next to each other but still as seperate atoms) with each atom having its own north poles and south poles, for each atom, holding it together to make H20? So the "indivdual" H20 atom would have two hydrogen atoms with each atom having 2 north poles and two south poles and one oxygen atom of having two north poles and two south poles? So the entire nucleus of the H20 water atoms would have a total of 12 magnetic (6 north and 6 south) poles orbiting the atoms holding it together?

So when the nucleus of each atom get ripped apart if the poles are combined together the poles magentism is then seperated to equal that of what it was before they combined "together" in its original state of each nucleus having its original two south and two north poles?

Sorry for the lengthy drawn out question. I have no idea if my question even makes any sense to anyone but in my own twisted mind it makes perfect sense.

I am only asking because to make heat from rubbing hands or two sticks together and increasing energy for heat takes frequency. The frequency of me moving my hands together faster or the two sticks together faster. The faster I frequency the more energy and heat produced. Am I removing, dislodging, vibrating, repositioning the north and south poles to create that energy?

I could go on forever with questions so I should leave it there for now but what happens to the nucleus of the atoms if the poles are removed all together? or is that even possible?

Thanks,
Scott
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-28-2011, 01:15 AM
Post: #2
RE: Lecture/Open Discussion of my work on the EPG system
Hey Scott,
The creator of the video could answer much better than I could, but the way I picture the magnetrons is like sea of currents. Picture a water molecule flowing in the Gulf stream of the Atlantic ocean. It probably doesn't flow the entire distance through the stream of the ocean, but gets kicked off to the side and replaced by another water molecule. Even though that one molecule left the stream, the power of the current didn't decrease. To me magnetrons are hard to contain in one closed path for a long period of time. They are constantly flinging off and being replaced by the next magnetron that happened to be flowing by.

I think I can sort of answer the question of what happens to magnetrons when a water molecule recombines from H and O elements. I think there has to be a release of "extra" magnetrons during the process. This is why a fuel cell can produce electricity by chemically combining H and O and getting a byproduct of water.

-Nate

(05-28-2011 12:50 AM)HHOstar Wrote:  So I really like your theory. I have a few questions regarding your theory.

If you have two or lets say three nucleus in thier original state before combining 2 oxygen atoms and one hydrogen atom combining together to make H20 for example. Are these nucleus combined into one nucleus with two south pole and two north pole magnotrons circling the one "new" nucleus to keep it combined together as water?

Do the south poles and north poles of the individual oxygen atoms and the hydrogen nuclues north and south poles all combine together to make a larger magnetic field to hold all three nucleus "fuse" together to make just "one" nucleus atom? If so do the south poles from the individual nucleus atoms combine with the opisite poles of the other atoms? So the nucleus of the hydrogen atom two south poles combine with the two north poles of the nucleus of the oxygen atom and the two north poles of the hydrogen atom combine with the two south poles of the oxygen atom to be a larger more magnetic pole for both the south and north poles? And then when the two stronger north poles and south poles combine with the new nucleus of another oxygen atom north poles and south poles to combine with an even stronger magentic field to hold the new atom all together to form an H20 water molecule? So I guess I am asking do the poles combine to create a stronger magnetic north and south pole or stay seperate at all times and just increase the amount of magnetic energy in a seperate state and never combine?

or is the three nucleus over laying each (combined together next to each other but still as seperate atoms) with each atom having its own north poles and south poles, for each atom, holding it together to make H20? So the "indivdual" H20 atom would have two hydrogen atoms with each atom having 2 north poles and two south poles and one oxygen atom of having two north poles and two south poles? So the entire nucleus of the H20 water atoms would have a total of 12 magnetic (6 north and 6 south) poles orbiting the atoms holding it together?

So when the nucleus of each atom get ripped apart if the poles are combined together the poles magentism is then seperated to equal that of what it was before they combined "together" in its original state of each nucleus having its original two south and two north poles?

Sorry for the lengthy drawn out question. I have no idea if my question even makes any sense to anyone but in my own twisted mind it makes perfect sense.

I am only asking because to make heat from rubbing hands or two sticks together and increasing energy for heat takes frequency. The frequency of me moving my hands together faster or the two sticks together faster. The faster I frequency the more energy and heat produced. Am I removing, dislodging, vibrating, repositioning the north and south poles to create that energy?

I could go on forever with questions so I should leave it there for now but what happens to the nucleus of the atoms if the poles are removed all together? or is that even possible?

Thanks,
Scott

Ideas are bullet proof.
[Image: sig.php?id=1286]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-28-2011, 01:28 AM (This post was last modified: 05-28-2011 01:33 AM by HHOstar.)
Post: #3
RE: Lecture/Open Discussion of my work on the EPG system
I see. so the magnetrons dont combine they release to create the energy instead of increase to create the energy.

thanks Nate,
Scott

(05-28-2011 01:15 AM)firepinto Wrote:  Hey Scott,
The creator of the video could answer much better than I could, but the way I picture the magnetrons is like sea of currents. Picture a water molecule flowing in the Gulf stream of the Atlantic ocean. It probably doesn't flow the entire distance through the stream of the ocean, but gets kicked off to the side and replaced by another water molecule. Even though that one molecule left the stream, the power of the current didn't decrease. To me magnetrons are hard to contain in one closed path for a long period of time. They are constantly flinging off and being replaced by the next magnetron that happened to be flowing by.

I think I can sort of answer the question of what happens to magnetrons when a water molecule recombines from H and O elements. I think there has to be a release of "extra" magnetrons during the process. This is why a fuel cell can produce electricity by chemically combining H and O and getting a byproduct of water.

-Nate

(05-28-2011 12:50 AM)HHOstar Wrote:  So I really like your theory. I have a few questions regarding your theory.

If you have two or lets say three nucleus in thier original state before combining 2 oxygen atoms and one hydrogen atom combining together to make H20 for example. Are these nucleus combined into one nucleus with two south pole and two north pole magnotrons circling the one "new" nucleus to keep it combined together as water?

Do the south poles and north poles of the individual oxygen atoms and the hydrogen nuclues north and south poles all combine together to make a larger magnetic field to hold all three nucleus "fuse" together to make just "one" nucleus atom? If so do the south poles from the individual nucleus atoms combine with the opisite poles of the other atoms? So the nucleus of the hydrogen atom two south poles combine with the two north poles of the nucleus of the oxygen atom and the two north poles of the hydrogen atom combine with the two south poles of the oxygen atom to be a larger more magnetic pole for both the south and north poles? And then when the two stronger north poles and south poles combine with the new nucleus of another oxygen atom north poles and south poles to combine with an even stronger magentic field to hold the new atom all together to form an H20 water molecule? So I guess I am asking do the poles combine to create a stronger magnetic north and south pole or stay seperate at all times and just increase the amount of magnetic energy in a seperate state and never combine?

or is the three nucleus over laying each (combined together next to each other but still as seperate atoms) with each atom having its own north poles and south poles, for each atom, holding it together to make H20? So the "indivdual" H20 atom would have two hydrogen atoms with each atom having 2 north poles and two south poles and one oxygen atom of having two north poles and two south poles? So the entire nucleus of the H20 water atoms would have a total of 12 magnetic (6 north and 6 south) poles orbiting the atoms holding it together?

So when the nucleus of each atom get ripped apart if the poles are combined together the poles magentism is then seperated to equal that of what it was before they combined "together" in its original state of each nucleus having its original two south and two north poles?

Sorry for the lengthy drawn out question. I have no idea if my question even makes any sense to anyone but in my own twisted mind it makes perfect sense.

I am only asking because to make heat from rubbing hands or two sticks together and increasing energy for heat takes frequency. The frequency of me moving my hands together faster or the two sticks together faster. The faster I frequency the more energy and heat produced. Am I removing, dislodging, vibrating, repositioning the north and south poles to create that energy?

I could go on forever with questions so I should leave it there for now but what happens to the nucleus of the atoms if the poles are removed all together? or is that even possible?

Thanks,
Scott


(05-28-2011 01:28 AM)HHOstar Wrote:  I see. so the magnetrons dont combine they release to create the energy instead of increase to create the energy.

thanks Nate,
Scott

I guess it would be likie lightening when the individual are combining the magnetrons probably increase until the release in the form of photrons or light like he was explaining where if you rub your hands together fast enough they would start to glow.

Ok got it now I think.

thanks again,
Scott

(05-28-2011 01:15 AM)firepinto Wrote:  Hey Scott,
The creator of the video could answer much better than I could, but the way I picture the magnetrons is like sea of currents. Picture a water molecule flowing in the Gulf stream of the Atlantic ocean. It probably doesn't flow the entire distance through the stream of the ocean, but gets kicked off to the side and replaced by another water molecule. Even though that one molecule left the stream, the power of the current didn't decrease. To me magnetrons are hard to contain in one closed path for a long period of time. They are constantly flinging off and being replaced by the next magnetron that happened to be flowing by.

I think I can sort of answer the question of what happens to magnetrons when a water molecule recombines from H and O elements. I think there has to be a release of "extra" magnetrons during the process. This is why a fuel cell can produce electricity by chemically combining H and O and getting a byproduct of water.

-Nate

(05-28-2011 12:50 AM)HHOstar Wrote:  So I really like your theory. I have a few questions regarding your theory.

If you have two or lets say three nucleus in thier original state before combining 2 oxygen atoms and one hydrogen atom combining together to make H20 for example. Are these nucleus combined into one nucleus with two south pole and two north pole magnotrons circling the one "new" nucleus to keep it combined together as water?

Do the south poles and north poles of the individual oxygen atoms and the hydrogen nuclues north and south poles all combine together to make a larger magnetic field to hold all three nucleus "fuse" together to make just "one" nucleus atom? If so do the south poles from the individual nucleus atoms combine with the opisite poles of the other atoms? So the nucleus of the hydrogen atom two south poles combine with the two north poles of the nucleus of the oxygen atom and the two north poles of the hydrogen atom combine with the two south poles of the oxygen atom to be a larger more magnetic pole for both the south and north poles? And then when the two stronger north poles and south poles combine with the new nucleus of another oxygen atom north poles and south poles to combine with an even stronger magentic field to hold the new atom all together to form an H20 water molecule? So I guess I am asking do the poles combine to create a stronger magnetic north and south pole or stay seperate at all times and just increase the amount of magnetic energy in a seperate state and never combine?

or is the three nucleus over laying each (combined together next to each other but still as seperate atoms) with each atom having its own north poles and south poles, for each atom, holding it together to make H20? So the "indivdual" H20 atom would have two hydrogen atoms with each atom having 2 north poles and two south poles and one oxygen atom of having two north poles and two south poles? So the entire nucleus of the H20 water atoms would have a total of 12 magnetic (6 north and 6 south) poles orbiting the atoms holding it together?

So when the nucleus of each atom get ripped apart if the poles are combined together the poles magentism is then seperated to equal that of what it was before they combined "together" in its original state of each nucleus having its original two south and two north poles?

Sorry for the lengthy drawn out question. I have no idea if my question even makes any sense to anyone but in my own twisted mind it makes perfect sense.

I am only asking because to make heat from rubbing hands or two sticks together and increasing energy for heat takes frequency. The frequency of me moving my hands together faster or the two sticks together faster. The faster I frequency the more energy and heat produced. Am I removing, dislodging, vibrating, repositioning the north and south poles to create that energy?

I could go on forever with questions so I should leave it there for now but what happens to the nucleus of the atoms if the poles are removed all together? or is that even possible?

Thanks,
Scott
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-30-2011, 04:43 PM (This post was last modified: 06-30-2011 04:55 PM by freethisone.)
Post: #4
Smile RE: interesting video based on Leedskalnin theories
Hi Edd Lee had information. He completes the idea of magnetic particle are dipole domains, and they can pass with ease.

I add this drawing based on concept alone. eddy particles.Big Grin

Later you may cross cut the copper tube so the magnet will not be effected by the eddy currents, and will slide with ease. just a few cuts in stratigic places of the copper tube.


Attached File(s) Thumbnail(s)
   

Heart http://www.youtube.com/user/freethisone?feature=mhum
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-17-2011, 02:29 PM (This post was last modified: 10-04-2011 09:32 AM by freethisone.)
Post: #5
RE: interesting video based on Leedskalnin theories
A new and exiting way to cause a magnet to rotate.
This just in, we found a way to cause a magnet to exhibit asymmetrical balance.
Taping into the vacuum itself.

IMHO the south pole charge is a negative, therefore the proton be a south pole charge, and it shows a positive charge.

add picture.


Attached File(s)
.pdf  6417597_Gravitational_wave_generator.pdf (Size: 168.78 KB / Downloads: 4)

Heart http://www.youtube.com/user/freethisone?feature=mhum
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-30-2011, 06:06 AM
Post: #6
RE: interesting video based on Leedskalnin theories
Lovely and informative video..Great post indeed.

Kitchen design
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Leedskalnin and Meyers symanuk 7 817 01-03-2013 09:44 AM
Last Post: FaradayEZ
  Leedskalnin shorted PMH Coils symanuk 1 375 12-31-2012 11:18 AM
Last Post: freethisone
  Interesting magnet motor video from youtube, is it real? job38org 6 844 11-30-2012 11:47 AM
Last Post: k c dias

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)